Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods 15-17 March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Organizational Governance
Advertisements

The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
The governance of metadata management in the S-DWH
1 CREATING AN EFFECTIVE CENTRAL HARMONIZATION UNIT PEM-PAL WORKSHOP FOR INTERNAL AUDIT OFFICIALS Moldova, June 2007 Dr. Darius MATUSEVICIUS Financial.
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Child Safeguarding Standards
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Civil Service Performance Assessment in Lithuania: Current.
Development of internal control: methodology and responsibility
The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.
Professional Development: Problems and Perspectives Danguolė Subačienė Manager of Personnel Training Division National Audit Office of Lithuania.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions
MIE2009 Good Evaluation Practice Workshop Pirkko Nykanen 1 Guidelines for Good Evaluation Practices in Health Informatics - A shared networked initiative.
Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Standards for Internal Control in the.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Financial Management and Control Arrangements in Practice Monika Kos, Ministry of Finance, the Republic of Poland.
Purpose of the Standards
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Improving Corporate Governance in Malaysian Capital Markets – The Role of the Audit Committee Role of the Audit Committee in Assessing Audit Quality.
Corporate governance: Asia Pacific. JAPAN  The Japan corporate governance committee published its revised code in The Code had six chapters, which.
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
The National Audit Office of Finland
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
Good practices from and for the EU accountability process Irena Petruškevičienė Vilnius, 17 October 2006.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
Republic of the Sudan The National Audit Chamber (NAC) Presentation to: INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee (CBC) Stockholm – September 8, 2015.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Co-operation Between the Ministry of Finance and the Court.
World Bank Institute Regional Workshop for Anglophone Africa on Auditing and Financial Accountability Addis Ababa KEY ISSUES IN CREATING AN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL.
1 Kingsley Karunaratne, Department of Accounting, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Colombo - Sri Lanka Practice Management.
22/10/20151 SAIs and PIFC Assessment policies Ankara, 8 July 2008 Robert GIELISSE Head of unit DG BUDGET.B.4 European Commission.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
Practice Management Quality Control
Musa KAYRAK Principal Auditor, CISA December, Tehran.
1 Polish SAI (NIK) experience in the field of EU funds Piotr Szpakowski Najwyższa Izba Kontroli Prague, 6-8 November 2006.
Supreme Audit Office (the NIK): Basic Facts Riga, 4 April 2012.
Project Guideline for Auditing Internal Control Systems Claudia Kroneder-Partisch Austrian Court of Audit.
PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL (PIC) SYSTEM OF HUNGARY Ms. Edit NÉMETH CENTRAL HARMONISATION UNIT FOR PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL, HUNGARY BUDAPEST, 25 TH OF JUNE,
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
S3: Understanding the Business. Session objective To explain why understanding of the business of the entity is important for the auditor To explain why.
Reporting on internal control in the light of the results of the survey of the Subcommittee on Internal Control Standards Maria Sieklucka Senior Public.
RTI, MUMBAI / CH 91 QUALITY ASSURANCE IN PERFORMANCE AUDIT QUALITY ASSURANCE IN PERFORMANCE AUDIT DAY 9 SESSION NO.1 (THEORY) BASED ON CHAPTER 9 PERFORMANCE.
Cooperation with the Seimas Audit Committee Tomas Mackevičius Deputy Auditor General.
Internal and external quality evaluation of internal audit in public sector in Ukraine Maxim Timokhin, Head of CHU, Public Financial Inspection, Ukraine.
LATVENERGO GROUP COMPLIANCE AND FRAUD RISK MANAGEMENT Kristine Arensone Compliance officer
Quality Milestones Elaborate quality system developed over the years “Joint Agenda Building” (JAB) group “Strategic Quality” – Progress report CA/80/04.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Regional Accreditation Workshop For Asia and Eastern Europe Manila, Philippines th March, 2012.
1 “Good Practices in Managing for Results” Workshop Santiago, Chile October 27 th and 28 th, 2010 Benjamin Nelson Managing Director for Quality Office.
1 Vereniging van Compliance Officers The Compliance Function in Banks Amsterdam, 10 June 2004 Marc Pickeur CBFA CBFA.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
I. Annual audit plan and summary audit plan II. Annual audit report and annual summary audit report III. Information Supporting System of Internal Audit.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Internal Audit manual dr. Ágnes Gerencsér Ministry of Finance Central Harmonistaion Unit.
SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Jacek Gdański Accounting Department
years of existence.
Corporate Governance It is a system by which companies are managed and directed in the best interests of the owners and shareholders. It refers to the.
CREATING AN EFFECTIVE CENTRAL HARMONIZATION UNIT PEM-PAL WORKSHOP FOR INTERNAL AUDIT OFFICIALS Moldova, June 2007 Dr. Darius MATUSEVICIUS Financial.
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences in Implementing Audit Quality Dr. Klára Kerekes Legal Advisor

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Antecedents The ‘Guidelines on Audit Quality’ elaborated by the Expert Group on Audit Quality and approved by the Contact Committee of the Heads of the SAIs of the European Union at its meeting in Luxembourg on 6-7 December

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) First steps and inputs to adapt the provisions of the ‘Guidelines on Audit Quality’ to the Hungarian environment: - Decision of the SAO President to develop an internal regulation - Translation of the Guidelines into Hungarian - Common Assessment Framework (CAF) - ASOSAI Draft Guidelines on Audit Quality Management System - Quality-related requirements of other SAIs - ISO standards on quality - Quality regulation of large accounting and consulting companies 3

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Precondition to further develop the quality management system at the SAO: The SAO has its own audit principles, standards and manuals based on international standards (such as INTOSAI standards, IFAC standards). They are altogether called the regulation system of the audit work. 4

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Strategy, Mission Code of Ethics Audit Principles and Standards Audit Manual Methodology for Performance Audit Field manuals Elements of the professional regulation system of the SAO Quality Management System Methodology for Comprehensive Audit Field manuals Methodology(ies) for Financial Other Regularity Audit Field manuals Field manuals 5

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Carrying out an in-depth review of the legal status, and duties and tasks of the SAO which – among others - include audits in respect of: - public finance system - local governments - political parties subsidized from the central budget - National Bank of Hungary - foundations, public foundations - non-profit and non-governmental organisations - statutory collegiate bodies - natural and legal persons receiving public subsidies Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (i) 6

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (ii) Major measures taken to ensure an adequate quality of the audit work and results: - establishment of an independent Quality Assurance Unit (carrying out hot and cold reviews) - setting up of internal quality controls - putting supervisory and review procedures in place 7

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (iii) Basic objective of further developing the quality management system: Ensuring an evenly good quality of the audit work and results, comprising the findings, conclusions and recommendations included in the reports and opinions. 8

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elements of the Quality Management System of the SAO Management and control Working environment Vision, mission, basic values, audit standards Strategic management and planning Strategic and annual audit planning Identifying, assessing and managing risks Human Resource Management Ensuring adequate HR-arrangements, recruitment Training, Human Resource Development Achievement requirements and evaluation The allowances provided, welfare services 9

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elements of the Quality Management System of the SAO (cont’d) Audit activity Supervising the audit work IT-tools Reviewing the audit work Tools and guidance to support the audit work External relations Audit communication, messages of the audits Relations with Parliament Feedback from the users of audit results Continuous development and improvement Other ways of continuous improvement Continuous review and monitoring Self- assessment Opinions from outside Audit Team Legal support Quality assurance review Preparing the audits Evidences and documentation Site Audit Developing the report Independent review on the draft report Hiring external experts 10

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (iv) The ‘Quality Document’ is an internal regulation, which: - describes and regulates in a comprehensive manner factors and conditions having an impact on audit quality and is tightly interrelated with the internal professional regulation system; - focuses on aspects, requirements, procedures to be taken into account, met and followed respectively in order to ensure adequate quality; - covers all organisational structures, procedures, processes and resources that are absolutely necessary to ensure the good quality of audit work and reports; - covers all elements of the audit activity; - follows the recommendations of the ‘Guidelines on Audit Quality’. 11

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (v) Main Chapters of the ‘Quality Document’: Introduction 1.General Provisions 2.Management and Control 3.Human Resource Management 4.Audit Activity 5.External Relations of the SAO 6.Continuous Development and Improvement 12

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (vi) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 1. General Provisions 1.1. Goal of (establishing) the quality management system 1.2. Interrelations between the quality management system and the professional regulation system 1.3. Quality requirements 1.4. Elements of the quality management system 13

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (vii) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 2. Management and Control 2.1. Control principles 2.2. Management and control elements A working environment designed to serve the fulfilment of the high professional requirements set by the top management The SAO’s vision, mission, basic values and audit standards Strategic management and planning Strategic and annual audit planning Identifying, assessing and managing risks 14

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (viii) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 3. Human Resource Management 3.1. Ensuring adequate HR-arrangements, recruitment 3.2. Training, Human Resource Development 3.3. Achievement requirements and evaluation 3.4. The allowances provided, welfare services 15

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (ix) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 4. Audit Activity 4.1. Supervising the audit work 4.2. Reviewing the audit work 4.3. Audit Team 4.4. IT tools 4.5. Tools and guidance supporting the audit work 4.6. Legal support 4.7. Hiring external experts 4.8. Preparing for the audits 4.9. Audit evidences and documentation of audit work Site audit Developing the draft audit reports Independent review on draft reports 16

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (x) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 5. External Relations of the SAO 5.1. Communicating the audit messages 5.2. Relations with the Parliament 5.3. Feedback from the users of audit results 17

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (xi) Subchapters of the ‘Quality Document’: 6. Continuous Development and Improvement 6.1. Continuous review and monitoring 6.2. Quality assurance review 6.3. Self-assessment 6.4. Opinion from outside 6.5. Other ways of continuous improvement 18

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (xii) As the ‘Quality Document’ does not apply to all operations of the SAO, it cannot be regarded as a total quality management system. For instance, it does not include any provisions on supporting services. 19

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Elaboration of the ‘Quality Document’ (xiii) The further development of the quality management system should bring other benefits beyond the appropriate audit quality. It should further the integration of: - external outputs necessary to methodological development activities; - results of external and internal assessments of the SAO; - data gathered and documented during the audits. 20

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Summary The document on the ‘Quality Management System in the State Audit Office’ was developed in line with the key elements and recommendations of the ‘Guidelines on Audit Quality’. The integration of the SAO’s audit quality regulation into all internal controls will promote the achievement of good quality at the outputs. 21

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Some lessons to learn From the aspect of successful completion it was important to know and thoroughly consider, even in the early stages, the views that auditor colleagues had when developing the ‘Quality Document’. Making the colleagues aware of the role of the ‘Quality Document’ was of great importance. At the time of developing the document, it was also important to clear and resolve any temporary contradictions that prevailed between rules of the existing regulation in force and the prospective ‘Quality Document’. The main advantage of the ‘Quality Document’ is that it treats quality as an individual system in the SAO’s organisation, and based on existing internal regulations it pools all requirements and procedures necessary for ensuring quality into a single structure. The application of checklists describing self-assessment criteria may promote a continuous development quality in the audit work. 22

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Thank you for your kind attention!