1 Overview of USPTO Work-Sharing December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting Bruce Kisliuk - Assistant Deputy Commissioner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For Improvement of IP Infrastructure For Improvement of IP Infrastructure Japan Patent Office.
Advertisements

The IP5 view on the future of classification IPC Committee of Experts March 2009.
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
0 Progress Report on Work for Establishing Mechanisms for Feedback and Analysis on WOISAs /ISRs 9 February 2014 PCT/MIA Quality Subgroup Meeting.
Michael D. Stein Principal Stein IP LLC 1400 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC (202) Patent Prosecution.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
1 © 2014 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved. Advantages and Disadvantages of PPH Mark Abumeri 9 November 2014 Asian Patent Attorneys.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association RCE Practice: Pilot Programs and Delays in Examination Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP.
Q. TODD DICKINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) USPTO PUBLIC MEETING JULY 20, 2010 AIPLA Comments: Enhanced.
International Worksharing and its Perspective Inhong YEO International Cooperation Division.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, 2010 Report on Patent Prosecution Highway Manny Schecter Chief Patent Counsel
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
Biotech, Chemical & Pharmaceutical Partnership Meeting March 12, 2008.
Introduction to the Patent Cooperation Treaty
0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Second Session Tokyo, February 4 to 6, 2015.
Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court - enforcement and forum shopping Gwilym Roberts, Kilburn & Strode LLP.
Worksharing Robert A. Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration United States Patent and Trademark Office.
USPTO PCT Task Force Public Hearing January 13, 2010 Lawrence T. Welch Assistant General Patent Counsel Eli Lilly & Co.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Strategic Handling of Applications for Rapid Examination (SHARE) United States Patent and Trademark.
1 Introduction to the Japan Patent Office Japan Patent Office.
Collaboration between WIPO & the Vancouver Group Technical infrastructure for improved international collaboration on search and examination John Alty.
1 Worksharing: A Cooperative Approach to Patent Workload Management Charles Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of External Affairs USPTO.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association “The Global Dossier Initiative” Anthony Venturino – Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 Patent Quality Initiatives Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Valencia Martin-Wallace Deputy Commissioner.
The Patent Prosecution Highway: Strategic Considerations in Accelerating U.S. and Foreign Patent Prosecution ACC Quick Hits June 13, 2012 Dr. John K. McDonald.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
1 USPTO Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Paolo Trevisan Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs United States Patent.
PPH Introduction to the Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.
PPH from the JPO Point of View Yutaka Niidome Deputy Director Japan Patent Office AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May 19, 2010.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team September 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team as part of the Patent End-To-End Processing Team.
10-year Goal Achieved, Now Aiming for Top Quality January, 2015 澤井 智毅 Tomoki SAWAI JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
1 IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO Ken-Ichi MOROOKA The Japan Patent Office Fordham IP Conference April 29, 2011.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
Harmonization! Biotech/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting December 9, Mark R. Powell Special Advisor to the Commissioner for Patents.
Niclas Morey23 October 2015Director, International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 Technical Harmonization in the IP5 EPO’s Global Dossier, CCD and CPC.
Global Dossier Mr. Mark Powell Deputy Commissioner
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
1 The Patent Prosecution Highway A Brief History and Current Status Mark R. Powell Director, TC 2600 USPTO.
2 Jesus J. Hernandez Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs The INPI-USPTO Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Seminario Sobre.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Niclas Morey, Director International Co-operation PCT developments at the EPO Partnership for Quality, Washington D.C.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
Recent developments at the EPO and its co-operation in Africa Nicholas Körnig August 2016Administrator International Relations.
Patent Cooperation Treaty Improvements Past, Present & Future
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
EPO PPH status report February 2016.
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fourth Session Reykjavík February 8 to 10, 2017.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Third Session Santiago January 20 to 22, 2016.
IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO
Patent Prosecution Highway(PPH)
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Sixth Session Cairo February 13 and 14, 2019.
Boston Patent Law Association Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview of USPTO Work-Sharing December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting Bruce Kisliuk - Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations, Chemical Disciplines & Designs, USPTO

2 Work-sharing Work Sharing –Re-use the search and examination results done on an application or corresponding application to the maximum extent practicable in order to minimize duplication of work.

3 Background 2006 Cross filing Applications among IP5 Offices

4 Foundations of Work-sharing Examiner Perspective: Awareness that prior work results are available Access to results Understanding the substance of the results Applicant/User Perspective: Awareness of re-use programs and when they are available Access to re-use programs of different IP Offices Understanding the benefits

5 Work-sharing Initiatives Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) SHARE-type initiatives: –USPTO-KIPO SHARE Pilot –USPTO & UK-IPO Action Plan for Re-use –JP-First –Trilateral FLASH Pilot PCT Updates

6 PPH: Fast Track Examination of Applications What is PPH? –When claims are determined to be allowable in the Office of First Filing (OFF), a corresponding application with corresponding claims filed in the Office of Second Filing (OSF) may be advanced out of turn What is the Purpose of PPH? –OSF can utilize the search and examination results of the OFF thereby avoiding duplication of work and expediting the examination process in the OSF PPH Benefits for Applicant –Provides quicker patentability determination in multiple jurisdictions –Decreases costs of prosecution

7 Example: Paris Convention and National Applications The U.S. application is (a) a Paris Convention application which either (i) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) and 37 CFR 1.55 to one or more applications filed with OFF OFF application Indication of allowable claim(s) in an Office communication or Grant Priority claim Request for PPH US application OSF

8 One Example of PCT-PPH ZZ application PCT RO/-- Priority claim WO/ IPER DO/US DO/ ISA/XX or IPEA/YY Request for PPH XX=JP, US, EP, KIPO, Spain, Russia, Austria YY=JP, US, EP, KIPO, Spain, Russia, Austria US application is national stage entry of the corresponding PCT application Corresponding PCT application claims priority to a national application filed anywhere

9 Current and Planned PPH Programs  Japan (JPO) PPH Pilot July 2006, Full Jan  United Kingdom PPH (UK IPO) Sept  Korea (KIPO) PPH Pilot Jan. 2008, Full Jan  Canada (CIPO) PPH Jan  Australia (IPAU) PPH April 2008  European Patent Office (EPO) PPH Sept  Denmark (DKPTO) PPH Nov  Germany (DPMA) PPH April 2009  Singapore (IPOS) PPH Feb  Finland (NBPR) PPH July 2009  Trilateral (EPO & JPO) PCT-PPH Jan  Korea (KIPO) PCT-PPH June 2010, only KIPO-to-US  Hungary (HPO) PPH July 2010  Russia (Rospatent) PPH & PCT-PPH Sept  Spain (SPTO) PPH & PCT-PPH Oct  Austria (APO) PPH & PCT-PPH Oct  China in discussions, Israel planned

10 Paris-Route PPH Statistics USPTO data as of September 1, Other data as of the end of July OFFICE OF SECOND FILING - OSF OFFICE OF FIRST FILING - OFF JPOUSPTOKIPO UK- IPO DPMACIPOIP-AUDKPTOEPOIPOSNBPRROSPATENTAPOHPO Totals JPO USPTO KIPO UK-IPO DPMA CIPO IP-AU DKPTO EPO IPOS NBPR ROSPATEN T APO HPO

11 PCT-PPH Statistics USPTO data as of September 1, Other data as of the end of July Office of National Stage Filing ISA/IPEA JPOUSPTOEPONBPRKIPOAPO Totals JPO USPTO EPO NBPR KIPO APO

12 PPH Requests at the USPTO

13 PPH Requests by Technology Center

14 PPH Statistics - Benefits For example, when USPTO is the Office of Second Filing: Overall Allowance Rate –PPH cases: 92% –Non-PPH cases: 45% Actions to Complete Patent Application Prosecution –PPH cases: 1.9 –Non-PPH cases: 2.4 About 20% reduction in number of claims. Pendency reduction varies, but an 18 month decrease has been observed in some technologies.

15 Promoting PPH USPTO eliminated the PPH petition fee (effective May 25, 2010) Robust outreach campaign launched –PPH informational video and brochure for external stakeholders (on USPTO website) –Communication plan targeting key meetings and audiences –Articles and blogs in popular IP publications Question and feedback inbox established FAQs posted on USPTO website

16 SHARE Background SHARE = Strategic Handling of Applications for Rapid Examination The SHARE concept is intended to appropriately prioritize and balance workloads in order to be able to maximize re-use of foreign search and examination results and minimize duplication of examination work done in other IP offices. One important distinction of the SHARE-related projects relative to the PPH is that SHARE does not depend on an applicant’s request to reutilize work; it operates independently of such requirements. As such, its potential is not limited in the same way that PPH is limited by applicant requests.

17 SHARE-Related Projects USPTO and Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) agreed to cooperate on a one-year SHARE pilot, which began in Fall To maximize re-use, the OSF waited to perform their search until the OFF completes their search on 326 cross-filed applications. Completion of all office actions expected by Jan. 2011,final evaluation by April USPTO & United Kingdom (UK-IPO) Action Plan (March 2010 Press Release) Focusing on “Office-driven” mechanisms for reutilization of work, versus applicant-initiated. Timing between the two offices is such that in cross-filed applications, USPTO can use the UK search results for our FAs, and UK can use USPTO FAs for their examination phase. JP-FIRST JPO accelerates certain work as OFF if there is an OFF, JPO shares with the USPTO a list of applications with JPO actions done. FLASH – First Look Application Sharing Relatively small scale Trilateral pilot to accelerate U.S. first actions when we are aware there is a foreign Office of Second Filing. Within the year of filing in the U.S., applicants file a corresponding application in another Trilateral Office claiming priority to the U.S. application, and many request the U.S. priority document via PDX, thus providing an early indication that the USPTO is the OFF.

18 Updates on PCT December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting

19 PCT Task Force Formed in the fall of 2009 Mission –Ensure that USPTO provides world-class products and services under the PCT Public Outreach –Public meeting held January 2010 –Heard comments on how the USPTO could improve performance as RO, ISA, IPEA and DO/EO Focus to date –Timeliness and quality of products and processing

20 PCT Timeliness

21 PCT Quality Modified the quality measures of contractor- prepared PCT work products to be more aligned with those of U.S. national applications to maximize potential for re-use Provided training to contractors Conducting Trilateral ISR re-use study Recently concluded a PCT collaborative search and examination pilot project

22 PCT Collaborative Search and Examination Pilot Pilot project aimed at testing the feasibility and the potential of collaborative work between examiners of different Offices in the international phase Small scale pilot between EPO, KIPO and USPTO Designed for six examiners per Office with each acting as: –The first examiner on two PCT applications in which their Office was selected as ISA –Peer examiner on two PCT applications from each of the other Offices

23 PCT Collaborative Search and Examination Pilot (continued) PCT Collaborative Pilot results and recommendations –Quality: Examiners indicated that the collaboration resulted in more complete final products Sometimes additional citations were included Sometimes no additional citations were included, but discussions provided confidence to examiners about results –Efficiency: Examiners indicated that, in general, little or no additional search would be required at national phase –Participating examiners recommended a 2 nd phase pilot with focus on improving methodology and developing IT tools

24 Russia as ISA/IPEA Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent) and the USPTO have signed an agreement for Rospatent to serve as ISA/IPEA for international applications filed in –RO/US –RO/IB Where at least one applicant is a resident or national of the United States Rospatent international search fee = 449 USD Technical details are being finalized Start date to be announced

25 Resources For more information, please visit our website at: Plurilateral PPH website can be found at: kumi_e/patent_highway_e.htm

26 Thank you!