© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Science Research Simulation Task Analysis Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 5: Academically Productive Talk Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and.
Introduction for CTE Teachers on Supporting Common Core State Standards : Part Three.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 1.Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2.Evidence:
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
STRATEGIC PLAN Welcome to TNCore Summer Training! Day 1.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Respond to the following prompt: According to our conversations in class, what is a meaningful relationship and how might we learn more about this from.
Working Together to Develop Positive Practices in a Co-Instructional Teaching Environment This orientation session will help educators committed to collaborative.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
Gear-up: Content Literacy Jackson Independent/Breathitt Co Schools October 1, 2012
Text Complexity and Close Reading District Learning Day Location goes here Session time goes here Date goes here.
Mathematical Practices.  Goals today: ◦ Become familiar with the Mathematical Practices and what they mean and look like in instruction ◦ Addition.
Reading Comprehension 4th & 5th Grade Session #2 Presented by Jill Bryan and Madeleine Heins.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 3: Text Complexity Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching and Learning.
STRATEGIC PLAN Tennessee Department of Education School Team Training Series Opening Session – Literacy June 2014.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
CFN 204 Network Math Meeting Monday, December 3, 2012 PS 29 Paul Perskin.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Close Reading in the Social Studies Classroom District Learning Day Location goes here Session time goes here August 5, 2015.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Writing Assignments in Science and Technical Subjects/ Working with Evidence Day 3 Chris Bowen Milligan College.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 4: Academically Productive Talk Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh The CCSS & Close Reading 1.
Writing in the 3-8 ELA Modules New to NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 5.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Deep Dive into the Up-Dated Curriculum with Literacy Connections District Learning Day Grades :30-11:30 August 6, 2015.
Animal Systems September 20, 2008 Monica Hartman Laura A. Chambless St. Clair RESA Math/Science.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
SOUTH DAKOTA COUNTS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE Brookings, SD
Fraction Sense Fran Gibson. 2 Sacramento County Office of Education | Welcome and Introductions Please share the following information about.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 7: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching.
Reading Text in the Social Studies Classroom District Learning Day Bolton High School August 5, 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
Learning and Growing Together WELCOME TO THE HAMILTON COUNTY SCIENCE LEADERS NETWORK MEETING October 15, 2015.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Shelby County Schools Modified TN Core Training
STRATEGIC PLAN TNCore Science/CTE Summer Training Closing Session.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
A Deep Dive into the Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Deep Dive into the Up-Dated Curriculum with Literacy Connections District Learning Day 10:30-11:30 August 6, 2015.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Promoting Perseverance in Mathematics Borough Instructional Leads for Mathematics Math Team Department of STEM December 3, 2015.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
BILs Science Meeting April 21, 2016 Student Agency in Science BILs Science Meeting April 21, 2016 Student Agency in Science Office of Curriculum,Instruction,
Together We improve student learning and achieve more by:
Activity 2.10: unpacking EA2 preparing for argument writing
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Together We improve student learning and achieve more by:
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
K-8 Session 2: Understanding Cluster Organization
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Goals Deepen understanding of scientific argument and informational/explanatory writing by analyzing the similarities and differences in the two types of writing; engaging in a short research project writing task; and considering writing tasks and strategies to support your students as they write in both styles. Reflect on your learning. 2

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Norms for Working Together Keep students at the center. Be present and engaged. Monitor air time and share your voice. Challenge with respect. Stay solutions oriented. Risk productive struggle. Balance urgency and patience. 3

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Writing: Understanding Text Types

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Understanding Text Types Part I—Writing to Inform and Make Arguments 1. As you watch the Writing to Inform and Make Arguments video clip, think about these two questions: a. What are the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) expectations for student writing? b. How can we support student writing in our science classrooms? 2. Following the video clip, write a response to the above two questions. 5

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Understanding Text Types Part II—Understanding the Writing Standards 1. Please take about 5 minutes to individually a. review the writing standards for your grade band 6

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Understanding Text Types Part II—Understanding the Writing Standards (continued)  In pairs, discuss (about 3 minutes) the following questions:  What are the differences between argument and explanatory writing according to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)?  Be prepared to share your thinking with our whole group. 7

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Understanding Text Types Part III—Whole Group Discussion What is distinctive about these two different types of writing? Why are they both important to being literate? Why are they both important to science education? 8

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Short Research Project Writing Task

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Short Research Project Writing Task Part I—Reading and Writing to Inform or Make Arguments A. Count off by twos; then read the directions for your assigned task. 1. = Argument (green, “Argument Task”) 2. = Explanatory (blue, “Explanatory Task”) 10

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task Sheet Short Research Project Writing Task Part I—Reading and Writing to Inform or Make Arguments (continued)  Locate and read your texts. 1. Connected by the Light 2. Exchange Cycles 3. Use the blank pages to write your response. Take 20 minutes (this will probably not be enough time to finish the task) to individually write the essay as an adult.  Use the appropriate rubric to guide your writing. 1. Argument (Green) 2. Explanatory (Blue) 11

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Bridge To Practice The BTP Assignment for our next meeting is to complete the writing assignment you DID NOT complete today. It is essential that we as educators be exposed to both types of writing tasks before our next PD session. In our next session we will un-pack both writing tasks and discuss implications for teaching and learning in our classrooms. Thank you for your time! 12