The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 19, Horizon West Area 28,000 Gross Acres Six (6) Planned Villages / Communities Includes one (1) Town Center ~41,000 Planned Households.
Advertisements

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
What is SBCAG? Voluntary council of governments Established in 1966 under a JPA executed by local governments 13 member Board of Directors: – 5 County.
Market Analysis Economic Development Land Planning Implementation Harrisburg, NC Economic Development Implementation A strategic community assessment.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
Evaluating the future: forecasting urban development using the urbansim land use model in el paso, tx. Quinn P. Korbulic.
“Old Approach to Needs Analysis” The standard practice in Oregon has been to extrapolate forward the past 5 or more years in housing production as the.
Smith County - Public Hearing TRZ Description & Boundary Based initially from 1-mile off centerline for Toll 49 alignment Included all GIS parcels for.
Urban Containment Increasing in Popularity  Most common in fast-growth regions  Intent to contain sprawl, minimize costs  Too much land, urban sprawl.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
CTAP Project Area I-93 Community Technical Assistance Program.
Using the Land Use in Central Indiana (LUCI) Models in Transportation Planning John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Land-Use and Transportation
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
TRANSECT ZONING IN DUBUQUE COUNTY Prepared by: Barrett Voigt Jamie Sanchagrin Evgeny Chavanin Special thanks to: Dr. Anthony Andrea Uhl.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
August 3, Introductions 2. Status Reports 3. Demographics Presentation 4. Community Engagement—Plan Norwalk by MindMixer 5. Project Team—City.
1 Common Procedures For Small Area Forecasting Justin Clarke, Arlington County Mubarika Shah, Fairfax County Greg Goodwin, COG Staff Metropolitan Washington.
What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
CorPlan: Place Based Scenario Planning Tool
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Chittenden County Land Use - Transportation Decision Support System November 19, 2003 Chittenden County Metropolitan.
MetroScope RTP Base Case Run 2000 – 2030: How MetroScope Works A Short Course about MetroScope Operation – What Goes Into MetroScope and What Comes Out.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis Nov 5, 2007 New techniques - for an old friend.
MACATAWA AREA COORDINATING COUNCIL. November 18, 2013 Scenario Planning Session MACC Scenarios Goals Data & Funds Defining Future Scenarios Integration.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Development and Application of a Land Use Model for Santiago de Chile Universidad de Chile Francisco Martínez Francisco Martínez Universidad de Chile
Framework for Phase 2 Modeling Function of the Model: A platform for discussing alternative growth scenarios in Metro Boston and the associated tradeoffs.
Data Development Common Issues for UPLAN and I-PLACE3S.
2010 National Air Quality Conference Laura Loges Director of Marketing and Public Affairs Martin Kim, AICP, GISP Director of Regional Planning.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Wende Mix, Buffalo State College GIS Research Needs Strategic Planning.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Transportation Planning and the Land Use Connection Presented to the FDOT and MPOs May 14, 2010 By Paul G. Van Buskirk, Ph. D., AICP,PE Copyright©2010.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) June, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
Avalon Park Retail Market Analysis Fishkind and Associates, Inc Corporate Blvd. Orlando, FL December 12, 2008.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
Fundamentals of Real Estate Lecture 11 Spring, 2002 Copyright © Joseph A. Petry
HELIOS: Household Employment and Land Impact Outcomes Simulator FLORIDA STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Development & Application Stephen Lawe RSG Michael Doherty.
Balanced Land Use Strategies Using Density and Design to Achieve Your Community’s Goals.
Modeling and Forecasting Household and Person Level Control Input Data for Advance Travel Demand Modeling Presentation at 14 th TRB Planning Applications.
July 26, Agenda A.Refresher B.Discussion of Planning Process C.Creating the “Currents” and “According to Plan Scenarios” D.Creating the “All for.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.
Land Needs Simulator: Overview and Recommended Assumptions Presented to: RPS Policy Committee Presented by: ECONorthwest January 9, 2007.
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
Presentation to the Water and Environmental Planning Committee September 22, 2006 Ad Hoc Committee on UGB/A Policy: Progress Report.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Update of the Regional Transportation Plan A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities.
2015 ABNMS Conference Application of Bayesian Networks in Urban Growth Models © 2015, Sizztech Pty Ltd.
Validation and Sensitivity Testing of the Metropolitan Council Phase I Minneapolis-St. Paul Socioeconomic Land Use Forecasting Model Colby Brown, AICP.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS City of Snoqualmie Planning & Buildable Sno-lutions Chris Sungjin Im Ian Garnier Nick Nielson Geography 469.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
SCENARIO PLANNING FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IN THE TRUCKEE MEADOWS NNWPC Agenda Item 9 Jeremy M. Smith, TMRPA Jim Smitherman, WRWC 8/3/2016.
Planning for Victoria 27 March 2014
Scenario Planning for Water and Wastewater in the Truckee Meadows
City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
TRB Planning Applications Conference
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
Presentation transcript:

The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission September , 2011 | Hyatt Regency Hotel | Columbus, Ohio

Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission Voluntary association of governmental and non- governmental organizations in the Dayton metropolitan region in southwest Ohio Regional Planning Commission and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducting transportation, land use and environmental planning

a region-based land use planning initiative to build a collective vision for the future of land development in the Miami Valley Region

Develop Alternative Scenarios through Civic Engagement Conduct a GIS- based Land Holding Capacity Assessment Develop a Preferred Scenario Scenario Planning Framework Given the projected need for future population and job growth in our Region, where would you like to see the Region develop? Land Holding Capacity: A measure of the capacity (theoretical) of suitable areas to accommodate development within the limits defined by existing infrastructure and natural resource capabilities, often expressed in dwelling units, households, number of employees or acres +=

METHODOLOGY

Basic Holding Capacity Methodology 1.Data acquisition aggregated to study area boundary size 2.Establish constraints to create ‘Net Buildable Area’ 3.Develop density/intensity assumptions 4.Convert net development area into population and employment figures

1.Data acquisition aggregated to study area boundary size 2.Establish constraints to create Net Buildable Area 3.Develop Density/Intensity Assumptions 4.Convert net development area into population and employment figures

Study Area Analysis Multiple counties vs. single jurisdiction –Try to get data adjacent to your boundary Size of the Study Area changes the complexity involved

Data Needed Land Use Data Parcel data Square footage Developed/Undeveloped/Partially Developed Usage Share Socio-economic Data –Employment Data (Traffic Analysis Zones) Commercial Industrial –Census Data Population People per Household Housing Unit Count

Data Inconsistency Issues

Consistent boundaries with Blocks –TAZ Level Data aggregated down to Block level – Parcel Level Data aggregated up to Block Level Block 1 P1P2 Block 1 B1 TAZ 1

Temporal Data Issues CensusTAZ Parcel 2007 Year Data Gathered

Classification Issues

1.Data acquisition aggregated to study area boundary size 2.Establish constraints to create Net Buildable Area 3.Create Density/Intensity Assumptions 4.Convert net development area into population and employment figures

Remove Unsuitable Lands for Development

Issues Establishing Constraint How unsuitable is too unsuitable for development?

Is this considered Buildable?

Or this?

Establish Constraint Solution Identify on the spectrum where your community’s visions match. –If focus is to preserve natural assets, slide higher on the spectrum –If emphasis is on growing, slide lower on the spectrum ?

Land Development Suitability Analysis Earlier analysis divided suitability into 4 categories based on constraints Removed lands only marked in most stringent category of “Unsuitable”

1.Data acquisition aggregated to study area boundary size 2.Establish constraints to create Net Buildable Area 3.Develop Density/Intensity Assumptions 4.Convert net development area into population and employment figures

Developing Density Assumptions What are your community’s goals? –More Walkability? Higher Density –Larger Lots? Lower Density Large LotsCompact ?

Our Density Assumptions Within a Block: –Existing Density Levels would remain constant

Our Density Assumptions - Current Land Use Shares would remain constant

How is Land Developed on That Which Has No Development?

Rural/Urban Development Issues Will rural develop at same rate as urban? How does this incorporate with existing land use?

Determining Regional Densities Delineated a boundary between areas with existing water/sewer access (urban) and areas without (rural) Calculate each area’s density average Use these averages as density for areas with no previous development

Drawing Density Assumptions Large Lots Compact Rural Average Urban Average

How Much Land to Develop? Use historic trending levels to predict rate of non-residential development in rural areas Take rate of change of development from and apply the same rate towards how much new land will be developed by 2040.

Historical Trends Adjust for error by normalizing the size of the blocks – Percentage of development over area of total block

1.Data acquisition aggregated to study area boundary size 2.Establish constraints to create Net Buildable Area 3.Develop Density/Intensity Assumptions 4.Convert net development area into population and employment figures

Converting Acreage to People Buildable Res Acres x Housing Units/Acre x Population per HouseHold x Residential Vacancy Rate = Maximum # of People in Area

Convert Acreage to Jobs Buildable Non-Res Acres x FAR/Acre x Jobs/Acre x Non-Residential Vacancy Rate = Maximum # of Jobs in Area

Where can we get Vacancy Rate for: Census data: subtract occupied housing units (Households) from total number of housing units (Housing Units) Residential?

Where can we get Vacancy Rate for: Used local market study (Gem Real Estate) and applied to sub regions within the study boundary Non-Residential?

Post Analysis: Other Items to Consider What is proper amount of land for future infrastructure, schools, police, etc.? –Sources recommend anywhere from % of available land for public use

Questions?