Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved Chapter Customer Value and Relative Positioning 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS AN INTRODUCTION. FORCES DRIVING INDUSTRY COMPETITION.
Advertisements

Economics of Strategy AEC 422 Unit 3 Chapter 12 Industry Analysis.
2 External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats.
Copyright ©2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. Slide 2-1 The Competitive Environment: Assessing Industry Attractiveness.
Industry and Competitive Analysis
Industry Analysis - Porter's Five Forces
External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats Porter, Five Forces and Industry Cycles.
Industry Analysis. Introduction Industry analysis takes two broad forms  Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Brandenberger and Nalebuff’s Value Net Outcome.
A Framework for Industry Analysis
The External Environment
Industry & Competitive Analysis
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY - Dolly Dhamodiwala.
Chapter 2 The External Environment:
The External Environment for Strategy Strategic Management Lecture 2 義守大學企管系四年級 B 班
EVALUATING A COMPANY’S EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
Porter’s Five Forces Michael Porter
Tutorial 5 Five forces and PEST analysis
Porter’s Five Forces Model of Competition
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.3-1 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition and Competitor Analysis.
Industry and Competitive Analysis
Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland
Cola Wars Key Take-aways.
Components of the General Environment
External Analysis BUSI 7130/7136 Dr. Shook. What’s an Environment? What’s an Environment? Analyzing the Industry Analyzing the Industry v Five Forces.
Competition. Direct Competitors - Firms likely to gain or lose a substantial share of customers from each other over time because they serve the same.
2 Chapter 2: External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats BA 469 Spring Term, 2005 Professor Dowling.
Figure 11.3: Sales and Profit Life Cycles
2 External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats.
Strategic Elements of Competitive Advantage
Conducting an Industry Analysis. Seven Questions for Industry Analysis 1. What are the industry dominant economic traits? 2. What competitive forces are.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Fall 2000MGTO L1 & L2 (Dr. JT Li)1 Lecture #3: Analyzing the Industry Environment The objectives of industry analysis Porter’s Five Forces Model.
Chapter 2: The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition and Competitor Analysis Overview: The firm’s external environment.
Modern Competitive Strategy 3 rd Edition Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reservedMcGraw-Hill/Irwin.
External and Internal Analyses General Environment GeneralEnvironmentGeneral Environment Sociocultural Global Technological Political/Legal Demographic.
Copyright © 2001 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats Strategic.
The Strategy Environment Session 2 Business Strategy.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
Ch2-1 Chapter 4: Competitor Analysis “What are they going to do?”
COM333 – IS3 IS and Competition. A number of techniques exists that support the analysis and assessment of Organisations’ competitive position from an.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved. Power Point Presentation by Dr. Leslie A. Korb Georgian Court University.
CH 2 STRATEGY ANALYSIS. Strategy Analysis Strategy analysis is an important starting point for the analysis of financial statements –Allows the analyst.
Industry Structure— Porter’s 5 forces
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Evaluating a Company’s External Environment.
The Marketing Environment and Competitor Analysis
Forces Driving Industry Competition. Structural Determinants of the Intensity of Competition Competition in an industry continually works to drive down.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved. Chapters 3 & 5 Driving Forces, Porter’s 5 Forces, Generic Competitive.
Ch2-1 Chapter 2 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis The External Environment: Opportunities,
THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT Chapter 2. The Organization Owners & Directors Managers Employees The Task Environment Gov’t agencies Competitors Unions Suppliers.
A Summary of Porter’s Main Points in His Article Created by Samantha Wong, Northeastern University 2009.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT II Porter’s five forces module.
Applying the Five Forces by Wesley Shu, text by D. Besanko et al.
INTERNAL INDUSTRY RIVALRY
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Porter’s Five Forces Model
The External Environment
EXTERNAL (TASK) ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING 1
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats Industry structure and Globalisation.
Porter’s Competitive Forces dan Value chain
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Strategic Charles W. L. Hill Management Gareth R. Jones
Student Version Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved.
The External Environment
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS.
STRATEGIC ANALYIS OF BUSINESS
5: Competitive Advantage
POWER OF SUPPLIERS IS HIGH WHEN:
Presentation transcript:

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved Chapter Customer Value and Relative Positioning 2

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-2 Customer Value: Low-Cost or Differentiated Products Customers choose one firm’s products over its competitor’s products if the firm’s product offers benefits that customers need and that either: – Are superior to benefits of competitors’ products. – Are identical to benefits of competitors’ products but are offered at a lower price than competitors. – Are superior to benefits of competitors’ products and are offered at a lower prices than competitors.

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-3 Differentiation Product Features Brand-Name Reputation Network Size Timing Location Service Product Mix

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-4 Determining Demand for Differentiated Benefits Multidimensional Scaling Hedonics Technological Progress Sources of Differentiation

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-5 Benefits Map for Passenger Jet Airlines Figure 2.1 Cruise Speed and Number of Passengers the Plane Can Carry

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-6 Figure 2.2 Benefits Map for Passenger Jet Airlines Range And Number of Passengers

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-7 Low Cost and Its Determinants Economies of Scale Factor Costs Industry-Specific Cost Drivers Innovation Economies of Learning Agency Costs

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-8 Differentiation versus Low Cost Firm pursuing a low-cost strategy gets higher market share. Firm is then likely to enjoy a high level of profitability. Firm pursuing a differentiation strategy has a lower market share. Firm may enjoy high level of profitability since it charges premium prices. Figure 2.3 Low-Cost vs. Differentiation Positions

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-9 Creating Customer Value and Capturing Profits from It (1 of 2) The benefits that customers value in a firm’s product stem from the combined efforts of the firm and its suppliers, complementors, and customers.

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-10 Creating Customer Value and Capturing Profits from It (2 of 2) Complementors: Firms that offer products that are complementary to the firm’s products – sales of their products increase demand for the firm’s products. e.g. The sales of software increases sales of computers. Coopetitors: Suppliers, rivals, complementors, and customers with whom a firm often must cooperate and compete.

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-11 Figure 2.4 Coopetitors

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-12 Cooperating to Create Value (1 of 3) Competing to Appropriate Value – How much of the revenues that customers pay for the created customer value can the firm capture or appropriate? – How much of the costs of creating and offering the value does the firm, rather than coopetitors, incur?

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-13 Cooperating to Create Value (2 of 3) Impact of Bargaining Position on Ability to Appropriate Value Profits = revenues - costs = P(Q) x Q(P) - C(Q) – Relative Positioning vis-à-vis Suppliers – Relative Positioning vis-à-vis Customers – Relative Positioning vis-à-vis Complementors

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-14 Cooperating to Create Value (3 of 3) Impact of Rivalry, New Entry, and Substitutes on Ability to Appropriate Value – Rivalry – Potential New Entry – Substitutes

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-15 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (1 of 8) Competitive Forces Exerted by Coopetitors – Suppliers – Buyers – Rivalry – Threat of Entry – Substitutes – Complementors

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-16 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (2 of 8) – Supplier power over firms is a function of:  Concentration and dominance of suppliers  Differentiated products  Credible threat of forward integration  Small fraction of costs  High profits  Importance to the quality of industry firms’ products  Cost savings  Unavailability of substitute products  Lack of information

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-17 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (3 of 8) – Buyer power over firms is a function of:  Concentration and dominance of buyers  Undifferentiated products  Credible threat of backward integration  Large fraction of costs  Low profits  Importance to the quality of buyers’ products  No cost savings  Availability of substitute products  More information

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-18 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (4 of 8) – Rivalry is increased in an industry by several factors:  Number of competitors and their similarity  Small or declining industry growth  Undifferentiated products  Excess capacity  High exit barriers  High fixed costs, low variable costs  Diverse competitors

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-19 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (5 of 8) – Threat of Entry factors that contribute to high barriers to entry:  High economies of scale  Product differentiation  Capital requirements  Access to critical inputs  Network externalities  Experience curve  Reputation for retaliation  Government policies

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-20 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (6 of 8) – The extent to which firms offering substitute products have power is determined by:  Availability of key substitutes and willingness of customers to switch  Benefits from substitutes  Price elasticity of demand

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-21 Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (7 of 8) – Complementors’ power over industry firms is determined by:  Availability of key complements  Benefits from complements  Cross-price elasticity of demand

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-22 Influencing Competitive Forces to Strengthen One’s Relative Positioning – Differentiation Position as Influencer – Low-Cost Position as Influencer Determinants of Relative Positioning Among Coopetitors (8 of 8)

Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved 2-23 Customer Value and Relative Positioning Questions