Trends in Cervical & Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women in Rural & Urban Areas of the United States AcademyHealth 2008 Gender and Health Interest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Language Attributes and Older Adults: Implications for Medicare Policy Ninez Ponce, PhD,MPP 1,2 ; Leighton Ku, PhD 4 ; William.
Advertisements

Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African AmericansIn Lansing Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African Americans In Lansing Costellia Talley, PhD,
Exhibit 1. Percent of Adults Under Age 65 with a Usual Source of Care, by State, 2012 Percent Data source: 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Eligible Women and Participation in the Women’s Health Network Ellen M. Kramer ScD RD April 7, 2005.
Role of racism on cancer behavioral risk profiles: a focus on secondary prevention (screening behaviors) Salma Shariff-Marco, PhD, MPH Cancer Prevention.
Asthma Prevalence in the United States
Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Asthma Disparities Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Kirsti Bocskay, PhD, MPH Office of Epidemiology.
The Burden of Cancer and an Action Plan for Change in Monroe County January 2013 Byron Kennedy, MD, PhD, MPH Deputy Director of Health Monroe County, NY.
Use of Spiritual Healing Therapy in Relation to Race and Ethnicity Catherine Simile, Ph.D. and Hanyu Ni, Ph.D. Division of Health Interview Statistics.
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.
¡Celebremos La Salud!: A cancer prevention program for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women living in a rural area Silvia Tejeda, MPH Doctoral Candidate.
Cancer Program Fewer Montanans experience late stage cancer. Fewer Montanans die of cancer. Metrics Biannual percent of Montanans who are up-to-date with.
Research and analysis by Avalere Health The Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Hospitals in an Era of Health Reform April, 2011.
Chronic Disease in Missouri: Progress and Challenges Shumei Yun, MD, PhD Public Health Epidemiologist and Team Leader Chronic Disease and Nutritional Epidemiology.
Health Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Paula A. Johnson, MD, MPH Chief, Division of Women’s Health; Executive Director, Connors Center for Women’s.
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
Disparities in Cancer September 22, Introduction Despite notable advances in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, a disproportionate number.
Mammography Screening Information for Providers Indian Health Service National GPRA Team.
GOVERNOR’S INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HEALTH DISPARITIES Emma Medicine White Crow Association of Public Hospital Districts, Membership Meeting June 24, 2013.
A Profile of Health among Massachusetts Adults: Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Survey.
Source: Massachusetts BRFSS Prepared by: Health Survey Program Using the BRFSS to Track Healthy People 2010 Objectives Highlights from the 2004 Massachusetts.
Effect of Cost-Sharing on Screening Mammography in Medicare Managed Care Plans Amal Trivedi, MD, MPH William Rakowski, PhD John Ayanian, MD, MPP 2007 AcademyHealth.
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
How Well is SCHIP Meeting Children’s Primary Health Care Needs?: Findings From A Congressionally Mandated Study Genevieve Kenney The Urban Institute Jamie.
Assessing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials: Setting Attainable Goals The Minority and Women Clinical Trials Recruitment Program Department of.
Maria C. Mejia de Grubb, MD, MPH; Barbara Kilbourne, PhD; Courtney Kihlberg, MD, MSPH; and Robert Levine, MD. Department of Family and Community Medicine.
DISPARITIES IN ACCESS: Reality vs. Perception Peter J. Cunningham Jack Hadley 2008 AcademyHealth Annual Meeting June 8, 2008, Washington D.C.
Women’s Health in Massachusetts Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): Health Survey Program Bureau.
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Assessing the Value of the NHIS for Studying Changes in State Health Coverage Policies: The Case of New York Sharon K. Long John A. Graves Stephen Zuckerman.
American Public Health Association
Cancer Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Name Institution Date. Description of the Target Population The target population for this study are the African- American population aged between
Exploring The Determinants Of Racial & Ethnic Disparities In Total Knee Arthroplasty: Health Insurance, Income And Assets Amresh Hanchate, PhD Health Care.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Knowledge of Shaken Baby Syndrome among Recent Mothers Findings from the Rhode Island PRAMS Hanna Kim, Samara.
CLINICAL PREVENTIVE SERVICES Chartbook on Healthy Living.
Veterans Using and Uninsured Veterans Not Using VA Health Care Karin Nelson, MD, MSHS Gordon A. Starkebaum, MD Gayle E. Reiber, PhD, MPH VA Puget Sound.
Differences in the Quality of the Patient- Physician Relationship Among Terminally Ill African American and White Patients: Impact on Advance Care Planning.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Is There Progress Toward Eliminating Racial/Ethnic.
Joni Reynolds, RN-CNS, MSN Director of Public Health Programs Winnable Battles: Cancer in Colorado.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
OKLAHOMA’S RURAL HEALTH STATUS Richard Perry, M.A., Director Oklahoma AHEC OSU Center for Rural Health.
U.S. Obesity Trends in From Source: Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, et al. JAMA, October 27, 1999; 282(16): Source: Mokdad AH, Serdula.
Effect of process indicators on the episode sensitivity of mammography Tytti Sarkeala, MSc Finnish Cancer Registry Ahti Anttila Matti Hakama Irma Saarenmaa.
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
Cost-Sharing and Screening Mammography Amal Trivedi, MD, MPH 2008 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.
Trends in childhood asthma: NCHS data on prevalence, health care use and mortality Susan Lukacs, DO, MSPH Lara Akinbami, MD Infant, Child and Women’s Health.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3 Cancer Progress Review October 16, 2002.
Estimating Wisconsin Asthma Prevalence Using Clinical Electronic Health Records and Public Health Data Carrie Tomasallo, PhD, MPH Wisconsin Division of.
Using a State Employee Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to Inform Worksite Wellness Policies and Programs in Oregon Sabrina Freewynn, MPH Comprehensive.
Impact of Perceived Discrimination on Use of Preventive Health Services Amal Trivedi, M.D., M.P.H. John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P. Harvard Medical School/Brigham.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3: Cancer Progress Review August 17, 2006.
Will Public Health’s Response to Bioterrorism be Fair? AcademyHealth 2004 Annual Research Meeting David P. Eisenman, M.D., M.S.H.S. Assistant Professor,
Widening of Socioeconomic Disparities in U.S. Mortality from Major Cancers Ahmedin Jemal, PhD Elizabeth Ward, PhD June 10, 2008 Kinsey T, Jemal A, Liff.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates by Race, Age and Indices of Access to Medical Care in the U.S., Yongping Hao, PhD 1 Ahmedin Jemal,
BREAST CANCER BY STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS, CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Arthur Owora, MPH; Aaron Wendelboe, PhD; David Thompson, PhD; Janis Campbell, PhD The.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Oregon Monica Hunsberger, MPH, RD, PhD 1, Rebecca J. Donatelle, PhD 2, Kenneth D. Rosenberg,
Patterns of HPV vaccination among Latinos: Key factors for consideration Rachel A. Reimer, PhD Chair Department of Public Health Director MPH program Associate.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Previous cancer screening behavior as predictor of colon cancer screening among women aged 50 and over Rafael Guerrero-Preston DrPH, MPH APHA 135th Annual.
University of MD, School of Medicine
Impact of Length of U.S. Residence and Health Insurance on Mammography Screening in Vietnamese American Women Gem Le, MHS 1,2 Stephen J. McPhee, MD 1 Tung.
Rural Health in an Era of Health Reform
Mesfin S. Mulatu, Ph.D., M.P.H. The MayaTech Corporation
Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
Burden of Diabetes in Connecticut: An Overview
Burden of Diabetes in Connecticut: An Overview
Presentation transcript:

Trends in Cervical & Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women in Rural & Urban Areas of the United States AcademyHealth 2008 Gender and Health Interest Group Meeting June 7, 2008 Mark P. Doescher, MD, MSPH J. Elizabeth Jackson, MA Department of Family Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine

Background  Disparities in cancer screening for rural women have been reported by others  A more refined definition of rural residence may allow identification of areas where need for services is especially great

Guidelines  Periodic screening for breast cancer and cervical cancer can reduce risk of premature death  USPSTF recommendations:  Mammogram for women aged 40+ every two years  Papanicoloau (Pap) smear for women aged 18+ every three years

Disparities  Rates of Pap screening fall short of Healthy People 2010 goal of 90%  Less frequent use of preventive services among rural women may be due to:  Greater distance to medical facilities  Less accessibility of services  Inadequate health insurance coverage  Rural disparity more pronounced among racial/ethnic minorities

Study Aims Aim 1 To examine the prevalence of and trends in mammography and Pap smear screening among adult women living in rural and urban locations between 1994 and Aim 2 To explore the uptake of these tests among groups of rural women who might be relatively unlikely to benefit from any temporal improvements in screening.

Data and Methods

Data  Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)  Women aged 18+ for Pap screening and 40+ for mammography  Annual samples from , 2002 and 2004 (1994 n=105,853, 2004 n=303,822)  United States (excluding District of Columbia, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Alaska, and territories)

Data – Dependent Measures Women were asked:  If they had ever had a mammogram and the date of their most recent mammogram  If they had ever had a Pap smear and the date of their most recent test; also asked whether they had had a hysterectomy Classified as up-to-date if:  Mammogram within prior two years  Pap smear within prior three years

Data – Key Independent Measures  Rural/urban residence classified by county by 2003 Urban Influence Code (UIC)  Metropolitan  Non-metro: 1) adjacent non-metro; 2) remote micropolitan; 3) remote non-core  Sociodemographic factors examined: age; race/ethnicity; educational attainment; household income; labor force participation

Analysis  Logistic regression used to estimate rates of screening overall and by selected factors  SuDaAn 8.0 [RTI 2001] adjusts standard errors for complex sample design  Predicted marginal percentages are presented  Trends were examined by comparing estimates from individual years

Results

Percent Women with Current Mammogram or Pap Screening by Rural/Urban (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram by Race/Ethnicity (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram by Age (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram by Educational Attainment (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram by Income (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram by Labor Force Participation (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear by Race/Ethnicity (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear by Age (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear by Educational Attainment (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear by Income (2004)

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear by Labor Force Participation (2004)

Adjusted Percent of Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammogram ( )

Adjusted Percentage of Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear ( )

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 40+ with Current Mammography in Rural Counties by State

Adjusted Percent Women Aged 18+ with Current Pap Smear in Rural Counties by State

Discussion

Factors Influencing Screening Behavior  Rural residence is an independent risk factor for lacking current mammography  Low SES and advanced age are risk factors for lacking cervical and breast cancer screening  Rural disparities are pronounced for those without a high school diploma  Rural African Americans lagged behind urban counterparts in mammography  Latinas were more likely than whites to have current screening regardless of residence

Screening Trends Mammography  Participation improved  However, rates lower in all rural areas  Rural areas of many states lagged behind Healthy People 2010 target of 70% screened Pap screening  No significant increase in any area  Below Healthy People 2010 target of 90% screened

Variation by State  Wide variability by state in breast and cervical cancer screening in rural counties  Also wide variability by state in:  per-capita health spending  Medicaid spending per enrollee  States with higher personal spending tended to have higher screening rates

Limitations  Households without telephones were excluded  Attitudes and beliefs that may affect screening behavior could not be examined  Potential recall bias of self-report data  Data aggregated by county may overlook intra- county differences  Population-based research on travel distance and out-of-pocket costs needed to determine the effect of access to radiographic facilities

Policy Implications  Improvements in mammography are needed for rural residents  Improved access to mammography and Pap screening is needed for women with risk factors  Preservation and expansion of Medicaid coverage would improve screening rates for racial/ethnic minority groups  Expansion of programs like the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP)