Energy and Number Density Created at RHIC What’s in the PHENIX White Paper, and a little bit more Paul Stankus, ORNL PHENIX Focus, Apr 11 06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Advertisements

TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.
Peter SteinbergBNL/RIKEN Flow Workshop Landau Hydrodynamics & RHIC Phenomenology Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory Workshop on Collective.
Diffusion and local deconfinement in relativistic systems Georg Wolschin Universität Heidelberg, Theor. Physics Georg Wolschin.
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
Results from PHENIX on deuteron and anti- deuteron production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Joakim Nystrand University of Bergen for the PHENIX Collaboration.
In relativistic heavy ion collisions a high energy density matter Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be formed. Various signals have been proposed which probe.
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
CERN May Heavy Ion Collisions at the LHC Last Call for Predictions Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Particle Interactions
Helen Caines Yale University SQM – L.A.– March 2006 Using strange hadron yields as probes of dense matter. Outline Can we use thermal models to describe.
DPG spring meeting, Tübingen, March Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Recent results from STAR at RHIC.
Inflation, Dark Energy, and the Cosmological Constant Intro Cosmology Short Course Lecture 5 Paul Stankus, ORNL.
Christina Markert Physics Workshop UT Austin November Christina Markert The ‘Little Bang in the Laboratory’ – Accelorator Physics. Big Bang Quarks.
Sept WPCF-2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on: Yu.S., I. Karpenko,
Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)
Steffen A. RHIC #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The Protons Puzzle at RHIC - the demise of pQCD? Recombination.
KROMĚŘĺŽ, August 2005WPCF Evolution of observables in hydro- and kinetic models of A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev.
Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:
As one evolves the gluon density, the density of gluons becomes large: Gluons are described by a stochastic ensemble of classical fields, and JKMMW argue.
The effects of viscosity on hydrodynamical evolution of QGP 苏中乾 大连理工大学 Dalian University of Technology.
Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University
STRING PERCOLATION AND THE GLASMA C.Pajares Dept Particle Physics and IGFAE University Santiago de Compostela CERN The first heavy ion collisions at the.
Workshop for Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy 2011
Peter Steinberg 20 th Winter Workshop, Jamaica 2004 Landau on the Beach: Hydrodynamics & RHIC Phenomenology Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory.
مدرس المادة الدكتور :…………………………
EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR HADRONIC DECONFINEMENT In p-p Collisions at 1.8 TeV * L. Gutay - 1 * Phys. Lett. B528(2002)43-48 (FNAL, E-735 Collaboration Purdue,
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
The CGC and Glasma: Summary Comments The CGC, Shadowing and Scattering from the CGC Inclusive single particle production J/Psi Two Particle Correlations.
Jet energy loss at RHIC and LHC including collisional and radiative and geometric fluctuations Simon Wicks, QM2006 Work done with Miklos Gyulassy, William.
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Ultra-Dense Matter.
Jet Physics in ALICE Mercedes López Noriega - CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Hot Quarks 2006 Villasimius, Sardinia - Italy.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
Marzia Nardi CERN – Th. Div. Hadronic multiplicity at RHIC and LHC Hadronic multiplicity at RHIC and LHC Korea-EU ALICE Collab. Oct. 9, 2004, Hanyang Univ.,
QuarkNet 2006 Lets go smash some Atoms! Peripheral Collision:Central Collision Head-On Collision: Largest # of Nucleons Participate Glancing Collision:
Dynamical equilibration of strongly- interacting ‘infinite’ parton matter Vitalii Ozvenchuk, in collaboration with E.Bratkovskaya, O.Linnyk, M.Gorenstein,
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Probing the properties of dense partonic matter at RHIC Y. Akiba (RIKEN) for PHENIX collaboration.
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.
John Harris (Yale) LHC Conference, Vienna, Austria, 15 July 2004 Heavy Ions - Phenomenology and Status LHC Introduction to Rel. Heavy Ion Physics The Relativistic.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
Structure and Fine Structure seen in e + e -, pp, pA and AA Multiparticle Production Wit Busza MIT BNL workshop, May 2004.
Relativistic Theory of Hydrodynamic Fluctuations Joe Kapusta University of Minnesota Nuclear Physics Seminar October 21, 2011 Collaborators: Berndt Muller.
R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.
QM2008 Jaipur, India Feb.4– Feb. 10, STAR's Measurement of Long-range Forward- backward Multiplicity Correlations as the Signature of “Dense Partonic.
Nuclear Size Fluctuations in Nuclear Collisions V.Uzhinsky, A.Galoyan The first RHIC result – Large elliptic flow of particles.
Scott PrattMichigan State University Femtoscopy: Theory ____________________________________________________ Scott Pratt, Michigan State University.
Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
What Can We Learn from Charm Production at RHIC? James Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder c _c_c.
PhD student at the International PhD Studies Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Department of Theory of Structure of Matter.
1 Probing dense matter at extremely high temperature Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China April 20, 2009.
JET Collaboration Meeting June 17-18, 2014, UC-Davis1/25 Flow and “Temperature” of the Parton Phase from AMPT Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics East Carolina.
QGP-Meet’06, VECC, Kolkata. 6 th Feb-2006 RAGHUNATH SAHOO, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, BHUBANESWAR TRANSVERSE ENERGY PRODUCTION AT RHIC OUTLINE: Introduction.
Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.
Alexander Milov ICHEP06: Global observables at RHIC July 27, Global Observables at RHIC Alexander Milov ICHEP Moscow July 27, 2006.
Zbigniew Majka M.Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland Review of early results from BRAHMS experiment.
3-D Hydro: present and future Tetsufumi Hirano Columbia University Second RHIC II Science BNL, Probes of EOS.
Intermediate pT results in STAR Camelia Mironov Kent State University 2004 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop on Strangeness and Exotica at RHIC.
Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
ICPAQGP 2010 Goa, Dec. 6-10, Percolation & Deconfinement Brijesh K Srivastava Department of Physics Purdue University USA.
Presentation transcript:

Energy and Number Density Created at RHIC What’s in the PHENIX White Paper, and a little bit more Paul Stankus, ORNL PHENIX Focus, Apr 11 06

2 Energy Density, Take 1 2R ~ 14 fm 2R/  ~.13 fm Rest Frame  = E/V = M/V 0  ~ 0.14 GeV/fm 3 =   Boosted Frame  = E/V =  M/(V 0 /  ) =  0  2  RHIC = 106  ~ 1570 GeV/fm 3 (!!) Just divide energy by volume, in some frame.

3 Energy Density, Take 2 Examine a box with total momentum zero.  = 0      ~ 3150 GeV/fm 3  = ? Very high, but very short-lived!

4 Energy Density, Take 3 Count up energy in produced particles/matter. Define produced as everything at velocities/rapidities intermediate between those of the original incoming nuclei. Two extremes: All particles Bjorken All fluid Landau

5 The Bjorken Picture: Pure Particles Key ideas: Thin radiator Classical trajectories Finite formation time

6 Particles in a thin box with random velocities Release them suddenly, and let them follow classical trajectories without interactions Strong position- momentum correlations!

7 J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 140 “Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region ” Key idea: Use the space- momentum correlation to translate between spatial density dN/dz and momentum density dN/dp Z Thin radiator The diagram is appropriate for any frame near mid-rapidity, not just the A+A CMS frame specifically.

8 x z p T = p X = p p Z = 0 y = 0 E=√m 2 +p T 2  m T x’ z’ p T = p X m T =√m 2 +p T 2 p Z = m T sinh(y) E = √m 2 +p 2 = m T cosh(y)  Z = p Z /E = sinh(y)/cosh(y) y =tanh -1 (  Z ) y   Z for  Z <<1 Useful relations for particles in different Lorentz frames

9 dZdZ Exercise: Count particles in the green box at some time t, add up their energies, and divide by the volume. Particles in the box iff 0<  Z <dZ/t (limit of infinitely thin source) R Valid for material at any rapidity and for any shape in dE T (t)/dy! A plateau in dE T (t)/dy is not required.

10 How low can t go? Two basic limits:  Bjorken For many years this  Bjorken formula was used with a nominal  Form =1.0 fm/c with no real justification, even when it manifestly violated the crossing time limit for validity! 2R/  = 5.3 fm/c for AGS Au+Au, 1.6 fm/c for SPS Pb+Pb.

11 Better formation time estimates Generic quantum mechanics: a particle can’t be considered formed in a frame faster than h bar /E Translation:  Form  1/m T ~ 1/ PHENIX Data: (dE T /d  )/(dN ch /d  ) ~ 0.85 GeV Assuming 2/3 of particles are charged, this implies  Form ~ 0.35 fm/c

12

13 Some assumptions we’ve used Transverse energy density dE T /dy only goes down with time. The number density of particles does not go down with time (entropy conservation). We can estimate, or at least bound, thermalization time from other evidence. An unanswered question: What are the initially produced particles? (Bj: “quanta”)

14 Identifying the intial “quanta” Multiplicities in Au+Au at RHIC were lower than initial pQCD predictions. Indicates need for “regularization”. Good candidate is CGC. CGC identifies intial quanta as high-ish p T gluons (~1 GeV), which is consistent with our particle picture.

15 The Landau Picture: Pure Fluid Key ideas: Complete, instant thermalization Fluid evolves according to ideal relativistic fluid dynamics (1+1) Very simple √s dependences for multiplicity and dN/dy (Gaussian)

16 Courtesy of P. Steinberg; see nucl-ex/ Multiplicities Widths

17 Basic Thermodynamics Sudden expansion, fluid fills empty space without loss of energy. dE = 0 PdV > 0 therefore dS > 0 Gradual expansion (equilibrium maintained), fluid loses energy through PdV work. dE = -PdV therefore dS = 0 Isentropic Adiabatic Hot Cool