Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Open beauty production in pp collisions at 7 TeV with CMS Kajari Mazumdar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India. on behalf of CMS Collaboration,
Advertisements

Monte Carlo simulation of the background for the Drell-Yan COMPASS Marialaura Colantoni Laboratory of Nuclear Problems Dubna Marialaura.
Invariant mass plot for different geometry schemes using HSD generator Hemen Kalita*,B Bhattacharjee*, P Bhaduri and S Chattopadhyay * Dept of Physics,
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Open Charm Everard CORDIER (Heidelberg) Grako meeting HD, April 28, 2006Everard Cordier.
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
J/  production in In-In collisions at SPS energies Philippe Pillot — IPN Lyon for the NA60 Collaboration work 2005 June 16–20   Outline: Reminder.
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
PHENIX Fig1. Phase diagram Subtracted background Subtracted background Red point : foreground Blue point : background Low-mass vector mesons (ω,ρ,φ) ~
HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © The RHIC Beam Energy Scan (BES) was proposed to search for the possible critical.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
 and  results from NA57 in Pb-Pb collisions at 160 A GeV/c at the CERN SPS Giuseppe E. Bruno Università di Bari and INFN, Bari, Italy On behalf of the.
Quest for omega mesons by their radiative decay mode in √s=200 GeV A+A collisions at RHIC-PHENIX ~Why is it “Quest”?~ Simulation Study Real Data Analysis.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Muon simulation : status & plan Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Di-muon measurements in CBM experiment at FAIR Arun Prakash 1 Partha Pratim Bhadhuri 2 Subhasis Chattopadhyay 2 Bhartendu Kumar Singh 1 (On behalf of CBM.
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
3/12/2003 ACAT03 - Giuseppe Lo Re Study of the K*(892) 0 signal in pp ALICE events Giuseppe Lo Re INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) ACAT03, 12/3/2003.
Feasibility of J/ψ studies by MPD detector Alla Maevskaya, Alexei Kurepin INR RAS Moscow NICA Roundtable Workshop 11 September 2009.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
ϒ measurements in p+p collisions at √s = 500 GeV with the STAR experiment Leszek Kosarzewski, for the STAR Collaboration Warsaw University of Technology,
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
January 15, 2004CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration Quark Matter 2004, Oakland, CA CMS HI groups: Athens, Auckland,
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - State University of New York at Stony Brook for the PHENIX.
1 - Onset of deconfinement NA60+ - Existence (or non existence) of QCD critical point - Chiral symmetry restoration  Measuring dimuons at different energies.
2008 Oct. Tsukuba 1 Misaki Ouchida Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration ω ω ω e+e+ eーeー γ γ π+π+ π0π0 γ πーπー π0π0 γ γ Low mass vector.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Jet-Hadron Azimuthal Correlation Measurements in pp Collisions at √s = 2.76 TeV and 7 TeV with ALICE 2012/08/11-18 Quark Matter 2012 Motivation PhysRevC (CMS)PhysRevC (PHENIX)
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
IOPB Dipak Mishra (IOPB), ICPAQGP5, Kolkata Feb 8 – 12 1 Measurement of  ++ Resonance Production in d+Au sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV Dipak Mishra.
Monday, April 27, Feasibility of J/ψ measurement in p+A 25GeV Partha Pratim Bhaduri (VECC) Anand Kumar Dubey (VECC) S. Chattopadhyay.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Fall DNP Meeting,  meson production in Au-Au and d-Au collision at \ /s NN = 200 GeV Dipali Pal Vanderbilt University (for the PHENIX collaboration)
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata

Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata2 Motivation The aim of the relativistic heavy-ion collisions is to study the onset of de-confinement and the properties of the de-confined media in the laboratory. Hence it is necessary to define unambiguous and experimentally viable probes for de-confinement. In this respect proton-nucleus (p+A) collisions must be a fundamental component of any heavy-ion physics program Defines the reference baseline relative to which we recognize HI specific phenomena p+A collisions provide a measure of the nuclear effects – helps in disentangling the “QGP” effect from the “non-QGP” effects. Here there is no formation time for the “secondary” medium, hence such collisions provide as essential tool to correctly account for the effect of the nuclear medium initially present.

Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata3 System The specifications of the system chosen are:  Target : Au, Cu, S, O, C  Projectile : p (1, 1)  Beam energy : 30 GeV  Event generator used : HSD – 2.5  Events : 5,000 (ISUBS = 50, NUM = 100)

Results with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata4 J/Psi pseudo-rapidity distribution pC pO pS pCu pAu pC pO pS pCu pAu CMS Frame Laboratory Frame

J/Psi transverse momentum spectra Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata5 pC pO pS pCu pAu

HSD vs. Pluto (pseudo-rapidity distribution ) Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata6 HSD Pluto

Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata7 CMS Frame Laboratory Frame Muons decayed from J/Psi Isotropic decay in J/Psi rest frame

8 CbmRoot Version: Trunk version Number of events : 4000 Much geometry : Standard Geometry 2 layers in 5 stations Distance between layers 10 cm. Gap between absorbers 20 cm 3 layers at the last trigger station Total 13 layers Total length of Much 350 cm Signal : J/  decayed muons from HSD for p+Au system for 30 GeV p beam Background : central UrQMD events for p+ Au at 30 GeV/n Much Hit producer w/o cluster & avalanche L1(STS) & Lit (Much) tracking with branching Simulation Absorber thickness (cm):

Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata3rd CBM-India Collaboration Meet9 Analysis Use the reconstructed data after the full tracking through the detector set-up. Reconstructed global tracks have to satisfy : 1.Fraction of true hits (truehits/(true hits+ wrong hits+fake hits) >= No. of STS Hits associated with the global track >=4 3.No. of Much Hits associated with the global track >=10 4.Chi 2 primary <=2

Detector Acceptance Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata10 Raw HSD Layer # 1 Layer # 3 Layer # 5 Layer # 7 Layer # 9 Layer # 11

Invariant mass spectra Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata11 Embedded Reconstruction efficiency : 23.8 % Pure HSD Reconstruction efficiency : 25 % Negligible background effect

Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Kolkata3rd CBM-India Collaboration Meet12 Thank You