Beyond Transit Justice: Lessons From Welfare Reform for Transportation Policies and the Poor Paul Ong, Director The Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4.1- Plot Points in a Coordinate Plane
Advertisements

Research Results Rents, Transport and Costs 8,502 Respondents – Online Methodology October 2007.
Environmental Attitudes and Travel Behavior of Youth Cindy Tse, Master of Applied Science Student, UBC Sustainable Mobility Summit 2011 October 31, 2011.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Social Equity in Distance Based Fares Steven Farber, University of Utah GIS in Transit October 16-17, 2013.
IMMIGRATION EXPLOSION AND MATURING SETTLEMENT DOWELL MYERS School of Policy, Planning, and Development University of Southern California.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
What Happens When We Expand Transportation Capacity? Don Pickrell Volpe Center, U.S. Dept. of Transportation UCLA Public Policy Symposium: Tackling Traffic.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Bill Davidson | PB | | Dawn McKinstry | PB | | Marie-Elsie Dowell | PB |
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
Structural Accessibility Layer SAL Structural Accessibility Layer WU_PT1 Cecília Silva Vitor Oliveira, Ana Amante, Sílvia Sousa WG2 meeting. Edinburgh.
The First International Transport Forum, May , Leipzig INDUCING TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE BEHAVIORIAL CHANGES IN KOREA: A Quantitative Analysis.
Final First Round Scenario Analysis Results David Ory Metropolitan Transportation Commission March 23, 2011 Presentation for Regional.
Anne Goodchild | Andrea Gagliano | Maura Rowell October 10, 2013 Examining Carrier Transportation Characteristics along the Supply Chain.
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Emerging Trends: The Demographics and Needs of Seniors Richard Weiner Nelson/Nygaard Grady Tarbutton Washoe.
Using ArcView to Create a Transit Need Index John Babcock GRG394 Final Presentation.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
1 Predicted-versus-Actual Studies: Why/how to do them and Lessons Learned Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
Introduction and welcome How does planning influence air quality? Roger Barrowcliffe 1.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Graphing With Coordinates
1 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Add-on Status Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
NAHB/Realtors What Buyers Want. Type of Home Preferred (Percent of Respondents) Source: “What Home Buyers Really Want”, National Association of Home Builders.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
GHG Reduction Strategies Survey Results October 15, 2013 Policy Advisory Committee.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Marko Matulin University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 21 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN Measure 4.4: Mobility management for.
M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N TIP Investment Analysis Presentation to the FTIP Workshop for the 2013 TIP.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
TPB SCENARIO STUDY Development of “CLRP Aspirations” Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
2/2/2016US DOT/Volpe Center1 Distributional Impacts of Congestion Pricing Douglass B. Lee, Jr. International Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, FL.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
Kids these days Since the mid-2000s, car use and licensure declined in the US and peer countries, particularly among the young. We explore the dramatic.
IMMIGRATION AND SETTLEMENT. Percentage of 2000 Population that is Foreign Born Dowell Myers USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development.
David Sutton, Chief Officer Integrated Transport Strategy Directorate.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
DOES WEATHER IMPACT ON COMMUTERS’ TRAVEL DEMAND - EMPIRICAL CASE STUDY OF BELGRADE Dragana Petrovic, Ivan Ivanovic, Vladimir Djoric Faculty of Traffic.
City Centres: Understanding the Travel Behaviour of Residents and the Implications for Sustainable Travel Firas H.A. Asad Ph.D. Student – CSE School -
The JARC Program: New Research on Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefits David Schneider Transportation Program Specialist Federal Transit Administration.
REVIEW. A. All real numbers B. All real numbers, x ≠ -5 and x ≠ -2 C. All real numbers, x ≠ 2 D. All real numbers, x ≠ 5 and x ≠ 2.
MODULE 2 - LESSON 3 The Americans with Disabilities Act and Civil Rights Dr. Jill Hough Public Transportation Class.
Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning 2016 Sustainability & Public Transportation Workshop Joe Iacobucci Director of Transit & Shared.
Two way tables CoachRailCarAirTotals Jan Feb Mar Total
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Transformations.
Graphing Rational Functions
Objective The student will be able to:
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Define “government” in your own words.
Graphing Ordered Pairs on a Coordinate Plane.
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Presentation transcript:

Beyond Transit Justice: Lessons From Welfare Reform for Transportation Policies and the Poor Paul Ong, Director The Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies Lake Arrowhead October 14, 2001

Transportation Classes Two Key Policy Issues I. Allocation to Transportation Classes II. Shifting the Boundaries

Case Study The impact of welfare reform in Los Angeles. Non-Welfare PoorWelfare Poor 1) Transportation Behavior 2) Transportation Resources 3) Transportation Preference Welfare Reform

Table 1 - Comparison of Demographic Characteristics, CTNA Survey and 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS)

Table 2 - Comparison of Trip Purpose and Mode, CTNA Survey and 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS)

Table 3 - Trips Characteristics by Welfare- to-work Stages

Table 4 - Travel Characteristics of CTNA Survey Respondents

Table 5 - Modal Choice of CTNA Survey Respondents

Table 6 - Transit Problems by Geographic Area, CTNA Respondents Who Used Public Transit Within the Last 6 Months

Table 7 - Auto Related Program Preferences by Percent First Choice (Row Percentages Add to 100 Percent, Except When Due to Rounding)

I. Car Insurance Car Ownership Employment II. Level of Transit Employment Some Empirical Results Ong & Houston, 2001 Ong, 2001

Equity, Fairness & Redistribution Vertical Equity Transit II & IV Auto I & III Horizontal Equity Poor III & IV Rich I & II III IIIIV Targeted versus universal policies