Comments on: Labor market effects of worksharing arrangements in Europe Jan van Ours Tilburg University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1: The Labor Market Labor Economics: Studies the determination of wages and employment and the resulting income distribution. Most relevant to.
Advertisements

Contesting Time: International Comparisons of Employee Control of Working Time Peter Berg Michigan State University The Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable.
Are Europeans Lazy ? Or Americans Crazy? Final Remarks Guido Tabellini.
Public Economics: Welfare states and inequalities University of Castellanza Session #1(b) Employment and Euroscelerosis 1 March 2012.
Unit 4 Microeconomics: Business and Labor Chapters 9.1 Economics Mr. Biggs.
Chapter 6 Women at Work Outline of Chapter: 1) Review employment trends. 2) Discuss various reasons for observed trends. 3) Note current employment differences.
FENICs Female Employment and Family Formation in National Institutional Contexts Welfare State Regimes and Female Labour Supply Research Objectives: Are.
Economic Fluctuations, Unemployment, and Inflation Chapter 8.
Unemployment & Business Cycles Chapter 8. The Three Faces of GDP == Market value of final goods and services ProductionExpenditureIncomeInvestment Consumption.
Public Economics: Welfare states and inequalities University of Castellanza Session #1(b) Employment and Euroscelerosis 8 November 2010.
1 The Long-Run Evolution of the Distribution of Income A B Atkinson, Nuffield College, Oxford DULBEA Conference.
To work or not to work? Do people prefer leisure to work? Different preferences around the world. Dave Van Calster & Jonas Van Riel.
The transformations of work in Europe: flexibility and social regulation Enzo Mingione University of Milan-Bicocca Rethymno, Crete 5-7– June 2008.
MACROECONOMICS AND THE GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The Wealth of Nations The Supply Side.
Part-Time Work in the Netherlands: Success or Failure? Gido ten Dolle Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment CICERO FOUNDATION Paris 12 October.
The Impact of Hours Flexibility on Career Employment, Bridge Jobs, and the Timing of Retirement Kevin E. Cahill Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston.
German Labour Market Successful Labour Relations Models in Europe: the German, Austrian and Danish models Madrid, 08 th Februar 2010 Dr. Ulrich Walwei.
An alternative view ”European unemployment: the evolution of facts and ideas” Olivier Blanchard Economic Policy 21 (45):5-59.
Payroll taxes Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
Part 2 – US Social Security System from an International Perspective How similar or different is the Social Security system to that of other developed.
TRUE or FALSE 1. The labor force participation rate of women has risen from 37.6% in 1960 to 60.6% in The hourly earnings of full-time working.
Public Economics: Welfare states and inequalities University of Castellanza Session #1(b) Employment and Euroscelerosis 6 May 2013.
Family Leave. Realities of the U.S. Family (charts on pg144 and 145) 1) 18% of all families are stay at home mom and working dad. 2) 11% headed by females.
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza Session #2(b) Blocked Societies? The crisis of continental corporatism and the success of.
Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Definitions, facts, and trends Unit 3: The demand for labor Unit 4: The supply of labor Unit 5: The determination of wages.
Indicators and measurement for performance Gene Chang.
Marginal Productivity Theory of Income Distribution
Economics of Gender Chapter 8 Assist.Prof.Dr.Meltem INCE YENILMEZ.
Family policies Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
MACROECONOMICS Chapter 6 Unemployment. 2 Steady State The labor market is in equilibrium. The labor market is in equilibrium. No unemployment = long-run.
Facing the challenge of increasing women’s participation on the European labour market NEUJOBS WORKING PAPER NO. D16.2C Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak Agnieszka.
Public Economics: Welfare states and inequalities University of Castellanza Session #2a Employment and Euroscelerosis 21 April 2015.
ICMEC seminar, 22 February 2010 The provision of child care services; the Barcelona targets revisited Janneke Plantenga
Economic Systems Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples 8. Great Britain.
Labor Market Trends Chapter 9, section 1.
European Population Forum, Geneva January 2004 Childbearing and parenting in low fertility countries: enabling choices Anne H. Gauthier (Canada) With contributions.
The Lisbon Process and European Women at Work Political Economy and Social Policy of Western Europe Indiana University, Bloomington November 11, 2005 Tito.
May 13, 2011 The gender pay gap in the European union: Quantitative and qualitative indicators DULBEA Department of Applied Economics of the Université.
Statistics to Support Policies on Work and Life Balance Kyunghee Kim Employment Statistics Division Statistics Korea.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 31 Unemployment Fluctuations and the NAIRU.
GENDER INDICATORS International Conference on Reconciliation: “Tips to top reconciliation: work it out, home it in: por una conciliación compartida”
Study on social policy effects resulting from the scope of application of the European framework agreement on the prevention of health risks in the hairdressing.
Nef (the new economics foundation) 21 hours for the 21 st century Anna Coote Head of social policy new economics foundation October 2010.
Labour Supply and Inequality Trends in the U.S.A. & elsewhere Lars Osberg Department of Economics Dalhousie University
Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation Gerhard Bosch Working time patterns and work-sharing in Europe Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament Brussels,
Labor Market Effects of Work-Sharing Arrangements in Europe Francis Kramarz Pierre Cahuc Bruno Crépon Thorsten Schank Oskar Nordström Skans Gijsbert Van.
To Accompany “Economics: Private and Public Choice 10th ed.” James Gwartney, Richard Stroup, Russell Sobel, & David Macpherson Slides authored and animated.
Module 9 Labour Market Trends & Needs. Learning outcomes  9.1 Understand the concept of the labour market  9.2 Understand labour market information.
Mikuláš Luptáčik Martin Lábaj Department of Economic Policy University of Economics in Bratislava June 8, 2012 Bratislava Economic Meeting 2012.
Tito Boeri Bocconi University and Fondazione Debenedetti Portovenere 27 May 2006 Are Europeans Lazy? or Americans Crazy?
Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective Lars Osberg -Dalhousie University -I.S.E.R. U of Essex.
Bellwork  How concerned are you about being able to find a job when you enter the labor force? Ten years from now,  Do you think it will be easy or hard.
Unemployment in the U.S.. The U.S. Unemployment Rate since 1960 Sources : and, Robert J. Gordon, Macroeconomics (Boston: Addison-Wesley,
Parenting, Employment and Gender Roles in Russia and Sweden Akvile Motiejunaite, Zhanna Kravchenko Baltic and East European Graduate School South Stockholm.
Europe—From Catch Up to Jobless Growth. European Economy in 1950.
Public Economics: Welfare states and inequalities University of Castellanza Session #1(b) Employment and Euroscelerosis 26 March 2014.
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza Session #2(b) Blocked Societies? The crisis of continental corporatism and the success of.
1 Every Hand is Needed: Making the Benefit System Employment Friendly Mark Pearson, Head of Social Policy, OECD.
Can the state set decent standards for gender equality? Jill Rubery European Work and Employment Research Centre Manchester Business School University.
Regulation of working hours Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
The organizational level as a key factor shaping individual capabilities for WLB Organizational (firm/employer level)  Working-time policy, including.
STUC – SG Biannual – June 2013 Employment in Scotland is increasing and unemployment is decreasing. Scotland is outperforming the UK on all headline labour.
Liberalisation. Dualization or integration? Evidence from a study of Working Poverty Neil Fraser, Rodolfo Gutierrez, Ramon Pena-Casas.
Session #2(b) Labour market participation 8 March 2017
Can Family-Support Policies Help Explain Differences in Working Hours across Countries? Urban Sila (January 2009)
Labor Markets and Unemployment Rates: — A Cross Country Analysis
Ohio Wesleyan University
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza
SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SOCIAL SERVICES SECTOR IN EUROPE
Family policies Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
Presentation transcript:

Comments on: Labor market effects of worksharing arrangements in Europe Jan van Ours Tilburg University

Long history  May 1, 1886 – Chicago  Eight hour song  We want to feel the sunshine (…)  8 hrs for work, 8 hours for rest, 8 hours for what we will  Chapman (EJ 1909) – Hours of labor  Why work 10 hours per day if 9 is optimal?

Annual changes in hours actually worked per employee France W-Germany Netherlands Sweden Italy-7.4 U.K

Decomposition – 2002 Hours/ week France36.2 Germany36.5 Netherlands31.8 Sweden38.1 Italy37.4 U.K.38.2

Decomposition – 2002 Hours/ week Weeks/ year France Germany Netherlands Sweden Italy U.K

Decomposition – 2002 Hours/ week Weeks/ year Hours/ year France Germany Netherlands Sweden Italy U.K

Decomposition – 2002 Hours/ week Weeks/ year Hours/ year Employment rate France Germany Netherlands Sweden Italy U.K

Decomposition – 2002 Hours/ week Weeks/ year Hours/ year Employment rate Hours/ person France Germany Netherlands Sweden Italy U.K

Work-sharing arrangements  Standard hours per week   France, Germany  Weeks per year:  Sweden  Part-time work , employment   Netherlands  Extensive margin:  Italy

Common elements  Downward trend in average working week  More flexibility  Germany – increase working time  Netherlands – part-time work  Worksharing – no positive employment effects  Employment rates of men slowly falling  Employment rates of women strong increase

Main differences  Forced – voluntary  France  the rest  France: strong government influence – massive subsidies

Main differences  Forced – voluntary  France  the rest  France: strong government influence  Opposition against part-time work  Netherlands  the rest  NL: at first opposition of unions

Main differences  Forced – voluntary  France  the rest  France: strong government influence  Opposition against part-time work  Netherlands  the rest  NL: at first opposition of unions  Availability of childcare facilities  Netherlands  the rest  NL: still few formal childcare facilities

Dichotomy  France and Germany  Position of male full-time workers  Events similar  Sweden and the Netherlands  Combining work and family life  Different routes

Comments Nice and interesting paper/chapter overview of many studies & empirical observations French bias almost 60% of the authors theoretical model France (& Germany) French lazy & crazy: decreasing productivity, rising wages, government intervention

Main comments - theory  Interesting reduction of standard working hours  Upper limit working hours “over the hill”  Small decreases: employment  Big decreases: employment

Main comments - theory  Interesting reduction of standard working hours  Upper limit working hours “over the hill”  Small decreases: employment  Big decreases: employment  Explanation  Non-competitive world: Monopsony/bargaining  State regulation may be required

Main comments - theory  Interesting reduction of standard working hours  Upper limit working hours “over the hill”  Small decreases: employment  Big decreases: employment  Explanation  Non-competitive world: Monopsony/bargaining  State regulation may be required  Other forms of working time reduction: part-time work & leave policies  Theory less clear

Main comments - theory  Interesting reduction of standard working hours  Upper limit working hours “over the hill”  Small decreases: employment  Big decreases: employment  Explanation  Non-competitive world: Monopsony/bargaining  State regulation may be required  Other forms of working time reduction: part-time work & leave policies  Theory less clear  Interaction between extension margin of labor supply (participate or not) and the intensive margin of labor supply

Main comments - II  Growth of part-time work in NL – “Butterfly effect”?  “In no country work-sharing per se has created employment”  Not sure: part-time work encouraged increase of labor supply  Competitive world: employment is determined by labor market participation

Main comments - III  Sweden – no working hours reduction but leave facilities  Almost 1 week in 5 is lost due to “absence for other reasons than holidays”  For competitive reasons?  More flexibility?  Conclusion: “work sharing through career interruptions is not an attractive policy option”  Question: “why is it maintained?”

Conclusions – worksharing  Normative point of view  nothing against; preferences  Economic efficiency  does not reduce unemployment  difficult to persuade non-economists  Actual hours follow standard hours  norms follow actual changes

Are Europeans lazy or Americans crazy?  Suggests that one of the two is true

Are Europeans lazy or Americans crazy?  Suggests that one of the two is true  Maybe both are true

Are Europeans lazy or Americans crazy?  Suggests that one of the two is true  Maybe both are true  “Are some Europeans more crazy than others?”