Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL.
Advertisements

Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL.
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Muon Acceleration Plan David Kelliher ASTeC/STFC/RAL UKNF WP1, October 9 th, 2008.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
UK FFAG Plans Introduction to FFAGs Scaling vs non-scaling Non-scaling FFAGs Non-scaling POP Why the interest? UK plans.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Dejan Trbojevic Dejan Trbojevic An Update on the FFAG Minimum Emittance Lattice with Distributed RF D. Trbojevic, J. S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, E. D. Courant,
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
NUFACT’05 24-June-2005 H. Schönauer CERN The typical approaches to Muon acceleration at higher energies: Recirculating linacs Scaling FFAG’s : constant.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
“2:1” Scaled eRHIC FFAG Design Featuring ≤30T/m quadrupoles August 18, 2014Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
An Alternative to Grahame Rees’ Isochronous FFAG Lattice for the Acceleration of Muons from 10 – 20 GeV Horst Schönauer, CERN Proposed FFAG-type Muon Accelerators:
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Suzie Sheehy DPhil Candidate, John Adams Institute 3/9/08 PAMELA lattice studies Dynamics of the Machida lattice.
, UKNF Meetin, Imperial College J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Dejan Trbojevic, September 21, 2009International Workshop on FFAG09 - Fermilab 1 Dejan Trbojevic Crossing Resonances In a Non-scaling FFAG.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Nonscaling FFAG design and EMMA experiment
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
for the Neutrino Factory
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Presentation transcript:

Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK

Basis for an Isochronous FFAG Ring Design By introducing more non- linearity than in a scaled FFAG,  h may be positive, for an isochronous, cyclotron design Under study: a 16-turn, 8-20 GeV, isochronous muon ring Orbit lengths must be accurate as MHz rf is assumed LinearityScaling Chromaticity  1LinearNon-scalingNegative 2Non-linearScalingZero 3Non-linearNon-scalingPositive

Muon Reference Orbits Reference orbits: 8.0, 8.75, …….19.25, 20.0 GeV. Intermediate reference orbits: 8.375, 9.125, GeV. A fully isochronous FFAG has  t =  over energy range. RF phase slips occur if  t =  only at reference energies. Slips are reduced if  t =  also at intermediate energies. Slips are also reduced by small  t changes relative to . Accurate estimates of orbit path lengths are required to enable the checking of the isochronous orbit conditions.

Basis for an Isochronous Lattice Design The range of  t values needed is to  To obtain such a range, use of reverse bending is required.  Resonant excitation of the lattice dispersion is not required. Reverse b bend, bFDFbO triplets are suitable for 20 GeV,  but have a wide orbit spacing at ~ 8 GeV to obtain low  t.  So, bd is used in place of b: O-bd-o-F-o-BD-o-F-o-bd-O. At 20 GeV, the gradient K(bd) is made <<K(BD) & K(F),  so reverse bend, high  =  t conditions are hardly affected.  Gradients are adjusted so that, at 8 GeV, K(bd)>>K(BD). At 8 GeV, the focusing changes to that of a dFBFd triplet, with reverse bends in d units and in the non-linear F quads.  Betatron tunes may be raised for a reduced orbit spacing.

O bd(-) o F( ± ) o BD(+) o F(±) o bd(-) O Bending angle over the cell = (360/123) o = o sector entrysector exit m FFAG Lattice Cell for the 10.2 m, 20 GeV Muon Orbit

Number of cells in lattice (123) 3  41 Length of a long straight section4.800 m Short straight lengths at 20 GeV0.500 m Orbit length of a cell at 20 GeV m Orbit circumference at 20 GeV m Orbit circumference at 8 GeV m bd orbit length at 8 & 20 GeV , m F quad lengths at 8 & 20 GeV , m BD orbit length at 8 & 20 GeV , m Field of combined function bd to T F orbit fields for 8 and 20 GeV to T Field of combined function BD to T

Estimation of Non-linear Fields and Reference Orbits A lattice code is modified for an FFAG feasibility study and to find estimates for non-linear fields in the magnets. Full analysis needs tracking in derived or Opera 3D fields. Low amplitude, Twiss parameters are set for a 20 GeV cell. Successive, adjacent, lower energy reference orbits are then found, assuming linear, local changes of the field gradients. Estimates are repeated, varying the field gradients for the required  t, until self-consistent values are obtained for:  the magnet bending radii throughout the cell  the bending angle for each magnet of the cell  the beam entry & exit angle for each magnet  the orbit lengths for all the cell elements, and  the local values of the magnet field gradients

Homing Routines in the Modified Lattice Program New bend radii are found from an average field gradient between adjacent orbits & a derived dispersion value, D. D is a weighted, averaged, normalized dispersion of the new orbit relative to the old, and the latter to the former. A first, homing routine obtains specified betatron tunes. A second routine is for exact closure of reference orbits. A final, limited-range, orbit-closure routine homes for  t. Accurate estimates are made for reference orbit lengths. Small corrections give exact, isochronous, closed orbits. In practice, correction-winding currents would be used. Careful magnet simulation & measuring is needed for ~ 1 in10 5 orbit accuracy, to limit slippages in rf phase.

Beta and Dispersion Functions of the 8 GeV Muon Orbit

 h /2  tt  v /2   h /2  tt  v /2  Cell Tunes Muon Kinetic Energy (GeV) Cell Betatron Tunes and  t Values versus Muon Energy

Separation of Reference Orbits BD has the highest field (4.8 T), but lowest orbit spacings. Further optimising may be possible but current values are: Energy Range Magnet bd Quadrupole F Magnet BD GeV272.3 mm253.8 mm177.5 mm GeV230.0 mm210.1 mm143.7 mm GeV191.6 mm171.5 mm114.6 mm

Injection, Extraction and Acceleration Systems. Injection septum and kicker in adjacent cells, with  h = 71 o. Extraction kicker & septum two cells apart with 2  h = 276 o. Low orbit separations allow extraction from 17 to 20 GeV. 41, MHz, 3-cell cavities of energy gain 8.2 MeV/m. 13, MHz, 1-cell flat-top cavities,  E = 26.0 MeV/m.

Practical Considerations The number of lattice cells is chosen as 3  41 to allow the range of  t needed, to keep the maximum  h value < 140 o and to allow a symmetrical arrangement for 41 rf cavities. A shorter, higher field bd unit is not used as its length of 0.45 m is only ~ 50% greater than its good field aperture. Sector entry is used for fixed, long straight, orbit lengths. The maximum field chosen for any reference orbit occurs in the BD magnets and is 4.8 T, at the energy of 8.0 GeV.  This is to limit the unit’s stored energy and for reliability. The maximum reference orbit field in a non-linear F quad is 2.66 T at the energy of 20 GeV. A shorter, higher field unit is not used as the max gradient is high, at T/m.

Other Practical Issues Cryostat size affects the injection and extraction designs. The ends of the 6.2 m cryostats, used for the cell magnets, lower by ~ 0.8 m the free space in a long straight section. The choice of 4.8 m long straight sections allows the use of 3-cell rf cavities in 3.0 m long cryostats, with ~ 1.0 m left for gate valves, monitors and vacuum pumping units. The reason for using the 3-cell cavities is to reduce the number of main, rf systems and their associated costs. Flat-top, cavity design is eased by a use of single cells. Muon acceleration is at field maxima with rf power to control the resistive beam loading less than in a phase slip ring, which has resistive & reactive beam loading.

FFAG Lattice Cell for the 0.65 m, 20 MeV Electron Orbit Same cell structure is used as in the GeV Muon ring O bd(-) o F( ± ) o BD(+) o F(±) o bd(-) O Bending angle over the cell = (360/45) o = 8 o sector entrysector exit m Isochronous 11 to 20 MeV FFAG Electron Model

Parameters for the 15 Turn, 11 to 20 MeV Electron Model Number of cells in lattice (45) 3  15 Length of a long straight section0.150 m Short straight lengths at 20 MeV0.040 m Orbit length of a cell at 20 MeV0.650 m Orbit circumference at 20 MeV m Orbit circumference at 11 MeV m bd orbit length at 11 & 20 MeV , m F quad lengths at 11 & 20 MeV , m BD orbit length at 11 & 20 MeV , m Field of combined function bd to T F orbit fields for 11 and 20 MeV to T Field of combined function BD to T

Acceleration System for the Isochronous Electron Model Isochronous e-ring has:  a larger circumference (29.25 m),  straights in adjacent cells for both injection & extraction,  five magnets in each lattice cell in place of three,  fifteen ring revolutions in place of five,  fifteen 40 kV cavities in place of forty-five 78.5 kV units,  and similar magnet apertures (14.1 (v) and 20.1 mm (h)). Number of cavities (1 every 3 rd cell)15 Number of klystrons1 Harmonic number (842 for muon ring)293 Choice of radio frequency3002 MHz Electron energy gain per turn600 keV Peak accelerating voltage per cavity40 keV Linear, Non-Scaling FFAG Electron Model Comparison

Beta and Dispersion Functions of the 20 MeV Electron Orbit