By Krishnan Sudharsan Data, Accountability, and Technical Assessments OCTE November 7, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perkins IV Update Legislation and Funding Legislation and Funding Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Accountability.
Advertisements

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Dan Smith Marlys Bucher “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
National Association of Career and Technical Information Pre-Conference Workshop—Perkins 101 Accountability Jim Schoelkopf Perkins.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
Where does data come from and how it is used
DQI State Plan Accountability Requirements, Guidelines, Timeline, Student Definitions and Indicators John Haigh, U.S. Department of Education Savannah,
PERKINS NEW COORDINATOR TRAINING SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 PERKINS 101.
Standardization: Why Now? A Post-Secondary Perspective From Minnesota Pradeep Kotamraju Ph.D. System Director, Perkins Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
11/15/07 1 Career-Technical Education Accountability Ohio Department of Education Sharon Enright Dave Ozvat Erica Cheyney Ohio School Improvement Institute.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
State Directors of Career and Technical Education Quarterly Webinar September 17, :00 – 3:00 PM Eastern.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
11 Don’t Be Afraid of the New Tech Prep Accountability! ! NACTEI CONFERENCE Boise, Idaho May 21 & 22, 2008.
Washington Educational Research Association – WERA March 28, 2008.
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY NACTEI Annual Conference May 2012.
The Carl D. Perkins Act of 2006 An Overview for Career and Technical Education WI Dept. of Public Instruction Academic Excellence Division Deborah Mahaffey,
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 27, 2012.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Perkins Data Collection Help Link - MDE Marlys J. Bucher, Ph.D. Coordinator Secondary Perkins CTE Assessment and Evaluation Specialist
YearELAMath Technical Skills School Completion Graduation Secondary Placement Nontraditional Participation Nontraditional Completion 2013Yes NoYes 2012No.
Reauthorizing Perkins: Rigorous Academics and Career Pathways NTPN Conference October 1, 2005.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education Division of Academic and Technical Education Progress of the State Perkins Accountability.
CTE Data and EDFacts September 22 & 23, Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) For , due December 31, 2010 – Either CAR or EDFacts, not both –
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data September 8, 2015 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Perkins IV: The Special Populations Perspective Mimi Lufkin, CEO CCCAOE Conference October 22, 2008 San Diego, CA National Alliance for Partnerships in.
111 TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV National Association of Tech Prep Leadership September 30, 2009 NCPN October 2, 2009.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 9, 2015.
Dale Gruis Ag Ed Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
Career and Technical Education Assessments New CTE Teacher Workshop September 22-23, 2015 Valerie Felder Office of Career and Technical Education Grants,
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New CTE Teacher Workshop September 22 nd and 23 rd, 2015 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department.
Georgia Department of Education Bradley Bryant, State Superintendent All Rights Reserved 1.
Marlys Bucher Dan Smith. Secondary Consortium Data Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1.
Perkins IV FY 2010 Plan ITV Meetings February 23, 2009 March 6, 2009 March 19, 2009 Daniel Smith, Education Supervisor Adult & Career Education
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Michelle Kamenov Kari-Ann Ediger “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
Using Perkins Data To Improve CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NCLA Conference October 1,
Perkins 101 Dale Gruis, Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
OPERATIONALIZING PERKINS IV ACCOUNTABILITY DRAFT.
NACTEI 2011 BY FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D..  The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) supports career and technical.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
A Brief Look at Career and Technical Education NCCCS - Perkins Update
Student Data Management
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
CTE One-Day Conf CTE Data
Perkins Accountability ~ Secondary 2016 CTE Fall Webinar Series
Geoff Grove & Melissa Maynard July 2017
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Secondary Perkins Data
REPORTS CTE 103.
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Presentation transcript:

By Krishnan Sudharsan Data, Accountability, and Technical Assessments OCTE November 7, 2013

Acknowledgments OCTE Staff PTD Technology Ferris State University 2

Overview Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) Secondary Core Performance Indicators (CPIs) and Regional GIS maps Data Analysis Example (State CPIs) 3

Consolidated Annual Report Reports to OVAE on Michigan’s CPIs 8 secondary CPIs Performance of 26 regions Improvement plans (when 90% target not met) 4

Secondary CPIs 1S1: Academic Attainment in Reading 1S2: Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1: Technical Skill Attainment 3S1: School Completion 4S1: Student Graduation Rate 5S1: Placement 6S1: Nontraditional Participation 6S2: Nontraditional Completion 5

Secondary CPIs 2013 Targets Core Indicator Target Level Target Level Target Level Target Level 1S1: English 47.50% 48.00% (  ) 57.00% (  )59.00% (  ) 1S2: Math 45.05% 46.00% (  ) 30.00% (  )36.00%(  ) 2S1: TSA 35.00% 35.05% (  )48.00% (  )49.00%(  ) 3S1: Sch. Comp 90.00% 83.00% (  )93.00% (  )93.50%(  ) 4S1: Sch. Grad 80.00%80.00% (=) 85.00% (  )88.00%(  ) 5S1: Placement 94.79% 95.04% (  )93.00% (  ) 93.00% (=) 6S1: Nontrad Part % 25.00% (  )23.00% (  )23.50%(  ) 6S2: Nontrad Comp % 21.20% (  )22.00% (  )23.00%(  ) 6

Secondary CPIs: CAR Core Indicator Target Level Actual Target Level Actual 1S1: English 57.00% (  )51.69%(  )59.00% (  )55.20%(  ) 1S2: Math 30.00% (  )23.05%(  )36.00%(  )25.12%(  ) 2S1: TSA 48.00% (  )55.27%(  )49.00%(  )59.15%(  ) 3S1: Sch. Comp 93.00% (  )94.67%(  )93.50%(  )95.26%(  ) 4S1: Graduation 85.00% (  )94.85%(  )88.00%(  )94.86%(  ) 5S1: Placement 93.00% (  )95.33%(  ) 93.00% (=) 94.87%(  ) 6S1: NonTrad P 23.00% (  )24.44%(  )23.50%(  )25.55%(  ) 6S2: NonTrad C 22.00% (  )28.90%(  )23.00%(  )31.07%(  ) 7

Secondary CPIs: CAR 2 out of 25 regions met all 8 indicator targets (1 met all 8 in & 10 met all 8 in ), 24 regions failed to make 90% of at least one indicator The number of regions not meeting 90% of the Adjusted Level of Performance (ALP) improved for indicator 1S1 (from 11 to 9 regions) and for 6S2 (from 4 to 3 regions) compared to last year 8

Secondary CPIs: CAR The number of regions not meeting 90% of the ALP increased for indicators 1S2 (from 21 to 23 regions) compared to last year All 25 regions exceeded the 90% ALP for Indicators 3S1, 4S1, and 5S1 in , , and The number of regions not meeting 90% of the ALP remained the same for 2S1 (constant at 2) and 6S1 (constant at 6) 9

Thought Question/Exercise Do you think a relationship exists between 1S1/1S2 and 2S1? Would you expect this relationship to have a high r 2 value? Why or why not? How would you describe the nature of this relationship (positive, negative)? 10

1S1: Academic Attainment Reading Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school reading assessment Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in reading and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education 11

1S1: Statewide Trends 12

13

1S2: Academic Attainment in Mathematics Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school mathematics assessment Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in mathematics and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education 14

1S2: Statewide Trends 15

16

2S1: Technical Skill Attainment Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who passed technical skill assessments that are aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate during the reporting year Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took assessments during the reporting year 17

2S1: Statewide Trends 18

19

3S1: School Completion Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who earned a regular secondary school diploma, earned a General Education Development (GED) credential, or earned a state-recognized equivalent, during the reporting year Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included in the state’s computation of its five-year graduation rate 20

3S1: Statewide Trends 21

22

4S1: Student Graduation Rates Numerator = Number of CTE program concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included as graduated in the state’s computation of its graduation rate Denominator = Number of CTE program concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included in the state’s computation of its graduation rate as defined in the state’s Consolidated Accountability Plan pursuant to Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi) of the ESEA 23

4S1: Statewide Trends 24

25

5S1: Placement Numerator = Number of 11 th and 12 th grade CTE completers who left secondary education and were placed in postsecondary education or advanced training, in the military service, or employment in the third quarter following the program year in which they left secondary education Denominator = The number of 11 th and 12 th grade grade CTE completers who left secondary education during the reporting year 26

5S1: Statewide Trends 27

28

6S1: Nontraditional Participation Numerator = Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year Denominator = Number of CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year 29

6S1: Statewide Trends 30

31

6S2: Nontraditional Completion Numerator = Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups, who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields prior to leaving secondary education and who left school in the reporting year Denominator = Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups, who had participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields and who left school in the reporting year 32

6S2: Statewide Trends 33

34

Why is Data Important? 15 days (Data) “From October 1 st to 16 th, 2013 the US Federal government was shutdown.” (Information) “Moody’s Analytics estimated cost for 3-4 week shutdown was $55 billion and Goldman Sachs estimated a decline of 0.9% in GDP.” (Knowledge) “The government’s failure to raise the debt ceiling could have halted a $5 trillion lending mechanism and thrown the entire world into a recession” is (Wisdom) 35

Data Dashboards “A dashboard is a visual display of the most important information needed to achieve one or more objectives; consolidated and arranged on a single screen so the information can be monitored at a glance.” 36

Creating CPI Dashboards Tableau software (download Tableau Reader 8.0 to use CPI dashboards) Overall Dashboard Gender Dashboard Race Dashboard Special Populations Dashboard Gender/Race Dashboards 37

Questions CTE Administrators What CPI information would help you in planning and making improvements? Would the information generated provide actionable steps? What can OCTE do better to help you? 38

Thank You Krishnan Sudharsan (517)