Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, 2013 19/23/13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of Particle Production between MARS and FLUKA (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Aug. 8, /8/13.
Advertisements

SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
Adam Para, Fermilab, March 23, Methodology  Use Hadr01 example  In G4SteppingVerbose::StepInfo() select all the steps with inelastic processes.
NuFact July 2009 Jim Strait, Nikolai Mokhov, Sergei Striganov Fermilab Comparisons between MARS and HARP data* * Title as given by organizers.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
6/30/20091 Meson Production with Different Directional Incident Proton Beam X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL.
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
1 Muon Yield Comparisons for Different ICOOL Versions and Lattices X. Ding Front End, Nov. 23, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015.
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Target Simulations for Hadron, Electron and Heavy-Ion Beams 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10-14, 2005 Fermilab High-Power Targetry.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Production by IDS120h with Focused Gaussian Beam and Fixed Emittance (Update) X. Ding, UCLA AAG June 27, /27/12.
Multiplicity, average transverse momentum and azimuthal anisotropy in U+U at √s NN = 200 GeV using AMPT model Md. Rihan Haque 1 Zi-Wei Lin 2 Bedangadas.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Gilles Gerbier for EDELWEISS collab.
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13

IDS120h and IDS120j Geometry 9/23/132

Fieldmap 9/23/133

Target Setting Simulation code: MARS15(2012) code (denoted as MARS15 below), FLUKA; Geometry setting: Nicholas (MARS15), John (FLUKA) Fieldmap: (IDS120j, 15T  1.5T); Target parameters at 3 GeV (from IDS120h): Carbon: target radius/0.346 cm, beam radius/ cm, both beam and target angle/42 mrad, launch at z 100 cm, target length/72 cm along z axis; Mercury: target radius/0.23 cm, beam radius/0.069 cm, beam angle/137 mrad, jet angle/155 mrad; launch at z = -75 cm; Galium: target radius/0.34 cm, beam radius/0.102 cm, beam angle/114 mrad, jet angle/125 mrad; launch at z = -75 cm; 9/23/134

Target Setting (cont’d) Target parameters for Mercury at 8 GeV (from IDS120h): Mercury: target radius/0.4 cm, beam radius/0.12 cm, beam angle/117 mrad, jet angle/137.6 mrad; launch at z = -75 cm. Particle production collection: (0 m and 50 m downstream, 40 MeV < KE < 180 MeV). Energy spectra at z = 0 m and z = 50 m. 9/23/135

MARS15(2012) Running Mode Mode 1: MARS15 default mode (without either LAQGSM or the MCNP tables) Mode 2: MARS15 with MCNPDATA (with the MCNP tables but without LAQGSM mode) An optional “MCNP mode” in MARS with it using the MCNPDATA x-section libraries for neutron interactions below 14 MeV. 9/23/136

MARS15(2012) Running Mode Mode 3: MARS15 in LAQGSM mode (with the LAQGSM mode but without the MCNP tables) A hybrid that includes the native inclusive model, Quark-Gluon String Model implementation in MARS15 and CEM (Cascade-Exciton Model). Mode 4: MARS15 in LAQGSM mode with MCNPDATA (with both the LAQGSM mode and the MCNP tables) 9/23/137

MARS15 in LAQGSM Mode ICEM C1CEM C2CEM EMODEL IQGSM NEVTYPE Variables which control hadron event generator and use of cascade-exciton and quark-gluon string models, and evaporation scheme. IQGSM An integer that globally switches between the inclusive and exclusive event generators at nuclear inelastic interactions. For IQGSM=0, the default inclusive model is used at E >5 GeV and the CEM model at lower energies. 9/23/138

MARS15 in LAQGSM Mode (Cont’d) For IQGSM=1, exclusive modeling with the LAQGSM is done at E > ECEMLQ = 1 + A/65, or/and A < 3, and at all energies for, K ±, d, t, 3 He, 4 He,, hyperons and heavy ions; the CEM model is used otherwise. (ICEM 4=1) For IQGSM=2, exclusive modeling with the LAQGSMcode is always done for everything at all energies. IQGSM=1 and IQGSM=2 provide a theoretically consistent nuclear interaction modeling, but can be time-consuming. Default IQGSM=0 is more appropriate for shielding studies. (ICEM 4=2) 9/23/139

Incident Particle Energy and the threshold in matter for subsequent generated particles in MARS15 ENRG E0 EM EPSTAM EMCHR EMNEU EMIGA EMIEL E0: The incident particle kinetic energy; EM: The hadron threshold energy (Default: GeV); EPSTAM: The star production threshold kinetic energy (Default: 0.03 GeV); EMCHR: The threshold energy applied collectively to muons, heavy ions and charged hadrons (Default: GeV); EMNEU: The threshold energy for neutrons (Default: GeV) EMIGA: The threshold energy for γ (Default: GeV); EMIEL: The threshold energy for e ± (Default: 5*10 -4 GeV) Default Setting: ENRG E0 Non-default setting: ENRG 1=E0 2=0.02 3=0.3 4=0.01 5=0.05 6=0.01 7=0.01 9/23/1310

Particle Production from MARS15 (Unit: Yield/proton/GeV) Carbon/3GeV/ z = 0 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode3 IQGSM=1 Mode4 IQGSM=1 Mode4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default) /23/1311 Carbon/3GeV/ z = 50 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode4 IQGSM=1 Mode4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default)

Particle Production from MARS15 (Unit: Yield/proton/GeV) Mercury/3GeV/ z = 0 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default) /23/1312 Mercury/3GeV/ z = 50 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default)

Particle Production from MARS15 (Unit: Yield/proton/GeV) Gallium/3GeV/ z = 0 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default) /23/1313 Gallium/3GeV/ z = 50 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG (default) ENRG (Non- default)

Particle Production from MARS15 (Unit: Yield/proton/GeV) Mercury/8GeV/ z = 0 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG(default) ENRG(Non- default) /23/1314 Mercury/8GeV/ z = 50 m Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=1 Mode 4 IQGSM=2 ENRG(default) ENRG(Non- default)

Particle Production from FLUKA Yield/proton/GeV Carbon3 GeV, z = 50 m0.030 (neg: 0.012, pos: 0.018) Carbon3 GeV, z = 0 m0.033 (neg: 0.014, pos: 0.020) Mercury3 GeV, z = 50 m0.021 (neg: 0.011, pos: Mercury3 GeV, z = 0 m (neg: 0.013, pos: 0.012) Gallium3 GeV, z = 50 m (neg: 0.012, pos: 0.014) Gallium3 GeV, z = 0 m0.030 (neg: 0.014, pos: 0.016) Mercury8 GeV, z = 50 m (neg: 0.014, pos: 0.013) Mercury8 GeV, z = 0 m (neg: 0.015, pos: 0.014) 9/23/1315

Yield comparison between default and nondefault ENRG card 9/23/1316 MARS15, Mode 4 Carbon at 3 GeV Results are similar. However, the running speed with non-default ENRG card is about several times (~10) faster.

Yield comparison between default and nondefault ENRG card 9/23/1317 MARS15, mode 4 HG at 8 GeV Results are similar. However, the running speed with non-default ENRG card is about several times (~10) faster.

Yield comparison between mode 3 and mode 4 of MARS15 (C at 3 GeV) 9/23/1318 Results are very similar. This means MCNP mode doesn’t play important role in particle production.

MARS15 (mode 1) vs. FLUKA (Carbon target at 3 GeV) 9/23/1319 Higher peak of soft pions Shoulder (Pos+Neg) Strange shape from Mode 1: Higher peak of soft pions and shoulder

MARS15 (mode 4) vs. FLUKA (Carbon target at 3 GeV) 9/23/ No strange shape at mode 4 is not observed. 2. Energy spectra between MARS15 and FLUKA look similar.

Energy spectra (MARS15 vs. FLUKA) (Carbon target at 3 GeV, z = 0 m) 9/23/ Strange shape from MARS15 with default mode (IQGSM=0) 2. Results similar between MARS15 (mode 4) for IQGSM=1 or IQGSM=2 and FLUKA.

Energy spectra (MARS15) (Carbon target at 3 GeV, z = 50 m) 9/23/ Results similar between IQGSM=1 and IQGSM=2 2.Yield (pos) ≈ 2*Yield (neg)

9/23/1323 Positive and Negative Yield (MARS15/mode 4/IQGSM=1) (Carbon target at 3 GeV) Yield (pos) ≈ 2*Yield (neg) z = 0 mz = 50 m

Energy spectra (MARS15 vs. FLUKA) (Mercury target at 3 GeV, z = 0 m) 9/23/ Narrow peak width from IQGSM=0 and IQGSM=1. 2. Results different between MARS15 (mode 4) and FLUKA. 3. MARS15 in LAQGSM mode (IQGSM=2) with MCNPDATA gives big peak width and almost double yield.

Energy spectra (MARS15) (Mercury target at 3 GeV, z = 50 m) 9/23/ Results much different between IQGSM=1 and IQGSM=2 2.Yield (neg) ≈ 1.1*Yield (pos) for IQGSM=2

9/23/1326 Positive and Negative Yield (MARS15/mode 4/IQGSM=2) (Mercury target at 3 GeV) Yield (neg) ≈ 1.1*Yield (pos) z = 0 mz = 50 m

Energy spectra (MARS15 vs. FLUKA) (Gallium target at 3 GeV, z = 0 m) 9/23/ Strange shape from MARS15 with default mode (IQGSM=0) 2. Results different between MARS15 (mode 4) and FLUKA.

MARS15 (mode 4) (Gallium target at 3 GeV, z = 50 m) 9/23/ Results similar between IQGSM=1 and IQGSM=2 2.Yield (pos) ≈ 1.3*Yield (neg)

Positive and Negative Yield (MARS15/mode 4/IQGSM=1) (Gallium target at 3 GeV) 9/23/13 29 Yield (pos) ≈ 1.3*Yield (neg) z = 0 mz = 50 m

SUMMARY 1.The setting of ENRG card with default and or non-default in MARS15 gives almost same particle production. However, the running speed with non-default ENRG is much faster. 2.Mode 3 and Mode 4 of MARS15 give almost same particle productions for carbon target at 3 GeV. So MCNP mode doesn’t play an important role in particle production. 9/23/1330

SUMMARY (Cont’d) 3. Strange shape for Carbon or Gallium at 3 GeV with higher peak of soft pions and shoulder is observed for MARS15 default mode (IQGSM=0). It doesn’t exist with MARS15 in LAQGSM mode (IQGSM=1 or IQGSM=2). So MARS15 in LAQGSM mode is needed. 4.For Mercury at 3 GeV and for MARS15 in LAQGSM code, the setting of IQGSM=2 can give double particle production than that of IQGSM=1 or IQGSM=0. 9/23/1331

SUMMARY (Cont’d) 5. For carbon target at 3 GeV, MARS15 in LAQGSM mode (IQGSM=1 or IQGSM=2) gives similar particle production with FLUKA. However, it’s much different for mercury or gallium target (FLUKA will give less than MARS15). 6. Carbon target(MARS15/mode 4): Yield/proton/GeV at z = 50 m Yield (pos) ≈ 2*Yield (neg) Yield/proton/GeV (from FLUKA) at z = 50 m 9/23/1332

SUMMARY (Cont’d) 7. Mercury target (MARS15/Mode 4/IQGSM=2): Yield/proton/GeV at z = 50 m Yield (neg) ≈ 1.1*Yield (pos) Yield/proton/GeV (from FLUKA) 8. Gallium target (MARS15, Mode 4): Yield/proton/GeV at z = 50 m Yield (pos) ≈ 1.2*Yield (neg) Yield/proton/GeV (from FLUKA) at z = 50 m 9/23/1333