The Studying very light gravitino using ILD detector simulation Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: T.Suehara(ICEPP), T.Tanabe(ICEPP), Y.Satoru(ICEPP),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.Ball/K.Desch, Experimental Analysis of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a 1 Experimental Study of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a: a First Look Markus Ball.
Advertisements

Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Sep/15/ Search for   e/ K.Hayasaka(Nagoya U.) Belle Collaboration.
Search for Long-Lived Particles at DØ Todd Adams Florida State University July 19, 2005 SUSY05 IPPP Durham.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
Measurement of B (  (nS)   +   ) at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration 1 st Meeting of the APS.
Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e  e   H 0 Z 0       X Analysis Hai-Jun Yang & Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor SiD Benchmarking.
Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.
Single boson production at LEP Guillaume Leibenguth On behalf of the LEP experiments Institut de physique nucléaire Université catholique de Louvain DIS’04,
SM and Susy Higgs searches at LEP Magali GRUWÉ CERN QFTHEP Workshop, September 2001.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Determination of Heavy Smuon and Selectron Mass at CLIC Outline Physics motivation Mass measurement methods (Energy scan, End Point) Energy spread, ISR.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Taikan Suehara et al., Beijing, 2010/3/29 page 1 Simulation study of W + DM signature for identification of new physics Taikan Suehara (ICEPP,
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
1 A.Nomerotski SUSY Benchmarking Analyses with SiD Yiming Li, Tomas Lastovicka, Andrei Nomerotski (University of Oxford) TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Collaborators: T. Moroi (Tokyo) [for basic idea: arXiv: ] & K. Fujii (KEK), T. Moroi (Tokyo), T. Suehara (ICEPP)
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Taikan Suehara et al., Albuquerque, 1 Oct page 1 Tau-pair analysis in the ILD detector Taikan Suehara (ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo) T. Tanabe.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Taikan Suehara, ILC physics mini-workshop, 2009/01/21 page 1 SUSY and Tau-pair analysis with full simulation in ILD detector model Taikan Suehara ICEPP,
February 27, 2003APPI20031 Study of Chargino Production in e + e ‐ Collisions at Large tanβ Yukihiro Kato Kinki University Collaboration with K.Fujii (KEK),
Feasibility study of Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,,
Significant effects of second KK particles on LKP dark matter physics Collaborated with Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR) Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR) Shigeki Matsumoto.
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University CIPANP, June 2012.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
LCWS 05 1 Experimental studies of Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in gauge boson scattering and three gauge boson production P.Krstonosic Work done.
ALEPH Status Report LEPC - July Gary Taylor, UC Santa Cruz SM processes Higgs searches SUSY searches.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau decays at B-factory 2006/2/27-3/2 K.Inami Nagoya university, Belle - Introduction - Experimental results - Future.
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
Taikan Suehara et al., Tokyo, 12 Nov page 1 Taikan Suehara (Kyushu) A. Miyamoto (KEK), T. Tomita (Kyushu) Higgs recoil mass analysis: status.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Physics performance with SB2009 Progress report of a study by QuickSimulator Akiya Miyamoto 15-Jan-2010 KEK SB2009 WG Meeting.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Discrimination of new physics models with ILC
Chargino and Neutralino Masses at ILC
Status of the OPERA experiment
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
BSM search using Higgs to invisible decay at the ILC
LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China, March 2010
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

The Studying very light gravitino using ILD detector simulation Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: T.Suehara(ICEPP), T.Tanabe(ICEPP), Y.Satoru(ICEPP), M. Sigeki(IPMU), M. Takeo(IPMU), F.Keisuke(KEK) 1

Introduction In the case of Gauge mediated SUSY breaking (GMSB), the gravitino appears as the lightest supersymmetric particle(LSP) The O(1 eV) very light gravitino is very attractive from view of Cosmology 2

3 NLSP stau By measuring the NLSP mass and lifetime, gravitino mass be determined For example, the following value give a stau life time of m LSP =6.5eV, m NLSP = 120 GeV  c  = 100  m For comparison, the tau lifetime is  c  =  m ~ e+e+ τ−τ− τ+τ+ τ−τ− ~ Z *, γ* e-e- ~ ~ τ+τ+ [arXiv: ]

The measurement of stau lifetime The impact parameter is defined as the shortest length between track and IP. By using the impact parameter distribution,we can measure the stau lifetime. The stau decay to cascade products.  The impact parameter enhance. We do not use the impact parameter in the z direction because of the large uncertainty of the primary vertex in that direction.  We use the d0 component (projection onto the x-y plane). 1st layer Gravitino stau  Hadronic decay (π ±, K ±, etc.) Impact parameter  16mm IP Leptonic decay (e ±, μ ±, ν.) 4 Decay products ~ e+e+ τ−τ− τ+τ+ τ−τ− ~ Z *, γ* e-e- ~ ~ τ+τ+

Signal and Background Signal & Background processes 5

Condition stau mass :120GeV decay life time :cτ = 100μm Center of mass energy : 500GeV, Integrated luminosity : 500fb -1, Beam polarization : (P e-,P e+ )=(+0.8,-0.3) τ decay mode :1-prong ~ 85 % Selection: 1-prong+1-prong event [PDG] 6

Cut 7 stau-stau  ->  WW, ZZ -> l l No cut e Track= e p T > 5 GeV for each track e |cos  miss | < e E vis > 20 GeV |cos  |< 0.8 for each track Acoplanarity >   / E vis > 3.0/400 (stau lifetime) |d 0 |/  d 0 ) > 2.0 for each track (stau mass)

stau mass accuracy (preliminary) From fitting track energy upper limit, the stau mass can be determined from kinematic relation. By running Poisson statics fluctuation to high statistics track energy distribution samples, we make a experiment (Toy MC). By running Toy MC 10,000 times, the mass fit distribution can be acquired. From the error estimation from the mass fit distribution, we acquired following result. 8

stau lifetime accuracy1(preliminary) The d o distribution reflect the lifetime stau->tau. High statistics sample was prepared for c  = 90  m, 100  m, 110  m (Template samples). By using for c  = 100  m, the d o distribution was created from Toy MC. 9 注 ) 右上二段目の Background 分布は c  ~ 100  m のデータを使用

stau lifetime accuracy2(preliminary) At first, we compute the reduced chi2   between Toy MC sample and template sample. The chi2 minimum indicates the most probable value of the lifetime given by the fit. By Evaluating the error from Toy MC 10,000 times, we obtained following result. 10

Gravitino mass accuracy (preliminary) The NLSP lifetime and mass substitute to the following gravitino mass accuracy formula 11 The relative accuracy of gravitino mass can was determined about 3%.

open issues The Cross Section of Bhabha scattering and  ->ll have order ~ nb,event number~O(10 9 ). Since MC statistics is insufficient, preselected samples should be prepared. If Bhabha is found to be problematic, we may choose to drop theelectron channel. Estimate the accuracy of the stau mass by using the threshold scan Changing stau mass and lifetime, evaluate the accuracy of gravitino mass. 12

Summary 13 In the case that stau mass is 120GeV and lifetime is c  = 100  m, using ILD detector simulation, we acquired the following result: From track energy fit, the accuracy of stau mass is 1.1% From template fit, the accuracy of stau lifetime is 1.4% Combiding above results, the accuracy of gravitino mass is estimeted to be about 3%.

Back Up 14

Constraint from cosmology 15

Acoplanarity (with all other cuts applied)

Visible Energy (with all other cuts applied)

Transverse momentum (with all other cuts applied)

|cos  mis | (with all other cuts applied)

|cos  | (with all other cuts applied)

 12 /E vis (with all other cuts applied)

Transverse momentun(after only 2-prong) 注 ) ただしシグナルは無偏極である

Visible energy ( after only 2-prong ) 注 ) ただしシグナルは無偏極である

|cos  | (after only 2-prong) 注 ) ただしシグナルは無偏極である

Acoplanarity (After only 2-prong) 注 ) ただしシグナルは無偏極である

track energy(GeV) d0/d0error Yellow:Signal Red:Tau pair Blue:AA->tautau Green:WW+ZZ