RDA in MARC American Library Association July 2009 Sally H. McCallum Library of Congress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Espley and Robert Pillow ALA New Orleans 26 June 2011 The RDA Sandbox and RDA Implementation Scenario One.
Advertisements

Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
FRBR Overview and Application Authorities: Part 1 June 2012.
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
RDA for machines Gordon Dunsire Presentation to CC:DA meeting, ALA Midwinter 2014, Philadelphia, Pa, 25 Jan 2014.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
T ASK G ROUP TO F ORMULATE OR R ECOMMEND PCC/NACO RDA P OLICY ON A UTHORITY I SSUES : S UMMARY OF R ECOMMENDATIONS Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
5: Describing Carriers and Content 1.Content type 2.Media type 3.Carrier type 4.Extent 5.Describing content 6.Other content attributes 5-1.
RDA – The SLQ experience Karen Stone 12 May 2014.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
RDA - MARC Name: Huldah Raubenheimer Job Title: Cataloguer: University of the Free State Tel:
7: Basics of RDA Relationships for Serials Relationships in RDA Relationship designators Creators and other corporate bodies related to works Corporate.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Music Library AssociationFeb. 18, 2005BCC Open Meeting Development of AACR3 Kathy Glennan University of Southern California.
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data.
RDA data and applications Gordon Dunsire Presented to staff of the British Library, Boston Spa, 20 Mar 2014.
11 RDA & CJK Materials Workshop Session two—Comparison between AACR2 & RDA Part 4—MARC21 tags: changes Prepared by Charlene Chou.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
Cataloging Sound Recordings with RDA
Society of American Archivists Research Forum 18 August 2015 A Deep Dive into the Archival MARC Records in WorldCat (and ArchiveGrid) Jackie Dooley Program.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Introduction to Description and AACR II University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Highlights from recent MARC changes Sally McCallum Library of Congress.
RDA Coming soon to a catalogue near YOU Chris Todd National Library of New Zealand 2010, revised 2012.
New MARC Fields with RDA Bibliographic and Authority Formats Bibliographic and Authority Formats.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
Robert Pillow, VTLS Inc. How Will RDA Impact Your System? A Forum of Vendors Discussing Implementation Plans Association for Library Collections & Technical.
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
1 Making Changes to Personal Name and Corporate Body Authority Records Module 7. Making Changes to Existing Name and Work/Expression Authority Records.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Update MARC Change Summary Sally McCallum RDA Update Forum June 23, 2012 Library of Congress.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
Authority Control Interest Group RDA and MARC ALA Mid-Winter Denver 23 January 2009 John Espley VTLS Inc.
The FRBR-RDA Puzzle: Putting the Pieces Together Answers to Exercises.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Module 2 RDA Basics Recognizing and Using RDA Records A Practical Primer on RDA COSUGI Detroit, Michigan May 14, 2014.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
A Practical Primer on RDA COSUGI Salt Lake City, Utah March 13, 2013 Module 2 RDA Basics Recognizing and Using RDA Records.
Future of Cataloguing: how RDA positions us for the future for RDA Workshop June, 2010.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
Sally McCallum Library of Congress
RDA in NACO Module 1.b Background : FRBR/FRAD. 2 FRBR Foundation of RDA If you want a more detailed background, watch this webcast by Barbara Tillett:
MARC Tags to BIBFRAME Vocabulary: a new view of metadata Sally McCallum Library of Congress ALA - January 2014.
RDA Training University of Nevada, Reno February 2013 Module 2 RDA Basics Recognizing and Using RDA Records.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
RDA for Law Catalogers:
MARC 21 Update CIG Standards Forum 3rd September 2008
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
MARC21 changes to accommodate RDA
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

RDA in MARC American Library Association July 2009 Sally H. McCallum Library of Congress

Overview  Good news  MARC changes  Process  Principles  Content, media, carrier types  Attributes for names and resources  Relationships  Other  Documentation

Good news  RDA was designed to be compatible with MARC 21  most libraries creating RDA data are currently using an ILS that imports/exports data in MARC 21

245 Title statement $a Title2.3.2 Title proper $b Remainder of title2.3.3 Parallel title proper Other title information Parallel other title information $c Statement of responsibility, etc Statement of responsibility relating to title proper $n Number of part/section of a work Title proper $p Name of part/section of a work Title proper

300 Physical description $a Extent3.4 Extent File size 7.22 Duration $b Other physical details3.6 Base material 3.7 Applied material 3.8 Mount 3.9 Production method 3.11 Layout 3.14 Polarity 3.15 Reduction ratio 3.16 Sound characteristic […] 7.15 Illustrative content 7.17 Colour content 7.18 Sound content $c Dimensions3.5 Dimensions $e Accompanying material27.1 Related manifestation

MARC Changes Process - Working Group  Everett Allgood - New York University and CC:DA Liaison  Corine Deliot - British Library  Rebecca Guenther - Library of Congress  Bill Leonard - Library and Archives Canada  Sally McCallum - Library of Congress  Marg Stewart - Library and Archives Canada and Joint Steering Committee Liaison  Martha Yee - UCLA Film and Television Archive  Rich Greene – OCLC  John Espley – VTLS  Reinhold Heuvelmann – Deutsche Nationalbibliothek  Rhonda Lawrence – UCLA  Kathy Glennan – University of Maryland  Bill Moen – University of North Texas, School of Library and Information Sciences

MARC Changes Process  MARBI paper from JSC in January 2008  Organized Working Group in early 2008  Worked from summaries of possible differences provided by the JSC liaison  Met every week via teleconference  Divided up the work – 25 items initially  Proposals  Discussion papers  No Change needed  Contractor analysis needed  RDA intent not yet clear  June 2008 – 4 Proposals, 5 Discussion Papers  January 2009 – 3 Proposals, 2 Discussion Papers  June 2009 – 3 Proposals, 3 Discussion Papers

MARC Changes Working principles  FRBR entities and RDA data  MARC 21 will continue to be used by diverse communities with different rules and data models – although RDA will be prominent Neutral concerning which types of records (authority, bibliographic, holdings) map to which FRBR entities Neutral and flexible with respect to enterprise database designs that ingest MARC data, but enabling enterprise use of any of the designs hypothesized by RDA

MARC Changes Working principles  Parsing data  Weigh parsing of data at point of data entry and possible increase in cataloging costs, against enhanced end user experience.  Consider the existing MARC Principles for parsing data: Categorical indexing or retrieval Special manipulation or formatting  Favor use of system-generated display labels based on a field tag or a subfield code, as is common already

MARC Changes Working principles  Coded values for RDA terms  RDA term lists are open ended and not meant to be closed and complete  Exactly aligning MARC code lists with RDA term lists is not necessary – but comparison and adjustment is useful

Content, media, and carrier types  RDA 6.10 content type RDA – “fundamental form of communication in which the content is expressed and the human sense through which it is intended to be perceived” E.g., still image, text, 3-dimensional form  RDA 3.2 media type RDA – “general type of intermediation device required to view, play, run, etc., the content of a resource” E.g., audio, microform  RDA 3.3 carrier type RDA – “format of the storage medium and housing of a carrier” E.g., audio disc, microform cassette  Open ended RDA term lists for each type

Content, media, and carrier types  Content type  MARC Leader/06 - must continue to use –Less granular than RDA –MARC LDR/06 code examples »e - cartographic material »f - manuscript cartographic material  New field use if want to record exact RDA terms $a Content type terms $2 Source –RDA term examples »cartographic dataset »cartographic image »cartographic moving image »cartographic tactile image »cartographic tactile three-dimensional form »cartographic three-dimensional form –336 ## $a cartographic dataset $2 rda

Content, media, and carrier types  Media type  MARC 007/00 – close match with RDA 007 provides coding for multiple facets of resource –MARC 007/00 code examples »h - microform »s - sound recording  New field use if want to record exact RDA terms and/or do not need to code additional facets of resource $a Media type term $2 Source –RDA term examples »microform »audio –337 ## $a microform $2 rda –337 ## $a audio $2 rda

Content, media, and carrier types  Carrier type  MARC 007/01 – close match with RDA 007 provides coding for multiple facets of resource –MARC 007/01 code examples »b - microfilm cartridge »d - sound disc  New field use if want to record exact RDA terms and do not need to code additional facets of resource $a Carrier type term $2 Source –RDA term examples »microform cartridge »audio disc –338 ## $a microfilm cartridge $2 rda –338 ## $a audio disc $2 rda

Attributes of names and resources  RDA specifies attributes that are currently included in headings (preferred access points) and additional ones from FRAD  Attributes of names persons, families, corporate bodies recorded in MARC “name” Authority record in heading or in separate field  Attributes of resources works and expressions recorded in MARC “name/title” Authority record (common model) or in Bibliographic record for work or expression (possible model) in heading or in separate field

Attributes of names (Authority format)  Dates: birth and death, period of activity, corporate establishment and termination, family  Access point: $d for persons and meetings  New 046 (Special coded dates)  Same field as in Bibliographic record with new subfields  Places: of birth, death, residence, associated with person or family, corporate headquarters  Access point: $c for meetings  New 370 (Associated place)  Address: of person or corporate body  New 371 (Address) Modeled on 720 from Bibliographic format  Activities: field of activity of person or corporate body, affiliation and occupation of person  Access point: $c for persons  New 372 (Field of activity)  New 373 (Affiliation)  New 374 (Occupation)  Gender  New 375 (Gender)  Families: type, hereditary title, prominent member  New 376 (Family information)  Language: of person or corporate body  New 378 (Associated language)

Attributes of names (Authority format)  Example 100 0# $aSpagna $c(Artist), $d ## $a Artist 046 ## $f1450 $g1528  Example 110 2# $a Double Image (Musical group : 1977-) 046 ## $s ## $a Musical group  Example 100 1# $a Singer, Isaac Bashevis, $d ## $f1904 $g ## $a Radzimyn, Poland $b Surfside, Fla. –[born in Radzimyn, Poland; died in Surfside, Fla.]

Attributes of works and expressions (Discussion Paper currently at MARBI)  Form of work  E.g., motion picture, play, music, symphony  Access point: parenthetical in $a or $t titles  No controlled RDA list  New 380? (Form of work) in Bibliographic and Authority  Date of work / of expression  Access point: $f in titles  046 (Special coded dates) - additional subfields in Authority  Place of origin of work  Add new Authority field 370 (Associated place) to Bibliographic  Other distinguishing characteristic of work / of expression  New 381? (Other distinguishing characteristics) to Bibliographic and Authority  Medium of performance  Access point: subfield $m  New 382? (Medium of performance) to Bibliographic and Authority  Numeric designation of a musical work  Access point: subfield $n  New 383? (Numeric designation of musical work) to Bibliographic and Authority  Key of a musical work  Access point: subfield $r  New 384? (Key) to Bibliographic and Authority

Attributes of works and expressions (draft currently at MARBI)  Example 130 0# $aCinderella (Choreographic work) 380? ## $aChoreographic work  Example 100 1# $aBach, Johann Sebastian,$d $t $aKaffee- Kantate 383? ## $cBWV 211  Example 100 1# $aFaith, Richard,$d1926-$tMiniatures 382? ## $aoboe $apiano 382? ## $aclarinet $apiano

Attributes of names and resources  Again, attributes may be recorded  In separate new field  In heading subfield, if available,  In both  Note (15 July 2009): These PowerPoint slides have been changed to reflect the decision made the day after the program to use the 37X range (rather than the 62X range) in the Authority format for the Name attributes. The Resource attribute tags (38X) in the previous two slides are under discussion and not yet approved.

Relationships  Resource to name RDA Appendix I Examples: author, artist, illustrator, cartographer, conductor  Resource to resource RDA Appendix J Examples: dramatized as (work); sequel; digest of (expression); filmed with (manifestation)  Name to name RDA Appendix K Examples: alternate identity, employee, founder, descendent, founding family  Names = persons, families and corporate bodies  Resources = works, expressions, manifestations and items

Relationships Name to resource  Relationship designators  In Bibliographic 1XX, 6XX, 7XX, and 8XX –record relator terms in $e ($j for X11) –700 1# $aSmith, Elsie, $d , $eillustrator –700 1# $aGalway, James. $eperformer $econductor  In Authority 1XX, 4XX, 5XX –record relator terms in $e ($j for X11) –100 1# $aBlum, Leon, $d , $edefendant $tLeon Blum devant la Cour supreme, Riom. $lHebrew

Relationships Resource to resource  RDA specifies 4 basic linking methods:  Identifiers such as ISBN, ISSN, record control number, URIs e.g., $x, $w, $0, $u subfields; 856 field  Authorized access points e.g., Bibliographic 7XX; Authority 4XX and 5XX  Structured description fields e.g., 76X-78X  Unstructured description fields (notes) e.g., Bibliographic 500; Authority 600

Relationships Resource to resource  Relationship designation  Identifier linking methods Bibliographic and Authority 856 –Relationship expressed in $y Other identifiers in specific fields that indicate relationship  Authorized access points Authority 4XX and 5XX; Bibliographic , 730 Relationship expressed in subfield $i  Structured description fields Bibliographic 76X-78X (Linking entry fields) Relationship expressed in tag, indicator, and/or subfield $i  Notes Authority 6XX and Bibliographic 5XX Relationship expressed in text of note

Relationships – Resource to resource Authorized access points  Designation in $i (proposed)  Bibliographic record $a Triumph : $b for concert band / $c by Michael Tippett # $i paraphrase of $a Tippett, Michael, $d $t Mask of time.  Authority record 130 #0 $a Alice in Wonderland, or, What's a nice kid like you doing in a place like this? / $c Hanna-Barbera Productions # $i parody of $a Carroll, Lewis, $d $t Alice's adventures in Wonderland.

Relationships – Resource to resource Linking entry fields, 76X-78X  Designation in indicator (continued by) $aPreliminary seismological bulletin $tTEIC quarterly seismological bulletin $x $w(DLC)sc# #  Designation in tag (issued with) $aMythlore # $tMythprint $x  Designation in $i 100 1# Verdi, Giuseppe, $d $a Otello $b full score 787 0# $i reproduction of $a Verdi, Giuseppe, $t Otello $d Milan : Ricordi, c1913

Relationships Name to name  Authorized access points Authority 4XX and 5XX Relationship expressed in subfield $w/0 or in $i  Designation in $i $a I.M. Pei & Partners 500 1# $a Pei, I. M $d $i founder

Mis’l other additions for RDA  502 (Dissertations) additional specificity in for degree type, institution and date  Under consideration  Date of capture (enhanced 518)  Repeatability of ISSN subfield in 490  Subfield for URIs for values

Where to find MARC/RDA change information  Documentation -  Draft documentation of approved changes  Links to documents describing possible changes under discussion  Direct link: RDA.htmlwww.loc.gov/marc/formatchanges- RDA.html  Examples will be added after decisions from this MARBI meeting are finalized

 Thanks  Contacts and information:   