NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PPPL,NFRI Study of Error Field and 3D Plasma Response in KSTAR J.-K. Park 1, Y. M. Jeon 2, In collaboration with J. E. Menard 1, K. Kim 1, J. H. Kim 2,
Advertisements

Berkery – Kinetic Stabilization NSTX Jack Berkery Kinetic Effects on RWM Stabilization in NSTX: Initial Results Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General.
Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
NSTX XP830 review – J.W. Berkery J.W. Berkery, S.A. Sabbagh, H. Reimerdes Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL.
NSTX SAS – APS DPP ‘05 Supported by Office of Science S.A. Sabbagh 1, A.C. Sontag 1, W. Zhu 1, M.G. Bell 2, R. E. Bell 2, J. Bialek 1, D.A. Gates 2, A.
Supported by NSTX-U Present status and plans for Non-axisymmetric Control Coil (NCC) design J.-K. Park, J. W. Berkery, A. H. Boozer, J. M. Bialek, S. A.
J. Manickam, C. Kessel and J. Menard Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Special thanks to R. Maingi, ORNL and S. Sabbagh, Columbia U. 45 th Annual Meeting.
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
Edge Stability of Small-ELM Regimes in NSTX Aaron Sontag J. Canik, R. Maingi, R. Bell, S. Gerhardt, S. Kubota, B. LeBlanc, J. Manickam, T. Osborne, P.
Sustainment and Control Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt 12/5/12 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP1518: RWM PID control optimization based on theory and experiment S. A. Sabbagh, J.W. Berkery, J.M Bialek Y.S. Park, (et al…) Department of Applied Physics,
EP-TSG session Meeting agenda et al. M. Podestà NSTX-U Research Forum 2015 EP-TSG session PPPL, Room B252 02/24/2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Non-axisymmetric Control Coil Upgrade and related ideas NSTX Supported by V1.0 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
Active resistive wall mode and plasma rotation control for disruption avoidance in NSTX-U S. A. Sabbagh 1, J.W. Berkery 1, R.E. Bell 2, J.M. Bialek 1,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
NSTX IAEA FEC 2006 PD: S.A. Sabbagh 1 Supported by Office of Science S.A. Sabbagh 1, R. E. Bell 2, J.E. Menard 2, D.A. Gates 2, A.C. Sontag 1, J.M. Bialek.
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
Plans / collaboration discussion – stability/ control theory/modeling (Columbia U. group) NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
ASC SPG NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst.
Second Switching Power Amplifier (SPA) Upgrade Physics Considerations Discussion S.A. Sabbagh 1, and the NSTX Research Team 1 Department of Applied Physics,
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP for Recomissioning the HHFW System R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli NSTX-U Supported by.
NSTX-U Construction Erik Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Readiness to Operate Review LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
NSTX WZ – XP524 - NSTX Results Review ‘05 Supported by Office of Science Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT.
Supported by NSTX-U NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Non-axisymmetric Control Coil (NCC) Applications J.-K. Park, J. W. Berkery, A. H. Boozer, J. M. Bialek, S. A.
Development of Improved Vertical Position Control S.P. Gerhardt, E. Kolemen ASC Session, NSTX 2011/12 Research Forum Location Date NSTX Supported by College.
M&P TSG Prioritization for FY2015 and campaign startup M.A. Jaworski, C.H. Skinner, R. Kaita NSTX-U Science and Topical Science Group organizational meeting.
NSTX-U Columbia U. Group Research Plan Summary ( ) S.A. Sabbagh, J.W. Berkery, J.M. Bialek, Y.S Park NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meeting.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: X Science LLC Ricky Maqueda NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U.
Energy Confinement Scaling in the Low Aspect Ratio National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) S. M. Kaye, M.G. Bell, R.E. Bell, E.D. Fredrickson, B.P.
Safety Jerry Levine Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 May 2 - 3, 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
Macroscopic Stability TSG Pre-forum Meeting #1 J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
XP1020: Determination of Weak RWM Stability Rotation Profiles J.W. Berkery, S.A. Sabbagh, H. Reimerdes Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
EP-TSG: draft plans for commissioning & first research phases of NSTX-U operation M. Podestà, D. Liu, N. Gorelenkov, N. Crocker for the NSTX-U EP-TSG Pre-Forum.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX H. Yuh (Nova Photonics) and the NSTX Group, PPPL Presented by S. Kaye 4 th T&C ITPA Meeting Culham Lab, UK March.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
NSTX MHD Mode Control Mtg S.A. Sabbagh 1 RWM Stabilization and Control Research on NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1, J.M. Bialek 1, R.E. Bell 2, D.A. Gates 2,
Macroscopic Stability TSG Research Forum J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Enhancement of edge stability with lithium wall coatings in NSTX Rajesh Maingi, Oak Ridge National Lab R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, J.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
NSTX-U Disruption PAM Working Group – Controlled Shutdown XP Discussion S. A. Sabbagh and R. Raman Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Global Mode Stability and Active Control in NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1, J.W. Berkery 1, R.E. Bell 2, J.M. Bialek 1, S. Gerhardt 2, R. Betti 3, D.A. Gates 2, B.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
NSTX 2007 MHD XP Review – J. Menard 1 Optimization of RFA detection algorithms during dynamic error field correction Presented by: J.E. Menard, PPPL Final.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP-945: ELM Pacing via Vertical Position Jogs S.P. Gerhardt, J.M. Canik, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, R. Maingi, J. Menard, S. Sabbagh, A. Sontag.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
Automatic Rampdowns S. Gerhardt, et al. and the NSTX Research Team Meeting name Location Date NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
1 Status of the 2008 ASC TSG Run plan Presented by D. A. Gates (J. Menard Deputy) At the NSTX Mid-run asessment PPPL April 16, 2008 Supported by Office.
NSTX XP802 review - S.A. Sabbagh S.A. Sabbagh 1, R.E. Bell 2, S. Gerhardt 2, J.E. Menard 2, J.W. Berkery 1, J.M. Bialek 1, D.A. Gates 2, B. LeBlanc 2,
NSTX-U Research Highlights and Plans Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team IAEA FEC Meeting October 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
J-W. Ahn 1 K.F. Gan 2, F. Scotti 3, R. Maingi 1, J.M. Canik 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 4, A.L. Roquemore 3, V.A. Soukhanovskii 4 and the.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Profiles Variations in NSTX-U and their Potential Impact on Equilibrium and Stability Magnetoboss 12/6/2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Presentation transcript:

NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC NSTX-U Supported by Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability at High-beta, and in Reduced Collisionality Spherical Torus Plasmas J.W. Berkery 1, S.A. Sabbagh 1, A. Balbaky 1, R.E. Bell 2, R. Betti 3, J.M. Bialek 1, A. Diallo 2, D.A. Gates 2, S.P. Gerhardt 2, B.P. LeBlanc 2, J. Manickam 2, J.E. Menard 2, M. Podestà 2, H. Yuh 4 1 Columbia U., 2 PPPL, 3 U. Rochester, 4 Nova Photonics 55 th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics Denver, CO November 14, 2013

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 2 Outline: Resistive wall mode (RWM) and kinetic effects introduction Highest β N /l i is not the least stable – why? Measured stability in experiments using active MHD spectroscopy a)Stability vs. β N /l i b)Stability vs. collisionality c)Stability vs. rotation MISK kinetic RWM stabilization code analysis Kinetic effects in a disruption prediction algorithm The highest performance plasmas are not the least stable in NSTX Kinetic stabilization can explain this favorable result

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 3 The resistive wall mode (RWM) is a kinking of magnetic field lines slowed by penetration through vessel structures where An unstable RWM is an exponential growth of magnetic field line kinking that can be studied with a linear model Linear, perturbative model is justified BpBp RWMs in NSTX cause a collapse in β, disruption, and termination of the plasma

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 4 Kinetic effects in the RWM dispersion relation allows for passive stabilization of the RWM, can explain experiments β N no-wall β N with-wall unstable stable 0 Ideal Kink Mode Resistive Wall Mode ~ τ w -1 Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) fluid dispersion relation: τ w -1 is slow enough that active stabilization (feedback) can keep the plasma stable Passive stabilization –Collisional dissipation –Rotational stabilization Simple models with a scalar “critical rotation” level for stability could not explain experiments  However, NSTX experiments have often operated in this range without active control! [S. Sabbagh et al., Nucl. Fusion 50, (2010)]

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 5 β N no-wall β N with-wall unstable stable 0 Ideal Kink Mode Resistive Wall Mode Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) fluid dispersion relation: τ w -1 is slow enough that active stabilization (feedback) can keep the plasma stable Kinetic Effects [B. Hu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004)]  However, NSTX experiments have often operated in this range without active control! Passive stabilization –Collisional dissipation –Rotational stabilization Simple models with a scalar “critical rotation” level for stability could not explain experiments [S. Sabbagh et al., Nucl. Fusion 50, (2010)] Kinetic effects in the RWM dispersion relation allows for passive stabilization of the RWM, can explain experiments

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 6 Kinetic effects arise from the perturbed pressure, are calculated in MISK from the perturbed distribution function Kinetic Effects [B. Hu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004)] Force balance: leads to an energy balance: Kinetic Energy Change in potential energy due to perturbed kinetic pressure is: Fluid terms

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 7 Kinetic effects arise from the perturbed pressure, are calculated in MISK from the perturbed distribution function Force balance: leads to an energy balance: Kinetic Energy Change in potential energy due to perturbed kinetic pressure is: Fluid terms is solved for in the MISK code by using from the drift kinetic equation to solve for

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 8 Kinetic effects arise from the perturbed pressure, are calculated in MISK from the perturbed distribution function Force balance: leads to an energy balance: Kinetic Energy Change in potential energy due to perturbed kinetic pressure is: Fluid terms Precession Drift~ Plasma RotationCollisionality is solved for in the MISK code by using from the drift kinetic equation to solve for

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 9 NSTX reaches high β N, low l i range of next-step STs and the highest β N /l i is not the least stable NN lili  N /l i ST-CTF ST-Pilot Next-step STs aim to operate at: –High β N for fusion performance –High non-inductive fraction for continuous operation High bootstrap current fraction -> Broad current profile -> Low internal inductance, l i = / ψ 2 This is generally unfavorable for ideal global MHD mode stability –Low l i reduces the ideal n = 1 no-wall beta limit [S. Sabbagh et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] NSTX can reach high β, low l i range where next-step STs aim to operate Recent years with n = 1 RWM feedback in red β N /l i = 6.7 : computed NSTX n = 1 no-wall limit

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 10 0 lili NSTX reaches high β N, low l i range of next-step STs and the highest β N /l i is not the least stable NN lili  N /l i [S. Sabbagh et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] [S. Gerhardt et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] NN  N /l i NSTX can reach high β, low l i range where next-step STs aim to operate The highest β N /l i is not the least stable in NSTX –In the overall database of NSTX disruptions, disruptivity deceases as β N /l i increases 2 β N /l i = 6.7 : computed NSTX n = 1 no-wall limit

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 11 0 lili NSTX reaches high β N, low l i range of next-step STs and the highest β N /l i is not the least stable NN lili  N /l i [S. Sabbagh et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] [S. Gerhardt et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] NN  N /l i NSTX can reach high β, low l i range where next-step STs aim to operate The highest β N /l i is not the least stable in NSTX –In the overall database of NSTX disruptions, disruptivity deceases as β N /l i increases –Active control experiments reduced disruption probability from 48% to 14%, but mostly in high β N /l i Unstable RWM Stable/Controlled RWM β N /l i = 6.7 : computed NSTX n = 1 no-wall limit 2

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 12 High beta plasma stability is directly measured to test experimental trend of disruptivity Active MHD spectroscopy is used to measure RWM stability when modes are stable –Resonant field amplification of n=1 applied AC field is measured –Increased RFA indicates decreased stability [H. Reimerdes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004)] 40 Hz n=1 tracer field n=3 braking Resonant field amplification (RFA) RFA = B plasma /B applied

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 13 Dedicated NSTX experiments reveal stability dependencies that can not be explained by early theories Experiments in NSTX measured RFA of high beta plasmas with rotation slowed by n=3 magnetic braking –Blue: unstable at 0.9 s –Green: higher β, lower rotation: stable Counter-intuitive without invoking kinetic effects

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 14 Dedicated NSTX experiments reveal stability dependencies that can not be explained by early theories A series of 20 discharges was generated in NSTX –Trajectories of RFA amplitude vs. key parameters for this database shows the stability space RFA vs. β N /l i

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 15 Dedicated NSTX experiments reveal stability dependencies that can not be explained by early theories A series of 20 discharges was generated in NSTX –Trajectories of RFA amplitude vs. key parameters for this database shows the stability space

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 16 Dedicated NSTX experiments reveal stability dependencies that can not be explained by early theories A series of 20 discharges was generated in NSTX –Trajectories of RFA amplitude vs. key parameters for this database shows the stability space

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 17 Dedicated NSTX experiments reveal stability dependencies that can not be explained by early theories A series of 20 discharges was generated in NSTX –Trajectories of RFA amplitude vs. key parameters for this database shows the stability space How can we explain this behavior? 1.Evaluate simplified kinetic stability theory expectations (guided by MISK) and compare experimental results 2.Use the full kinetic calculation of the MISK code for greater insight Stability increases at the highest β N /l i Stability is weakest, and unstable plasmas are found, at intermediate β N /l i

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 18 Collisionality affects the strength of kinetic resonances, experimental results consistent with theoretical expectation Early theory predicted RWM stability to decrease at low ν Kinetic RWM stability theory at low ν: –Stabilizing resonant kinetic effects enhanced (contrasts early theory) MISK calculations on-resonance more stable  ~ -1/ν off-resonance less stable  ~ constant [J. Berkery et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011)] unstable stable Precession Drift~ Plasma RotationCollisionality

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 19 MISK calculations Precession Drift ~ Plasma Rotation Collisionality unstable stable on-resonance more stable  ~ -1/ν off-resonance less stable  ~ constant Early theory predicted RWM stability to decrease at low ν Kinetic RWM stability theory at low ν: –Stabilizing resonant kinetic effects enhanced (contrasts early theory) Expectations for lower ν tokamaks (ITER): –Stronger stabilization near resonances –Almost no effect off- resonance Collisionality affects the strength of kinetic resonances, experimental results consistent with theoretical expectation

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 20 The stability boundary vs. ExB frequency can be explained by kinetic resonances, favorable range found low rotation less stable RWMs intermediate rotation less stable RWMs [J. Berkery et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (2010)] Average range Pedestal Precession Drift~ Plasma Rotation ExB frequency radial profile precession drift resonance stabilization Evaluate inside the pedestal –Quantity can be evaluated in future real-time systems

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 21 The stability boundary vs. ExB frequency can be explained by kinetic resonances, favorable range found Average range Pedestal Precession Drift~ Plasma Rotation ExB frequency radial profile Evaluate inside the pedestal –Quantity can be evaluated in future real-time systems –Favorable range, ≈ 4-5 kHz, found experimentally

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 22 Stability boundaries in NSTX from MHD spectroscopy are explained by kinetic theory, have favorable dependencies Discharge trajectories for 20 plasmas a) Stability vs. β N /l i Stability increases at the highest β N /l i due to kinetic effects b) Stability vs. collisionality Stable plasmas appear to benefit further from reduced collisionality c) Stability vs. rotation Precession drift resonance is stabilizing, useful for disruption avoidance

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 23 MISK calculations of precession drift resonance of many equilibria are consistent with the measured β N /l i trend MISK code calculation for 44 equilibria from the 20 discharge database Less stable δW K small More stable δW K large Precession Drift~ Plasma Rotation bounce harmonic l = 0 MISK calculations

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 24 MISK calculations of kinetic RWM growth rate for individual equilibria compares well with marginal stability point MISK calculations with scaled experimental rotation profiles show: –Stable discharges calculated as stable –Marginally stable discharge predicted unstable with 20% reduction in rotation MISK calculations

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 25 MHD Spectroscopy –Experiments in NSTX-U: Use real-time MHD spectroscopy while varying rotation and β N to predict disruptions –Apply as a Predictor in control scheme –Disadvantage: plasma stability can suddenly change when kinetic profiles change, but MHD spectroscopy is limited in frequency. Active control still necessary Need a predictor informed by kinetic theory Need to maximize warning time, minimize false positives [S. Gerhardt et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, (2013)] ? Avoidance Actuators (ω φ, β N control) γ contours Control Algorithms NSTX-U is planning a disruption avoidance system, in which real-time MHD spectroscopy or kinetic physics can be used

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 26 Control Algorithms Avoidance Actuators (ω φ, β N control) γ contours Control Algorithms Kinetic Physics –Real-time measurement of plasma rotation not good enough! NSTX-U is planning a disruption avoidance system, in which real-time MHD spectroscopy or kinetic physics can be used

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 27 Kinetic Physics –Real-time measurement of plasma rotation not good enough! –Evaluate simple physics criteria for global mode marginal stability in real-time –Can obtain inside the pedestal from real-time ω φ and modeled density and temperature profiles (future work) –Apply as a Predictor in control scheme safe too high too low Control Algorithms Avoidance Actuators (ω φ, β N control) γ contours Control Algorithms NSTX-U is planning a disruption avoidance system, in which real-time MHD spectroscopy or kinetic physics can be used

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 28 Experimentally determined stability trends in NSTX can be explained by kinetic theory, are favorable for future devices NSTX operates at very high beta – a long-sought goal for tokamaks — NSTX reaches high β N, low l i range of next-step STs Disruptions do occur, but for the first time it has been found that disruption probability decreases at the highest β N /l i Kinetic stability of resistive wall modes, specifically rotational resonances, can explain this new and highly-favorable result — Whereas past theory showed low ν to be destabilizing, here stable plasmas appear to benefit further from reduced collisionality (good for future devices) Stabilizing precession resonance is useful for disruption avoidance — An initial, simplified kinetic stability physics criterion has been found and will be used in a disruption avoidance algorithm in NSTX-U

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 29 backup slides

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 30 RWM active stabilization coils RWM poloidal sensors (B p ) RWM radial sensors (B r ) Stabilizer plates High beta, low aspect ratio –R = 0.86 m, A > 1.27 –I p < 1.5 MA, B t = 5.5 kG – β t 7 Copper stabilizer plates for kink mode stabilization Midplane control coils –n = 1 – 3 field correction, magnetic braking of ω φ by NTV –n = 1 RWM control Combined sensor sets now used for RWM feedback –48 upper/lower B p, B r NSTX is a spherical torus equipped to study passive and active global MHD control, rotation variation by 3D fields NBI port hole

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 31 Benchmarking of RWM stability codes through the ITPA was successful; codes agree and support present understanding fluid growth rates fluid plus kinetic growth rates unstable stable low rotation precession resonance high rotation bounce/transit resonance The codes support the present understanding that RWM stability can be increased by kinetic effects –At low rotation through precession drift resonance –At high rotation by bounce and transit resonances –Intermediate rotation can remain susceptible to instability The successful benchmarking gives great confidence that these codes are correctly calculating kinetic effects of RWM stability –To the extent that this model is validated against experimental evidence of RWM stability, one can then project the stability of future devices with greater confidence ITER case [J. Berkery et al., “Benchmarking Kinetic Calculations of Resistive Wall Mode Stability”, Report to the ITPA (2013)]

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 32 Avoidance Actuators PF coils 2 nd NBI: q, v , p control 3D fields (upgraded + NCC): EF, v  control n=1-3 feedback Divertor gas injection Control Algorithms: Steer Towards Stable Operation Isoflux and vertical position ctl LM, NTM avoidance RWM and dynamic EF control RWMSC (plasma response) Divertor radiation control Predictors (Measurements) Shape/position Eq. properties ( , l i, V loop,…) Profiles (p(r), j(r), v  (r),…..) Plasma response (n=0-3, RFA, …) Divertor heat flux Loss of Control General framework & algorithms applicable to ITER Disruption prediction by multiple means will enable avoidance via profile or mode control or mitigation by MGI

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 33 0 lili β N vs. l i NN  N /l i

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 34 0 lili β N vs. l i NN  N /l i

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 35 0 lili β N vs. l i NN  N /l i

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 36 MISK calculations of precession drift resonance of many equilibria are consistent with the measured β N /l i trend MISK code calculation for 44 equilibria from the 20 discharge database Less stable δW K small More stable δW K large Precession Drift~ Plasma Rotation bounce harmonic l = 0 MISK calculations

55 th APS DPP Meeting TI2.02: Measured Improvement of Global MHD Mode Stability in ST Plasmas (J.W. Berkery) NSTX 37 The resistive wall mode (RWM) is a kinking of magnetic field lines slowed by penetration through vessel structures where An unstable RWM is an exponential growth of magnetic field line kinking that can be studied with a linear model Linear, perturbative model is justified BpBp RWMs in NSTX cause a collapse in β, disruption, and termination of the plasma