U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jonathan Doherty National Park Service.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
William Reese & Noah D’Antonio. Intro: Noah and Bill Course: Chesapeake Bay and the Science of Land Use Change. (Dr. Claire Jantz) Course overview: The.
Scott Phillips, USGS for Severn River Association September 16, 2014.
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Estuaries Where Fresh Water Meets Salt Water. Estuary Defined An estuary is a partially enclosed body of water formed where fresh water from rivers and.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Citizens Advisory Committee Ann Swanson Executive Director February 27, 2014 Chesapeake Bay Commission.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
November 11, 2009 Mid-Atlantic Forum: Sea Grant Method, Regional Activities, & Emerging Issues Troy Hartley VASG Director.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Fisheries Goal Team (GIT 1) Management Board presentation 9/2/2012 Peyton Robertson, Chair Thomas O’Connell, Vice Chair Bruce Vogt, Coordinator.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Ankle bracelets for fish.. knowing who is coming and going… Developing an acoustic fish “gate” for the Chester River. Hassan Moustahfid, PhD. U.S. IOOS.
Chesapeake Bay: An Introduction to an Ecosystem Section 4: Habitats II-1D View this quiz as a slide show from “the beginning” During the slide show, you.
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives John Kennedy VA DEQ, Chesapeake Bay Program
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips U.S. Geological Survey.
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Potential Activities, Costs, and Priorities for Watershed Monitoring Scott Phillips Joel Blomquist Katie Foreman Eff/Opt Conf Call July 24, 2009.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
CHESAPEAKE BAY. Chesapeake as an Estuary An estuary is a semi-enclosed body of water that has a free connection with the sea An estuary is a semi-enclosed.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Tidal Wetlands and Shorelines in the Chesapeake Bay
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Evolving USGS Chesapeake Activities – 2018/2019
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan Kramer, MD Sea Grant

Outline  Monitoring Needs and Objectives  Chesapeake Bay Program Action Plan  Presidential Executive Order  Current CBP Monitoring Efforts  Partnership Team Objectives

Chesapeake Action Plan  CBP Goals  Emphasis on implementation  Optimize resources  “Adaptive management” approach  Plan  Goals and Targets  ID priority areas and practices  Implement  Monitor and Assess  Evaluate and Adapt  Science and monitoring

Living Resources Habitat Water Quality Sound Land Use Steward- ship Chesapeake Action Plan Chesapeake 2000 Topics Tentative Priorities Oysters Striped Bass Alosa sp. Menhaden Blue Crab SAV Wetlands Fish Passage Wastewater Treatment Agricultural Lands Developed Lands Air Deposition Shorelines & Streambanks Land Conservation Developing Lands Public Access Education - Interpretation General Communication Chemical Contaminants Citizen Outreach Watershed Planning Adaptive Management—Monitoring and Assessment Stream health

Rockfish, Bluefish Menhaden Habitat Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat -Water-quality standards -Fish, Crabs, and Grasses Source: EPA Bay Grasses Habitat Oyster, Crab, Croaker and Spot Habitat Summertime Crab Food Habitat “Delisting” the Bay

Effectiveness of Actions  Water Quality  N, P, and sediment allocations  Tributary strategies  Changes in nutrients and sediment  Land Use  Changes in sources  BMPs  Stream conditions  Biological communities  Habitat  Estuary response

Presidential Executive Order  Topics:  Living resources  Water quality  Agriculture and watersheds  Expand public access  Climate Change  Monitoring and ecosystem management  Ecosystem management  Report to strengthen monitoring  Fish and wildlife in Bay and watershed  Water quality and habitat  Adaptive management  Assess existing monitoring and gaps

 Water-quality networks  Watershed  NT network  Small watersheds  Estuary  Status and trends  Shallow water  Living Resources/Habitat  SAV  Fisheries Monitoring Partnerships

Ecosystem-based fisheries management

Partnership Team Objectives  Id existing water quality and habitat programs in nontidal areas that meet “management effectiveness” needs.  Id partner efforts in tidal areas that could meet “delisting” needs and fill gaps in water quality and habitat monitoring created by funding redirection.  Id partner monitoring programs to assess priority living resources and habitats.  Id gaps where needs are not met.  Outcomes:  Chesapeake Bay Program monitoring report  Information for Presidential E.O. report

Challenges  Scope  Water quality  Living resources and habitat  Information for E.O.  Interacting with partners  Accurate inventory  Flexibility in modifying programs  Multiple partners and priorities  Time and people  Report deadlines  CBP  E.O  Limited availability of people