Research Here and There Zhizheng Zhang( 张志政 ) Southeast University( 东南大学 )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Approaches, Tools, and Applications Islam A. El-Shaarawy Shoubra Faculty of Eng.
Advertisements

Zoran Majkic Integration of Ontological Bayesian Logic Programs
Kees van Deemter Matthew Stone Formal Issues in Natural Language Generation Lecture 4 Shieber 1993; van Deemter 2002.
Hard or Soft: Does it matter? Michael Lyons Manager, Strategic Analysis and Research.
What is a Database By: Cristian Dubon.
The Logic of Intelligence Pei Wang Department of Computer and Information Sciences Temple University.
3. Basic Topics in Game Theory. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1 What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the.
Auto-Epistemic Logic Proposed by Moore (1985) Contemplates reflection on self knowledge (auto-epistemic) Permits to talk not just about the external world,
Everything You Need to Know (since the midterm). Diagnosis Abductive diagnosis: a minimal set of (positive and negative) assumptions that entails the.
An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Presented by : M. Eftekhari.
Evidence Dynamics in Neighborhood Models Johan van Benthem University of Amsterdam.
1 Semantic Description of Programming languages. 2 Static versus Dynamic Semantics n Static Semantics represents legal forms of programs that cannot be.
CPSC 322, Lecture 23Slide 1 Logic: TD as search, Datalog (variables) Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 23 (Textbook Chpt 5.2 & some basic concepts from.
CPSC 322, Lecture 19Slide 1 Propositional Logic Intro, Syntax Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 19 (Textbook Chpt ) February, 23, 2009.
Dynamic Ontologies on the Web Jeff Heflin, James Hendler.
CPSC 322, Lecture 23Slide 1 Logic: TD as search, Datalog (variables) Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 23 (Textbook Chpt 5.2 & some basic concepts from.
Knowledge Acquisitioning. Definition The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
Models -1 Scientists often describe what they do as constructing models. Understanding scientific reasoning requires understanding something about models.
Description Logics. Outline Knowledge Representation Knowledge Representation Ontology Language Ontology Language Description Logics Description Logics.
/dept. of mathematics and computer science TU/e eindhoven university of technology wwwis.win.tue.nl/~hera WWW2002May Specification Framework for.
Artificial Intelligence Overview John Paxton Montana State University February 22, 2005
WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF FUZZY SYSTEMS. DEFINITION Fuzzy logic is a superset of conventional (Boolean) logic that has been extended to handle the concept.
CPSC 322, Lecture 24Slide 1 Reasoning under Uncertainty: Intro to Probability Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 24 (Textbook Chpt 6.1, 6.1.1) March, 15,
Belief Revision Lecture 1: AGM April 1, 2004 Gregory Wheeler
Test Design Techniques
Agent-based Simulation of Financial Markets Ilker Ersoy.
Katanosh Morovat.   This concept is a formal approach for identifying the rules that encapsulate the structure, constraint, and control of the operation.
Artificial Intelligence: Definition “... the branch of computer science that is concerned with the automation of intelligent behavior.” (Luger, 2009) “The.
The Electronic Geometry Textbook Project Xiaoyu Chen LMIB - Department of Mathematics Beihang University, China.
THIS IS HOW WE DO IT! Logic and Information van Benthem-style Celebration Event in Honor of Johan van Benthem Amsterdam, September 26-27, 2014 Vincent.
1 CMPT 275 Software Engineering Requirements Analysis Phase Requirements Analysis Activity (Identifying Objects, Scenarios) Janice Regan,
Ming Fang 6/12/2009. Outlines  Classical logics  Introduction to DL  Syntax of DL  Semantics of DL  KR in DL  Reasoning in DL  Applications.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
LDK R Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation Modeling First version by Alessandro Agostini and Fausto Giunchiglia Second version by Fausto Giunchiglia.
Lecture 2 Economic Actors and Organizations: Motivation and Behavior.
Relationships Between Structures “→” ≝ “Can be defined in terms of” Programs Groups Proofs Trees Complex numbers Operators Propositions Graphs Real.
K. J. O’Hara AMRS: Behavior Recognition and Opponent Modeling Oct Behavior Recognition and Opponent Modeling in Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems.
Lection 3. Part 1 Chapter 2 of Russel S., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: Modern Approach.
Ontology Summit 2015 Track C Report-back Summit Synthesis Session 1, 19 Feb 2015.
Software Project Management By Deepika Chaudhary.
KNOWLEDGE BASED TECHNIQUES INTRODUCTION many geographical problems are ill-structured an ill-structured problem "lacks a solution algorithm.
I Robot.
Chapter 13 Designing Databases Systems Analysis and Design Kendall & Kendall Sixth Edition.
Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the gracious help of the McNair Scholars Program. The authors of this project thank.
Metadata Common Vocabulary a journey from a glossary to an ontology of statistical metadata, and back Sérgio Bacelar
Mining the Biomedical Research Literature Ken Baclawski.
Definitions of AI There are as many definitions as there are practitioners. How would you define it? What is important for a system to be intelligent?
International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, p.p ,July 2011.
Artificial Intelligence: Research and Collaborative Possibilities a presentation by: Dr. Ernest L. McDuffie, Assistant Professor Department of Computer.
CMSC 345 Fall 2000 Requirements Expression. How To Express Requirements Often performed best by working top- down Express general attributes of system.
4 th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing Adaptive Web Processes Using Value of Changed Information John Harney, Prashant Doshi LSDIS.
EEL 5937 Content languages EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
An argument-based framework to model an agent's beliefs in a dynamic environment Marcela Capobianco Carlos I. Chesñevar Guillermo R. Simari Dept. of Computer.
2009/6/30 CAV Quantifier Elimination via Functional Composition Jie-Hong Roland Jiang Dept. of Electrical Eng. / Grad. Inst. of Electronics Eng.
Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation.
KNOWLEDGE MODELING FOR READINESS SELF-ASSESSMENT Presented by: Fuhua Lin Aothors: Dunwei Wen, Ken Dickson, Fuhua Lin Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada.
Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge Representation Part I Ontology Jan Pettersen Nytun Knowledge Representation Part I, JPN, UiA1.
Integrating SysML with OWL (or other logic based formalisms)
Artificial Intelligence
EPISTEMIC LOGIC.
Artificial Intelligence introduction(2)
The Thinking of Grey Information Coverage
Chapter 17 Designing Databases
Some Programming Paradigms
PASSI (Process for Agent Societies Specification and Implementation)
Expert Knowledge Based Systems
Expert Knowledge Based Systems
Diagrams.
Habib Ullah qamar Mscs(se)
Presentation transcript:

Research Here and There Zhizheng Zhang( 张志政 ) Southeast University( 东南大学 )

Here

There

Research ModelsLanguagesAlgorithmsWorld Mathematical Interpretations Problem Ontology

Outline Did –Fuzzy relational database –Financial Time Series Forecasting –Preference Logic Doing –Learning ASP/Action Languages –Medical decsion support system –Modeling interaction scenario. To do –Formalizing medical guidelines using action language –Logic for interaction Logic programs sequences

Did Fuzzy Relational Database –World: linguistic variable+fuzzy raletions –Language: fuzzy SQL –Model: fuzzy relations theory –Problem: Fuzzy Query

Financial Time Series Forecasting –World: exchange rate change history, concerning factors (e.g. oil price.) –Language: neural network, Baysian network, fuzzy rules…. –Model: Time Series x t+1 =f(x t, x t-1,…,y t,y t-1,…) –Problem: What are the parameters’ values in a given language for a given world of histories.

My work on preference logic –Provide an axiomization system with four kinds of preferences introduced in [1]. J. van Benthem, S. van Otterloo, and O. Roy. Preference logic, conditionals, and solution concepts in games. In H. Lagerlund,S. Lindström, and R. Sliwinski, editors, Modality Matters, 61–76, [2]. Johan van Benthem. Games in dynamic-epistemic logic. Bulletin of Economic Research, 53:219–248, 2001.

,  are propositional logic formula –  >   : there exist at least one model m of  and at least one model m’ of  such that m is better than m’. –  >   : there exist at least one model m of  such that m is better than every model of . –  >   : there exist at least one model m of  such that every model of  is better than it. –  >   : for any model m of  and any model m’ of , m is better than m’.

Satisfaction of a preference logic formula

Preference Revision –Example, In valentine's day, based on your and your girlfriend’s usual preferences, your new preferences are romantic movie is better than other types of movies, and more stars is better.

Doing Learning ASP/Action Languages –Why: Motivation Problems: –How to make new questions automatically according to a student’s QA histories and textbook knowledge in educational assistant systems? –How to diagnose a student’s psychological status according to his behaviors records and middle school students psychological knowledge? We hope our programming languages are our natural languages.

Medical decision support system World : dynamic domain Model : transition diagram Language : action language Problem : Planning Difficulties : complex ontology, conflict knowledge, preferences.

Modeling interaction scenario –Static Games. The status of agents are static –Dynamic Games. The behaviors of agents can change their preferences, beliefs.

To Do 1.Formalizing some diseases prevention and cure guidelines using action language I don’t know what difficulties we will meet. Maybe they include: uncertain, complex ontology, quantitative constriants, commonsense……etc.. My question: Is “Modular” method good enough to model the complex domain for action languages? My thinking now: Yes, it is successful in C++ and jave, but need to test it in the real applications by using it to model domains with character of inheritance hierarchy.

Logic for interaction –Axiomatization If preferences are the basis of social choice, how to model the decision procedures when preferences are dynamic. –Computation issue of some interaction scenarios Formalizing interaction procedures using ASP/AL –Why we have ASP sequences? »Beliefs are changing. »Prioritized goals »We formalize the open/evolving domain step by step »Every agent has its own belief on world, but they have to work together.

Question: What is the rational “answer set” of ASP sequences? My thinking: 1). Rational answer sets of the sequences should also be those literals that we are forced to believe. 2). If the union of those ASP is consistent. GOOD! 3). Restoring consistency is rational if we can remove inconsistency by its causes and making a minimal change.

What are the causes of inconsistencies in an ASP seqeuences? Example, P<Q (1). Indirect Exceptions P: { p:-c, not –p. q:-p. } Q: { c. –q } CR-Prolog is great!

(2) not-cycle P: { a:-b. } Q: { b:-not a. } (3)Unsatisfied Constraints P: { :-a, b. a. } Q: { b. }

(4) others? P: { a.} Q: { -a.} (5) Any others? How to deal with them?

THANK YOU