X-Band: test stand and structure program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COOLING TUBE ACCELERATING STRUCTURE MANIFOLD COUPLER VACUUM INTERFACE FLANGE RF INTERFACE FLANGE TUNING STUD ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF X-BAND.
Advertisements

IWLC2010Walter Wuensch19 October 2010 Progress on CLIC rf structures.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Jiaru Shi(Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University) Hao Zha (CERN) CLIC Workshop 2014 CLIC choke mode structure and X-band activities.
SLAC workshop 7-10 July 2009 WP1: microwave based accelerators Status of CLIC X-band high-power components G. Riddone, (contribution from A.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CERN-KEK X-band collaboration 3 Dec T. Higo on behalf of X-band group of KEK.
Development of an X-band Dielectric PETS C. Jing, Euclid Techlabs / ANL HG Workshop, May
Working Group 1: Microwave Acceleration Summary 10 July 2009.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
Walter Wuensch CLIC project meeting, 31 March 2015 Accelerating structure program: design and testing.
W. Wuensch, rf development meeting Considerations on running normal conducting cavities cold.
X-Band and High-Gradient à la Carte
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
5 th CLIC X-band collaboration meetingWalter Wuensch16 May 2011 CLIC rf structure program.
Status of X-band program at RadiaBeam
Accelerating structure test results and what’s next Walter Wuensch CTF3 collaboration meeting
Investigation threads on fabrication technologies for the CLIC X-band Accelerating Structures C. Rossi on behalf of the CLIC X-band Activity Thanks for.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
Statistical analysis of RF conditioning and breakdowns Jorge GINER NAVARRO CLIC Workshop /01/2015 J. Giner Navarro - CLIC WS20151.
Overview of the CLIC RF Structure Development Program W. Wuensch Second Collaboration Meeting on X-band Structures KEK,
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
Development of Dielectric PETS Chunguang Jing and Wei Gai ANL and Euclid CLIC workshop 2013.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
Cost Model including Civil Engineering and Conventional Facilities Hans-H. Braun, CLIC ACE, June 20, 2007  Cost model goals  Methodology  Scaling assumptions.
Recent High-gradient test result at KEK Linear Collider Workshop 2012 Arlington, Texas (WebEx) 25 October, 2012 Toshi Higo and X-band group of KEK.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
The CERN dc Spark System (and a little bit of theory)
Performance of CLIC prototype accelerator structures tested at Nextef CLIC February 2014 Toshiyasu Higo (KEK)
Activities and news Last meeting: 2015 CERN budget allocations as expected, now distributed on accounts Annual report done, and MTP (Medium Term Plan)
Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011.
常伝導技術での LC の可能性 LC feasibility consideration with normal conducting technology 第5回「機構の研究推進について」の意見交 換会 (ILC の推進について ) 平成 24 年 2 月 13 日 加速器・肥後寿泰.
Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.
Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,
KEK workshopWalter Wuensch18 April 2012 Status and objectives of the CLIC X-band and high- gradient activity.
The CLIC accelerating structure development program Walter Wuensch CARE05 23 November 2005.
EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop. June 2014 I. Syratchev X-band high RF power testing activity at CERN I.Syratchev.
CLIC Accelerating Structure R&D Introduction W. Wuensch X-band workshop
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF X-BAND ACCELERATING STRUCTURE TD24 WITH WFM Abstract To achieve high luminosity in CLIC, the accelerating structures.
Progress of X-Band Accelerating Structures LINAC10, Tsukuba 17 Sep T. Higo (KEK)
Tsinghua Collaboration Plan Jiaru Shi, CERN On behalf of Huaibi Chen, Tsinghua University, Beijing November Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
W. Wuensch CLIC project meeting High-power rf structure testing.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
Nextef results & status International Workshop on Breakdown Science and High Gradient Technology KEK, Japan 18 April 2012 Toshi Higo.
High-gradient rf constraints W. Wuensch X-band workshop
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
Summary of XFEL uses for CALIFES Erik Adli (University of Oslo, Norway)
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
GOLD- ELECTROPLATING COOLING FITTING ADAPTER ACCELERATING STRUCTURE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF X-BAND ACCELERATING STRUCTURE TD26 CC SIC Abstract Many accelerating.
An Overview of the CLIC RF Structure Development Program ~
Introduction to Summary of the X-band resource estimation exercise
CALIFES A proposed electron beam test facility at CERN
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Application of moderate (5 MW) X-band power sources for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program and other projects I. Syratchev, CERN.
The situation is far better than I had thought.
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Developments on Proposed
Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development
X-band Facilities and High Gradient Tests Stands Around the World
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Recent high-gradient testing results from the CLIC XBoxes
CLIC rf structure program
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Linac LLP Outline LINAC Long Lead Procurements
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Status of DESY-PSI-CERN collaboration on development of X-band TDS with variable polarisation: PolariX-TDS Alexej Grudiev on behalf of Polarix-TDS collaboration.
Presentation transcript:

X-Band: test stand and structure program

Outline Gradient status XBox status Collaborators Structures under test Longer-term objectives Concrete Generalize Wakefields and tolerances I will not have time to cover the excellent progress which has been made in operation and data analysis .

State of the art Operating frequency 12 GHz Accelerating gradient 100 MV/m Peak surface electric field 250 MV/m Pulse length 200 ns Repetition rate 50 Hz Input power 50 MW Breakdown rate <10-7 BD/pulse/m One structure showed 120 MV/m, so full margin for beam loading (about -15%). But no damping features. Numerous structures around 100 MV/m. Technical issues (probably) identified, feeding back on design and production. Parameters (rounded values)

X-band test stands at CERN XBox-1: beam test area XBox-1 XBox-2 XBox-2 and 3: Bunker XBox-3

Technical Specifications klystron Peak power pulse length Modulator Rep rate XBox-1 CPI 50 MW 1.5 µs Scandinova 50 Hz CTF3 beam test capability XBox-2 XBox-3 Toshiba 4x6MW 5 µs 400 Hz up to 4 testing slots! Cavity-type pulse compressors on all the XBoxes. Full computer control, data acquisition and on-line analysis for all three XBoxes. XBoxes test prototypes but also are prototypes of linac rf units for a wide variety of applications: initial energy stage CLIC, XFEL (low and high rep rate), Compton/Thompson sources, transverse deflectors, linearizers, photo injectors etc.

Status XBox-1 – Operational XBox-2 – Operational XBox-3 All four klystron/modulators at CERN 3a – Operational 3b,c,d – Site acceptance testing week of 12 October followed by commissioning Waveguide network, LLRF under preparation, complete for end of year

Structures under test right now XBox-1 – CLIC prototype, re-conditioning, beam loading test to follow (TD26CC). XBox-2 – Structure from halves, conditioning (T24-open) XBox-3 – 3-D printed Ti waveguide under medium (5 MW-range) power test

Collaborators Now a brief look at collaborators with major X-band rf infrastructure; KEK, SLAC, Tsinghua and SINAP. Many more collaborators make important contributes to the effort: University of Valencia, University of Lancaster, University of Uppsala, Sincrotrone Trieste, PSI, SACLAY, CIEMAT, Melbourne University/Australian Light Source, University of Helsinki, University of Tartu, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, University of Eindhoven, University of Oslo, Argonne.

NEXTEF – prototype and single cell testing KEK Outstanding record of structure production and testing. Close coordination with CLIC study. CERN designed, KEK/SLAC built prototype. Single-cell test cavity NEXTEF – prototype and single cell testing

SLAC Extensive, independent high-gradient program.

Tsinghua University Choke-mode cavity Working towards new generation Thompson scattering source. Choke-mode cavity

SINAP X-band deflector Currently building soft X-ray XFEL test facility at C-band. Plan to propose hard X-ray XFEL, X or C decision not taken yet. Building up in-house capability for high-gradient and high-frequency cavities. They will build: X-band deflector T24 CLIC structure Four XFEL-optimized accelerating structures X-band deflector To be tested at KEK

CLIC prototype in XBox1/dog-leg First try with beam loading experiment was only partial success. Experiment established but structure developed hot front end, perhaps due to accumulated beam loss. Re-aligned collimator. Re-use TD26CC to minimize conditioning time. Pulse compressor was very hard to run. Modified and now runs far better. Currently re-conditioning structure, behaving well. 110 MV/m, 100 ns Comparison to initial conditioning

T24 open in XBox2 Milled structures have huge potential advantages - cost, treatment, materials. Early tries with quadrants yielded unsatisfactory results, but don’t believe this was end of story. We’re back! Over 70 MV/m, 100 ns and behaving well so far. Similar behaviour to disk-based. Sc comparison shown. Structure in halves built by SLAC

Baseline program CERN production CLIC prototypes: Second ready but needs leak repair. Objectives, refine CERN production, reproducibility (TD26CC#2 and 3). CLIC prototype with SiC absorbers: a missing element (TD26CC-Sic) T24s to confirm KEK result: Essential question of effect of damping features on gradient. Do they lower? If so why? And how to counteract? New 3 TeV baseline series: Absorb lesson learned so far, redesign for higher performance at lower cost (CLIC-G*) Collaborator production Three CLIC prototypes to be built and tested at KEK. Still unbeaten production! One TD26CC built by CIEMAT One T24 built by SINAP

Alternative program Milled structures: Potentially much lower cost. If current progress continues follow up with: Bonded irises Open with hard copper Many other options! Two T24s built by PSI in their production run. Vacuum brazing alternative Potentially lower cost. Choke-mode damping by Tsinghua. Potentially much lower cost. Deflector by SINAP Four XFEL structures by SINAP. Connection to XbXFEL Pulsed dc system –presentation later in morning

Schedule

Overall high-gradient objectives Consolidate existing results – solve issues uncovered as we move towards higher gradient, statistics, operational experience, conditioning Investigate a high-potential, performance and cost, alternatives Critically evaluate and optimize baseline fabrication procedure Validate new baseline structure Run klystron/pulse compressor units up to full specification – feed two structures in parallel

Wakefield suppression Wakefield from 1.5 m long, 6 structure length, prototype measured directly with beam at the FACET facility at SLAC. The agreement between measurement and simulation is a spectacular validation of our design capabilities and we meet our beam dynamics requirements!

Tolerances Component tolerances achieved. We order such parts regularly from industry. We already are feeding back on the rf design to make the parts less expensive based on what we have learned. Assembly tolerances, mainly straightness, need work. Priority has been to produce high-gradient test structures and we choose to minimize time/risk associated with optimizing alignment. More work is needed on this.

I would like to acknowledge the excellent work which has been done by colleagues at CERN and around the world and express my sincere appreciation.

More information Our high-gradient high-gradient and X-band applications community recently held a workshop in Beijing: https://indico.cern.ch/event/358352/.