Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Alternative Response. WHAT IS AR? Referrals given to the agency for assessment. Read the referrals and decide whether you would screen this in or.
Advertisements

117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
CRITICAL THINKING IN ASSESSING PROTECTIVE CAPACITIES.
2010 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Safety and Risk Management – Three Key Case Decisions Barry Salovitz Senior Director, Strategic.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
1 Module 1. 2 Module 1 Learning Objectives Participants are able to: Discuss the purpose of a safety plan in response to impending danger. Justify the.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
2 3 Regional Manager Employment Services Supervisors Employment Services Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Adult Services.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
Southern Middle School Student Support Services
Lakota Oyate Wakanyeja Owicakiyapi. The purpose of the LOWO Tiwahe Risk Assessment/Investigation is to protect children from risks of harm and to assess.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Mandated Reporter Training: Identifying and Reporting Child Abuse and Maltreatment/Neglect.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency CM 124_OAP_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS) SERVING OUR CHILDREN.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
GEORGIA CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEM- DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Charles Ringling DBHDD Region 5 Coordinator/ RC Team Leader.
Circuit 7 Department of Children and Families. What About Safety Plans??? Let’s think about it.  Do all safety plans have the same function or purpose?
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.
Assessing Child Vulnerabilities 1. Introductions Name Agency and Position What you’d like to learn today 2.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities 1.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Where are you from? (office and role) 3. What do you hope.
Facility Related Intake Training Presented by Melissa Sayer
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Overview of Crawford County Children and Youth Services.
Child Protection Services By: Katrina Schimke. Introduction Please watch video before going through PowerPoint Presentation t. (Right click and then open.
Maltreatments FSFN Core 110_MAL_FSFN_PPT_July 2012 PPT 1.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Carolina Health Centers, Inc.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
Ongoing Assessment and Safety Planning
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Maltreatments FSFN Core 110_MAL_FSFN_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1.
Present Danger Assessment and Planning
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Lisa Litchfield| SSIS Worker Mentor Coordinator
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1

Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions 2

Ongoing assessment of risk to the child’s safety at every contact and at … Formal assessment of risk at decision-making points Screening Referral Formal Safety Assessment Family Strengths and Needs Assessment Formal Reviews Reunification Case Closure Actuarial Risk Assessment 3

Safety Assessment Safety Plan Family Assessment Case Plan Case Review Semiannual Administrative Review Reunification Assessment Specialized Assessment/Investigation Ongoing Case Assessment &Investigation The CAPMIS Toolset 4

Let’s see what you already know about… Safety Assessment and Safety Planning 5

Assessment of Risk to the Child’s Safety At the Safety Assessment, the threat of harm must be serious and imminent 6

Let’s take a closer look… Serious Harm Life threatening Life threatening Substantively retards mental health or development Substantively retards mental health or development Substantial physical suffering, disfigurement or disability; permanent or temporary Substantial physical suffering, disfigurement or disability; permanent or temporaryImminent Current or impending Current or impending 7

Safety Decision Safety Threats Protective Capacities Child Vulnerability CAPMIS SAFETY MODEL 8

Threat Protective Capacity Degree Of Vulnerability 9

Completing a Safety Assessment Minimum Contact Requirements Face-to-Face contact with the alleged child victim(s). At least one of the caretakers must be interviewed face-to-face. 10

Timeframes for Safety Assessment Completed within four (4) working days from the receipt of the report. If initial attempt to make face-to-face contact is unsuccessful: an additional attempt within the first four (4) working days of the assessment/investigation is required. After face-to-face contact is made, the Safety Assessment tool must be completed the next working day. 11

Specific and concrete strategy for:  controlling threats of serious harm to a child(ren) or  supplementing protective capacities  implemented immediately when a family’s protective capacities are not sufficient to manage immediate safety threats for at least one child in the family. Safety Plan 12

Threat P r o t e c t i v e C a p a c i t i e s 13

Safety Plan Guidelines Safety Plan Guidelines Safety Plans must be continuously re-evaluated and modified, whenever necessary. In-home safety plans – weekly home visits by PCSA weekly home visits by PCSA Out-of-home safety plans – weekly contact by PCSA with the children or persons responsible for an action step, either by telephone or face-to-face weekly contact by PCSA with the children or persons responsible for an action step, either by telephone or face-to-face and have face-to-face contact with each child involved every other week and have face-to-face contact with each child involved every other week 14

When a threat of serious harm no longer exists or When a threat of serious harm no longer exists or When control of the threat within the family is probable and can be maintained without PCSA safety focused intervention or active safety plan monitoring. When control of the threat within the family is probable and can be maintained without PCSA safety focused intervention or active safety plan monitoring. All parties of the Safety Plan need to be notified in writing within one working day of the Safety Plan being discontinued. All parties of the Safety Plan need to be notified in writing within one working day of the Safety Plan being discontinued. CPS cases cannot be terminated, outside a court order, when a Safety Plan is active. Discontinuing a Safety Plan 15

Let’s see what you already know about… Family Assessment 16

Guide to Family Assessment Requirements Family Assessment is completed for: Intra-familial child abuse/neglect (including third party) Intra-familial child abuse/neglect (including third party) Dependency Dependency Family Assessment is not completed for: completed for: Deserted Child Deserted Child Emancipated Youth Emancipated Youth Permanent Surrender Permanent Surrender 17

The Family Assessment 18 Safety Reassessment Child Harm Strengths and Needs Family’s Perception Actuarial Risk Assessment Case Analysis

19 A. Case Decision Case Disposition Preliminary Matrix-Indicated Case Decision Final Case Decision

20 Case Analysis B. Service Planning

Let’s see what you already know about… Case Reviews 21

Case Review Completed no later than every 3 months based on whichever occurs first: Original Court Complaint Date Original Court Complaint Date Date of Placement Date of Placement Date of Court ordered Protective Supervision Date of Court ordered Protective Supervision Date of Agency Worker Signature – No Court Date of Agency Worker Signature – No Court …also completed at Case Closure unless the case is closed within 30 days of last review and intent to close case was recorded. 22

S A dministrative R S emiannual A dministrative R eview Completed no later than every 6 months based on whichever occurs first: Original Court Complaint Date Original Court Complaint Date Date of Placement Date of Placement Date of Court ordered Protective Supervision Date of Court ordered Protective Supervision Date of Agency Worker Signature – No Court Date of Agency Worker Signature – No Court … completed in conjunction with Case Review 23

Let’s see what you already know about… ReunificationAssessment 24

Reunification Considerations Are safety threats active that require external control? If so what controls are necessary? If so what controls are necessary? Have threats been resolved, altered or reduced to a level altered or reduced to a level whereby control within the whereby control within the family is probable? family is probable? 25

Reunification Assessment May be completed at anytime PCSA deems it appropriate. Must be completed: At Safety Re-Assessment when the safety response is Modify or Discontinue and the child has been placed out of the home for 30 days or more. At Safety Re-Assessment when the safety response is Modify or Discontinue and the child has been placed out of the home for 30 days or more. Within 30 days prior to any court hearing where the agency is anticipating the child will be returned home. Within 30 days prior to any court hearing where the agency is anticipating the child will be returned home. 26

Specialized Assessment / Investigations Alleged perpetrator meets one or more of the following criteria: Is responsible for the care of a child in Out-of- Home Care Setting Is responsible for the care of a child in Out-of- Home Care Setting Is responsible for the care of a child in Out-of- Home Care Is responsible for the care of a child in Out-of- Home Care Has access to the child by virtue his/her employment or affiliation with an institution Has access to the child by virtue his/her employment or affiliation with an institution 27

Ongoing Assessment & Investigation If Intra-familial child abuse and/or neglect is alleged in a case which is opened for ongoing agency services… A Safety Assessment and Ongoing Assessment/Investigation must be completed. 28

Family, Adult and Children Services Manual website: Websites for Rules, Tools & CAPMIS Mailbox 29