G050121-00-R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update Dennis Coyne LSC LLO March 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
G D LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Dennis Coyne Hannover LSC 19 August 2003.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker Aspen at Elba 23 May 2002.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development Update Dennis Coyne LSC Meeting at LLO 16 March 2004.
LIGO-G M 1 Advanced LIGO Status LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting August 15, Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory, Caltech.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
September 8, 2015 THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER Helios Vocca.
Substrate mechanical loss studies Sheila Rowan (Stanford University) for: LIGO Laboratory (Caltech, MIT, LLO, LHO) LSC Partners (University of Glasgow,
LIGO and Advanced LIGO: Technical Issues Dave Ottaway (for LIGO Scientific Community) LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker  Gary Sanders Elba “Aspen” Meeting 23 May 2002.
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Louisiana,
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Update on Advanced LIGO suspension design and technology development towards the quad noise prototype Caroline A. Cantley for Advanced LIGO Suspension.
Thermal noise from optical coatings Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration - 25 July
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Advanced LIGO laser development P. Weßels, L. Winkelmann, O. Puncken, B. Schulz, S. Wagner, M. Hildebrandt, C. Veltkamp, M. Janssen, R. Kluzik, M. Frede,
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
DFG-NSF Astrophysics Workshop Jun 2007 G Z 1 Optics for Interferometers for Ground-based Detectors David Reitze Physics Department University.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
LSC August G Z Gingin High Optical Power Test Facility (AIGO) 1 High Optical Power Test Facility - Status First lock, auto-alignment and.
Update on Suspension Activities for Advanced LIGO Caroline A. Cantley University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, Livingston, March 2003 (Technical.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC Virgo meeting, Caltech, March 2008 LIGO G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
LIGO-G M LIGO R&D1 Initial LIGO upgrade to 30 W: Implication for the Input Optics UFLIGO Group.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Advanced LIGO Status Report
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Cascina, Nov. 4 th, 2008 AdV review 1 AdV Injection system E. Genin European Gravitational Observatory.
LSC Meeting March ‘07 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) LASTI Progress and Plans LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway/Richard Mittleman March.
THE INPUT OPTICS OF ENHANCED AND ADVANCED LIGO D.B. Tanner, M.A. Arain, A. Lucianetti, R.M. Martin, V. Quetschke, L.F. Williams, Wan Wu, G. Mueller, and.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Advanced Advanced Virgo BASELINE DESIGN advanced Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator for the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO-G D Core Optics Components (COC) Polishing Pathfinder Kickoff Advanced LIGO Project GariLynn Billingsley Caltech.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Material Downselect Rationale and Directions Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Technology On behalf of downselect working.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Evolution of the Virgo detector: The Virgo+ plans
Advanced LIGO Quad Prototype Janeen Romie LSC, March 2004
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update Dennis Coyne LSC LLO March 2005

G R LIGO R&D2 Advanced LIGO A reminder... »~Factor 10 in amplitude sensitivity »~Factor 4 lower frequency »Tunable Recombined Fabry-Perot Michelson »Signal recycling »~20x higher input power »40 kg masses »Fused silica suspension »Active seismic isolation, quad pendulum suspension Here and now: a quick run through of progress highlights and active questions

G R LIGO R&D3 Construction Project Status NSB endorsed the Advanced LIGO construction proposal (Oct ’04) »Contingent upon an integrated year of observation with Initial LIGO NSF & Presidential Out-year Budget includes LIGO! »LIGO is one of 3 proposed new start projects in the next 3 years »NSF has proposed an FY08 funding start (FY07 start is a possibility) AEI »Presidential Board of the Max Planck Society has endorsed AEI plans for Adv. LIGO material contribution Lab Planning: »Research, Design & Development (RD&D) phase aimed toward FY07 MREFC start »Continuing to refine plans, costs and contingencies »Anticipate a detailed baseline review for MREFC ~mid 2006 Sky map showing locations of superclusters, walls, and voids of galaxies within about 500 million light years. Superimposed circles show the range of LIGO (orange inner circle) and the 10 times larger range of AdvLIGO (purple outer circle). The milky way is at the center in this representation. Credit: the underlying black and white image with names of clusters and voids is by Richard Powell; the superimposed color circles were added by Beverly Berger, Division of Physics, NSF.

G R LIGO R&D4 “Systems” R&D Test Facilities progressing well: »40m Lab »LASTI »Gingin Systems Engineering »Refining the optical layout, Starting an integrated 3D optomechanical layout »E2E Adv. LIGO modeling »Systems trades, Requirements/Interface definition, … Project Management »Refining the planning & costing for the baseline MREFC review

G R LIGO R&D5 SEI BSC Design »Our design contractor (ASI) has completed and delivered the detailed BSC design »Critical Review: Are we still on track? –Cost and programmatic review successful (Jan) –Technical Review, informed by Stanford ETF testing, planned for ~May »LIGO Lab will competitively compete the piece part fabrication –After a go-ahead from the critical review, and any minor design modifications –Procurement strategy being developed HAM design »ASI has delivered a preliminary (layout) design »After BSC fabrication is underway, LIGO Lab will complete the final design effort (likely as a subcontracted design effort) Plan suspension structure testing on the ETF active SEI system to investigate coupled dynamics SEI Technology Demonstrator at the Stanford Engineering Test Facility (ETF) Good Performance (all 12 damping & isolation loops engaged)

G R LIGO R&D6 Seismic Isolation (SEI) Development SEI Critical Review »Successful Cost & Programmatic review Jan ’05 »Technical Review after ETF Results available, ~May ‘05

G R LIGO R&D7 Suspensions Test Mass (Quad) Suspension »Revised Cavity Optics Design Requirements Document released (T ) »‘Controls’ Prototype –‘Dirty’ sub-assembly underway –Design & Fabrication complete ~May –Delivery to LASTI planned early summer »‘Noise’ Prototype –Concurrent Design by the UK Team (under PPARC funding) Mode Cleaner (Triple) Suspension »LASTI Testing of controls prototype completed »Performance as expected »Model-measurement comparison caught some model shortcomings & an as- built difference

G R LIGO R&D8 Suspensions Silica Fiber/Ribbon Pulling »R&D on computer controlled CO 2 laser system proceeding well »Fibers up to 570 mm long, 184  5 microns diameter (15 microns dia. repeatability) with 3 GPa breaking stress (factor of safety  4) »Ribbons produced with the beam oscillating across the stock by mirror galvanometers (4 mm x 150 microns typ.) Fiber/Ribbon Welding »Fiber & ribbon welding demonstrated »Working to improve welded strength Eddy Current Damping »Component design is complete »Optimizatizing location for selected DOFs Electrostatics »Mask fabricated on penultimate mass Electronics »Optical Sensing & Electro-Magnetic actuator (OSEM) assembly Preliminary design: –Mechanical design complete –Electronics well underway »Damping Controls test stand fabrication & assembly completed at Caltech (dSpace version) Welding 3mm silica rod with 9W CO 2 laser Modified Hybrid OSEM Design

G R LIGO R&D9 Pre-stabilized Laser Injection locking of the 200 W Laser (LZH, AEI) »Automatic: Re-locks 3 stage system in less than 1 sec »Reliable: Durations > 40 min Characterizing spatial and temporal behavior »Higher order mode content measured with LIGO-like Pre-Mode Cleaner (PMC) »Spatial profile has donut mode after upgrade of components (100 W to 200 W) –Laser crystal Erbium doping too high –Thermal compensation lenses out of specification (fixed) Relative Intensity Noise (RIN) Stabilization »Outer loop power stabilization implemented on GEO600 »Mode Cleaner introduces RIN on the beam – effect being studied

G R LIGO R&D10 Input Optics (IO) LLO High Power Laser Facility (HPLF) »Operational (clean room, safety prototcols) »100 W CW 1064 nm linearly polarized Yb fiber laser is in spec »Reliability problems; since delivery failed 4 times Faraday Isolator »20 mm aperture with thermal lensing & depolarization compensation »20% thermal lensing of an uncompensated isolator »Total depolarization of -35 dB at 180 W Modulation »Received two New Focus EOMs with low absorption RTP crystals »No damage at 85 W for > 400 hrs at irradiances greater than for AL »Mach-Zehnder interferometer being assembled with monolithic mechanical ‘backbone’ IO Design »Building layout & Components in 3D SolidWorks »Will use Fused Silica for the Adaptive Mode Matching Telescope; Measured Thermal Distortion with Schott OG-515 is too high »Melody Model of the Mode Cleaner indicates that an Absorption Coefficient of 1 ppm can be tolerated

G R LIGO R&D11 Coatings Mechanical Loss Goal: ~10x reduction from to loss angle »Brings coating noise down below substrate Brownian noise »Increases NS-NS 1.4 Ms from ~160 Mpc to ~200 Mpc Need to reduce coating thermal absorption inhomogeneity Sense is that we can get pretty close with incremental improvements »New results on Tantala doping and single layer materials »New design algorithm for non- periodic, multi-layer dielectric coating decreases thickness of high mechanical loss Tantala

G R LIGO R&D12 Core Optics Substrate selection = Fused Silica! »Recommendation based on a comparative study of FS & Sapphire »either material could work, but more risks for sapphire »FS better at low frequencies (high mass BH- BH) »Sapphire better at high frequencies (LMXB) »Coating loss dominates –limits to ~160 Mpc (NS-NS 1.4 Ms) Lab work: »Annealing? »Scatter and absorption characterization of Initial LIGO optics for possible H1 ITM replacement pre-S5 »Developing & characterizing: –optical loss for improved cleaning procedures –Required particulate cleanliness levels SapphireSilica NS-NS 1.4 Ms 191 Mpc BH-BH 10 Ms 920 Mpc1050 Mpc Pulsar h/√Hz 7 x x Omega4.8 x x10 -9

G R LIGO R&D13 Advanced LIGO RD&D Summary RD&D phase plans are being adjusted to »accommodate limitations in LIGO operations funding »a stretched development phase »delayed SEI development The SEI Critical Review process is proceeding well Fused Silica has been selected as the Test Mass material (over Sapphire) ¡The NSF, NSB and the OMB have endorsed the Advanced LIGO Construction project! »MREFC funding start nominally FY08