RF systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, P. Mortazavi and Nathan Towne BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Stephen Kramer, VUV Ring Manager CSR Emission Studies in VUV/IR Ring NSLS.
Advertisements

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
Jim Rose CWRF08 March NSLS-II RF Systems Jim Rose For the RF Group CWRF08 Workshop March 26, 2008.
X-ray Booster IR Linac Harmonic RF RF Systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, N. Towne With help from many others at BNL and other institutions.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
ILC DR RF Cavity – D. Li DR Workshop, KEK, Japan 1 Design for the DR RF cavities and impedance issues Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview NSLS II Advisory Committees October 18/19, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Injection System T. Shaftan NSLS-II Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee October 11, 2006.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Canadian Light Source Commissioning Progress CLS Annual Users Meeting –
TAC Synchrotron Radiation Project Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University Science Faculty Physics Department.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
CEPC SRF System Heat Load CEPC Top-level Parameters related to SRF System (1) ParameterUnitMain Ring Booster Injection Booster Extraction.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XXIII (24-25/ ), ASTRID2 facility 1.
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings April 16 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Alexej Grudiev.
Operation Status of the RF Systems and Taiwan Photon Source
HOMs in high-energy part of the Project-X linac. V. Yakovlev, N. Solyak, J.-F. Ostiguy Friday 26 June 2009.
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(3)
Some CEPC SRF considerations
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
PETRA IV System design concept Old and new machine
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Harmonic RF systems for ESRF-EBS - Preliminary considerations -
CEPC Ring RF System Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP) Workshop on the Circular Electron Positron Collider Rome, May 25, 2018.
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

RF systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, P. Mortazavi and Nathan Towne BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

X-RAY Ring RF requirements Beam Energy 3 GeV Beam Current 500 mA Energy loss/turn (Initial/Upgrade) 0.9 /2.0 MeV Power to Beam (Initial/upgrade) 0.45 / 1 MW p/p acceptance 3% Momentum compaction 0.00037 RF parameters Frequency 500MHz Cavity Voltage 3.3 / 4.9 MV Bucket for 3.3MV

NSLS-II RF POWER REQUIREMENTS Covered in baseline cost Capability of installed RF Installing 3rd cavity+300kW Adding 4th cavity and transmitter Power # installed, power in kW Dipole -, 144 -, 144 Damping wiggler 3, 194 4, 259 8, 517 Cryo-PMU 3, 38 6, 76 6, 76 10, 127 EPU 2, 33 4, 66 4, 66 5, 83 Additional devices ?, 200 TOTAL 409 545 803 1071 Available RF Power 540 810 1080

Cavity Choice High beam currents achieved by B-factories made CESR-B, KEK-B and PEP-II cavities attractive Complex SUPERFISH analysis of CESR-B of HOM impedances used in preliminary CBI growth rate estimates with ZAP: maximum growth time of 65ms for 4 cavities, less than the damping time of 8ms GdfidL analysis of full 3-D cavity extends analysis to dipole modes and 3-D effects (fluted beampipe)

Cavity Modeling with CFish, GdfidL GdfidL vs. CFISH Benchmark ferrite losses, superconductor surface resistance GdfidL vs. measurements on ferrite loaded pillbox confirm GdfidL model Full Cavity HOM results used to analyze CB instability up to ~2GHz, No problems yet but need to extend to beampipe cutoff frequency of 7GHz Alexei Blednykh

CESR-B Cavity chosen for Baseline Beam energy gain/cav >2.4 MV Eacc >8 MV/m Unloaded Q >7108 Standby (static) losses <30 W Dynamic + static losses <120W Operating Temperature 4.5 K Max. beam power/cavity <250 kW Frequency 500 MHz SCRF chosen for lower R/Q, highly damped HOM’s, lower operating cost and comparable capital cost Well established commercial production. Units 15 and 16 now being produced by ACCEL. In operations at Cornell (4), CLS(2), Taiwan (2). Being commissioned at Diamond (3)

KEK-B Cavity Parameters Manufactured by Mitsubishi for KEK at 508 MHz They have produced one cavity at 500MHz Frequency (MHz) 500 Energy gain/cav (MeV) 2.5 E-Acc (MV/m) >12 Unloaded Q @ 8MV/m >109 BeamPower/coupler (kW) >270 *KEK has recently demonstrated 400kW per coupler KEK cavity is an option for NSLS-II *Shinji Mitsunobu SRF2005 ThP52 High Power Test of Input Couplers and HOM dampers  for KEKB Superconducting Cavity

Passive Third Harmonic Landau Cavity A harmonic bunch-lengthening cavity is required to increase Touschek lifetime. Increases beam stability by increasing energy-dependent tune spread ~1/3 of 500MHz voltage, ~1 MV, can be met with one Super3HC cavity Elletra/SLS Super 3HC cryo-module

Harmonic Cavity for Bunch Lengthening 1500MHz “Super-3HC” cavity Voltage/cell 0.5 MV Eacc >5MV/m Unloaded Q >7108 Static losses <50W Dynamic + static losses <100W Operating T. 4.5 K Frequency 1500 MHz Work continues on effect of bunch train transients on bunch lengthening (N. Towne) 4.9MV @500MHz required for 3% Momentum acceptance: 1.6MV @ 1500MHz requires 3 cavities N. Towne

NSLS-II RF Straight layout Two 500 MHz cavities + one 1500 MHz passive harmonic cavity fit in one 8m straight: meets initial power requirements Second straight reserved for third , fourth 500 MHz and second 1500MHz cavities as additional user insertion devices increase RF power requirement Klystrons located in adjacent RF building to minimize loop delays in feedback systems

RF Power Sources for Ring System Manufacturer/model Frequency MHz Power kW Efficiency % CPI VPK-7957A 500 800 60 Thales TH2161B/2178 310/800 61 Toshiba E3774 180 53 Klystron can be sourced by multiple vendors

Low Level RF System Effect of RF jitter on the beam: Amplitude modulation of the RF fields leads to momentum deviations of the beam, Likewise phase modulations translate into amplitude modulations again leading to momentum deviations. The momentum errors affect beam size and orbit jitter as follows: The beam size in the center of the 5 m straight is given by Since the dispersion is near zero (~1mm) and the natural energy spread is <0.001 the second term is negligible and the beam size becomes σ x,y= 40μm, 2.4 μm Orbit jitter is given as σx = σδ∙ηx , σy = σδ∙ηy σx′ = σδ∙ηx′ , σy′ = σδ∙ηy′ This work is in progress, and preliminary tolerances of +/- 0.5% amplitude and 0.5 degree phase have been adopted. These values have been achieved at other 3rd generation light sources.

Modeling: Future work NSLS-II bunch length of 4.5mm excites modes up to elliptical beam-pipe cutoff frequency C48 Ferrite loss factor decreasing rapidly ε′ Courtesy M. deJong, CLS μ′′ Losses declining μ′ ε′′ By combining different ferrite tiles broad range of frequencies can be damped V. Shemelin Impedance limit for 8ms damping time, 4.5mm bunch length 40

Booster Ring Requirements Full energy booster in same tunnel 780m circumference Energy loss /turn =493 keV Vacc = 1MeV for 1% RF acceptance 7nC/macropulse, 1 per min. Beam current = ~3mA Beam power 3kW Delta-E/E Phase in 500 MHz (radians) 1 “Petra” type cavity and (1) 50-80 kW IOT

Conclusions RF systems for third generation light sources are mature technology; RF cavities and power sources available from industry The short bunch length of 4.5mm in NSLS-II means operating the CESR-B cavities in a new regime, C-48 ferrite may not meet requirements at higher frequencies: This is being studied further, new ferrite combinations appear to be direct substitutes and can be incorporated in the preliminary design phase. Work continues to define RF tolerances, however modern digital RF control systems can achieve an order of magnitude improvement over existing (APS, ESRF) systems mitigating any concerns