1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Engaging All Families with Parent Leaders
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
December 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Google Sites Extending the Walls of Your Classroom.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
T EACHER L EADERSHIP FROM THE C LASSROOM Session 9 Thursday, December 12, 2013.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Standard I: Leadership, Advocacy & Collaboration NCDPI Webinar Series 10/2/13.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
1 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING within a COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY FRAMEWORK The professional learning cycle: serves as a process for professional learning is driven.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Educator Evaluation System: District Process and Responsibilities.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Solano County Office of Education Jay Speck Solano County Superintendent of Schools.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Only 3 work weeks left! Welcome to Unit 7!!. Preview of Upcoming Weeks Unit 7- Our last standard work week Unit 8-2 Final essays due Unit 9- Final paper.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
District Literacy Leaders Network Leading for Equity: The WILL, SKILL and CAPACITY (Part 1) February 10, 2016 Dr. Marion Smith, Jr. | Director, Learning.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Advancing Quality Partnerships
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Overview New Teacher Induction Program Malden Public Schools
Professional Review Process for Heads / Principals
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Talent Management and Leadership Development for the Health Workforce
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Align Combine Design.
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year conversation agreements for effective practice, review observational notes and feedback, reflect on performance against the role-specific framework. Beginning of year conversation guide Note catcher template SSP Framework Roles and responsibilities guide Mid year conversation Schedule time for a mid-year feedback conversation with your SSP. Mid year conversation guide SSP Framework Roles and responsibilities guide Continue observations After the conversation continue to observe your SSP as agreed upon in the beginning of year conversation, hold feedback conversations, and retain your notes in your personal records for reference at end of year. Note catcher template SSP Framework If you do not know if you are the evaluating leader for an SSP in your building please contact your HR School Partner or the Talent Management Hotline (or x32600) for If you not a primary evaluator for an SSP but want to provide feedback please contact the primary evaluator by phone or to share your feedback.

As you consider the performance of your SSPs against their framework please note that many SSP framework indicators align with indicators in LEAP*. For these indicators seek to find alignment of expectations of performance between the two roles 2 SSP FRAMEWORK CONNECTIONS TO LEAP SSP Framework IndicatorLEAP Indicator 2.A - SSP Demonstrates knowledge of, interest in and respect for diverse students’ communities and cultures in a manner that increases equity. LE.1 - Demonstrates knowledge of, interest in and respect for diverse students’ communities and cultures in a manner that increases equity. 2.B - SSP Implements high, clear expectations for student behavior, including self-advocacy. LE.3 – Implements high, clear expectations for students’ behavior and routines 4.A - SSP Demonstrates self-awareness, reflects on practice with self and others, and acts on feedback P.5 - Demonstrates self-awareness, reflects on practice with self and others and acts on feedback 4.B - SSP Pursues opportunities for professional growth and contributes to a culture of inquiry P.6 - Pursues opportunities for professional growth and contributes to a culture of inquiry 5.A - Advocates for and engages students, families and the community in support of improved students’ achievement P.4 - Advocates for and engages students, families and the community in support of improved students’ achievement 5.B - Collaborates with school teams to positively impact students’ outcomes P.3 – Collaborates with school teams to positively impact students’ outcomes 5.C - Builds capacity among colleagues and demonstrates service to students, school, district and the profession P.7 - Builds capacity among colleagues and demonstrates service to students, school, district and the profession ** Note that the School Counselor Framework is not as closely aligned to LEAP.