Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report NAME OF ARC NAME OF ARC CHAIR DATE Institutional Planning, Assessment, and Research

Mentoring/Review Process Describe your ARC review process –For example: What did you do? How many times did your ARC meet? How were the reviews conducted (individually, in a group, primary/secondary reviewers, etc.) Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

Component Data IA (Alex Senior) will complete this slide for your ARC) DevelopingAcceptableProficient Outcome Means of Assessment Criteria for Success Results Actions Taken Follow-Up to Actions Taken Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

Data Visualization IA (Alex Senior) will complete this slide for your ARC) Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

Best Practices – “Closing the Loop” [can use more than one slide] Outcome: Means of Assessment: Criteria for Success: Results: Actions Taken (based on analysis of results): Initiative/Change/Strategy Implemented for Program/Unit improvement: Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

Substantive Changes (For example: All new Outcomes/MOAs or a reorganization of the assessment unit) Program/Unit: Description of Changes: Justification for Changes: –Describe how change(s) is/are designed to improve student learning, program quality, or unit performance in response to the previous year’s assessment results Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

Rubric and Review Process Feedback Provide feedback on the rubric and review process. –For example: What worked for your ARC What difficulties were encountered? Describe your ARC’s process and progress towards addressing comments for “developing” and “acceptable” components received in the 2013 assessment review Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research