Chris R. Calkins, Ph.D. 402-472-6314 Impacts of Distillers Grains Feeding on Carcass and Meat Characteristics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Advertisements

Stockman’s Practice Info
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
The Effect of Animal Disposition on Carcass Traits
Welcome to the Wonderful World of Meat!
Managing Phosphorus with Distillers Grains Diets Allen Trenkle Iowa State University.
 Organic  Natural  Conventional  Grass fed beef with strict restrictions  The USDA sets those strict restrictions and they are as follows  Cattle.
Beef Retail Cut Session Home. Chuck Arm Roast Chuck Arm Roast (Boneless) Chuck Arm Steak Chuck Arm Steak (Boneless) Chuck Blade Roast Chuck Blade Steak.
Slaughter Overview and Cuts of Beef
Ag Science Meat Product Quality.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Marketing and Evaluating Beef Cattle
 While Quality grade deals with a prediction of the eating quality of the meat, Yield grade is a measurement of the amount of edible meat that the carcass.
Meat Goat Carcass Merit Dr. Dwight Loveday University of Tennessee-Knoxville Department of Food Science & Technology.
Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.
MARKET CLASSES AND GRADES OF MEAT ANIMALS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Effects of delayed implant protocols on performance, carcass characteristics and meat tenderness in Holstein steers J. L. Beckett, and J. Algeo Cal Poly.
BEEF QUALITY: WHAT IS IT? — HOW TO PRODUCE IT Harlan Ritchie Department of Animal Science Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan
Quality and Acceptability of High Selenium Beef M.J. Marchello Animal & Range Sciences Department North Dakota State University.
Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation.
1. Which of the following beef cut would not be suitable for roasting? (V-172) A. eye round B. tri-tip (bottom sirloin) C. round steak D. rump E. All of.
1. What are the guides to meat quality? (V-155). 1. What are the guides to meat quality? Government grades and manufacturer or retailer brands are guides.
Beef - From Pasture to Plate Many Choices, All Nutrient Rich Jennifer Leheska, Ph.D., R.D. Nutrition Research Consultant Funded by The Beef Checkoff.
Veterinary Science and Ag Economics.  Each person eats on average 59.7 pounds of beef per year (2010)  Compared to: ◦48.0 pounds of pork ◦Approximately.
Types of Meat Beef – Cattle, more than 1 year old – Bright red flesh Veal – Calves, 1-3 months old – Mild flavor, light pink color, little fat Lamb – Young.
Beef. Composition of Meat Water- Protein- Fat- Fat 1. Juiciness Marbling Surface Fats 2. Tenderness Muscle Fibers 3. Flavor.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Notes. Chuck Rib Short LoinSirloin RoundBrisket and Shank Short Plate and Flank.
Evaluation of meat quality attributes of US Highland cattle Peckman, T. E., Z. D. Callahan, T. A. Wilmoth, and B. R. Wiegand Division of Animal Sciences,
Corn Ethanol Co-Products For Finishing Beef Cattle Darrell R. Mark, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Galen Erickson, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Crystal.
Corn Replacement: Coproducts & Ag Residues Galen Erickson, Terry Klopfenstein, & many students.
Feeding Dried Distillers Grains to Hogs Ron Plain, University of Missouri.
Objective: Define cutability, degree of lean, marbling, and quality features used to market beef and swine.
As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension.
Utilization of byproducts by growing & finishing cattle G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein & many students.
Beef Quality Grading, Yield Grading and Pricing. Slaughter By-Products ($/cwt) $66/cwt$109/cwt Fab/Processing Credit Items: Fat $8.50/cwt Bone $5/cwt.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
Meat Selection and Storage
Meats Chapter 19 Page 321. What is Meat? The edible portions of mammals. These mammals contain muscle, fat, bone, connective tissue, and water. Meat provides.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
People Ethical Treatment Animals People Eating Tasty Animals.
Genetic Evaluation of Carcass Data Using Age, Weight, Fat, or Marbling Endpoints 2003 BIF Selection Decisions Committee May 29, 2003 Janice M. Rumph Montana.
Beef. Composition of Meat Water- 75% of muscle tissue Protein- 20% of muscle tissue, coagulates and becomes firmer when cooked Fat- 5% of meat, some fat.
Meat Grading.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Youth Livestock Specialist
General Meat Carcass Information
Introduction to Beef Cattle Bovine Humor Objectives Describe terms commonly used with beef cattle. Learning the language Identify external parts of.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
Introduction to Beef Cattle Student Notes Objectives Describe terms commonly used with __________ __________. ___________ __________ _________of the.
Class of Beef Ribs Class of Beef Ribs - Results.
AnSc 1101 Meat Grading. Outline Retail yield Inspection vs. grading Carcass Anatomy Quality Grading Yield Grading.
Welcome Class!.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Introduction into Meat Science
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
The effect of dietary modification with a flaxseed oil enhanced feed on the sensory characteristics and shelf life of farm raised brook trout was examined.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Quality Standards for Beef, Pork, & Poultry
Introduction to Beef Cattle
Live Animal Evaluation Beef
Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Tutorial
Beef and Nutrition.
Meat Chapter 19.
Animal Nutrition and Alternative Feedstocks
People Ethical Treatment Animals People Eating Tasty Animals.
Animal Selection and Evaluation
Meats Identify the differences between beef, pork, and lamb cuts;
Presentation transcript:

Chris R. Calkins, Ph.D Impacts of Distillers Grains Feeding on Carcass and Meat Characteristics

Attributes0%15%30%P-value Score a Slight 93 Small 03 Small Fat, % a Slight = , Small = Marbling attributes (Calf-fed)

Attributes0%15%30%P-value Score 1 Small 20 Small 22 Small Fat, % Slight = , Small = Marbling attributes (Yearlings)

Marbling Score Linear P = 0.05 Quadratic P = 0.05 % WDGS (DM basis)

Marbling vs. % Fat (Calf-fed) P = 0.72

P = 0.99 Marbling vs. % Fat (Yearlings)

12 th Rib Fat Depth Fat Depth, in Linear P < 0.01 Quadratic P = 0.04 % WDGS (DM basis)

Yield Grade Diet DM % WDGS Yield Grade Intercept cov. P = 0.03L P < 0.01 ≠ 0 P < 0.01 Q P = 0.06

Take-Home Points Fat thickness –Slight increase, then back to normal Yield grade –Slight numerical increase, then back to normal Marblilng –No negative effect on amount of marbling –No effect on “visualization” of marbling by the USDA grader

b a b Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids

Table 1. Weight percentage of fatty acids 1 and fat content of ribeye slices (Longissimus thoracis) from steers fed WDGS finishing diets. Dietary treatments 2 Effects 3 Fatty acid01530P-valueLinearQuadratic 18: b b a 0.02< :1t2.28 b 2.61 b 3.76 a < :1(n-9)36.14 a b b < :1(n-7)3.20 a 2.77 b 2.41 c < :1∆13t0.10 c 0.51 b 0.64 a < :2(n-6)3.27 b 4.22 a 4.50 a < Total Trans2.87 c 3.61 b 4.86 a < PUFA4.90 b 5.91 a 6.23 a < Omega 3****** Omega b 5.60 a 5.86 a < Omega6:Omega3****** 1 Weight percentage values are relative proportions of all peaks observed by GC. 2 Wet distiller’s grains plus solubles (%, DM basis). 3 Linear and quadratic response to WDGS level. a,b,c Means in the same row having different superscripts are significant at P ≤ 0.05 level. *not estimated.

Table 2. Weight percentage of fatty acids 1 and fat content of tenderloin steaks (Psoas major) from steers fed WDGS finishing diets. Dietary treatments 2 Effects 3 Fatty acid01530P-valueLinearQuadratic 18: :1t :1(n-9)35.31 a a b < :1(n-7)1.43 a 1.37 a 1.26 b 0.01< :1∆13t0.17 c 0.27 b 0.41 a < :1∆14t0.26 a 0.28 a 0.21 b < :2(n-6)3.08 c 4.07 b 4.80 a < Total Trans PUFA4.76 b 5.80 a 6.50 a < Omega Omega b 5.23 a 6.05 a < Omega6:Omega c b a < Weight percentage values are relative proportions of all peaks observed by GC. 2 Wet distiller’s grains plus solubles (%, DM basis). 3 Linear and quadratic response to WDGS level. a,b,c Means in the same row having different superscripts are significant at P ≤ 0.05 level.

Table 3. Weight percentage of fatty acids 1 and fat content of top blade steaks (Infraspinatus) from steers fed WDGS finishing diets. Dietary treatments 2 Effects 3 Fatty acid01530P-valuelinearquadratic 18: :1t2.17 c 2.79 b 4.03 a < :1(n-9) :1(n-7)1.73 a 1.58 b 1.47 b < :1∆13t0.08 c 0.23 b 0.37 a < :1∆14t0.38 a 0.28 b < :2(n-6)3.00 c 3.96 b 4.78 a < Total Trans4.36 b 4.98 b 6.15 a < PUFA4.60 b 5.38 ab 6.40 a < Omega Omega c 5.07 b 6.10 a < Omega6:Omega b b a < Weight percentage values are relative proportions of all peaks observed by GC. 2 Wet distiller’s grains plus solubles (%, DM basis). 3 Linear and quadratic response to WDGS level. a,b,c Means in the same row having different superscripts are significant at P ≤ 0.05 level.

Fatty acids at the duodenum - Corn vs WDGS Vander Pol et al. 2007

Take-Home Points Increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids

30% discoloration

Infraspinatus, aged 7 d Discoloration Lose about 10% of shelf life

Infraspinatus, aged 42 d Discoloration Lose about 40% of shelf life

Choice Strip steaks, aged 7 d Discoloration Lose about 10% of shelf life

Choice Strip steaks, aged 42 d Discoloration Lose about 17% of shelf life

Take-Home Points Feeding WDGS causes a decrease in shelf life of beef

Why Reduced Shelf-life? Color is compromised by oxidation. The red pigment is oxidized to brown.

Rancidity (TBA) during Retail Display a ab b a a b a b b Top BladeStrip Loin

Take-Home Points Oxidation –Cattle fed WDGS yield meat more susceptible to oxidation during retail display Fatty acid composition –Feeding WDGS causes an increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids (the ones most likely to oxidize)

Eating Quality Trained Evaluation (Jenschke et al., 2007) –Cattle fed 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 WDGS –No effect on tenderness –No treatment effects noted for: Metallic, sour, charred, oxidized, rancid or livery However, research done with meat directly removed from the vacuum bag – no retail display (no exposure to oxygen)

Liver Flavor aa a b a aa a P < 0.07

Liver Flavor aa a a a b a a

How to Address the Issue? Vitamin E is an antioxidant Can be fed during the finishing phase Question – can feeding high doses of vitamin E help to address the issue? Study – WDG at 0, 20 or 40% -- With or without solubles -- With or without vitamin E (fed at 500 IU/head/d for entire feeding period)

Corn 40% WDGS Fatty Acids Composition of Strip Loins [40% WDGS vs Corn]

PUFA Levels of Strip Loins [0, 20, & 40% WDGS] 0% WDGS 20% WDGS 40% WDGS

Fatty Acids Composition of Strip Loins [40% WDG with or without DS] No DS DS

Take Home Point The increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids comes from the distillers grains, not the solubles

Mineral Composition of Strip Loins [40% WDG vs Corn] Corn 40% WDG

Mineral Composition of Strip Loins [WDG with or with out DS] No DS DS

Take Home Point The solubles cause an increase in the mineral content of the muscles – minerals which support oxidation

Oxidative Rancidity of Strip Loins, Aged 7 & 28 d, at 7 d Retail Display [WDG vs Corn] WDG NO WDG 7 d Aged28 d Aged a b a b a b a b

Oxidation Rancidity of Strip Loins Aged 7 & 28d at 7 d Retail Display [E vs No E] E NO E 7 d Aged28 d Aged a b a b

Take Home Points Feeding WDG causes an increase in oxidation The effect is mitigated through feeding of vitamin E

% Discoloration of Strip Loins [0,20,40% WDG with or without DS or E] Aging 7 d Aging 28 d 0% WDG 20% WDG 40% WDG

Take Home Points Retail color stability is less a problem if the beef is aged just 7 d. When beef is aged longer, discoloration is an issue. Solubles exagurate the discoloration

Aging 7 d Aging 28 d Livery Flavor of Strip Loins, Aged for 7 & 28 d, at 7 d Retail Display [0 & 40% WDG with and without DS and E] 0% WDG 40% WDG

Take Home Points Vitamin E? – Vitamin E helps to minimize problems with oxidation, discoloration and off-flavors when fed with WDG What is the optimal level of vitamin E?

So...what is the optimal level of Vitamin E? Recent research (n=90 steers) CornWDGSWDGS + 100EWDGS + 300EWDGS + 500EWDGS E Aging – 7 dAging – 21 d Permeable filmHigh O 2 Low O 2

Discoloration (%) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E a a a a a b P < 0.10 b ab a P < 0.05 After 4 d of retail display, feeding 1,000 IU of vit. E was superior to all other levels.

Discoloration (%) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E P < 0.05 a b a aaa After 4 d of retail display, any level of vitamin E was sufficient to preserve color.

Redness (a*) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E a ab b b b b b b a b P < 0.05 After 3 and 4 d of retail display, feeding 1,000 IU of vitamin E helped preserve the read color.

Redness (a*) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E P < 0.05 a a a a a a a a a ab b bc b abc c c After 2, 3, or 4 d of retail display, feeding 300 IU (or more) of vitamin E helped to preserve the red color.

Discoloration (%) of strip steaks aged 7d from steers fed WDGS, corn, and WDGS plus different concentrations of vit E displayed under different MAP. MAP 2 Treatment 1 days Permeable film 1234 Corn0D0D 1.60 C 2.98 B 3.94 Aab WDGS0.88 D 2.00 C 3.13 B 4.25 Aa 100E0.33 C 1.89 B 3.25 A 3.92 Aab 300E0.54 B 1.53 B 2.77 A 3.12 Ab 500E0D0D 1.34 C 2.81 B 4.06 Aa 1000E0C0C 1.08 B 2.78 A 3.17 Ab High O 2 Corn0.38 Bb 0.19 Bab 2.59 A 2.01 A WDGS1.75 ABa 1.00 Ba 2.62 A 2.13 A 100E1.15 Bab 0.57B ab 2.88 A 2.59 A 300E0.98 Bb 0.98 Ba 2.94 A 2.32 A 500E0B c 0B b 2.60 A 2.81 A 1000E0.29 Bbc 0.19 Bab 2.59 A 2.01 A Beef discoloration

Table 4. Discoloration (%) of strip steaks aged 21d from steers fed WDGS, corn, and WDGS plus different concentrations of vit E displayed under different MAP. MAP 2 Treatment 1 days Permeable film 1234 Corn0.22 C 1.16 C 8.33 B Aa WDGS0.19 C 1.11 C 6.11 B Aa 100E0C0C 0.46 C 6.24 B Aa 300E0.22 C 0.66 C 5.89 B Aa 500E0.22 C 0.50 C 7.00 B Aa 1000E0B0B 0.38 B 4.61 A 7.87 Ab High O 2 Corn b WDGS0B0B 0B0B 0B0B Aa 100E b 300E b 500E b 1000E b Beef discoloration

Discoloration (%) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E

10%

Discoloration (%) Corn vs WDGS vs WDGS + vit E

Take Home Points The ideal level of vitamin E depends on the packaging system to be used With minimal aging (7 d), little to no vitamin E is needed With extended aging, up to 1,000 IU/head/day are necessary.

Summary Carcass traits –No negative effects on marbling traits Meat traits –Increased PUFA –Decreased shelf life –Increased off flavors –Vitamin E helps to mitigate these issues –Levels up to 1,000 IU/head/d are needed