What’s New? English Language Arts and Mathematics Grade Level Content Expectations OEAA Conference 2005 Office of School Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Advertisements

The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills and knowledge they need by providing clear goals for student learning. Common standards.
NAESP Webinar: Common Core State Standards April 23, 2012 Kenny L. Jones, Principal - Parkside Elementary School NAESP Zone 7 Director and Lucille E. Davy,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Common Core Standards General Information and Stakeholder Feedback Process Review of DRAFT v
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
1 Grade Level Content Expectations Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement Introduction to Companion Documents for English Language.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
The NEW ELA Core Curriculum and its Connection to NYS Grade 3 – 8 Testing Presented by: Louisa Kramer-Vida, Ed.D District ELA Supervisor Oyster Bay-East.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
1 Grade Level Content Expectations Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement Introduction to Companion Documents for English Language.
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Curriculum and Literacy Update Michigan Association of State and Federal Program Specialists 38th Annual Fall Director’s Institute November 12, 2007 Grand.
WIDA and ACCESS: Companion Pieces to RETELL Links to Resources for Districts.
Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Heads UP! It’s the GLCEs!! Keep your head out of the sand and get into improving student achievement in the general curriculum!!
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Clarifying Retreat.
The Common Core State Standards at Robert J. Fite Elementary School Information for Parents Back to School Night, August 12, 2014 Adapted from CCSS for.
Michigan High School Graduation Requirements Online Learning Experience October 2006.
Science Academic Content Standards and Standards-Based Education.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
1 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Fall 2005 Test Design English Language Arts Grades 3-8, High School Updated March 2005.
Overview of Michigan’s Secondary Assessments of Science Edward Roeber Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
FLORIDABROWARD ECHOSFAIRECHOSFAIR Not Yet Demonstrating 9%4%12%3% Emerging/Progressi ng 38%26%53%23% Demonstrating53%70%35%74% 2012 Third GradeFLORIDABROWARD.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Louisiana Grade-Level Expectations An Introduction for Parents.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Michigan School Improvement Framework. The Vision… Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
 To ensure continuous school improvement and exemplary education for all students.  To align instruction and curriculum with the expected.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
DO NOW 1.LOG ON NETWORK 2.Go to WIKISPACE…
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
OEAA Web Conference Series Michigan Educational Assessment Program Fall 2011.
PrevNext | Slide 1 MANS 2006 Michigan Educational Technology Standards and Expectations METS - Students October 19, 2006 Ron Faulds Michigan Department.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Shaping Up the Schoolwide Title I Plan Sybil Lenzi, Consultant 2010.
Georgia Milestone Assessments Bryant Elementary School 1"Where Scholars Are Prepared to Be LEADERS"
Prenatal to 3 rd Grade Alignment & School Readiness PSESD EL Center Directors February 27, 2014.
1 Michigan School Improvement Framework. 2 In Support of the State Board of Education’s Vision Statement State Board of Education’s Vision Statement The.
Slide 1 DRAFT 2010 State of Michigan Educational Technology Plan State Board of Education Presentation December 8, 2009 Sally Vaughn, Ph.D. Deputy Superintendent/Chief.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
Assessment November 18, From NECAP to the Common Core and New Assessments Deb Wiswell Bureau of Accountability October 8, 2010 NEA-NH Fall Conference.
Curriculum Overview for New Teachers New Teacher Orientation August 5, :30 P.M.
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
ORTIi Annual Conference April 28, 2016
Where do you house your CIA? (curriculum-instruction-assessment)
Redesign Family Meeting
LEA Planning Cycle.
Using the math4life Resources
Presentation transcript:

What’s New? English Language Arts and Mathematics Grade Level Content Expectations OEAA Conference 2005 Office of School Improvement

Where are We Headed?

Standards – Broad Content Learning Statements Benchmarks – More Discrete Grade Span Learning Expectations GLCE – Grade Level Content Performance Expectations Locally-Based Curricular Alignment NEW MEAP “OLD” MEAP * LBA Classroom–Based Instructional Design * TM The Structure of Curriculum

What are Grade Level Content Expectations?  Further clarification of student expectations on grade level assessments  Rigorous academic targets  Basis for assessment items in the annual collection of student achievement data to measure skills and concepts over time  Requirement of No Child Left Behind Legislation of 2001

Remember… The Michigan Curriculum Framework Standards and Benchmarks continue to represent the full scope of the curriculum!

Purpose of Companion Documents  Connect assessment with curriculum  GLCE re-emphasize the importance of the Michigan Curriculum Framework, including the Teaching, Learning & Assessment Standards  Connects the familiar (MCF) with the new (GLCE)

Grade Specific Website DRAFT

Grade Specific Links to…  Michigan Curriculum Framework  Teaching, Learning,& Assessment Standards  Grade Level Content Expectations

Grade Specific Links to…  Content Expectations Across the Grades*  Alignment at a Glance  MCF Alignment Document

Grade Specific Links to…  Reading First  MLPP  MiCLASS  Clarification Document*  Reading & Writing Genre Matrix, K-8*  Educators’ Guide to Lexiles*  Vocabulary Lists*  Genre Definitions*  Dolch Words  Parent’s Guide  Scope Alignment*  MiClimb

Mathematics

Taking a Second Look  Our Purpose To make the Grade Level Content Expectations more teacher friendly by ensuring that: To make the Grade Level Content Expectations more teacher friendly by ensuring that:  There is parallel text across the grades  The intent of the expectations are clear  The content is correct  There is a proper flow of concepts and skills across the grades – no repetitions or gaps

Protocol for Development and Dissemination of Curricular Documents Document development by work group of scholarsDocument development by work group of scholars Review by small group of MDE & representative practitionersReview by small group of MDE & representative practitioners MDE internal reviewMDE internal review State Board of Education reviewState Board of Education review Web reviewWeb review Work group of scholars revises documentsWork group of scholars revises documents Draft documents sent for National ReviewDraft documents sent for National Review Edits based on National ReviewEdits based on National Review Final documents to State Board of Education for approvalFinal documents to State Board of Education for approval Final documents disseminatedFinal documents disseminated

Resources for Parents The Parent’s Guides are companion documents for Mathematics and English Language Arts Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE). The Michigan Department of Education (MDE) has completed booklets for families of children in kindergarten through eighth grade. The documents are available on

Parent’s Guides  Grade level and content focused, user-friendly booklets describing the GLCE  Contain a brief letter that can be customized for each school site  Can be easily reproduced in the school  Translations coming in Spanish and Arabic

GLCE’ Impact on MEAP Test Design  GLCE represent the content students should master by the end of the grade level.  Future testing will occur in the fall.  ELA assesses previous years’ outcomes (cumulative).  Mathematics assesses the outcomes from the previous year.

Differentiating Instruction  How do we work with the GLCE to meet the needs of all students?  What are ways that Special Education and general education teachers can work together with the GLCE?  How do we meet the needs of English Language Learners?  How can we create a common vision?

Collaboration and Integration  Educators working together to meet the needs of all students  Using multiple methods to address learning styles and teach concepts  Integrating technology throughout the curriculum

What Else?  What initiatives are going on in your school or district?  What can you do to incorporate the GLCE into your curriculum and assessment practices?  What do you need to support your efforts?

Next Steps  Have frequent conversations about the GLCE. the GLCE.  Look at classroom/building/district curricula and assessment.  Look at current practices and align to GLCE.  Use Data – what are student strengths and what do they need.  CELEBRATE SUCCESSES!

Contacts For more information on the Grade Level Content Expectations or Michigan Educational Assessment Program

WEB Resources  SCoPE Curriculum  GLCE Website  OEAA Website  MSU K-12 Outreach Website  The Michigan Teacher Network

Office of School Improvement Dr. Yvonne Caamal CanulBetty Underwood DirectorAssistant Director Office of School Improvement (OSI) OSI, Curriculum and Instruction Gale Sharpe, GLCE SupportRuth Anne Hodges, Math Consultant OSI, Curriculum and InstructionOSI, Curriculum and Instruction Lynnette VanDyke, English Language Arts Consultant OSI, Curriculum and Instruction

Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Edward Roeber Senior Executive Director OEAA Jane Faulds English Language Arts Assessment Consultant OEAA Mike Radke MEAP Testing Coordinator OEAA Kyle Ward Mathematics Assessment Consultant

Thank you for all that you do for Michigan students!