Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continued Psy 524 Ainsworth
Advertisements

Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 20 Curved Patterns.
Qualitative Variables and
4.3 Confidence Intervals -Using our CLM assumptions, we can construct CONFIDENCE INTERVALS or CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ESTIMATES of the form: -Given a significance.
Chapter 8 Linear Regression © 2010 Pearson Education 1.
Chapter 8 Estimating Single Population Parameters
Lecture 23: Tues., Dec. 2 Today: Thursday:
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 14-1 Basic Business Statistics (9 th Edition) Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression.
Data mining and statistical learning, lecture 5 Outline  Summary of regressions on correlated inputs  Ridge regression  PCR (principal components regression)
Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics April 2, 2009 Tim Bunnell, Ph.D. & Jobayer Hossain, Ph.D. Nemours Bioinformatics Core Facility.
Lecture 24: Thurs., April 8th
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
Chapter 11 Hypothesis Tests and Estimation for Population Variances
The Analysis of Variance
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building Basic Business Statistics 11 th Edition.
Slide 1 Detecting Outliers Outliers are cases that have an atypical score either for a single variable (univariate outliers) or for a combination of variables.
Review for Final Exam Some important themes from Chapters 9-11 Final exam covers these chapters, but implicitly tests the entire course, because we use.
Multiple Linear Regression A method for analyzing the effects of several predictor variables concurrently. - Simultaneously - Stepwise Minimizing the squared.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel 6 th Global Edition.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Multiple Regression Chapter 23.
CENTRE FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH AND COMPETENCE IN THE LEARNING ECONOMY Session 2: Basic techniques for innovation data analysis. Part I: Statistical inferences.
Describing distributions with numbers
Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 25 Categorical Explanatory Variables.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building Statistics for Managers using Microsoft.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on the Least-Squares Regression Model and Multiple Regression 14.
Multiple Regression Analysis
1 Least squares procedure Inference for least squares lines Simple Linear Regression.
Integrating Reserve Risk Models into Economic Capital Models Stuart White, Corporate Actuary Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar, Washington D.C September.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression
Ch4 Describing Relationships Between Variables. Pressure.
Understanding Regression Analysis Basics. Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc Learning Objectives To understand the basic concept of prediction.
HAWKES LEARNING SYSTEMS Students Matter. Success Counts. Copyright © 2013 by Hawkes Learning Systems/Quant Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Section 12.4.
Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent.
Chapter 3 Descriptive Statistics: Numerical Methods Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Sequence VID Consortium FTP Matrix Oils – Phosphorus Retention During AMA Mileage Accumulation Jim Linden GM R&D February 22, 2007.
Describing distributions with numbers
By: Amani Albraikan.  Pearson r  Spearman rho  Linearity  Range restrictions  Outliers  Beware of spurious correlations….take care in interpretation.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
13-1 Copyright  2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Croucher, Introductory Mathematics and Statistics, 5e Chapter 13 Measures.
Chapter 4 Linear Regression 1. Introduction Managerial decisions are often based on the relationship between two or more variables. For example, after.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Comparing Groups: Analysis of Variance Methods Section 14.1 One-Way ANOVA: Comparing.
Worked Example Using R. > plot(y~x) >plot(epsilon1~x) This is a plot of residuals against the exploratory variable, x.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 13 Linear Correlation and Regression Analysis.
Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 7 th Edition, Global Edition Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education.
Outliers and influential data points. No outliers?
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 14-1 Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression Statistics for Managers using Microsoft.
Copyright (C) 2002 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Understandable Statistics Seventh Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by: Lynn Smith.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building Basic Business Statistics 10 th Edition.
Slide 1 Regression Assumptions and Diagnostic Statistics The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the impact of violations of regression assumptions.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 14-1 Chapter 14 Multiple Regression Model Building Statistics for Managers.
Linear Regression Linear Regression. Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Purpose Understand Linear Regression. Use R functions.
Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent.
Chapter 12 REGRESSION DIAGNOSTICS AND CANONICAL CORRELATION.
Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building
MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY Central tendency means average performance, while dispersion of a data is how it spreads from a central tendency. He measures.
Inference for Least Squares Lines
Understanding Regression Analysis Basics
Regression Analysis Simple Linear Regression
Chapter 12 Using Descriptive Analysis, Performing
Chapter 11 Hypothesis Tests and Estimation for Population Variances
Chapter 2 Exploring Data with Graphs and Numerical Summaries
Charles University Charles University STAKAN III
College Algebra Chapter 6 Matrices and Determinants and Applications
Presentation transcript:

Reproduction of any material whether by photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means or otherwise is prohibited without prior written consent of Infineum International Limited. © Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED All rights reserved See the legal disclaimer notice on "INFINEUM", "DOBANAX", "PARATAC", "SYNACTO", "VEKTRON", and the corporate mark comprising the interlocking ripple device are trademarks of Infineum International Ltd. “VISTONE” is a trademark of Exxon Mobil Corporation used under licence by Infineum International Limited. GM FTP Phosphorus Volatility Analysis D. Boese February 15, 2007

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED General Analysis Information mThe data for this analysis includes analytical results released through February 8, mThe analysis indicates the presence of outliers and suspicious results though no cause for departure from expectation could be determined. Analyses were performed in iterations of successively smaller subsets due to the exclusion of the outliers and suspicious results. mThe “fresh” data, labeled 0 miles for each vehicle/oil combination is not included in this analysis. mThe Low Impact oil was run in a different vehicle (Buick-3) than the other FTP matrix oils and therefore is confounded with Vehicle. The Low Impact oil is included in an analysis in which vehicles of the same make are grouped into one Vehicle Make term. mThe Sample miles (2000 versus 6500) are utilized as a categorical variable in lieu of a continuous variable because the exact miles at the oil change are not published in all cases.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED * Denotes second run of same oil

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

4

5 * Denotes second run of same oil

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

7 Analysis of All 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention mRegression model: qTransformed % Phosphorus Retention (PR) to Log(100 – PR) qn = 69 qR 2 = 61% qRMSE = 0.30 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample. mAnalysis qOdometer mileage is statistically significant and indicates that PR diminishingly increases with increasing odometer miles (within the range of the data). The estimated coefficient corresponds to the delta from 100 of PR decreasing by 14% per 10,000 miles (e.g., if the PR is 90% at 20,000, under the same conditions, the PR would be 91.4% at 30,000 miles). qEstimated average decrease in PR from 2000 to 6500 miles is 5.5. qLeast Square Means are plotted on following slide. (Least Square Mean is mean of factor of interest adjusted for other factors modeled.) qThe Oil term is not statistically significant. qAbsolute values of Saab residuals are high – Saab Phosphorus Retention for Oils B and D are low (upper 70’s) while that for Oils A and C are comparable to that for other vehicles. qLeast Square Means of Pontiac-1 and -2 differ considerably.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of All 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention (Continued)

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Excluding Saab Results mThere are two Saab results which are outliers. The analysis with the data set of the two Saab outliers excluded is provided in the additional material section for those interested. The remaining Saab residuals are at the extremes of the distribution. mDue to the apparent non-random nature of the residuals of the remaining Saab results, all Saab data is omitted from the remainder of the analyses, however, no cause was found for the results to be suspect. mRegression model: qTransformed Phosphorus Retention to Log(100 – Phosphorus Retention). qn = 61 qR 2 = 74% qRMSE = 0.21 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample. mAnalysis qOdometer mileage is significant with Phosphorus Retention increasing with odometer mileage. qEstimated average decrease in % Phosphorus Retention from 2000 to 6500 miles is 4.8. qThe Oil term is statistically significant after the exclusion of the Saab results. qThe Least Square Mean PR of Pontiac-1 and -2 differs by 5.1.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Excluding Saab Results (Continued)

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Omitting Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oil A Results mPrevious analyses indicate that there is a larger than expected difference between Least Square Means for PR of Pontiac-1 and -2. The first run of Oil A in Pontiac-1 resulted in substantially lower results than the second run and therefore is excluded (in addition to the Saab results). mRegression model: qTransformed Phosphorus Retention to Log(100 – Phosphorus Retention). qn = 59 qR 2 = 76% qRMSE = 0.19 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample. mAnalysis: qOdometer mileage is no longer statistically significant. qEstimated average decrease in % Phosphorus Retention from 2000 to 6500 miles is 4.4. qOil is statistically significant. mIn a subsequent analysis, the first run of the Pontiac-1 Oil C results are also excluded (provided in the Additional Materials section). The results are similar to those of this analysis.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Omitting Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oil A Results (Continued)

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Omitting Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oils A and C Results (Low Impact Oil Included) mThe Impact Oil is run in Buick-3, therefore, if there is a difference within Makes, the effects of Impact Oil and Buick-3 are confounded. For this analysis, we assume that vehicles within the same vehicle Make are the same. mRegression model: qTransformed Phosphorus Retention to Log(100 – Phosphorus Retention). qn = 59 qR 2 = 79% qRMSE = 0.20 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample. mAnalysis qMake, Oil and Sample are statistically significant. qEstimated average decrease in % Phosphorus Retention from 2000 to 6500 miles is 4.2. qOil Least Square Means are similar to those resulting from previous data subset.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Omitting Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oils A and C Results (Impact Oil Included)

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Summary Summary based on GM FTP data: mSome Saab results are outliers. mResults of Vehicles and Suppliers (Supplier 1, Supplier 2 and JAMA) are partially confounded due to limited results of crossover of chemistries within vehicles. This could impact estimates of Oil impact. m% Phosphorus Retention may increase with Odometer mileage though this relation is heavily influenced by the first runs of Oils A and C in Pontiac-1. mThe % Phosphorus Retention reduction between the 2000 and 6500 mile samples is approximately 5%. mAfter exclusion of the Saab results there is discrimination among select oils.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Additional Material

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Excluding 2 Saab Outliers mSaab Oil A results in the prior analysis set were outliers. They are excluded in this analysis. Remaining Saab data are in extremes of the residual distribution. mRegression model: qTransformed % Phosphorus Retention (PR) to Log(100 – PR) qn = 67 qR 2 = 73% qRMSE = 0.25 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Excluding 2 Saab Outliers (Continued)

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Excluding Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oils A and C Results mIn this analysis the first set of Pontiac-1 Oils A and C results are excluded in addition to the Saab results. mRegression model: qTransformed Phosphorus Retention to Log(100 – Phosphorus Retention). qn = 57 qR 2 = 76% qRMSE = 0.20 qFactors include Vehicle, Oil, Odometer, and Sample. mAnalysis qOdometer mileage is somewhat higher than in previous data subset. qEstimated average decrease in % Phosphorus Retention from 2000 to 6500 miles is 4.4. qOil Least Square Means are similar to those resulting from previous data subset.

© Copyright INFINEUM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Analysis of 2K and 6.5K Mi Phosphorus Retention Omitting Saab and First Set of Pontiac-1 Oils A and C Results (Continued)