Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
Muon Data Quality and Performance A. Belloni - G. Zevi Della Porta for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
Simulating the Effects of Wire Sag in ATLAS’s Monitored Drift Tubes Ashley Thrall, Vassar College ‘04 Dan Levin, Mentor REU Presentations August 5, 2004.
Atlas Detector. ATLAS Components Discovers head-on collisions of protons of extraordinarily high energy.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Toronto, Canada High-Precision, Large-Volume Particle Tracking U. Bratzler* Outline (Example: Muon Tracking in ATLAS)
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
Status & Readiness of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer J. Chapman - University of Michigan on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Groups Particular Thanks to C. Ferretti,
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Analyzing Praxial Platform Positions on MDT Barrel Chambers Using X-Ray Tomograph Measurements Chris Hayward Advisor: Silvia Schuh August 14, 2003 UM CERN.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Llea Nasira Samuel Benedict College Charlotte Wood-Harrington
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Implementation of Chamber Misalignments and Deformations in the
Presentation transcript:

Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector Rosemarie Aben Supervisor: Peter Kluit Track: Particle and Astroparticle Physics Amsterdam Master of Physics Symposium, 16 April 2010

Outline LHC and ATLAS The muon spectrometer of ATLAS Precision measurements Sagitta Analysis Sagitta Resolutions ATLAS Now

Detection of Higgs decay: H  ZZ  4µ “Golden Channel” Standard Model & Higgs Solution: ? Energy per Collision 14 TeV Protons per bunch 1011 Bunches per ring 2835 Design Luminosity 1034 cm-2 s-1 Circumference 27 Km Collisions per bunch 25 Detection of Higgs decay: H  ZZ  4µ “Golden Channel”

Exotic physics and ATLAS

Layout of the Muon spectrometer Trigger chambers: trigger on muons Precision chambers: Reconstruction of muon tracks Small and Large muon stations Three layers of muon stations Sector, containing 12 Measurement towers

Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) Chambers Tube diameter 30 mm Diameter Sense wire 50 μm # Tubes per chamber Up to 432 Length MDTs 1-6 m # MDT chambers 1150

Precision Measurements and Sagitta Needed accuracy MDT chamber: 10% for 1 TeV muons  Knowledge about the precision of the chambers is extremely important. Contributions to precision: alignment and calibration. Reconstructed Track Sagitta Misalignment Outer Middle Inner Sagitta: measure for the precision of the MDT chambers.

Sagitta Distribution Distribution of the sagittas for all barrel sectors. # Tracks  Sagitta [mm] 

Sagitta Distribution Improvements Old alignment Improved alignment Misalignment was seen in certain towers: shifts and extra peaks. With this knowledge improvements have been made. New analysis shows good alignment!

Sagitta Resolution Fit Resolution: necessary to monitor the performance of the muon chambers in measuring momentum and position. Sagitta resolution is a measure for the accuracy of the chambers depending on alignment + calibration + chamber geometry + chamber deformations+ ... 10-20 GeV 20-40 GeV 40-70 GeV 70-110 GeV Slices up to 350 GeV. Each slice is fitted with a double Gauss fit and the standard deviation of the smaller Gauss is taken to do the final fit, using: σ (sagitta) = √( P1² + P2²/momentum²) P1 = intrinsic resolution term: gives the sagitta resolution P2 = multiple scattering term

 Look to simulated cosmic muons! Sagitta Resolution from Cosmic Data Latest results Large sectors Small sectors Intrinsic term Multiple Scattering term Sagitta resolution: 101 ± 6 μm Sagitta resolution: 143 ± 16 μm Last November the sagitta resolutions were still around 200 μm…. But, is this as expected?  Look to simulated cosmic muons!

Muons ready to be reconstructed in ATLAS! Sagitta Resolution from Simulated Cosmics Simulation Large sectors Small sectors Sagitta resolution: 63 ± 2 μm Sagitta resolution: 102 ± 5 μm Comparison with data: 101 μm for Large sectors and 153 μm for Small sectors. Difference between data and simulation due to effects not yet corrected for. But accuracy is already good enough for the muons coming from latest collisions. Muons ready to be reconstructed in ATLAS!

Time for questions.

Summary and Conclusions BACK UP The sagitta is a good measure to study the achieved precision of the MDT chambers with respect to alignment and calibration; The sagitta resolution is a measure for the accuracy of the chambers; Sagitta resolution: - Resolutions for large sectors, data vs. MC: 101 μm vs. 63 μm. - Resolutions for small sectors, data vs. MC: 143 μm vs. 102 μm. The MDT chambers are ready for analysis of the 7 TeV Data!!!