Chapter 4 Stop and Frisk. Introduction  Terry v. Ohio  reasonable suspicion  field interrogations are essential for investigating and detecting street.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEARCH AND SEIZURE The 4 th. Disclaimer Mr Koepping is NOT an attorney. This discussion is for the purpose of explaining general constitutional principles.
Advertisements

Terry v. Ohio and NY City Stop and Frisk Policy
Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.
Criminal Justice Process: the investigation – Chp 12 Arrest – Suspect taken into custody 4 th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their.
Criminal Procedure Class Three. ARREST AND THE WARRANT CLAUSE.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence.
Policing within the Law
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS FOUR. Today’s Topics Search Incident to Arrest Pretext Arrest Plain View and Plain Touch Automobile Searches Exigent Circumstances.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
Chapter Five – Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse Detention Rolando V. del Carmen.
Featured Programs Awards Publications Products Catalog LRE Network Contact Print This | Page Feedback | ShareThisPage Feedback Criminal Law Rules on Search.
Search & Seizure Stephanow th Amendment. CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS in TEXAS =3952&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm.
Stop and Frisk" is a police action to momentarily detain and search the body of a person. Under judicial interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the.
Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4. CJ140-02A – Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4: The Fourth Amendment CJ140-02A– Class 4 Part 1.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
The criminal justice process includes: everything that happens to a person from arrest through prosecution and conviction to release from control of the.
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.
 Most cases are handled by state courts  Arrest: When a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody Arrest warrant v. probable cause  A judge.
Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation. Criminal Justice Process The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from arrest.
Authority of the Police Chapter Two All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Chapter 6: Police and the Constitution.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
Do Now: 1.When can an officer stop and frisk a person? Analyze the data on pg. 135 of your textbook. 2.What happens after charges are brought against an.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation Mrs. Gurzler.
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
Navarette v. California Argued January 21, Fourth Amendment Text The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
EMLYN A. RICKETTS, ESQ. Criminal Procedure: The Investigative Phase.
Chapter 11: Investigative Constitutional Law LawTech Custom Publishing, Inc. Copyright 2010 Investigative Constitutional Law.
STOP AND FRISK Terry v. Ohio and NY City Stop and Frisk Policy.
Slide 1 III. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution A.Analyze and Define Criminal Procedure B.Analyze the provisions of the 4 th and 5 th Amendments pertaining.
The Investigation Phase. An arrest takes place when a person is suspected of crime and taken into custody.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Chapter 12: Criminal Justice Process ~ The Investigation Objective: Student should be able to correlate how the constitution relates to an investigation.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
4TH AMENDMENT  The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from the moment of arrest, through.
Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
CJ I / Critical Thinking 3/13/16 Why do you think it is important that law enforcement agencies have limited authority? What do you think are the key benefits.
Unit 3 The Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment To The United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
STOP AND FRISK - NJ Erin Barry Julia Weinkauf Erin Walker.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 3 Arrests Criminal Justice Procedure 8 th Edition.
Chapter 3 Taking Custody of Juveniles
Supreme Court briefs.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Chapter 3 Searches.
Chapter 8 Police and Constitutional Law
Chapter 16 Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause.
Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice, 2d.
Bell Work (Think of your response and be prepared to share)
4th amendment By: KEila Aguilar.
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE
Authority to Detain and Arrest; Use of Force
Encounters Leading to Detentions
Authority of the Police
Terry v. Ohio and NY City Stop and Frisk Policy
Encounters Leading to Detentions
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 4 Stop and Frisk

Introduction  Terry v. Ohio  reasonable suspicion  field interrogations are essential for investigating and detecting street crimes  distinguished from custodial arrests  purpose of protection  “Reasonableness Clause” of the Fourth Amendment

Reasonable Suspicion  balancing: the need for swift action by an officer to investigate and to detect crime the modest intrusion on individual privacy  requiring an officer to wait until he/she has developed probable cause would place society at risk  the facts relied on by the police officer are to be judged against the objective standard of whether the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure “warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that the action taken was appropriate”

Terry v. Ohio  Three men engage in a “series of acts,” each of which may have been “innocent in itself, but which taken together warranted further investigation”  “It would have been poor police work indeed for an officer of thirty years’ experience in the detection of thievery from stores in the same neighborhood to have failed to investigate this behavior.”

Determining Reasonable Suspicion  facts cannot be “reduced to a neat set of legal rules”  case-by-case basis  articulable suspicion  objective standard of judgement  experience, expertise, and informants  totality of the circumstances  probabilities  probable cause vs. reasonable suspicion  various facts contributing to reasonable suspicion

Legal Equation

Informants and Hearsay  secondhand information / hearsay reports informants victims eyewitnesses police bulletins  must posses an “indicia of reliability”

Informants and Hearsay (cont.)  informant credibility  information specificity  anonymous tips  reasonable suspicion is a “less demanding standard than probable cause” and may be based on less complete and less reliable information than is required for probable cause  Adams v. Williams and Alabama v. White

Legal Equation

Drug Courier Profiles  typically are based on an analysis of the behavior of individuals who have been arrested in the past for crimes such as air hijacking and illegal immigration.  first profiles were developed to detect trafficking in illegal narcotics.  “Markonni drug courier profile”  three points concerning reliance on profiles reasonable suspicion suspect’s conduct nonsuspicious conduct

Legal Equation

Race and Reasonable Suspicion  racial profiling  to solely rely on race to stop an individual would be contrary to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments  sole factor  incongruity  identifications  profiles

Legal Equation

Scope and Duration of Terry Stops  emphasis on “limited intrusion”  challenges focus on three areas movement length of detention intrusiveness

Legal Equations

Automobiles and Terry Stops  Pennsylvania v. Mimms officers can make driver and passengers exit a stopped vehicle purpose of officer safety minor intrusion  three state supreme courts have have held that the police require reasonable suspicion to order a driver out of an automobile  two state supreme courts have held that an officer requires reasonable suspicion to order a passenger out of an automobile

Legal Equation

Frisks  American criminals have a “long tradition of armed violence”  officers is entitled to protect him/herself by searching the outer clothing of a suspicion individual  a frisk is intended to protect the officer and others in the vicinity and that it must therefore be “confined to an intrusion reasonably designed to discover guns, knives, clubs or other hidden instruments for assault of the police officer”

Frisks (cont.)  the officer need not be absolutely certain that the individual is armed and presently dangerous  the test is whether a reasonably prudent man or woman under the circumstances would believe that his or her safety or the safety of others is at risk  a number of courts have approved “automatic” frisks in the cases of suspected drug trafficking

Frisks (cont.)  automobiles Michigan v. Long the search must be limited to those areas in which a “weapon may be placed or hidden”  narcotics narcotics can be seized as a result of a frisk immediate probable cause / immediately apparent plain-feel doctrine

Legal Equations

Legal Equation