Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum Curriculum Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Performance Assessment
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe Chapter 7: What is “Uncoverage”? Created & Presented by Jane Cook, EASTCONN Staff Development/Literacy.
By George H. Reavis From Chicken Soup for the Soul
USING RUBRICS to spice up your life! Performance Assessments and.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Lesson Planning Finding your way…
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
SATURDAY, JANUARY 9, 2010 MARCIE TAYLOR-THOMA World History Writers’ Training.
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
ASSESSMENT Formative, Summative, and Performance-Based
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum Curriculum Design.
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Understanding by Design (UbD) The “backward design” model.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Performance-Based Assessment Authentic Assessment
Using Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum The Problem “Even good students don’t always display a deep understanding of what is taught.
Assessment Whittney Smith, Ed.D.. “Physical vs. Autopsy” Formative: Ongoing, varied assessment used as a tool for learning and diagnosing Summative:
The Backward Design Process
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Understanding By Design
Understanding By Design Stage 1 BestPrep TIW Monday, July 30, 2012 What is UbD?
Stage 2 Understanding by Design Assessment Evidence.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
The Animal School. The Administration of the School Curriculum with References to Individual Differences by George H. Reavis With a Foreword and Epilogue.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe
Performance Based Assessment. What is Performance Based Assessment? PBA is a form of assessment that requires students to perform a task rather than an.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
Chapter 7- Thinking Like an Assessor Amy Broadbent and Mary Beck EDU 5103.
4.1 The Animal School Illustrations © 1999 Crystal Springs Books; Text by George H. Reavis.
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Understanding by Design DESIGNING CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding By Design
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum
Curriculum Design for STEM Education
Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Understanding By Design Developing Standards-based Curriculum Curriculum Design

“Even good students don’t always display a deep understanding of what is taught even when conventional tests certify success.” (Wiggins & McTighe) The Problem

Try this….. Draw this…..

One time the animals had a school. The curriculum consisted of running, climbing, flying and swimming, and all the animals took all the subjects. The duck was good in swimming; better in fact than his instructor, and he made passing grades in flying, but he was practically hopeless in running. Because he was low in this subject, he was made to stay after school and drop his swimming class in order to practice running. He kept this up until he was only average in swimming. But average is acceptable, so nobody worried about that except the duck. The eagle was considered a problem pupil and disciplined severely. He beat all the others to the top of the tree in the climbing class, but he used his own way of getting there. The rabbit started out at the top of the class in running, but he had a nervous breakdown and had to drop out of school on account of so much make-up work in swimming. The squirrel led the climbing class, but his flying teacher made him start flying lessons from the ground instead of the top of the tree down, and he developed "charley horses" from over-exertion at the take-off and began getting C's in climbing and D's in running. The practical prairie dogs apprenticed their offspring to a badger when the school authorities refused to add digging to the curriculum. At the end of the year, an abnormal eel that could swim well, run, climb, and fly a little, was made valedictorian. A Curriculum Fable

Stating a Concept vs. Developing a Concept

Seatwork Time Spent in Three Kinds of Tasks

How will your courses and lessons contribute to the academic achievement of your students? Answer: Develop curricula that makes a difference The Question

Focus on a topic that matters Use instructional methods that engage Cause deep and enduring learning related to an important standard –Is it important enough to remember when the student is 50 years old? Curriculum That Makes a Difference

BD Begins with the end in mind Starting with a clear understanding of the destination Making sure that you are taking steps in the right direction (Stephen Covey) Is justifiable and reliable What is Backward Design

Begin with a favored lesson, time-honored activities (or the next page in the text) Backward design starts with the end (the desired results). What would I accept as evidence that students have attained the desired understandings and/or abilities? Unfortunately, Many Teachers

We begin BD with the following question: –What would I accept as evidence that students have attained the desired understandings/abilities? Backwards Design

Backwards Design Process

Stage One: Backward Design

How do teachers decide what content should be taught? -standards/frameworks

4 filters to determine worthiness Should a Lesson be Taught

Stage 2: Backwards Design

Types of Assessments

Two Different Approaches

Does not come naturally to most teachers We unconsciously jump to the activity once we have a target Backwards design demands that we short-circuit the natural instinct that leads most of to developing the activity first Thinking Like the Assessor

Six Facets of Understanding Facet 1 : A student who really understands, can explain. –Can provide complex, insightful and credible reasons. –Can make distinctions, argue for and justify central ideas –Can avoid common misunderstandings –Can personalize the information Facet 2 : A student who really understands, can interpret. –Can make powerful, meaningful interpretations and translations –Can read between the lines –Can use historical and biographical information to make ideas more relevant

Facet 3 : A student who really understands, can apply. –Can extend what he/she knows to realistic, hands-on situations –Can make adjustments along the way –Can apply knowledge in a variety of settings Facet 4 : A student who really understands, sees in perspective. –Can critique and justify a position –Understanding the history of an idea –Know the limits as well as the power of an idea –Can see through biased arguments Six Facets of Understanding

Facet 5 : A student who really understands, demonstrates empathy. –Can appreciates another’s situation –Can see when even flawed ideas are plausible –Can describe how an idea could be misunderstood by others –Can listen and hear what others often do not Facet 6 : A student who really understands, reveals self-knowledge. –Can recognize own prejudices and style –Can think about thinking –Can question his/her own convictions –Can self-assess –Can accept feedback/criticism without defensiveness Six Facets of Understanding

You’re planning to deliver a lesson that uncovers the following standard – –NGSS Earth Science - ESS3.C Human impacts on Earth systems Societal activities have had major effects on the land, ocean, atmosphere, and even outer space. Societal activities can also help protect Earth’s resources and environments So far you have decided that the students will design a composting system for the school cafeteria during the exploration of this standard. What evidence will you accept to verify all 6 Facets of Understanding? –Explain, Interpret, Apply, Perspective, Empathy, & Self-Knowledge –Whiteboard/Marker Discussion

Stage 3: Backwards Design

What facts, concepts, principles and skills will students need to achieve in lessons? What activities will equip students with needed knowledge/skills? What materials/resources are available? Key Questions for Instructional Design

Bring abstract ideas and far-away facts to life? Students must see knowledge and skill as building blocks—not just isolated lessons How Will You?

Blending Breadth and Depth

You’re planning to deliver a lesson that uncovers the following standard – –STL 20. Students will develop an understanding of and be able to select and use construction technologies. –K-2 – A. People live, work, and go to school in buildings, which are of different types: houses, apartments, office buildings, and schools. This lesson will be assessed through the following ways: –Product, use of the design process, design journal, teamwork, and students ability to differentiate between four different types of man-made structures and their use and purpose in society. In general, you are thinking that the students will build different types of structures and testing them. –What would be an acceptable hook and design activity for this lesson? –Whiteboard/Marker Discussion

More learning through less teaching Suspends instructional planning Specific lessons are not developed until the last phase. This runs counter to the habits of many BD demands that we set goals and establish assessments first Teaching in a UBD Environment

Understanding is more stimulated than learned It grows from questioning oneself and being questioned by others Students must figure things out, not simply wait to be told! – This requires the teacher to alter their curriculum and teaching style Wisdom Can’t be Told

Routinely using teaching methods from all three general types – Didactic: Direct instruction (used to dispense factual information) – Coaching: Teachers providing feedback and guidance to students as they work – Constructivist: Allowing the student to “construct their own learning” by solving their own problems. Teaching for Understanding Requires:

It is not an either-or proposition –As a teacher: –When should we present the facts we that know? –When should we force to students to discover the information on their own? –When should we allow practice while we coach? – These are the key questions for teachers of understanding Direct and Indirect Teaching Approaches

Use direct instruction and focused coaching for discrete, unproblematic, and enabling knowledge and skill Use indirect teaching for those ideas that are subtle, easily misunderstood, and those ideas that need some personal inquiry, testing and verification We Should...

Engage students in inquiry and inventive work as soon as possible Use the text as a reference—not a syllabus Ask more questions/answer fewer Make it clear that there are no stupid questions Guidelines for Student Autonomous Learning

Ask naïve questions and let the students correct you Raise questions with many possible answers and push students to answer in multiple ways Demand final performances (speech, presentation, project demonstration) Continually assess for understanding Guidelines for Student Autonomous Learning

Performance Based Assessment

PBA is a form of assessment that requires students to perform a task rather than an answer questions from a ready made list. Also known as: Authentic Assessment Alternative Assessment Active Learning Performance Assessment What is Performance Based Assessment?

Performance-based assessments require students to apply knowledge and skills. PBA’s can be used as formative or summative assessments. Can be labor- and time-intensive. Can also be quite diverse. Introduction

PBA’s present students with hands-on tasks or other performance-based activities that students must complete individually or in small groups; Work is evaluated using pre-established criteria: –A performance task (actual prompt or activity) –A scoring rubric (scoring guide consisting of pre-established performance criteria) –Direct observation of student skills and capabilities (very different from pencil-and-paper tests) Characteristics of PBA

Performance assessments are: –Based in the “real world” = authentic assessment –Must be linked to instructional objectives/standards –Less abstract than more traditional forms of assessment –Assessments, by themselves, are meaningful learning activities –Concept of performance assessments is not new –Specific behaviors/capabilities should be observed –Measure complex capabilities/skills that can’t be measured with pencil- and-paper tests –Must focus on teachable processes –Can judge appropriateness of behavior/understanding Characteristics of PBA

Performance assessments are (continued): –Can be used to judge appropriateness of behavior or understanding –require products of behaviors that are valuable in their own right –tasks should encourage student reflection –Can specifically targets procedures used by students to solve problems –Results in tangible outcome or product Characteristics of PBA

Pros and Cons of PBA Pros More than one correct answer Creative solutions Engaging Part of learning process Can assess students ability to apply knowledge Real life/world tasks Can assess thinking skills Cons Address fewer learning objectives – time intensive Found intimidating to students used to memorization Less reliable Lower ability students sometimes frustrated

Six essential features to keep in mind. PBA’s should: 1.Have a clear purpose that specifies the decision that will be made resulting from the assessment. 2.Focus be on process, product, or both 3.No simple right or wrong answers; they must be assessed along some sort of continuum. 4.Focus on degrees (e.g., quality, proficiency, understanding, etc.). 5.Try to reduce potential subjectivity in scoring. 6.Share scoring information with students early—as a guide Developing PBA Tasks

Students actively construct meaning of their own understanding. Students become more actively engaged when they have to organize, structure and apply their knowledge. Research Findings on PBA

What Does PBA Look Like in the Classroom? No pencil and paper, not multiple choice Rubrics given prior to start Open ended response exercises/Hands on Portfolios – compilation of required tasks and best works Use of higher order thinking skills Synthesis of classroom instruction Student reflection Practical/Real life experiences Extended tasks