1 QUIET The Search for B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Using Coherent HEMT Detectors A Proposed New Initiative for Fermilab April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
Advertisements

First results from QUIET Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration 1.
Particle Astrophysics at Fermilab Craig Hogan, Director, FCPA Dan Bauer, Deputy Director, FCPA Presented to the FNAL PAC November, 2009 Overview and Strategic.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Calibration System with Cryogenically-Cooled Loads for QUIET-II Detector M. Hasegawa, O. Tajima, Y. Chinone, M. Hazumi, K. Ishidoshiro, M. Nagai High Energy.
Michael Lampton Overview of Space Sciences Laboratory 16 July 2003.
CMB polarisation results from QUIET
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
Doug Michael Jan. 12, First goal is to be ready to select an optimal technology in ~one year. –Demonstrate that fundamental technologies are ready.
Quantum to Cosmos Workshop Objectives Ulf Israelsson, JPL Airlie, May 21, 2006.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
Contact Scientist Workflow Scott Schnee Dec 19, 2011.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
BENE Meeting April 28, 2006 A. Bross US Contribution to the IDS Aka WDS BENE IDS/FP7 at RAL April 28, 2006 A. Bross.
Search for B-modes in CMB Polarization  QUIET and other experiments Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration Ultimate High Energy Physics QUIET collaboration.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
Results of the HPC in Europe Taskforce (HET) e-IRG Workshop Kimmo Koski CSC – The Finnish IT Center for Science April 19 th, 2007.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.
Project Overview How to get here…. Half Way to the Test Run October 18, 2012HPS Project Overview2 …starting from here? John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
Status report on MURAY telescope R&D
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
Helping Develop America’s Technological Workforce K. Whelan Oregon QuarkNet Meeting, June 2012 QuarkNet 101 Kris Whelan University of Washington.
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
3 Objectives Student Name: Ajao Hazzan ID: Kuala Lumpur Infrastructure University 1 Introductions.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting CMB Polarization Measurements Sarah Church John Fox, Chao-Lin Kuo, Sami Tantawi, Dan Van Winkle KIPAC/Stanford Physics/SLAC.
QUIET Experiment Rencontres de Moriond 2010 March 14 th, 2010 Akito KUSAKA (for QUIET collaboration) University of Chicago, EFI and KICP.
1 W-band Module Production and Other Fermilab Contributions Proposed Significant Partnership in QUIET-II to the Fermilab PAC in November 2009 Modest Fermilab.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Status Report for KEK-PS E391a KEK IPNS G.Y.Lim 14 April 2003.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
1 Our Proposed Involvement in QUIET Phase II Assembly of ~1500 W-band Polarization Analyzer Modules ~ 2 year production run Collaborative effort with Caltech.
1 draft NO A WBS J. Cooper NO A Working Group Meeting June 29,2005 Work is the effort of Ron, Dave, Bill, Suzanne, Harry, not just me.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
StatusUpdate Jian-ping Chen, JLab SoLID Collaboration Meeting September 11-12, 2015.
B.Sadoulet CDMS DUSEL The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory The process Themes DUSEL and CDMS Bernard Sadoulet Dept. of Physics.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
1 Injecting W-band power (from Gunn oscillator) into QUIET receiver module KEK and Fermilab Collaborating at Lab 3 Status of QUIET-II at Fermilab Fritz.
LIGO - G M LIGO Laboratory and LSC Background on Major Collaborative Efforts Gary Sanders LIGO Lyon Virgo-LIGO Discussion 8 January 2001.
PC Based Spectrum Analyzer April 29, 2003 May03-10 Faculty Advisor: Dr. DJ Chen Michael Cain Paul Heil Eric Rasmussen Aung Thuya Client: Teradyne Inc.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
UK X-FEL National Laboratory Perspective Susan Smith STFC ASTeC IoP PAB/STFC Workshop Towards a UK XFEL 16 th February 2016.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Cosmic Frontier Aspects of FNAL Program. The quality and significance of the laboratory’s recent scientific and technical accomplishments within each.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Forging New, Non-Traditional Partnerships among Physicists, Teachers and Students Marjorie Bardeen, Fermilab quarknet.i2u2.org.
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
BigPanDA Technical Interchange Meeting July 20, 2017 Hong Ma
CERN R&D plans and Infrastructures
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
India in ILC-detector R&D in
DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
A 10-m Diameter Submillimeter-wave Telescope for the South Pole
Particle Physics Theory
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 QUIET The Search for B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Using Coherent HEMT Detectors A Proposed New Initiative for Fermilab April 17-18th 2009 FCPA Retreat Fritz DeJongh, Scott Dodelson, Dave McGinnis, Hogan Nguyen, Albert Stebbins

2 Outline Bruce Winstein, the QUIET Principle Investigator: The QUIET Experiment, the Science, and the case for Fermilab involvement What have we done thus far ? Our proposal for QUIET Phase II involvement Request to the FCPA Through the talks, we will address Dan’s questions Is the science interesting and worthy of pursuit ? Why should Fermilab get involved ? What are the risks and the next steps ? Do we have the team carry out what we intend to do ?

3 QUIET R&D at Fermilab Large and accurate rotatable wire grids to produce and modulate polarized microwaves Made by PPD chamber winding group using HEP techniques In use at KICP lab in Chicago since Feb 09 to optimize detector settings, calibrate relative “angles” of all modules, and provide absolute response to known input polarization signal Will be deployed in Chile in May 09 Typical Stokes-Q Response from a W-band Module Grid rotates to modulate the polarization

4 QUIET R&D at Fermilab 20 Kelvin Black Body Microwave Source For Full-System Characterization A significant job carried out primarily by PPD Technical Staff: A vacuum tank with a high-strength microwave-transparent vacuum window with anti-reflective coating. A Microwave-absorbing epoxy cast over an aluminum core A Commercial Cryocooler To be delivered to KICP in Chicago in April 09, for full-system W-band characterization Mimics the sky noise in Chile, while in a laboratory setting D. Butler, J. Korienek, C. Lindenmeyer, W. Newby, J. Wilson. Not pictured: J. Montes, R. Rucinski, K. Schultz

W-band modules for QUIET Phase-II QUIET will need a National Lab Partner with Experience in Delivering Large and Complex Detector Arrays. Extensive experience in PPD for Microdetector Assembly, QA, and Production Tooling and Testing. Facility tools to do the job Large clean rooms and Lab space for Testing Wirebonding Machines Optical Measurement Tools Glue Robots Micron-accuracy Pick-and-Place Machines We believe the core expertise exists in Fermilab PPD for QUIET W-band assembly, for example at the Sidet Facility. Why Fermilab ? 1” W-band HEMT module

6 W-band electronics noise performance is crucial for success Why Fermilab ? Noise performance can be addressed and understood by RF expertise at the Lab Simulation tools Electronics circuit design Hardware RF/microwave VNA probe station at JPL HEMT-based Low Noise Amplifier Dies to be probed

7 R&D for QUIET at Fermilab DeJongh and Nguyen visited JPL in Dec 08, entered discussions with Winstein and JPL staff on QUIET. Rotatable Wire Grid delivered to collaboration in Feb 09 Received W-band module fabrication notes from JPL in April Kelvin Black Body Source to be delivered to collaboration in April 09 Nguyen to visit Atacama, Chile in May 09 Approved for hosting a QUIET Collaboration and Phase II meeting at Fermilab in June 09 Receive circuit design from JPL, and begin microwave simulation work. R&D on W-band module fabrication Completed Our next Steps

8 Risks Technical QUIET Phase I is currently running. Science quality Q-band observations is well underway and will complete in May 09. W-band operations will commence in May-June 09. A lot of details have been worked out and solved. QUIET Phase II will build on successes of Phase I. No Major Technical Changes. Scientific Q-band data already collected in Phase 1 should yield observation of a 2nd peak in E-mode polarization. Even if T/S were too small to be observed, there is B-mode expected from gravitational Lensing (e.g. from neutrino mass). QUIET Phase II running will occur simultaneous with module production. A continuous stream of science data even during project construction. Management CMB research on this scale have not occurred within DOE labs. We believe that a sound case can be made for Fermilab involvement in QUIET.

9 History and Strong Tradition of Intellectual Leadership Dodelson and Stebbins were among the first to understand the importance of primordial CMB polarization. A core for a strong Fermilab scientific team Dodelson, Stebbins: theory, analysis, scan strategy DeJongh, Nguyen: Detector fabrication, cryogenics McGinnis: RF/microwave circuit design and technology … And others who have expressed interest … The QUIET Collaboration is inviting us to take a leadership role. Why Fermilab ?

10 Possible Additional Scope of Fermilab Involvement Final detector assembly and Characterization at Fermilab before deployment (ala DeCam). An exciting possibility The current QUIET Fermilab Scientific team would have to grow

11 Request to the FCPA Thank you for the support thus far from the FCPA and PPD. We request endorsement for continued Fermilab scientific, engineering, and technical support for R&D to explore QUIET Phase II involvement. We have a clear plan. The FCPA is a major representative in the community of scientists interested in the cosmic frontier: We request a strong statement of support for CMB science to the PASAG, endorsing an increased level of partnership between DOE and NSF. We request endorsement for Fermilab to be a scientific member of QUIET Phase II. The NSF is eager to partner with the DOE. With Fermilab involvement, they would view the QUIET Phase II project even more favorably.

12 Back up Slides

13 Very Rough Estimate of Scientific, Engineering, and Technical Labor A production rate of a few modules per day