Camp Return Strategy SHELTER CLUSTER – LEOGANE

CCCM Pilot Programme

Identification of Beneficiaries Global registration Call for return Advantage for CM agency

Return Package Shelter Livelihoods (CFW, etc.) WASH, NFIs, etc.

Shelter Organization of family information  Name  Size  Locality of Return  Contact information

Shelter Coordination with Shelter Cluster/Shelter Agency according to map

Evaluation of other needs Livelihoods ▫CFW ▫FFW ▫Agriculture ▫Fishery WASH Health Education NFI

Final Product NbNoAbriName Family Size TelIP Current Location Localite of Return Correspon ding Shelter Agency Needs Upon Return (Y/N) ShelterWASHCFW/FFW 1131LOUIS Erlande ACTED Parc Gerard ChristopheChatuleyACTED NYY 2105 JACQUES Rose Daniel SASH Parc Gerard Christophe Rue d'AutantCARE NNY 3104EXILAS Sirilia Intersos Parc Gerard Christophe Cada? YYY

ACTED Case Study Parc Gerard Christophe Imol Camp Marche Chatuley

Chatuley Partnership in Chatuley with Samaritan’s Purse because of material pipeline challenges NbNoAbriName Family Size TelIP Current Location Localite of Return Correspon ding Shelter Agency Needs Upon Return (Y/N) ShelterWASHCFW/FFW 1131LOUIS Erlande ACTED Parc Gerard ChristopheChatuleyACTED NYY 2105 JACQUES Rose Daniel SASH Parc Gerard Christophe Rue d'AutantCARE NNY 3104EXILAS Sirilia Intersos Parc Gerard Christophe Cada? YYY

Process Evaluation Delivery Construction Post-construction evaluation

Evaluation Terrain of origin T-shelter criteria Land Title ▫Landowner information ▫Explanation ▫Neighbors ▫ASEC ▫CASEC ▫Mayor’s Office

Delivery/Construction Beneficiaries sign contract  Agreement to leave the camp 48 hrs after installation  Volunteer to work for the day  Preparation of terrain ACTED truck picks up materials at SP warehouse Camp volunteers unload, SP teams build T-shelter Reception receipt Sensitization on anchors

Post-construction evaluation SP questionnaire Anchors T-shelter constructed T-shelter inhabited Camp site evacuated

Challenges Aid activities focused within camps Families refuse to leave camp site ▫Camp still serves as a pull factor for families ▫Need to direct interventions towards localities of return  Inter-cluster support critical Global subscription to return strategy Hurricane season

Way forward Coordination with local government to understand and contribute to return strategy while strengthening capacity at return sites ▫Land titles, evaluations, camp decongestion support Advocacy at inter-cluster level ▫CCCM Agencies, IOM, OCHA Support from IPs Realization of return of pilot population ▫Develop lessons learnt ▫Prove the return process works Scale up

Thank you