Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Characterization of Spatial Heterogeneity for Scaling Non Linear Processes S. Garrigues 1, D. Allard 2, F. Baret 1. 1 INRA-CSE, Avignon, France 2 INRA-Biométrie,
Advertisements

Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - ESS Mapping land cover change and terrestrial dynamics over northern Canada using multi-temporal Landsat imagery Christopher.
Description of the enzymatic browning in avocado slice using GLCM image texture Stefany Cárdenas, Roberto Quevedo*, Emir Valencia and José Miguel Bastías.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Resolution Resolving power Measuring of the ability of a sensor to distinguish between signals that are spatially near or spectrally similar.
The Global Digital Elevation Model (GTOPO30) of Great Basin Location: latitude 38  15’ to 42  N, longitude 118  30’ to 115  30’ W Grid size: 925 m.
The Application of the Getis Statistic to High Resolution Imagery to Detect Change in Tropical Corals Ellsworth F. LeDrew, Alan Lim Faculty of Environmental.
Texture-Based Image Retrieval for Computerized Tomography Databases Winnie Tsang, Andrew Corboy, Ken Lee, Daniela Raicu and Jacob Furst.
Texture Classification Using QMF Bank-Based Sub-band Decomposition A. Kundu J.L. Chen Carole BakhosEvan Kastner Dave AbramsTommy Keane Rochester Institute.
Applied Geostatistics
Texture Classification Based on Co-occurrence Matrices Presentation III Pattern Recognition Mohammed Jirari Spring 2003.
Basics: Notation: Sum:. PARAMETERS MEAN: Sample Variance: Standard Deviation: * the statistical average * the central tendency * the spread of the values.
Image Classification To automatically categorize all pixels in an image into land cover classes or themes.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
Forest Structure and Distribution across the Geographic Range of the Giant Panda Up-scaling from Plots to the Entire Region Jianguo (Jack) Liu (Michigan.
Remote Sensing 2012 SUMMER INSTITUTE. Presented by: Mark A. Van Hecke National Science Olympiad Earth-Space Science Event Chair Roy Highberg North Carolina.
Maa Kaukokartoituksen yleiskurssi General Remote Sensing Image enhancement I Autumn 2007 Markus Törmä
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement
Entropy and some applications in image processing Neucimar J. Leite Institute of Computing
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Environmental Remote Sensing Lecture 5: Image Classification " Purpose: – categorising data – data abstraction / simplification – data interpretation –
Satellite Cross comparisonMorisette 1 Satellite LAI Cross Comparison Jeff Morisette, Jeff Privette – MODLAND Validation Eric Vermote – MODIS Surface Reflectance.
Attribute Expression Using Gray Level Co-Occurrence Sipuikinene Angelo*, Marcilio Matos,Kurt J Marfurt ConocoPhillips School of Geology & Geophysics, University.
Review of Statistics and Linear Algebra Mean: Variance:
The role of remote sensing in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
Resolution A sensor's various resolutions are very important characteristics. These resolution categories include: spatial spectral temporal radiometric.
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 5 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Area Data Lecture Four.
Christine Urbanowicz Prepared for NC Climate Fellows Workshop June 21, 2011.
Texture. Texture is an innate property of all surfaces (clouds, trees, bricks, hair etc…). It refers to visual patterns of homogeneity and does not result.
May 16-18, 2005MultTemp 2005, Biloxi, MS1 Monitoring Change Through Hierarchical Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Image Data James C. Tilton Mail Code 606*
Remote Sensing Supervised Image Classification. Supervised Image Classification ► An image classification procedure that requires interaction with the.
Remote Sensing. Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including.
Use of Aerial Videography in Habitat Survey and Computers as Observers Leonard Pearlstine University of Florida.
Comparisons of NDVI values Dean Monroe. Location.
The Semivariogram in Remote Sensing: An Introduction P. J. Curran, Remote Sensing of Environment 24: (1988). Presented by Dahl Winters Geog 577,
7 elements of remote sensing process 1.Energy Source (A) 2.Radiation & Atmosphere (B) 3.Interaction with Targets (C) 4.Recording of Energy by Sensor (D)
Applications of Spatial Statistics in Ecology Introduction.
Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing DeeDee Whitaker SW Guilford High EES & Chemistry
Texture Metric Comparison of Manual Forest Stand Delineation and Image Segmentation Richard M. Warnick, Ken Brewer, Kevin Megown, Mark Finco, and Brian.
Mao-Ning Tuanmu1, Andrés Viña1, Scott Bearer2,
Digital Image Processing
Disturbance Effects on Carbon Dynamics in Amazon Forest: A Synthesis from Individual Trees to Landscapes Workshop 1 – Tulane University, New Orleans, Late.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Levels of Image Data Representation 4.2. Traditional Image Data Structures 4.3. Hierarchical Data Structures Chapter 4 – Data structures for.
November 30, PATTERN RECOGNITION. November 30, TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION PROJECT Characterize each texture so as to differentiate it from one.
Defining Landscapes Forman and Godron (1986): A
Northern Michigan Forest Productivity Across a Complex Landscape David S. Ellsworth and Kathleen M. Bergen.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Colour and Texture. Extract 3-D information Using Vision Extract 3-D information for performing certain tasks such as manipulation, navigation, and recognition.
Phil Hurvitz Avian Conservation Lab Meeting 8. March. 2002
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Slides from Dr. Shahera Hossain
Remote Sensing Theory & Background III GEOG370 Instructor: Yang Shao.
Modeling biodiversity response to habitat heterogeneity in agricultural lands of Eastern Ontario using multi spatial and temporal remote sensing data Supervisor:
Spatial Analysis Variogram
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
Image Enhancement Band Ratio Linear Contrast Enhancement
1.Image Error and Quality 2.Sampling Theory 3.Univariate Descriptive Image Statistics 4.Multivariate Statistics 5.Geostatistics for RS Next Remote Sensing1.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Spatial statistics: Spatial Autocorrelation
Texture.
Lecture 21: GIS Analytical Functionality (V)
Quantifying Scale and Pattern Lecture 7 February 15, 2005
University College London (UCL), UK
Image Information Extraction
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Spectral Transformation
Data Analysis, Version 1 VIP Laboratory May 2011.
Presentation transcript:

Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity Mao-Ning Tuanmu 5/29/2012

Outline Objectives & rationale Remotely sensed data Heterogeneity metrics Calculation approaches of heterogeneity metrics Next steps

Spatial heterogeneity of land cover Species distributions and biodiversity patterns Landscape metrics based on categorical land cover maps Boundary delineation Heterogeneity within a land cover type Continuous measures of land surface characteristics from remote sensing

Objectives To explore different approaches for quantifying land cover heterogeneity based on remotely sensed data To generate remote sensing-based heterogeneity metrics at the global scale To evaluate the usefulness of those metrics for explaining biodiversity patterns and monitoring their temporal dynamics

Remote Sensing Imagery Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ Global Land Survey (GLS) surface reflectance 7 bands, QA Three epochs: 1990, 2000, 2005 7,000~8,000+ scenes for each epoch 22 scenes covering the entire Oregon Vegetation indices NDVI

Remote Sensing-Based Metrics First-order texture measures Statistics calculated from image pixel values Composition of pixel values Average, SD, range, maximum, minimum and etc. of pixel values within a pixel neighborhood Values of individual spectral bands Linear or non-linear combinations of spectral bands

First-order Texture Measures Standard deviation Coefficient of variation

Remote Sensing-Based Metrics Second-order texture measures Statistics calculated based on values of pixel pairs Information on the spatial relationship between two pixels Spatial configuration (or arrangement) of pixel values Metrics based on the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM)

Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) A tabulation of how often different combinations of pixel brightness values (grey levels) occur in a pixel neighborhood A symmetric n-by-n matrix, where n is the number of all possible gray levels (e.g., n=16 (2^4) for a 4-bit image) The element Pij of a GLCM is the occurrence probability of the pixel pairs with values i and j within a pixel neighborhood

GLCM Metrics Pixel neighborhood Pixel pairs Metrics Direction (0°, 90°, 45°, 135°) Offset distance (offset = 0) Metrics Contrast-related Contrast, dissimilarity, homogeneity Orderliness-related Angular second moment, entropy Descriptive statistics Mean, variance, correlation a b c d e f g h i

Second-order Texture Measures Angular second moment 𝑖,𝑗=0 𝑁−1 𝑃 𝑖𝑗 2 Homogeneity 𝑖,𝑗=0 𝑁−1 𝑃 𝑖𝑗 1+ (𝑖−𝑗) 2

Second-order Texture Measures Contrast 𝑖,𝑗=0 𝑁−1 𝑃 𝑖𝑗 (𝑖−𝑗) 2 Correlation 𝑖,𝑗=0 𝑁−1 𝑃 𝑖𝑗 𝑖− 𝜇 𝑖 𝑗− 𝜇 𝑗 𝜎 𝑖 2 𝜎 𝑗 2

Moving Window vs. Fixed Grid Moving window approach Run a moving window across the entire image (study area) to calculate first- and second-order metrics for each pixel (e.g., Landsat pixel of 30m) Aggregate metric values (e.g., calculate mean and SD) for a larger regular grid (e.g., MODIS 500m grid) or specific area (e.g., sampling plot) Fixed grid approach Directly calculate metrics based on the values of Landsat pixels within each MODIS pixel

Approach Comparison Homogeneity (Mean of metric values in 3x3 windows) Angular second moment (Mean of metric values in 3x3 windows) Moving window approach Fixed grid approach (Metric values in MODIS 500m grids)

Approach Comparison Standard Deviation 3x3 moving window (Mean of metric values in moving windows) Moving window approach Fixed grid approach (Metric values in MODIS 500m grids)

Moving Window vs. Fixed Grid Moving window approach Texture characteristics at different grains (3x3, 11x11…) Computation-intensive Fixed grid approach Texture characteristics at the scale of the fixed grid Easier to interpret Much less computation-intensive (> 10 times faster)

Next Steps Comparison between texture measures and landscape metrics from categorical land cover data (NLCD) Fragstats Only in the Windows system Cannot handle the entire Landsat scene with the moving window approach

Next Steps Metrics related to spatial autocorrelation Measures of spatial autocorrelation (e.g., Moran’s I) Characteristics of variogram (e.g., sill and range) Seasonality effects Cropland Mosaicked images from NASA