Improved Application of Gas Reservoir Parameters ACARP Project C10008 May 10 th 2002 Mackay Technology Transfer Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 -Classification: Internal Uncertainty in petroleum reservoirs.
Advertisements

The influence of wettability and carbon dioxide injection on hydrocarbon recovery Saif Al Sayari Martin J. Blunt.
Running a model's adjoint to obtain derivatives, while more efficient and accurate than other methods, such as the finite difference method, is a computationally.
IMPACT ~ Breach Physical Modelling Review of Modelling Work Undertaken So Far...
Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Permeability Testing WTN Network Meeting April , 2011 ExxonMobil Exploration / Well Testing Team.
INDICATOR EVALUATION An indicator of appropriate fertilization practices must fulfill some criteria (SAFE) : No Discriminating power time and space >
UCL global drought monitor Benjamin Lloyd-Hughes.
Pore-scale modelling of carbonates 1 Hiroshi Okabe Petroleum Engineering and Rock Mechanics Research Group Department of Earth Science and Engineering.
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
1. Introduction Study Area Objectives Literature review Methodology Results Conclusions 2.
Classification of Fractured Reservoirs
Simulation of Cement Reactivity with CO 2 in the Wellbore Environment J. William Carey, Peter Lichtner, and Chuan Lu Los Alamos National Laboratory 2007.
Copyright © 2005 Advantica Inc. (USA Only) and Advantica Ltd. (Outside USA). All rights reserved by the respective owner. Own Use Gas Review of Pre-heater.
The NEA Sorption Project a multinational cooperative program to advance the use of Thermodynamic Sorption Models Mark Fuhrmann U.S. NRC Office of Nuclear.
Outburst Research Needs Hanes ACARP Workshop DMR Wollongong 12 th February 2003 Ray Williams.
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 14 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 14: Chapter 7: Design of Engineering.
Imbibition Assisted Recovery
Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
Mathematics of non-Darcy CO 2 injection into saline aquifers Ana Mijic Imperial College London Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering PMPM Research.
Unconventional Petrophysical Analysis in Unconventional Reservoirs
The Calibration Process
Vivek Muralidharan Simulation and imaging experiments of fluid flow through a fracture surface: a new perspective.
Upscaling and History Matching of Fractured Reservoirs Pål Næverlid Sævik Department of Mathematics University of Bergen Modeling and Inversion of Geophysical.
Combined Geological Modelling and Flow Simulation J. Florian Wellmann, Lynn Reid, Klaus Regenauer-Lieb and the Western Australian Geothermal Centre of.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Standard Energy Audit Manual for Government Buildings
Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López
Lost Ridge Klappan area Coalbed Methane potential of the anthracite Groundhog/Klappan Coalfield Northern Bowser Basin Barry Ryan New Ventures Branch Ministry.
Schlumberger Public Scope and Application of Pressure Transient Tests in CBM and Shale Gas reservoirs Baijayanta Ghosh Reservoir Domain Champion Testing.
1 Modelling Task 8 EBS Task Force Meeting 16, Lund, 28 November 2012 Dr. David Holton Dr. Steven Baxter
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
THEORY ABSTRACT The equations that are the basis of the DRAMBUIE scour model were developed at H.R. Wallingford (a U.K. civil engineering firm) and have.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
Modeling and Validation of a Large Scale, Multiphase Carbon Capture System William A. Lane a, Kelsey R. Bilsback b, Emily M. Ryan a a Department of Mechanical.
Project: NSF grant EAR “CZO: Transformative Behavior of Water, Energy and Carbon in the Critical Zone: An Observatory to Quantify Linkages among.
Modelling Unconventional Wells with Resolve and Reveal Juan Biörklund (Gauloise Energía) and Georg Ziegler (Wintershall Holding)
1 Handling Uncertainty in the Development and Design of Chemical Processes David Bogle, David Johnson and Sujan Balendra Centre for Process Systems Engineering.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.
Soil Water Tension Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review PDT and radiation transport Marvin L. Adams.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Strategy: Analysis and Practice Slide 1/1 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 Chapter 14. Risk, uncertainty and strategy.
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Céline Scheidt and Jef Caers SCRF Affiliate Meeting– April 30, 2009.
Evaluation of Subbase using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor
Alternative equation for sorption data interpretation Patrick van Hemert & K-H.A.A. Wolf May 25, 2006 International Symposium CBM, Tuscaloosa.
Reservoir Uncertainty Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques Authors: Jincong He Department of Energy Resources Engineering AbstractIntroduction.
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
15 th RPF 6 – 7 May 2008 Standard test methods for hot mix asphalt.
CMA Workshop, Pau 14 May 2008 Validation protocols developed within the NORMAN project David Schwesig (IWW Water Centre, Germany) Contributors: Biosense,
1 Tom Edgar’s Contribution to Model Reduction as an introduction to Global Sensitivity Analysis Procedure Accounting for Effect of Available Experimental.
KIMIA LINGKUNGAN BAGIAN 2: TERMODINAMIKA. PREVIEW In this third part of the course we:  define and apply a number of thermodynamic ideas and concepts.
Hemant Kumar EGEE /28/2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINERAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF EARTH AND MINERAL SCIENCES.
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Physics
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
An assessment framework for Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
A New Coal-Permeability Model:
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Chapter 6 Calibration and Application Process
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Kick-off Conference “Risk Management for
Hydraulic Fracture Optimization Study
Outburst Threshold Limits Current Research Outcomes
Problem statement Given: a set of unknown parameters
Uncertainty of Measurement
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Presentation transcript:

Improved Application of Gas Reservoir Parameters ACARP Project C10008 May 10 th 2002 Mackay Technology Transfer Update

The Team.… Applicant Organisation - GeoGAS Systems Pty. Ltd. Ray Williams, Eugene Yurakov Supporting Organisations – CSIRO Energy Technology North Ryde Abou Saghafi Multiphase Technologies Pty. Ltd. David Casey James Cook University Peter Crosdale $141,159 1 Year

Objectives Improving the quality of input data in key areas. Obtaining a clearer understanding of the combined effects of sets of gas reservoir parameters. Producing a set of sensitivity matrices that can be used as an improved guide in modelling and in identification of the most important data to acquire.

From the ACARP Submission “……… the importance of considering the gas implications is widely recognised. What is not generally recognised, is the variability in the gas reservoir and the processes and limitations of the tools available to undertake modelling assessments.”

From GeoGAS/CSIRO SIMED Procedure Manual 1998

For this project we look mainly at: Gas sorption isotherms Use of multiphase testing to: Validate gas sorption isotherms Generate relative permeability curves Assess desorption time constant  Gas drainage borehole recharge Other important stuff – Permeability, porosity, compressibility Sensitivity analyses

An Example – The Isotherm Shock

Start of Comparisons

Isotherm Comparison Tests – Factors Considered Method – all essentially the same (gravimetric) Grainsize distribution of tested coal Moisture before during and after testing, including equilibrium moisture Consistency between distributed samples

Density Comparisons of Sub Samples Isotherms shown to be quite sensitive to density. A change of 0.1 g/cc results in around 6-18% change in sorption capacity. Replots by Crosdale and Yurakov showed reduced scatter using the same density. Coal density inconsistencies identified as probably the most significant contributor to isotherm differences. Relative Densities (g/cc) Adsorbed CH4 Densities CSIRO g/cc GeoGAS g/cc JCU g/cc

Grainsize Comparison

Isotherms Field-Lab Desorption Pressure Comparisons From Multiphase Technologies Pty. Ltd. David Casey

CH4 Grosvenor Desorption Pressure During Well Production

Comparison Desorption Pressures – Well, Multiphase, Laboratory

Idea is to back out relative permeability curves from history matching water and gas production Have had difficulty doing this with SIMED in moderate to high permeability coal. Same problem using EclipseCBM Have contracted Molopo (Wang Xingjin) to further SIMED curve matching Matching per se is not the problem, it is getting a match using sensible parameters that is proving difficult……..

Parameters varied are: - porosity - permeability - sorption time constant - relative permeability

What is tau? Supposedly, the time taken for 63.2% of gas to desorb from a slow desorption gas content test Where  = desorption time constant  = coal matrix shape factor D = diffusion coefficient

But is it 63.2% of Qm, Q1+Q2 or just Q2? We have related tau (from Qm) to IDR30.

Assessed the variability For a particular study area, define a range of tau’s applicable to the gas content magnitude for that deposit for use in sensitivity assessments

At low perm (1mD, almost no difference between tau 4.5 and tau 30 days (8.5 m3/t)

At high perm (100 mD, big difference between tau 4.5 and tau 30 days (8.5 m3/t)

Gas drainage efficiency diminishes toward the end of boreholes, Not from the end…

Effect Of Hole Spacing

Effect Of DirectionalPermeability x y

Porosity x y

Conclusions Hope to bring project to a close in next couple of months Scope to improve understanding and standardisation between labs on isotherm testing. Need to evaluate combinations of parameters eg as we did for ranges of tau at low and high permeabilities. A wider range of field measurements is important to lock down parameters. Eg measurement of both water and gas flow from in- seam boreholes greatly improves the robustness of the modelling. The bottom line is to create more robust modelling that is relevant. That means: - better input data - good modelling packages. - defining the approach to modelling that includes being critical every inch of the way, quantifying uncertainty……..