Team building Games

Defining and Classifying Group Group(s) Two or more individuals interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives. Formal Group A designated work group defined by the organization’s structure. Eg- committee, small departments, a research development lab, management team, assembly line Informal Group A group that is neither formally structured nor organizationally determined; appears in response to the need for social contact. Eg – 3 employees from 3 different departments have lunch together

Defining & Classifying Group Command Group A group composed of the individuals who report directly to a given manager. EG- Director + team of lecturer’s Task Group Those working together to complete a job or task. Eg- cultural committees etc Interest Group Those working together to attain a specific objective with which each is concerned. Friendship Group Those brought together because they share one or more common characteristics. Eg- clubs

5- Stage Model of Group Development Forming Stage The first stage in group development, characterized by much uncertainty. ( awareness, commitment, acceptance) Storming Stage The second stage in group development, characterized by intragroup conflict. ( conflict, clarification, belonging ) Norming Stage The third stage in group development, characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness.( cooperation, development, support )

5- Stage Model of Group Development Performing Stage The fourth stage in group development, when the group is fully functional. ( productivity, achievement, pride) Adjourning Stage /Mourning Stage The final stage in group development for temporary groups, characterized by concern with wrapping up activities rather than performance. Separation, recognizing, satisfaction

Stages of Group Development

Group Structure Roles Role(s) A set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit. Role Identity Certain attitudes and behaviors consistent with a role. Role Perception An individual’s view of how he or she is supposed to act in a given situation.

Group Structure Roles Role Expectations How others believe a person should act in a given situation. Psychological Contract An unwritten agreement that sets out what management expects from the employee and vice versa. Role Conflict A situation in which an individual is confronted by divergent role expectations.

Group Structure Conformity Adjusting one’s behavior to align with the norms of the group. Reference Groups Important groups to which individuals belong or hope to belong and with whose norms individuals are likely to conform.

Group Structure - Norms (cont’d) Deviant Workplace Behavior Antisocial actions by organizational members that intentionally violate established norms and result in negative consequences for the organization, its members, or both.

Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior E X H I B I T 8–5 Category Examples Production Leaving early Intentionally working slowly Wasting resources Property Sabotage Lying about hours worked Stealing from the organization Political Showing favoritism Gossiping and spreading rumors Blaming coworkers Personal Aggression Sexual harassment Verbal abuse Stealing from coworkers Source: Adapted from S.L. Robinson, and R.J. Bennett. “A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study,” Academy of Management Journal, April 1995, p. 565.

Group Structure - Status Status A socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by others.

Group Structure - Size Other conclusions: Odd number groups do better than even. Groups of 7 or 9 perform better overall than larger or smaller groups. Other conclusions: Odd number groups do better than even. Groups of 7 or 9 perform better overall than larger or smaller groups. Social Loafing The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.

Group Structure - Composition Group Demography The degree to which members of a group share a common demographic attribute, such as age, sex, race, educational level, or length of service in the organization, and the impact of this attribute on turnover.

Group Structure - Cohesiveness Increasing group cohesiveness: 1.Make the group smaller. 2.Encourage agreement with group goals. 3.Increase time members spend together. 4.Increase group status and admission difficultly. 5.Stimulate competition with other groups. 6.Give rewards to the group, not individuals. 7.Physically isolate the group. Increasing group cohesiveness: 1.Make the group smaller. 2.Encourage agreement with group goals. 3.Increase time members spend together. 4.Increase group status and admission difficultly. 5.Stimulate competition with other groups. 6.Give rewards to the group, not individuals. 7.Physically isolate the group. Cohesiveness Degree to which group members are attracted to each other and are motivated to stay in the group.

Group Decision Making Strengths –More complete information –Increased diversity of views –Higher quality of decisions (more accuracy) –Increased acceptance of solutions Weaknesses –More time consuming (slower) –Increased pressure to conform –Domination by one or a few members –Ambiguous responsibility

Group Decision-Making Techniques Electronic Meeting A meeting in which members interact on computers, allowing for anonymity of comments and aggregation of votes. Brainstorming An idea-generation process that specifically encourages any and all alternatives, while withholding any criticism of those alternatives.

Group Decision-Making Techniques Nominal Group Technique A group decision making method in which individual members meet face-to-face to pool their judgments in a systematic but independent fashion. Delphi Decision Technique Used in situations where group members are unable to meet face to face. The process. A series of questions is distributed to a panel. Panel members submit their responses to a decision coordinator. The decision coordinator summarizes the responses, and sends the summary along with a follow-up questionnaire to the panel. Panel members send in their responses. The process is repeated until a consensus is reached.

Group Decision Making (cont’d) Groupthink Phenomenon in which the norm for consensus overrides the realistic appraisal of alternative course of action. EG- The Challengers Disaster (originally scheduled for Jan 22,1986 Jan 28,1986 Hubble Telescope mirror, Political Parties Group shift A change in decision risk between the group’s decision and the individual decision that member within the group would make; can be either toward conservatism or greater risk.

Team Versus Groups: What’s the Difference Work group A group that interacts primarily to share information and to make decisions to help each group member perform within his or her area of responsibility

Prentice Hall, 2001Chapter 921 Share information Neutral (may be negative) Individual Random and varied Goal Synergy Accountability Skills Collective performance Positive Individual and mutual Complementary Work Groups Work Teams Comparing Work Groups and Work Teams

Types of Teams PROBLEM SOLVING TEAMS- Groups of 5-12 employees from the same department who meet for a few hours each week to discuss ways of improving quality efficiency and the work environment Eg – Quality circles CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS - Employees from about the same hierarchical level, but from different work areas, who come together to accomplish a task Eg- Emergency trauma teams – surgeons, doctors, nurses, technicians Eg – Company selling its self in job fairs then members from Mktg,Finance, HR would be at the stall Eg- The boeing company created a team made up of employees from production, planning, quality, tooling etc Companies like Honda, Toyota, Daimler Chrysler M&M use such teams VIRTUAL TEAMS – Teams that use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed members in order to achieve a common goal Eg- Wipro technologies has a Meet your people programme which helps the managers interact with each other through yearly basis

A Team-Effectiveness Model Team Design Autonomy Skill variety Task identity Task significance Composition Ability Personality Roles & diversity Size Processes Team Member Relationships: Cohesiveness Common purpose Specific goals Team efficacy Conflict Team roles: Task- & Relationship-Oriented Interpersonal Problem solving Technical skills Extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness Adviser Maintainer Assessor, creator

SELF MANAGED TEAMS – Groups of people who take on responsibilities of their former supervisors. – Teams make decisions on: Scheduling work. Allocating tasks. Training in job skills. Evaluating performance. Selecting new team members. Controlling quality of work. EG- Hero HONDA the operator on the assembly line also undertakes quality checks maintenance activities EG – In Arkansas Eaton company which manufactures hydraulic hose that is used in tractors and trucks threw open the assembly line to 285 workers into more than 50 SMTS

 High performance teams. – High performance teams: Have strong core values. Turn a general sense of purpose into specific performance objectives. Have the right mix of skills. Possess creativity. They work best with the smaller organizations as employees know each other very well. Eg- John Akers of IBM was replaced by Lou Girstner to make the IBM team as hpt. Eg – Florida newspaper Tallahasse having all women employees in frontline staff

Virtual Teams  Key advantages of virtual teams. – Brings cost effectiveness and speed to teamwork. – Brings computer power to information processing and decision making.  Key disadvantage of virtual teams. – Direct personal contact among members suffers.

 Benefits of self-managing teams. – Productivity and quality improvements. – Production flexibility. – Faster response to technological change. – Reduced absenteeism and turnover. – Improved work attitudes. – Improved quality of work life.  Operational difficulties for self-managing teams. – Impact on supervisors and others accustomed to a more traditional way of working. – Self-managing teams are not appropriate for all organizations.