8:30 – 9:00Research and Educational Objectives / Spanos 9:00 – 9:45 CMP / Doyle, Dornfeld, Talbot, Spanos 9:45 – 10:30 Plasma & Diffusion / Graves, Lieberman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS ( MEMS )
Advertisements

Sputtering Eyal Ginsburg WW46/02.
FABRICATION PROCESSES
High Pressure Plasma with a third electrode James Roberts Physics TSP 2002 Supervised by Dr Kerrie Balla.
NARROW GAP ELECTRONEGATIVE CAPACITIVE DISCHARGES AND STOCHASTIC HEATING M.A. Lieberman Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University.
CHAPTER 8: THERMAL PROCESS (continued). Diffusion Process The process of materials move from high concentration regions to low concentration regions,
CMOS Fabrication EMT 251.
Etch Process Trends. Etch process trends Most trends are not consistent. They depend on the specific values of input parameters. At point A, pressure.
Section 3: Etching Jaeger Chapter 2 Reader.
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
Section 4: Thermal Oxidation
1 Microelectronics Processing Course - J. Salzman - Jan Microelectronics Processing Oxidation.
Silicon Laser Shyam Sabanathan Chenjing Li Thannirmalai.
Microelectronics Processing
The Deposition Process

ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
EE143 – Ali Javey Section 5: Thin Film Deposition Part 2: Chemical Methods Jaeger Chapter 6.
Lecture 11.0 Etching. Etching Patterned –Material Selectivity is Important!! Un-patterned.
Lecture 12.0 Deposition. Materials Deposited Dielectrics –SiO2, BSG Metals –W, Cu, Al Semiconductors –Poly silicon (doped) Barrier Layers –Nitrides (TaN,
EFFECT OF BIAS VOLTAGE WAVEFORMS ON ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS AND FLUOROCARBON PLASMA ETCH SELECTIVITY* Ankur Agarwal a) and Mark J. Kushner b) a) Department.
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS Dr. Esam Yosry Lec. #2. Chip Fabrication  Silicon Ingots  Wafers  Chip Fabrication Steps (FEOL, BEOL)  Processing Categories 
11/8/99 SFR Workshop - Education 1 Small Feature Reproducibility A Focus on Semiconductor Technology Education UC-SMART Major Program Award D.B. Graves,
1 Chemical Engineering Tools for Semiconductor Fabrication David Cohen, PhD AIChE Norcal Symposium April 12, 2005.
Gas-to Solid Processing surface Heat Treating Carburizing is a surface heat treating process in which the carbon content of the surface of.
SEMINAR ON IC FABRICATION MD.ASLAM ADM NO:05-125,ETC/2008.
NSF GOALI Interactions of Plasma/Energetic Beams with Organic Masking Materials Gottlieb S. Oehrlein, University of Maryland College Park, DMR
1 K. Overhage, Q. Tao, G. M. Jursich, C. G. Takoudis Advanced Materials Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
EEE 3394 Electronic Materials Chris Ferekides Fall 2014 Week 8.
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS Dr. Esam Yosry Lec. #3. Diffusion  Introduction  Diffusion Process  Diffusion Mechanisms  Why Diffusion?  Diffusion Technology.
FLCC March 28, 2005 FLCC - Plasma 1 Fluid Modeling of Capacitive Plasma Tools FLCC Presentation March 28, 2005 Berkeley, CA David B. Graves, Mark Nierode,
Introduction Amorphous arrangement of atoms means that there is a possibility that multiple Si atoms will be connected Amorphous arrangement of atoms means.
Top Down Manufacturing
Top Down Method Etch Processes
Introduction EE1411 Manufacturing Process. EE1412 What is a Semiconductor? Low resistivity => “conductor” High resistivity => “insulator” Intermediate.
8:30 – 9:00 Research and Educational Objectives / Spanos 9:00 – 9:50 Plasma, Diffusion / Graves, Lieberman, Cheung, Haller 9:00 – 9:50 Plasma, Diffusion.
Small Feature Reproducibility. 11/8/99 SFR Workshop - Overview 2 Small Feature Reproducibility Measuring, Understanding and Controlling Variability in.
Lecture 1 OUTLINE Semiconductors, Junction, Diode characteristics, Bipolar Transistors: characteristics, small signal low frequency h-parameter model,
Etching: Wet and Dry Physical or Chemical.
5/24/ Plasma Assisted Controllable Bonding SFR Workshop May 24, 2001 Yonah Cho, Chang-Han Yun, and Nathan Cheung Berkeley, CA 2001 GOAL: To establish.
11/8/99 SFR Workshop - Plasma 1 Small Feature Reproducibility A Focus on Plasma Etching UC-SMART Major Program Award E. Aydil, N. Cheung, D. Graves, E.
11/8/ Diagnostic and Etching Studies of Inductively Coupled Plasmas SFR Workshop November 8, 2000 Matthew Radtke, John Coburn, David Graves Berkeley,
11/8/ Plasma Assisted Surface Modification: Low Temperature Bonding SFR Workshop November 8, 2000 Yonah Cho, Adam Wengrow, Chang-Han Yun Nathan Cheung.
Large Area Plasma Processing System (LAPPS) R. F. Fernsler, W. M. Manheimer, R. A. Meger, D. P. Murphy, D. Leonhardt, R. E. Pechacek, S. G. Walton and.
Research Goal: We seek to measure and understand both self- and dopant diffusion in strained, relaxed, and ion implanted Ge and SiGe, utilizing isotopically-controlled.
11/8/ Radical Enhanced Atomic Layer Chemical Vapor Deposition (REALCVD) SFR Workshop November 8, 2000 Frank Greer, John Coburn, David Frazer, David.
Solid State Devices EE 3311 SMU
Conductivity, Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors
On Wafer Ion Flux Sensors
Saurabh J. Ullal, Anna R. Godfrey, Eray S. Aydil
Frank Greer, David Fraser, John Coburn, David Graves
Fermi Level Dependent Diffusion in Silicon
Solid State Devices Fall 2011
Etch Dry Etch.
SFR Workshop November 8, 1999 A.B. Wengrow, and N.W. Cheung
Testbed for Plasma-Wall and Etch Product Studies
Layer Transfer Using Plasma Processing for SMART-Wafer
Instabilities in Electronegative Inductive Discharges
1.6 Glow Discharges and Plasma
Silicon Self-Interstitial and Dopant Diffusion
K. Takechi and M. A. Lieberman
Silicon Etch Product Transport by an Inductively Coupled Plasma in Cl2
Instabilities in Electronegative Inductive Discharges
Instabilities in Inductive Discharges
Yaoxi Wu and M. A. Lieberman
On-Wafer Ion Flux Sensors
PLASMA-SURFACE INTERACTION (PSI) AT
Presentation transcript:

8:30 – 9:00Research and Educational Objectives / Spanos 9:00 – 9:45 CMP / Doyle, Dornfeld, Talbot, Spanos 9:45 – 10:30 Plasma & Diffusion / Graves, Lieberman, Cheung, Haller 10:30 – 10:45 break 10:45 – 12:00 Poster Session / Education, CMP, Plasma, Diffusion 12:00 – 1:00 lunch 1:00 – 1:45 Lithography / Spanos, Neureuther, Bokor 1:45 – 2:30 Sensors & Controls / Aydil, Poolla, Smith, Dunn, Cheung, Spanos 2:30 – 2:45 Break 2:40 – 4:30 Poster Session / all subjects 3:30 – 4:30 Steering Committee Meeting in room 373 Soda 4:30 – 5:30 Feedback Session 3rd Annual SFR Workshop & Review, May 24, 2001

5/24/ Diffusion and Plasma UC-SMART Major Program Award E. Haller, N. Cheung, D. Graves, and M. Lieberman, University of California Third Annual Workshop & Review 5/24/2001

3 Fermi Level Dependent Diffusion in Silicon Eugene E. Haller University of California at Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Collaborators Ian D. Sharp, Undergraduate Student Research Assistant, Chem. Eng. & MSE, UC Berkeley Samuel P. Nicols, Graduate Student Research Assistant, MSE, UC Berkeley Dr. Hartmut A. Bracht, Research Associate, Physics Dept., University of Münster, Germany Dr. Steven Burden, ISONICS Corp., Golden, CO

5/24/ Motivation Downscaling of devices is, in part, limited by diffusion of dopants (see: Paul Packan, Intel Corp., MRS San Francisco, April 19, 2001, Symposium X3, “Materials issues related to dopant diffusion and activation to form shallow, low resistance profiles will be addressed.”). Advanced modeling and control of diffusion requires an improved basic understanding of diffusion processes. Quantitative knowledge of the properties of silicon interstitials, the major active native defect assisting diffusion, is extremely limited. What are its charge states? Where do the energy levels lie in the silicon bandgap? What are the formation and migration energies?

5/24/ Approach Use undoped and doped Si isotope multilayer structures to study self- and dopant diffusion. Determine simultaneously the diffusivities of dopants and silicon as a function of temperature and Fermi level position. Introduce dopants without disturbing the local equilibrium of native defect concentrations (i.e., avoid “interstitial wind” caused by oxidation, implantation or clustering of excess dopant concentrations. Such extra interstitials lead to transient diffusion behavior.) Use a low-temperature MBE-grown amorphous silicon cap layer, implanted at low energies as dopant diffusion source. Boron diffusion is our first target.

5/24/ Theory Boron diffusion mechanism: kickout: Participation of different charge states: The various charge states of the silicon interstitial are not known. )erstitialintneutral(hIBB )donor ionized(IBB 0 S 0 I S 0 I     B S  I  B I

5/24/ Theory (cont.) System of four coupled differential equations has to be solved numerically: k f,b = forward/backward rate constants xxt  

5/24/ Experimental Results: As-implanted isotope Si superlattice

5/24/ Major Results First Fermi level dependent Si self-diffusion experiments have been conducted. Si self-diffusion is enhanced by moving the Fermi level towards the valence band. The kick-out mechanism accurately describes the experimental results assuming: i.e., Boron interstitials are neutral, substitutional boron acceptors are negatively charged (ionized acceptors), Si interstitials are positively charged (ionized donors). B I 0  B S   I ,

5/24/ Future Work Milestone 2002: Identical studies with phosphorus and arsenic Milestone 2003: Identical studies with arsenic and perhaps antimony (diffuses vacancy assisted)

5/24/ Plasma Assisted Controllable Bonding Yonah Cho, Chang-Han Yun, and Nathan Cheung UC-Berkeley, CA 2001 Milestone: To establish plasma recipes and bonding data for Si, oxide, and metal surfaces.

5/24/ New Applications of Plasma Enhanced Bonding Systems Integration Metal polymer Enhanced Adhesion between low k /metal Metal Precleaned wafers stored as bonded pair Si Particle/contaminant free storage Debond SOI Technology

5/24/ Summary of Progress and Research Activities Established SCA technique to monitor surface charge time-dependence of plasma treated surface. Bipolar substrate bias demonstrated as a control variable for surface charging Si-Si full-strength bonding can be achieved at temperature at low as 100 o C with plasma treatment Transient and steady-state bonding kinetics studied (SEE POSTER FOR DETAILS).Polarizability of water moleculars proposed as major mechanism for plasma enhanced bonding. Work initiated for Si and oxide bonding to surfaces with patterned metal Industrial interaction Changhan Yun as 2000 summer intern at AMD for SOI characterization

5/24/ Surface Charge Control: e - Bombardment Vacuum V Capacitance + V- V0 accumulation inversion After e- bombardment plasma exposed Complete neutralization by e- bombardment PIII Chamber with ECR plasma source Ar V wafer = +50 V dc I wafer =.17 A Surface Charge Analyzer Data p-Si

5/24/ Proposed Bonding Model O H O O H H H Si O O O H O O H H H OO Hydrophilic Bonding Plasma Enhanced Bonding ++ -- ++ ++ Interaction between Partial charges (  + and  -) due to high  x (electronegativity): O-H: 1.2, N-H: 0.8, C-H:0.3 Ref: I.N. Levine, Physical Chemistry ++ -- ++ -- ++ -- ++ ++ -- ++ -- ++ -- ++ Enhanced interaction between surface charge and H 2 O

5/24/ Bonding Kinetics E a = 0.58 eV Plasma enhanced bonding E a >> HL bonding (E a ~ 0.05 eV) Arrehenius Plot HL bonding at RT Time Dependent Bonding Strength,  (t)

5/24/ and 2003 Milestones Demonstrate polymer/metal adhesion enhancement with bipolar plasma bias Demonstrate concomitant plasma treated deposition surfaces as effective diffusion barrier. Surface Layer Si Substrate Plasma treatment Deposition Modified Surface What are the control variables and physical mechanisms for plasma enhanced adhesion ?

5/24/ F. Greer, M. Nierode, M. Radtke, M. Kiehlbauch*, D. Fraser, J. Coburn and D. Graves Berkeley, CA * Graduating May 2001 Plasma-Assisted Processes for Small Feature Reproducibility

5/24/ Novel Technologies: Radical-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has been proposed to deposit high conformality, very thin diffusion barriers for Cu interconnects Key issue for integration : low deposition temperature –Improve chemical stability of organic low-k films –Reduce mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients –Reduce copper migration Lower temperature deposition using radical activation promises easier process integration with low residual Cl content.

5/24/ Experimental Procedure: TiN from TiCl 4, D and N Conventional ALD-like sequence –Each step in process monitored in-situ with QCM –Many cycles used to grow a film –Resulting films removed for ex-situ XPS analysis Surface temp varied ( o C) TiCl 4 ~1 mL of TiCl x 1. Adsorption 2. Pump down D ~1 mL of Ti-D x 3. Dechlorination 4. Pump down 5. Nitrogenation N ~1 mL of Ti-N x

5/24/ Precursor (TiCl 4 ) Dissociative Chemisorption: Near-Monolayer as TiCl 2 1 L = Molecules/cm 2 QCM TiCl 4 TiCl 2 Adsorption Cl 2 Cl 2 desorption

5/24/ Dechlorination: D Atoms Abstract Cl from Surface as DCl D Cl QCM Dechlorination Cl Atoms/cm 2 Cl loss due to abstraction by D atoms Cl Lost Upon Exposure to Deuterium D atom Exposure (L) DCl

5/24/ QCM D Cl Dechlorination Residual Chlorine vs. Relative D Exposure Cl Content (%) Relative D Atom/Cl Exposure 100 o C Results Overall Dechlorination Results After Film Deposition Key result: Low Cl content at only 100 o C. Conventional thermal ALD requires > 400 o C DCl

5/24/ Nitrogenation Results N D Uptake Upon Exposure to N atoms QCM Nitrogenation N Atoms/cm 2 Nitrogen Atom Exposure (L) 2002  Study effects of surface preparation, type and temperature on film properties  Apply method to patterned surfaces for barrier film application. Explore DRAM capacitor applications. Milestones 2002/2003 ND

5/24/ Modeling and Simulation Well-diagnosed plasma experimental station Model development: plasma + neutral chemistry Focus on etch products altering plasma and etch characteristics Si and new gate stack materials: high k and metal gate electrodes

5/24/ Experimental Apparatus

5/24/ Etch Chamber (side view)

5/24/ Example: Silicon etching with Cl 2 Neutral transport and redeposition plays a key role in etch performance. Redeposition of silicon from gas phase on wafer can lead to loss of CD control. Deposition of silicon onto reactor wall requires expensive cleans. Etch Products in Plasma: CD Effects Vahedi et.al., 1999 Dry Process Symposium, Tokyo Mask Redeposited sidewallfilm CD 0 Mask Silicon CD f

5/24/ sccm SiCl 2 Transport & Inlet Position Center Inlet Cl 2 Flux Showerhead Inlet Cl 2 Flux Key result: location of etch gas inlet greatly alters etch product flow

5/24/ Modeling/Testbed Milestones 2002/2003 Convert plasma/neutral code to FEMLAB/MATLAB platform for ease of use and code transferability. Include self-consistent electron kinetics in model. Compare plasma/neutral model to test-bed experimental system: role of etch products in etching. Experimental studies of plasma-wall interactions (e.g. Si/O/Cl for gate/trench etch) Studies of new high-K and gate stack etching (e.g. etch precursors, by-products, selectivity)

5/24/ M. A. Lieberman, A. J. Lichtenberg, A. M. Marakhtanov, K. Takechi, and P. Chabert Berkeley, CA Plasma Sources for Small Feature Reproducibility

5/24/ Milestones September 30, Etch resist in LAPS to examine uniformity (completed). - Characterize instability using OES/actinometry and planar probe (completed). - Install the Z-scan sensor and explore the spectral RF signature of plasma instabilities (in progress). September 30, Characterize plasma instability using V-I-phase probe. - Model for reduced electron temperature and density. September 30, Develop and test instabilities control. Reduce electron temperature and density in discharges.

5/24/ Experimental LAPS Setup A Xm (0.5uH) X1X1 X2X2 Rs Vrf Plasma 900 pF (fixed) pF pF Bm 1 Voltage sensor D C B Bm 2 Antenna coil embedded in the plasma Eight quartz tubes threaded by copper antenna tubes 36.0 cm x 46.5 cm processing area New series-parallel system configuration

5/24/ Effect of Argon Addition to Oxygen Plasma on Photoresist Etch Rate Etch Rate (nm/min) Total Gas Pressure (mTorr) Rf power:1000 W ■ :Pure O 2, V bias =0 V ● :Pure O 2, V bias = 80 V □ :O 2 /Ar=1:1, V bias = 0 V ○ :O 2 /Ar=1:1, V bias = 80 V Experimental Data Ar* + O 2  Ar + 2O

5/24/ Effect of Argon Addition to Oxygen Plasma on Photoresist Etch Rate (Simulation vs. Experiment) Etch Rate (nm/min) Total Gas Pressure (mTorr) Data: O 2 /Ar, V bias =0 V Data: O 2 /Ar, V bias = 80 V Fit: O 2 /Ar, V bias = 0 V Fit: O 2 /Ar,V bias =80V Rf power:1000 W E – etch rate Y i – etch product desorbed/ion  0 – flux of O-atoms  i – flux of ions

5/24/ Experimental TCP Setup Mass Spectrometer Plasma Inductive Coil Langmuir Probe OES (PMT) 30 cm 19 cm Planar Probe Monochromator

5/24/ Upgraded TCP Coil and Matching Network Rogowski coil (RF current measurement, fast time response) Z-scan sensor (V-I measurements) 3-turn water cooled coil (high power)

5/24/ Instability Windows Capacitive Inductive Capacitive Inductive Instability linked to average attachment rate Old TCP system Upgraded TCP system Ar/SF 6 (1:1) SF 6

5/24/ Results in (1:1) Ar/SF 6 discharge Ar / SF 6 (1:1) p = 5 mTorr P rf = 500 W f = 0.8 kHz The electron density changes by a factor of 20 with fast rise and decay times Positive and negative ion densities decay at the same rate

5/24/ Global Model Equations Negative ion balance Electron balance Electron energy balance Charge neutrality at the walls Quasineutrality (slow time variation) (medium) (fast) (n - not lost to walls) (highly electronegative)

5/24/ Example of Phase Plane Motion Integrate DE’s for n -, n e, and T e for a given initial condition in the unstable regime Theory Ar/SF 6, 5 mTorr Experiment

5/24/ Future Work Characterize plasma instability using V-I-phase probe. Continue experiments and modeling of instability. Develop model for reduced electron temperature and density. Development of particle-in-cell (PIC) code for compassionate plasmas (in progress). Publications 1.K. Takechi and M.A. Lieberman, Effect of Ion Energy of Photoresist Etching in an Inductively Coupled, Traveling Wave Driven, Large Area Plasma Source (to appear in J. Appl. Phys.) 2. K. Takechi and M.A. Lieberman, Effect of Ar Addition to an O 2 Plasma in an Inductively Coupled, Traveling Wave Driven, Large Area Plasma Source: O 2 /Ar Mixture Plasma Modeling and Photoresist Etching (to appear in J. Appl. Phys.) 3.K. Takechi and M.A. Lieberman, Photoresist Etching in an Inductively Coupled, Traveling Wave Driven, Large Area Plasma Source, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 869 (2001) 4.M.A. Lieberman, A.J. Lichtenberg, and M.A. Marakhtanov, Instabilities in Low-pressure Inductive Discharges with Attaching Gases, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3617 (1999) 5.P. Chabert, A.J. Lichtenberg, M.A. Lieberman, and A.M. Marakhtanov, Instabilities in Low-pressure Electronegative Inductive Discharges (to appear in Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.)