Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-07-04 Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0070r1 Enabling AP Sleep Date: Authors: Jafarian, Qualcomm Slide 1 January 2013.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.:IEEE /0860r0 July 2012 Qualcomm Inc. Collision reduction after TIM Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Target Wake Times Date: Authors: July 2012 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
High Level MAC Concept for WUR
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
Polling for MU Measurements
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
TWT Information frames in 11ax
WUR MAC issues follow-up
Considerations for WUR Response
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
WUR MAC issues follow-up
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
Further considerations on WUR frame format
11az STA Polling for MU NDP Ranging
Discussion on CR for CID 5066
Further considerations on WUR frame format
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Mode Operation Procedures
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Considerations for WUR Response
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
WUR Mode Operation Procedures
Traffic Filter based Wakeup Service
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR with conventional power save
EHT Power saving considering multi-link
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission July 2015 Slide 2 Authors (continued): A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 SubmissionSlide 3 Authors (continued) July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 SubmissionSlide 4 Authors (continued) July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 SubmissionSlide 5 Authors (continued) July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Slide 6 Authors (continued) July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 SubmissionSlide 7 Authors (continued) July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Introduction MU procedures are under discussion in 11ax –The AP enables multiple STAs to transmit UL frames via Trigger frames (TFs) –MU STAs wait for the TF prior to transmitting UL frames Upon reception of a TF intended to them they can transmit to the AP In this presentation we focus on trigger frame scheduling with TWT signaling [1] –This way we also enable other useful operation modes for power save that fit in the 11ax use cases I.e., STAs wake up only in the allocated TWT SP and can sleep outside of them For simplicity, we focus on the implicit TWT operation which enables: –“Broadcast” TWT: Scheduled by the AP, irrespective of TWT requests, and indicated in the Beacon for multiple STAs (a generic scheduling mechanism that covers operation in [1]) –“Solicited” TWT: Scheduled by the AP, accounting for the STA’s TWT request July 2015 Slide 8A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Basics of Trigger TWTs “Broadcast” trigger TWT: –AP indicates the target trigger times in a TWT response included in the Beacon The pattern can be periodic, aperiodic (i.e., single indication for multiple Trigger frames) –The pattern is only valid for the Beacon Interval following the Beacon. The AP can indicate the broadcast trigger TWTs during a TWT Setup “Solicited” trigger TWT: –A STA requests the AP to schedule TFs (using TWT request) TWT pattern is based on STA’s UL traffic pattern and QoS requirements –The pattern can be periodic or aperiodic –The AP responds confirming or providing alternative TWT schedules The AP allocates its resources based on multiple STA’s information –STAs with similar traffic pattern can be allocated in similar TWTs, with similar TWT service periods (SPs), and other similar parameters July 2015 Slide 9 BeaconBeacon TFTF Next TWT BeaconBeacon TFTF TFTF TFTF TWT element: Implicit TWT, Next TWT, TWT Wake Interval TWT Wake Interval DL/UL MU A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Solicited Trigger TWT Trigger TWT setup (negotiated): –Setup of TWT parameters is the same as for basic TWT operation with the following additions: The HE non-AP STA may request scheduling of a TF at the start of each TWT The AP confirms scheduling of a TF at the start of each TWT Trigger TWT operation: –AP schedules a TF at the beginning of each TWT SP –Non-AP STAs wake up at the TWT, wait for the TF and get ready for MU DL/UL exchange STAs are not supposed to contend during the TWT SP but rather wait for the TFs sent by the AP During the TWT SP, STAs can exchange PS-Polls, APSD trigger frames, UL/DL BUs, etc. upon reception of TFs. STAs that negotiate TWT need not wake up to read the Beacon frame –DL BU availability is notified during the TWT SP itself. –STAs can renegotiate their TWTs when a traffic pattern changes July 2015 Slide 10 STA 1 STA 2 Poll 4 Poll 2 Tri gg er Poll 1 STA 4 TWT Wake Interval TWT SP Next TWT(s) TWT Setup(s) AckAck AckAck Tri gg er BU 1 BU 2 BU 4 BA 1 BA 2 BA 4 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Broadcast Trigger TWT TWT setup for broadcast trigger TWT –TWT request/response can be exchanged by a STA and an AP to negotiate the target Beacon frame monitored by the PS STA. –Example of operation A STA sends a TWT Request to request the broadcast trigger TWT operation. An AP sends a TWT Response including the Target Wake Time set to the target TBTT and TWT Wake Interval set to the ListenInterval of the STA. A STA monitors the Beacon frame with the period of TWT Wake Interval (ListenInterval) from the time of Target Wake Time (target TBTT). If a STA receives the target trigger times in a TWT response included in the Beacon, the STA may save its power till the time and the STA wakes up at the target trigger time to receive the Trigger frame. Otherwise, the STA save its power according to TWT Wake Interval. –Note. It is applicable to PS STAs which should monitor the TIM Beacon frame with certain periodicity. July 2015 Slide 11A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Benefits of TWTs TWT scheduling improves power saving for the SU case as exemplified in [1] –It also eases contention as the STAs should not access the medium outside the TWT SPs For the MU case, the STA indicates/negotiates with the AP: –The TWT SPs during which it is active and the rest of the times during which it is inactive Similar benefits to the SU case: STAs save power, eases channel contention, –To send TFs at the start of the TWT SPs Enables MU operation during the TWT SP and protects the medium access for the STA –Increases throughput as transmissions are protected at the receiver –Increases network efficiency due to MU transmissions and reducing collisions The AP uses the TWT scheduling to: –Spread out the wake up and access times of the STAs easing contention –Allocate MU resources more efficiently (as it can be based on received feedback) Avoids allocating resources to STAs with no UL data July 2015 Slide 12A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission TWT element Define a Triggered subfield in the Request Type field of the TWT element: –Set to 1 in a TWT Request to request for a TF at the start of the TWT –Set to 1 in a TWT Response to indicate that a TF will be scheduled at the start of the TWT Most of the use cases for 11ax seem to be covered by implicit TWT setup –So suggestion is that for 11ax the Implicit field of the TWT element be set to 1 Some more evaluations are needed to understand the benefits of explicit TWT –Which requires the use of TACK/STACK/BAT frames –Hence, here we focus only on the implicit TWT July 2015 Slide 13 B0B1B3B4B5B6B7B9B10 B14B15 TWT Request TWT Setup Command Reserved Triggered ImplicitFlow Type TWT Flow Identifier Wake Interval Exponent TWT Protection Bits: Element ID LengthControl Request Type Target Wake Time TWT Group Assignment Nominal Minimum Wake Duration TWT Wake Interval Mantissa TWT Channel NDP Paging (optional) Octets:11128 or 09 or 3 or or 4 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Summary of Trigger TWT Define implicit TWT operation for 11ax that enables: –Solicited TWT: STA and the AP negotiate the TWT parameters –STA sends TWT request and AP responds with a TWT response –Broadcast TWT: AP indicates to STAs the TWT parameters –AP sends TWT response to the STAs without receiving TWT requests The proposed Trigger TWT procedure –Inherits the power saving properties of the TWT protocol [1] July 2015 Slide 14A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Straw Poll #1 Do you support to add the following text in the SFD: –The spec shall include a mechanism that allows a target transmission time for a Trigger frame to be indicated. The mechanism is based on implicit TWT operation and additionally enables: Broadcast triggered TWT by including a TWT element in the Beacon Solicited triggered TWT by using implicit TWT negotiation procedure Yes No Abstain Slide 15 July 2015 A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Straw Poll #2 Do you support to add the following text in the SFD: –When the broadcast triggered TWT is enabled, STA and AP may exchange TWT request/response to indicate the target Beacon frame to be monitored by the PS STA. Yes No Abstain July 2015 Slide 16A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission References [1] M. Fischer (Broadcom) et. al., ah-targetwaketime Slide 17 July 2015