Of XX Competition and Bid Protests in Government Contracting Mike Schaengold, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP The Basics of Bid Protests on Federal and California State Procurements Christopher R. Rodriguez.

Advertisements

Georgia State E-Reserves Case What’s new, and what does it mean for libraries? Laura Quilter, UMass Amherst ALA’s CopyTalk Series, Jan. 8, 2015.

Duration and Scope of Litigation © Photograph by Natalie Fobes.

The Brave New World of Class Certification in Antitrust Cases Dallas Bar Association Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section March 24, 2011 Dallas Bar Association.

Tribal Authority Rule (TAR): Historical Overview David LaRoche.

Laura McKelvey, U.S. EPA. 2  CAA Implementation Authority [Section 301(d)] ◦ 1990 CAA Amendments ◦ Tribal air management authority ◦ TAS / TIP.

Court of AppealsBothSupreme Court. Court of AppealsBothSupreme Court FAB JCG DEK HN IX L M.

DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN 2006 Antenna Design updating Antenna Detailed Design PPDR K.O. PPDR Data Pack. Reflector Panels.

Wireless Password: July 24, 2013, Colorado Springs, CO Karen Bennett, Counsel Hunton & Williams LLP U.S. Mining: Challenges & Benefits Of.

Intellectual Property Group IP Byte sm : Damages Update Steve Hankins Schiff Hardin © 2015 Schiff Hardin LLP. All rights reserved.

Steven Koprince GovCon Legal Update 2014 Government Procurement Conference.

Patent Enforcement Teva v. Sandoz April 2015 introduction.

GIS and Law. Overview Get permissions Question 1: The Singer Speaker Songwriter - words Composer - music.

Current Developments in U.S. Patent Law Dimitrios T. Drivas April 24, 2014 Fordham IP Institute: 2C. U.S. Patent Law.

New Source Review Reform Vera S. Kornylak, Associate Regional Counsel EPA Region 4 Office of Regional Counsel and Gregg Worley, Chief, Air Permits Section,

I NDIRECT AND D IRECT I NFRINGEMENT A FTER A KAMAI 9 th Annual Advanced Patent Litigation Course July 26, 2013 Presented by Casey L. Griffith.

Do Now: Grab today’s Agenda (9:2). Read the story and sketch out the structure of the court system.

Captions and Citations Judicial History and Facts

Fordham IP Law Institute 19 th Annual Conference Review of Case Law and Legislative Developments in Patents Dimitrios T. Drivas 28 April 2011.

Prosecution Group Luncheon November, Prioritized Examination—37 CFR “No fault” special status under 1.102(e) Request made with filing of nonprovisional.

CURRENT STATE OF PLAY: ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Alison L. Doyle McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP NCMA Cape Canaveral Chapter Workshop May 14, 2008.

Chapter Seventeen: Appellate Courts. Courts of Last Resort Appellate courts oversee the lower courts and are restricted to questions of law; questions.

The Combined Impact of Prior Art Obviousness and Obviousness-Type Double Patenting on Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycle Strategies Brian V. Slater ACI 12.

WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.

Following a Case Through the Federal Courts. Overview A case begins when a lawyer or individual files a formal complaint with the clerk’s office of District.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update Statistics based first three years of AIA filings 3,655 petitions –3,277 (89.7%) inter partes review (IPR) –368 (10%)

 No C.H. v. Oliva, 990 F. Supp. 341, 354 (D.N.J. 1997) and 226 F.3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2000). By: Maria Dacles EDLP 611: Problems in Practice.

INTERESTING AND PENDING DECISIONS FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JANUARY, 2004 Nanette S. Thomas Senior Intellectual Property Counsel Becton Dickinson and Company.

Of XX Competition and Bid Protests Panel Richard Rector, Partner, DLA Piper LLP (US) ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1 Tinton Falls Lodging Realty,

Of XX Government Contracts Costs, Pricing & Accounting Karen Manos, Dave Hoffman & Greg Smith ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1 Sikorsky Aircraft.

Of XX Claims, Disputes, and Terminations PubKLaw Year in Review Moderator: Paul F. Khoury, Partner, Wiley Rein LLP Panelists: David M. Nadler, Partner,

Statute of Frauds By: Seyvon Jones & Maxwell Mastellone.

Of XX Competition and Bid Protests Daniel P. Graham, Partner, Vinson & Elkins, LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1 Bid Protests – Agency Corrective.

Supreme Court March 12, 2015 Define/Explain the following 1. Rule of Four 2. Writ of Cert 3. Stare Decisis Objective: Analyze the Supreme Court and understand.

Ongoing Royalties in Patent Litigation The Evolving Case Law on Damages for Post-Verdict Infringement: Procedural Issues Nicole D. Galli February 15, 2011.

Contract Formation and Source Selection Tim Sullivan.

Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.

Kym Nucci May 21, ,429 protests were filed at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2013 (slightly down from the prior year); the.

Significant Recent FOIA Court Decisions 1. 2 Env't Integrity Project v. EPA, 2016 WL (D.D.C. 2016) (appeal pending) Re: Request for data from.

Supreme Court March 24, 2017 Define/Explain the following 1

【New Draft】 France -Japan International Co-funding Joint call Schedule (revised version) APR. 11, 2017 Bpifrance / NEDO final meeting (week of 18/9) Announcement.

Courts, Judges, and the Law

Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.

Overview and Hot Topics in Petition for Review Litigation

Disruptive Potential of Madden v. Midland Funding

Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall

Appellate Courts: Let’s Take it Up

The Court System Appeals.

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Update on Sessions v. Dimaya

Reply Briefs Supplemental Authority Letters Supplemental Briefs

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision

Appeals Courts & Federal and State Court Systems

“The View From the Corner of U.S. Competition Law and Patents”

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

The Supreme Court Chapter 18.

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Courts, Judges, and the Law

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Catalog Production Timeline

Presentation transcript:

of XX Competition and Bid Protests in Government Contracting Mike Schaengold, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1 CMS Contract Management et al. v. United States Govt Cert. Petition Denied: 135 S.Ct (Apr. 20, 2015) 745 F.3d 1379 (Fed. Cir. March 25, 2014), rehearing & rehearing en banc denied (Aug. 8, 2014) (Protesters Win) 110 Fed. Cl. 537 (Apr. 19, 2013) (Protesters Lose) GAO: B et al., 2012 CPD ¶ 236 (Aug. 15, 2012) (Protesters Win) Fed. Cir. Grants Protesters Injunction Pending Appeal (Aug. 27, 2013) On Remand: 2015 WL (Fed. Cl. Sep. 29, 2015) (Protesters Win Bid Prep & Proposal Costs)

of XX Competition and Bid Protests in Government Contracting Mike Schaengold, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.2 CGI Federal, Inc. V. United States 779 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. Mar ) (Protester Wins) 118 Fed. Cl. 337 (Aug. 22, 2014) (Protester Loses) GAO: B et al., 2014 CPD ¶ 134 (Apr. 23, 2014) (Protester Loses, GAO Overrules Earlier Precedent) Unpublished Fed. Cl. Order (Sept. 2, 2014) (Court Grants Protester Injunction Pending Appeal)

of XX Competition and Bid Protests in Government Contracting Mike Schaengold, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.3 Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States Protester Cert. Petition Granted, 135 S.Ct (June 22, 2015). Oral Argument: Nov. 9, F.3d 923 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2014), rehearing en banc denied (Sept. 10, 2014) (Protester Loses 2-1 but Judge Reyna Dissents) 107 Fed. Cl. 226 (Nov. 27, 2012) (Protester Loses) GAO: B , 2012 CPD ¶ 165 (May 30, 2012) (Protester Wins)