© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing The concept of a person Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Abortion Part Four.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 17 Warren on Abortion
Philosophy 224 Moral Persons: Warren on Persons and Abortion.
1 Abortion I I. 2 Some Background 1 st Mo.2 nd Mo.3 rd Mo.4 th Mo.5 th Mo.6 th Mo.7 th Mo.8 th Mo.9 th Mo. Conception “Zygote” “Embryo” “Fetus”
Reasoning about Abortion Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
The Moral Status of the Non- Human World: Singer and Cohen.
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Practical ethics: applying theory Michael Lacewing
Metaethics and ethical language Michael Lacewing Michael Lacewing
Kant’s deontological ethics
Is stem cell research morally permissible? Michael Lacewing
Aristotle’s virtue ethics: three issues
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Deontology in practical ethics
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Animal Rights.
Animals and Persons (cont.). Tom Regan Contemporary American Philosopher Deontologist, in the tradition of Kant Specialist in animal rights The Case for.
The treatment of animals Michael Lacewing
Mary Anne Warren. A Brief History Abortion has been used throughout history, and has not become a criminal offence until anti- abortion legislation in.
What is abortion? Why do people disagree about it?
ABORTION.  Abortion is the most difficult and controversial moral issue;  Task: Listen to both sides, even if that is difficult to do. Both sides have.
Self and Society Who or What Can Have Rights? The Case of Animals.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights By David Kelsey.
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
Many people see the birth of a new child as the greatest moment of their lives. DNA is set and a potential human life has begun to form Life is a gift.
Practical Ethics Introduction to practical ethical issues and philosophical concepts. What is Practical Ethics? An area of moral philosophy looking at.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues
1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
EARLY LIFE Lo: To review the topic on Early life.
What makes someone a person? LO: I will explore the concept of ‘personhood.’ HOMEWORK: Read through the Bowie handout and complete the Tasks pg 194 and.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Abortion: An Overview of the Ethical Issues
Abortion and Moral Considerability
1 The Morality of Abortion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Religion and Early Life By Rishi, Conrad and Max.
Philosophy 220 Abortion Background and JP II. Fetal Development Abortion is another issue for which it is important to develop a shared vocabulary. Timmons’s.
Morality in the Modern World
Preference Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, we will have... Consolidated our knowledge of Act and Rule Utilitarianism by.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Animals and Persons. Ethical status for animals Kantian and utilitarian ethics traditionally extended to all people, but only people Kant: all rational.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
MODERN UTILITARIANISM AND GENETIC ENGINEERING IS IT WRONG TO INTERFERE WITH NATURE? CAN WE JUSTIFY THE SACRIFICE OF A FEW LIVES TO SAVE MANY? DO ANIMALS.
Chapter 9: Abortion Pope John Paul II, “The Unspeakable Crime of Abortion” – Main argument: 1. The human fetus from conception is “an innocent human being.”
What views do people have about abortion? Is it right or wrong? When does life begin?
Philosophical approaches to animal ethics
LIFE RELIGION & BELIEF – KS4
Substance and Property Dualism
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Eating animals Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Basic Moral Perspectives
LIFE RELIGION & BELIEF – KS4
Stage 2 Philosophy Moral Theories St John’s Grammar School
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Animals and Persons.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
STARTER QUESTION In 5 minutes, draw a spider diagram of everything you can remember about Consequentialism, Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics: Bentham.
Lecture 05: A Brief Summary
Background of the Abortion Debate
The Ethics of Abortion When, if ever, is Abortion morally permissible?
Abortion When Does Life Begin?.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The abortion debate arises from the conflict between two basic rights: the fetus’ right to life and the mother’s right over her own body. The pro-life.
Why Abortion Is Immoral
Abortion Little, The Morality of Abortion
Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide
Philosophy 224 Moral Persons Pt. 1.
Presentation transcript:

© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing

Arguing about abortion Most of the argument focuses on the moral status of the foetus: does it have a right to life? This question is usually connected to asking whether the foetus is a person.

Questions What is a person? Why think persons have a right to life? Is the foetus a person? Does it make a difference to whether abortion is right or wrong that the foetus is/is not a person? –The metaphysical question may not be relevant to the ethical question, and vice- versa.

Persons as possessing souls Persons have souls. This both distinguishes them from everything that isn’t a person, and is the basis of the right to life. If persons have souls, when do the soul and body come together? Traditional Catholic doctrine: at conception - so the embryo is sacred, as all human life is, straight away

Objections Many philosophical problems with the concept of a soul as a separate ‘thing’. Am I a soul? Is a soul a person before it has any of the characteristics of a person? Locke: persons aren’t souls –If you swapped all the memories between two souls, which soul would be which person?

Characteristics of personhood Implication: a person must have psychological attributes –But not all creatures with a psychology are persons What determines whether something is a person, if not having a soul? –Self-awareness, having a ‘point of view’ –Language –Reason –Autonomy –Morality –Being human

Dividing people up Apart from souls and ‘being human’, all other criteria are possessed by some human beings and not others, e.g. severe mental disability, senile dementia, permanent vegetative state –Not all human beings are persons –Yet we don’t think it is permissible to kill them for the benefit of others –Is this because they still have a right to life?

Sentience Sentience: primitive consciousness of perception, pleasure, pain –Doesn’t distinguish persons from non-persons –But perhaps it is the ground for a right to life? –Many animals are sentient - do they have a right to life? Sentience begins around 18 weeks, so younger foetuses don’t have right to life.

The argument from potential Foetuses are have a right to life because they will become a person with a right to life if allowed to develop But: –Sperm and egg prior to conception have this potential, if allowed to conjoin –Does potential matter? A student, who has the potential to become a teacher, is not put in charge of lessons until trained as a teacher; you can’t spend money you don’t have yet

Persons and abortion: recap Unless persons = embodied souls or persons = human beings, foetuses aren’t persons But they may still have a right to life –Potential persons –Sentience Both of these options are difficult to defend But even if the foetus doesn’t have a right to life, it might be wrong to kill it. –Not all morality is about rights.

The right to choose But suppose foetuses are persons, with a right to life. Is that enough to make abortion (always) wrong? –The case of the violinist Even a person with a right to life does not have a right to use another person’s body. Until it can survive outside her body, the foetus is part of the woman’s body. Even if the foetus is a person, even if it does have a right to life, the right to choose may take precedence.

Act utilitarianism The right thing to do is what will cause the greatest balance of happiness over pain. Importance of pleasure and pain - suggests sentience is right criterion for moral importance Since the feotus can’t feel pleasure or pain, does it not count at all? Or because, if it developed into a child, it would, should we count its future experiences (consequences)? Though we can’t tell exactly what these are, we normally prefer being alive to not being alive.

Virtue theory The discussion seems to treat women as containers for a foetus, rather than creators of life. The meaning of pregnancy in human life, and of abortion, haven’t been discussed. To think the foetus doesn’t matter is callous: –Even if the answer is that abortion is morally permissible, it would be wrong to do so lightly and without due consideration The life the woman is leading and her reasons for choosing abortion are central. Each case must be judged individually.