TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legislation passed in October 2009 established a Teacher Education And Mentoring Program.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Teacher Evaluation Model
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Teacher Education And Mentoring Program Overview of.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
Frameworks for South Dakota Schools.  Provide basic information on South Dakota’s Capstone Experiences.  Discuss how Capstone Experiences fit into South.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Mentor Update 1 Bridging the Journey from Preparation through Professional Practice.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Program Review & Evaluation Processes CSUSB 508/09/10 Presented by Kit Alvarez.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
April 10, A year of mentoring required to move from the initial to the professional license: Initial teaching Initial school specialist Initial.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATES ON IMPLEMENTING THE NEW REGULATIONS JUNE 2, 2009 MARY JANE PARKE.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
New Employee Induction Program
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science Teaching Guidelines for Program Evaluation Presented by Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. Project Manager.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Cristina G. Vázquez, Manager, Student Assessment Division, Texas Education Agency.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
TEAM Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. What is the TEAM Program? Legislation passed in October 2009 has established a Teacher Education and Mentoring.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction to TEAM Bridging the journey from preparation through professional practice.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
What it means for New Teachers
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Polices, procedures & protocols
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Dissemination Training
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Position descriptions
Presentation transcript:

TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC)

 Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process  TEAM Coordinating Committee (TCC)  District Support Plan Template  Sample Support Plans  TCC Support Plan (Draft Work) 2

 The mission of the Teacher Education and Mentoring (TEAM) Program is: ◦ to promote excellence, equity and high achievement for Connecticut students by engaging teachers in purposeful exploration of professional practice through guided support and personal reflection. 3

 Beginning teachers holding an initial, interim initial or 90 day certificate  Trained mentors  District administrators  Coordinating committees  Review committees  Higher Education  Professional Organizations  Regional Education Service Centers (RESCs)  CT Department of Education (CSDE) 4

A professional growth model aligned with five domains of the Common Core of Teaching  Classroom Environment  Planning  Instruction  Assessment  Professional Responsibility 5

6

 CCT Performance Profile (self-analysis)  Professional Growth Action Plan (PGAP) ◦ Module Goal ◦ Anticipated Impact on Student Performance ◦ Learning Activities/Classroom Applications ◦ Timeline for Module Completion ◦ BT and Mentor Meeting Log  Journal for Beginning Teacher  Journal for Mentor 7

 Sample Modules  Sample Reflection Papers  Recommended Resources  TEAM Coordinating Committee Guidelines  Sample District Support Plans  Review Committee Guidelines and Criteria  Tutorials 8

9

10

11

12

13

14

 A district committee that oversees, plans, implements and monitors the district’s Teacher Education and Mentoring (TEAM) Program. 15

Developing…  a three year district support plan.  an annual budget to support the activities of the three year plan. 16

Recruiting…  new mentors for TEAM training, anticipating the need to match content, grade level and school whenever possible.  previously trained mentors for update training. 17

Ensuring…  alignment of the TEAM Program with the district’s teacher evaluation and professional development program.  ongoing mentor/mentee conversations and interactions.  review and approval of the beginning teachers’ two year support plans/timelines.  organization of mentoring opportunities.  registration of beginning teachers in the TEAM program. 18

Accountability for…  overseeing the receipt of state money for mentor stipends using the online data system.  coordinating the process for reviewing reflection papers.  verifying successful completion of required modules for confirmation by the Superintendent.  submission of an annual activity report to the Superintendent. 19

I. Include your district’s three year objectives and supporting activities related to the mission of the TEAM Program. Consider: ◦ Alignment to school/district initiatives ◦ Teacher retention ◦ Professional development 20

II. Describe the criteria and process for identifying TCC members, establishing term length and timeline for the TCC to meet and communicate with the Superintendent and central office. Consider: ◦ Roles and responsibilities of the TCC 21

III. Describe the criteria and process used to select mentors, ensure that they have received appropriate state training and are assigned to beginning teachers based on subject areas, levels and need. Consider: ◦ Opportunities for professional development for mentors to address further development of best practices and essential content knowledge 22

IV. Based on district selection (regional or district) for review of reflection papers, describe the criteria and process used to identify who will participate on the review committee. Consider: ◦ Ability to provide release time for reviewers to attend state trainings and review papers 23

V. Describe the procedure for dissolving mentor placements, if not working, and for the removal, for good cause, of teachers from the eligible pool of mentors and/or cooperating teachers, if necessary. 24

VI.Describe the process used to collect beginning teachers’ two year support plans and ensure that mentors and beginning teachers are working together to complete the beginning teachers’ Professional Growth Action Plan (PGAP). 25

VII. Describe the process that the district will use to resolve internal disputes or appeals. Consider: ◦ Disputes concerning the mentoring module process, the PGAP, mentor/mentee relationships and/or reflection paper outcomes ◦ Requests for special accommodations based on disabilities 26

VIII. Describe the resources needed and the budget required to carry out the activities described in the plan to support beginning teacher and mentor activities as outlined here and in the Professional Growth Action Plans. Consider: ◦ Time for beginning teachers and mentors to meet ◦ Time for individuals to serve on the TCC and/or Review Committee ◦ Substitute coverage 27

IX. Complete the Annual Activity Report: Evaluation of the implementation of the three-year plan annually to inform changes as necessary for the following year. Consider: ◦ Documentation of support provided to beginning teachers ◦ Feedback from program participants 28

 In your packet, you will find sample plans representing districts of varied sizes and demographics. 1) Review sample plans with your district team. 2) Use information gained through the sample review to begin to outline a 3 year support plan for your district. 29