School of Education, www.udel.edu/educwww.udel.edu/educ CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development Supporting Teachers in Developing Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) Abstract Research is needed to identify and.
Advertisements

QAA Enhancement Themes Conference Heriot Watt University Wednesday 5 th March 2008 Poster Presentation by Mhairi Freeman (lecturer), Sally Michie, Stephanie.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
How do you do it?-- TPCK and Understanding by Design There is a new curriculum design model that helps us think about how to make assessment part of learning.
New Literacies Teacher Leader Institute, Summer 2010 Facilitator: Julie Coiro.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
EFTRE Workshop Overcoming poverty of experience and developing professional capacity in student teachers in Scotland.
The Purpose of Action Research
Claire Lloyd School of Education, Coleg Llandrillo, Claire Lloyd School of Education, Coleg Llandrillo,
Consistency of Assessment
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Thinking: A Key Process for effective learning “The best thing we can do, from the point of view of the brain and learning, is to teach our learners how.
Chapter 16 Narrative Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Educational Research: Action Research in Schools
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
“Fail to plan… plan to fail”
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Baker College Curriculum Design Tier II. Curriculum Tier Professional Development Tier I – (required) Professional development for curriculum development.
School of Education Faculty of Education, Social Sciences & Law Teacher Cognition & Second Language Grammar Teaching Dr Simon Borg.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Reflective Writing Beth Metcalf Teacher-in-Residence UNCW Watson School of Education.
Review Planning in English The Australian Curriculum English rationale identifies the key role English plays in developing successful learners who use.
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT LESSONS Region 5 Mathematics Network Conference September 16, 2013.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Topic 13 – Lesson Plan Review Facilitation Guideline Zone and Date
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
+ Shifting our focus… CSD Elementary Math Academy Common Core Practice Standards 10 Instructional Shifts Accessible Mathematics Increasing UNDERSTANDING.
Sharing Design Knowledge through the IMS Learning Design Specification Dawn Howard-Rose Kevin Harrigan David Bean University of Waterloo McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
March 5th, 2015, SITE 2015, Las Vegas, NV, USA
ASSESSING TEACHER KNOWLEDGE OF EFFECTIVE PRIMARY GRADE READING AND WRITING INSTRUCTION Measurement Issues and Concerns Panel Presentation by D. Ray Reutzel.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
Guided Reading How can we make this really effective for our students?
The Power of Observation. Before Observation Which students are the focus of the observation? What method will best capture the observation? What opportunities.
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
TPACK Model Summary Amanda Trigiani, Erica Sanders, Greg Santarelli, Mary Ellen Gibbons.
Using a Model Teaching Activity to Help Teachers Learn to Use Comparison in Algebra Kristie J. Newton, Temple University Jon R. Star, Nataliia Perova Harvard.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP. Objective 1: Design coherent instruction and learning activities collaboratively that are highly relevant to students and pedagogical.
Situating Teacher Learning in the Practice of Science and Mathematics Teaching Monica Hartman University of Michigan Pre-Oral Defense Meeting May 3, 2004.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Chapter 8 Putting It All Together DEVELOPING A TEACHING PHILOSOPHY © 2015 Etta R. Hollins.
Using simulations as tools to promote more powerful learning Instructor: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Yu-ting Tsai Roberta, L. (2005). Using simulations.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
Teaching Children About Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Video Enhanced Observation in teacher development
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Theresa Fraser’s Teaching and Learning Philosophy
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Theory and Practice of Learning and Teaching
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn via Visualization
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla Mouza & Yu-Chun Liu

School of Education, Background Teacher Professional Development  Need to help teachers become on-going learners  Need to help teachers develop flexible and contextualized knowledge Technology Professional Development  Increased need for continuous professional development  Need to help teachers situate technology knowledge within content and pedagogical knowledge Importance of Studying Classroom Practice (Hiebert et al., 2007)  Case methods (Merseth, 1996; L. Shulman, 1986; J. Shulman, 2002): Case development Case discussion and analysis

School of Education, Instructional Cases: Definitions, Functions “Case Knowledge”  knowledge of specific, well documented, and richly described events Purposes of cases  Cases as exemplars  Cases as opportunities to practice analysis  Cases as stimulants to personal reflection Theoretical Underpinnings  Cognitive Perspective: Case-based reasoning (Kolodner, 1993).

School of Education, Instructional Cases: Theoretical Underpinnings Case-based reasoning (Kolodner, 1993)  Human knowledge and experience is stored in memory in the form of cases or stories  Cases record both positive and negative experiences  Principles of CBR (Kolodner, 2006) Learners can learn from the cases of others as well as from their own Learners need to interpret and reflect on their experiences to make them into well articulated cases Experience applying cases from memory allows further learning Effective case authoring requires reflection on one’s experience to be able to summarize its most salient parts Sociocultural Theories of Learning  Draw attention to the role that discussion, debate, and negotiation can play in interactions between learners and their peers  Draw attention to the role of more knowledgeable peers

School of Education, Stages 1 & 2: Identify a pedagogical problem & design a technology- integration plan to address the problem Stage 3: Enact the technology-integration plan in the classroom, assess student learning, and collect relevant artifacts Stage 4: Analyze and reflect on the enactment of the technology- integration plan and develop an educative case Discussion & Analysis of Cases through Formal Professional Development Influence other teachers’ learning & practice in the use of technology Process of Case Development Influence own learning & practice in the use of technology Dissemination, Informal Discussion, Analysis, & Reflection on Cases

School of Education,

School of Education,

School of Education, Structure of Case-Development Case Description  Teaching Context (e.g., where is your case situated)  Problem (e.g., what is the learning problem addressed in your case?)  Content and Learning Goal (e.g., subject matter and learning goals)  Technology Standards (e.g., ISTE technology standards)  Intentions (e.g., intentions, anticipations and expectations)  What happened? (e.g., description of the actual implementation)  Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning (e.g., assessment procedures and evidence of student learning)

School of Education,

School of Education, Structure of Case-Development Case Analysis and Reflection  Analysis: Why events unfolded as they did? Positive and negative outcomes, intended and unintended consequences, theory to practice connections  Reflection: What did you learn as a result of implementing this case? Lessons learned, advice for other teachers

School of Education, Impact of Case Development In the past, I thought I was really integrating technology when merely allowing my students to word process their writing. Designing, implementing, and then reflecting on my lesson, has helped me strengthen and revisit my beliefs on the importance of technology. Before, I was really using technology in isolation – just as a support function of what I was doing in the classroom, but not as a central component of my teaching. Now I have aggressively moved towards real integration, where I use technology to address crucial pedagogical problems. Reflecting on my practice made me realize the importance of using technology as a tool to foster student learning – not as something that just added little in our curriculum as an afterthought. In the past, I was focusing on using technology without any concern about the quality of the undertaken activities. Reflecting on my lesson helped me realize that I should try to better integrate technology into our pedagogical curriculum – not just using different tools for the sake of utilizing technology.

School of Education, Reflection as a Source of Learning The most important aspect of case development was the need to analyze and reflect on my practice. With all of the lessons that I teach, it seems like I always reflect afterwards about how I can make it better for the following year, but I never get a chance to write it down. This case study can be used as a resource for next year when I decide to do this lesson again or even other technology integrated lessons. I will know exactly how the lesson played out, what went wrong, and my suggestions for making it better. When reflecting, I was particularly intrigued by the question that asked us to elaborate on our intentions. This showed me how we often predict things one way and in the end, we realize that things don’t always work out as we had planned.

School of Education, Impact of Case Discussion Exposed teachers to new types of technologies  I was very excited to learn about the online simulations discussed in the first case. They turned out to be a great resource for me, particularly in a unit on fractions that I teach. Enabled teachers to become aware and anticipate obstacles associated with technology use Provided advice to help teachers implement technology in their own classrooms  Reading and discussing other cases made me think about all the small details that a teacher needs to observe when using technology. Small details can cause major problems and as teachers we always need to have back up plans.

School of Education, Lesson & Resource Development Lesson Plan Development  CASEwise template that scaffolds lesson planning  CASEwise template that enables sharing of web resources

School of Education,

School of Education, Conclusion: Use of Cases Provide a fruitful context for deepening teacher understanding of technology integration, particularly in relation to content and pedagogy  Refers to teachers’ abilities to identify types and uses of technology within their local context, which can help them effectively teach science, mathematics, social studies, etc.  TK, CK, TCK, PK, PCK, TPK Emphasize the value of guided reflection Help teachers see their case as a lesson that can provide valuable information to other colleagues Mishra & Koehler, 2006

School of Education, Conclusion: CASEwise as a Scalable PD Model Cases disseminated through CASEwise make teaching with technology visible and accessible while providing insights into teacher decision-making processes, thoughts, and reflections. Teachers can access CASEwise resources to seek ideas on technology- integrated lessons, suggestions, advice, and lessons learned from the experiences of the case-authors. Teacher can engage in discussions on existing cases and contribute to CASEwise by authoring their own cases. CASEwise resources can help build a knowledge base for teaching with technology while supporting and scaffolding teacher-directed, on-demand learning.

School of Education, For More Information Contact: Chrystalla Mouza or Yu-Chun Liu   Visit CASEwise 