Learning Supports and Professional Development This PowerPoint was created Spring of 2005 for AEA Learning Supports Teams by Deb Hansen and Jane Todey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adolescent Literacy Cadre Day 4 Jane Awtry & Marnie Leiferman AEA 13 Reading Consultants.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Instructional Decision Making
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
A Guide to Implementation
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
APS District Technology Plan Team Project July 17, 2012 Jill Roberts, Sam Skeels, Deb Stevenson.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
TRMS ACTION PLAN Goal #1 O Throughout the school year, core content teams will develop pedagogy and strategies to integrate Common.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Blending School-wide PBS & Literacy Initiatives Chris Borgmeier, PhD & Amanda Sanford, PhD Portland State University
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module 3 Content.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
WELCOME! Elementary Math Building Leads / Coaches Please complete the ORANGE information sheet. Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Kathleen Wilson - Math Program.
Aligning Observations and In-service Professional Development Prek-3 rd Jason Downer May 9, 2012.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Key Elements of University Going Culture at La Joya ISD? By: Dr. Armando O'caña Sr. La Joya Independent School District Student Services Division Dropout.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Professional development for mainstream teachers of ELLs: Project GLAD ® and Beyond Theresa Deussen March 10, 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Foothill High School Reading Initiatives. About our School Accredited high school for long-term incarcerated youth.  1 Year Commitments  2 Year Commitments.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Beyond the Basics -Instructional Shifts -Rigor: Depth of Knowledge -Assessment: SBAC, to CCSS -Shifts In Action: Close Reading Strategies & Text Dependent.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
SIMS User Training SIMS State-Wide Training
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Data Coaching Getting to the human side of data. Session Goals  Identify the purpose of using data in an educational setting.  Describe ways to connect.
1 Duval County Public Schools Summer Learning. Turnaround in Action District tiered model of clustering schools for lower performing schools; Additional.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL OUR STORY… RTI Success in a REAL Comprehensive High School John Jorgensen, Curriculum Director Karinne Tharaldson Jones, Principal.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Professional Development Forum (FY13). Professional Development Forum (FY13) Welcome & Introductions District Departments ONLY.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
District Continuous Improvement Team September 17, 2013.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
January 25, 2012 Special Education Opportunities Review Progress Report.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
High School State of the Schools. Foley High School Staff Development Goals for Goal #190% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Understanding the Role of The Resource Teacher In order to help school professionals understand a few of the roles of the resource teacher, this power.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Professional Development
Comprehensive Planning
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Update on UDL Implementation Measurement and GD Comparison Districts
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Learning Supports and Professional Development This PowerPoint was created Spring of 2005 for AEA Learning Supports Teams by Deb Hansen and Jane Todey The goal of the presentation is to help create understanding of how the Iowa Professional Development Model works with Learning Supports.

Learning Supports and Professional Development How to support schools that have multiple goals for school improvement that require professional development?

Single Focus NOT focusing training on one strategy – School over generalize this concept IS narrowing the focus so schools accomplish transfer of training into practice

Can the study of a set of strategies be supported? – Carefully study theory (overtime) – See demonstrations – Plan with other teachers, working out issues of implementation, reviewing key elements of the new practices – Collect implementation data – Study students’ response to changed instruction

What should be the focus or foci? DATA Most schools will have data that leads them to a priority to move all student and/or subpopulation(s) to higher levels of proficiency in a content area Some schools may have data that suggests the need for learning supports

Resource Management Team Determines what actions are needed to address barriers to learning

Is Intensive, ongoing PD needed? Actions/ Supports Who?Is training required? Awareness or Intensive After School Program LS staffYesIntensive After School Program Classroom teachers YesAwareness

Is Intensive, ongoing PD needed? Actions/ Supports Who?Is training required? Awareness or Intensive Reading Across the Curriculum LS staffYesAwareness Reading Across the Curriculum Classroom teachers YesIntensive

Simultaneity How much can one school do simultaneously to train teachers and implement learning supports?

Local district decision on how to balance two initiatives Schedule – Distributed Training 80/20 is estimate for schools to use to prevent overload. – One in-service day LS might be 100% of agenda – Remaining days may be one hour of the agenda Or PD may be 80% LS priority for subset of staff Local district needs to determine what it will take to support both priorities

PD = ACTION RESEARCH Approach these decisions as an inquiry Look at data – academic and non-academic Examine resources and options Set a course Keep track of implementation Support those that have heavy load if both initiatives create double burden

Deb Hansen