August 20, 2015 Transportation Analysis Meeting 2015 Update Tampa Bay Region Roberto O. Miquel, AICP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ratio Technique This technique utilizes historic population data for a larger geographic area to project the population for a component subarea. Using.
Advertisements

Vertical Clearance Coordination and Next Steps AMSC Update August 29, 2013.
Waikiki Tsunami Preparedness Major Trisha Cobb, USA LT Hamadi Bouaicha, Tunisia Navy OA 4202 Team Project Network Flows and Graphs.
Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.
Elevator Scheduling Ingrid Cheh Xuxu Liu 05/05/09.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
TRANSPORTATION & EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CHECKLIST National Resource Center for Human Service Transportation Coordination (NRC)
The role of Public Health Nurse Leaders during the Post Recovery Phase of Hurricane Katrina Adriene Jones-Gill, RN, MN Charlotte M. Parent, RN, MHCM.
Household-Level Model for Hurricane Evacuation Destination Type Choice Using Hurricane Ivan Data Rodrigo Mesa-Arango, Samiul Hasan, Satish V. Ukkusuri,
The U.S. Mid-Atlantic Super-Region – Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable III Baltimore Metropolitan Council Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT)
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
Safety Methodology Implementation Status December 2, 2014.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
HEADS UP H urricane E vacuation A nalysis and D ecision S upport U tility P rogram.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Lec 28: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Traffic assignment Learn how to assign generated and distributed trips to the street system approaching the site.
April Raulerson, FPEM Kate Hardie September 27 th, 2011 UCF.
14-April Univ of Delaware Philadelphia Engineer District 1 DESTINATIONS OF EVACUATING VACATIONERS - WHERE IS HOME? - WHAT DAY OF THE WEEK IS IT? - STORM.
Capacity Constrained Routing Algorithms for Evacuation Planning: A Summary of Results Speaker: Chen-Nien Tsai.
Group 6: Paul Antonios, Tamara Dabbas, Justin Fung, Adib Ghawi, Nazli Guran, Donald McKinnon, Alara Tascioglu Quantitative Capacity Building for Emergency.
Traffic Assignment Convergence and its Effects on Selecting Network Improvements By Chris Blaschuk, City of Calgary and JD Hunt, University of Calgary.
May 2007 Developing a Walk-Out Evacuation Plan for Washington, DC TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro, VHB.
RCPG Project Update 2013 Whole Community Conference November 22, 2013.
Keir Opie National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity (NCTIP) New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) Paramics North American User.
2007 TRB Planning Application Conference D ELDOT S TATEWIDE E VACUATION M ODEL.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
A Connected Region for Our Future Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Meeting the Global Energy & Regional Transportation Challenge of the 21 st Century July 14 th, 2008 Raymond Kaiser, LEED AP.
Improving a world-class facility. TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Designed with passengers in mind Short Walking Distances parking—ticketing---gate gate---bag.
Public Hearing PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS I-95 DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS RAMPS TO THE ENGINEER PROVING GROUND Fort Belvoir, Virginia AUGUST 20, 2008.
Florida West Coast Section (FWCS) Serge Beauzile – Chair IEEE TISP Meeting – Tampa, FL May 19, 2012.
{ MEMA Massachusetts Statewide Mass Care and Shelter Coordination Plan 1.
1 Real-Time Parking Information on Parking-Related Travel Cost TRIP Internship Presentation 2014 Kory Harb July 24, 2014 Advisor: Dr. Yafeng Yin Coordinator:
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
1 Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis: A Case Study for Northern Sweden Erik Jenelius Transport and Location Analysis Dept.
Using ITS in Helping Florida Manage Evacuations Bob Collins Florida Division of Emergency Management.
Summer Campaign % of travelers have seen or heard a Tampa Bay Summer advertisement Tampa Bay’s Summer Campaign marketing reached 1.3M households.
EVACUATION LIAISON TEAM
Huiming Yin, P.E., PhD Liang Wang Paul Maurin Heqin Xu, P.E., PhD Dept. of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics Columbia University Jan 16, 2012 Dynamic.
County Report June 6, Statistics Managing For Results Current priorities Upcoming projects Agenda.
Capacity-constrained Traffic Assignment in Network with Residual Queues and Implementation in EMME/2 Tel.: , 16th.
Spatial Networks Introduction to Spatial Computing CSE 5ISC Some slides adapted from Shashi Shekhar, University of Minnesota.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
BOCC Special Meeting December 11, RESTORE Act  Clean Water Act grants the Federal EPA authority to impose fines on parties responsible for oil.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Copyright – Disaster Resistant Communities Group – Mid-Term Planning Conference Hurricane Phoenix – A Storm Recovery Tabletop Exercise.
Hurricane Charlie Friday, 13 August Monday 16 August 2004 initial reports 16 deaths and $11 Billion in Damage reports Charlotte County Fire Department.
Solid Waste Disposal Discussion Solid Waste and Resource Recovery Sally Palmi.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Introduction to Spatial Computing CSE 5ISC
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
12th TRB National Planning Application Conference Xiaobo Liu, Ph.D.
Network Assignment and Equilibrium for Disaggregate Models
Tools & Modeling: the Region and Further
Michael A. Case, Interim Executive Director
2010 Hurricane Season Update
US 41 Multimodal Emphasis Corridor
The Tampa Bay Watershed.
Purpose Tool needed to assist in planning for regional multimodal improvements in West Central Florida Develop a regional model to forecast travel patterns.
A mesoscopic approach to model path choice in emergency condition
Tampa Bay Area Commuting Flows
Presentation transcript:

August 20, 2015 Transportation Analysis Meeting 2015 Update Tampa Bay Region Roberto O. Miquel, AICP

Agenda  Introductions  SRESP Transportation Element Objectives  Clearance Time Definitions  Changes to Study  Analysis Results  Questions/Comments 2

Transportation Objectives  Satisfy State Requirements  Standardized definitions for clearance times  Statewide Consistency  All RPC regions use same transportation methodology  Single or Multi-Region Analysis  Each RPC has ability to conduct own analysis  Graphic User Interface  Allows users ability to easily create and run evacuation scenarios 3

Clearance Time Definitions  Clearance Time, To Shelter  Clearance Time, In-County  Clearance Time, Out-of-County  Regional Clearance Time 4

1. Clearance Time, To Shelter  The time necessary to safely evacuate vulnerable residents and visitors to a “point of safety” within the county based on a specific hazard, behavioral assumptions and evacuation scenario. Calculated from the point in time when the evacuation order is given to the point in time when the last vehicle reaches a point of safety within the county.  All in-county trips reach their destination w/in county.  Does not include any out-of-county trips. 5

2. Clearance Time, In-County  The time required from the point an evacuation order is given until the last evacuee can either leave the evacuation zone or arrive at safe shelter within the County. This does not include those evacuees leaving the County, on their own.  All in-county trips reach their destination w/in county  All out-of-county trips exit the evacuation zone, but may still be located in the county  Does not include out-of-county pass-through trips from adjacent counties, unless they evacuate through an evacuation zone 6

3. Clearance Time, Out of County  The time necessary to safely evacuate vulnerable residents and visitors to a “point of safety” within the county based on a specific hazard, behavioral assumptions and evacuation scenario. Calculated from the point an evacuation order is given to the point in time when the last vehicle assigned an external destination exits the county.  Roadway network within county is clear.  All out-of-county trips exit the county, including out-of-county pass- through trips from adjacent counties.  All in-county trips reach their destination. 7

4. Regional Clearance Time  The time necessary to safely evacuate vulnerable residents and visitors to a “point of safety” within the (RPC) region based on a specific hazard, behavioral assumptions and evacuation scenario. Calculated from the point in time when the evacuation order is given to the point in time when the last vehicle assigned an external destination exits the region.  Roadway network within RPC is clear.  All out-of-county trips exit the RPC, including out-of-county pass- through trips from adjacent counties.  All in-county trips reach their destination. 8

Changes to Study  Small Area Data based on 2010 Census  Scenario years are now 2015 and 2020  Traffic Routing Algorithm has been modified to improve the stability of model results  Some regions have updated evacuation zones  Transportation projects have been updated to reflect 2015 and planned 2020 conditions  Shelter locations and capacities have been updated where necessary 9

10 TBRPC Model Network

11 TBRPC Transportation Evacuation Zones (TEZ)

12 TBRPC Behavioral Assumptions

13 TBRPC Evacuation Zones

Analysis Results  Vulnerable Population  Remaining analysis split into two sections:  Base Scenarios  Operational Scenarios 14

15 Base Scenarios Scenario Overall Evacuation Level Year Behavioral Response Counties Evacuating (Evac. Level if different from overall assigned level) One-Way Plan University Pop. (Fall/Spring, Summer, None) Tourist Rate (Default, Custom) Shelters (All, Primary, Custom) Response Curve Evacuation Phasing Base Scenario 1A % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 2B % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 3C % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 4D % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 5E % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 6A % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 7B % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 8C % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 9D % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Base Scenario 10E % Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando NoneFall/SpringDefaultPrimary12-HourNone

Analysis Results  Evacuating Population  Evacuating Vehicles  Shelter Demand Evacuating Vehicle Trips by Scenario 16 Base Scenarios Level ABCDE ,620720,650947,0851,117,8041,269, ,837758,6041,003,9731,189,5881,355,219

17 Critical Link Maps

Clearance Times 18

19 Operational Scenarios Scenario Overall Evacuation Level Year Behavioral Response Counties Evacuating (Evac. Level if different from overall assigned level) One-Way Plan University Pop. (Fall/Spring, Summer, None) Tourist Rate (Default, Custom) Shelters (All, Primary, Custom) Response Curve Evacuation Phasing Other Notes Operational Scenario 1A2015Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte NoneSummerDefaultPrimary9-HourNone Operational Scenario 2B2015Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte NoneSummerDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Operational Scenario 3C2015Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte NoneSummerDefaultPrimary18-HourNone Operational Scenario 4D2015Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte, Citrus NoneSummerDefaultPrimary24-Hour All Hour 1 Except Citrus and Hernando at Hour 6 All 24-Hour Curve except Citrus and Hernando use 18-Hour; Skyway Bridge closes at Hour 18 Operational Scenario 5E2015Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte, Citrus NoneSummerDefaultPrimary24-Hour All Hour 1 Except Citrus and Hernando at Hour 6 All 24-Hour Curve except Citrus and Hernando use 18-Hour; Skyway Bridge closes at Hour 18 Operational Scenario 6A2020Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte NoneSummerDefaultPrimary9-HourNone Operational Scenario 7B2020Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte NoneSummerDefaultPrimary12-HourNone Operational Scenario 8C2020Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte, Polk NoneSummerDefaultPrimary18-HourNone Operational Scenario 9D2020Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte, Citrus I-4 and I- 75 SummerDefaultPrimary24-Hour All Hour 1 Except Citrus and Hernando at Hour 6 All 24-Hour Curve except Citrus and Hernando use 18-Hour; Skyway Bridge closes at Hour 18 Operational Scenario 10 E2020Planning Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Hernando, Charlotte, Citrus I-4 and I- 75 SummerDefaultPrimary24-Hour All Hour 1 Except Citrus and Hernando at Hour 6 All 24-Hour Curve except Citrus and Hernando use 18-Hour; Skyway Bridge closes at Hour 18

Analysis Results  Evacuating Population  Evacuating Vehicles  Shelter Demand Evacuating Vehicle Trips by Scenario 20 Operational Scenarios Level ABCDE ,355544,973792,9321,061,1541,299, ,454577,556931,6511,133,0301,389,460

21 Critical Link Maps

Clearance Times 22

Questions/Comments?? 23