Clinical Operations Workgroup Update Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Meaningful Use Stage I Class III Menu Objectives
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
E-prescribing gives providers an important tool to safely and efficiently manage patients' medications. Compared to paper or fax prescriptions, e-prescribing.
HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.
E-Prescribing in Medicaid/CHIP Agencies: Implementation Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities - 29 September 2009 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Population Management & Reporting. Federally-designated Regional Extension Center for the State of Missouri  University of Missouri:  Department of.
Pharmacist Informaticist Training July 16, Albuquerque, NM 1 Pharmacist Role in the CMS e-Prescribing Program & Meaningful Use e-Prescribing Measure.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
This document and all other documents, materials, or other information of any kind transmitted or orally communicated by RxHub (or its members) in the.
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
CMS NPRM proposes requirements for Stage 3 of EHR Incentive Programs (in FR March 30, 2015) In conjunction with.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 17, 2013.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
TWS July 2011 New Crop eRx Comprehensive Electronic Prescribing System.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Proposed Recommendations on MU Notice of Proposed Rule Making Paul Tang, Chair Palo Alto Medical Foundation.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
UNIT 5 SEMINAR.  According to your text, in an acute care setting, an electronic health record integrates electronic data from multiple clinical systems.
HIT Standards Committee Standards Summer Camp, ePrescribing of Discharge Meds Power Team (DMPT) Update and Recommendations Jamie Ferguson, Kaiser Permanente.
ePrescribing Functional Requirements
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Clinical Reports and Daily Processes Health Solutions Team Health Choice Network Facilitator: Brian DeBien.
Medication Error Reduction Principles in Practice Copyright © – Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)Slide 1.
Christopher H. Tashjian, MD, FAAFP July 23, 2013, Washington D.C.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup, Vocabulary Task Force Update on Vocabulary For Stage 2 Jamie Ferguson, Kaiser Permanente Betsy Humphreys,
Electronic Prescribing Through SureScripts
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Drug Formulary Checks Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
E-Prescribe: Adopting Health Care Information Technology ADG associates presenting: Barbara Antuna Jessica Carpenter Patrick Esparza Brian Frazior.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use and E-Prescribing Workflow Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Associate Professor, Dept. of Medicine, UCLA Research Scientist, RAND Corporation.
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
ERX Enhancement Project Presentation for the EDM Forum June 7, 2014 San Diego, CA.
E-Prescriptions Krishi. E-Prescriptions Overview One major contributor to PAEs is patient medication errors, and the implementation of e-prescription.
Clinical Documentation Hearing Recommendations Meaningful Use and Certification and Adoption Workgroups Paul Tang, MU Workgroup Chair Larry Wolf, C&A Workgroup.
History of Health Information Technology in the U.S. The HITECH Act Lecture b – Meaningful Use, Health Information Exchange and Research This material.
1 The information contained in this presentation is based on proposed and working documents. Health Information Exchange Interoperability Minnesota Department.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #4 – ePrescribing (eRx) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 12, 2016 Today’s presenter:
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Operations Workgroup Update Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013

Formulary & Benefit Standard Clinical Operations Workgroup Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013

Meaningful Use – Formulary & Benefit Core Measure Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx) Meaningful Use Stage 1: Core: More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology Menu: Implement drug formulary checks Core Measure MU Stage 2: Core: More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are compared to at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology

Flow of the e-prescription

NCPDP Formulary & Benefit Standard – Current Version 4.0 approved by membership What standards currently exist for F&B data? F&B Standard is not used from Pharmacy to Payer

At a high-level, the Sender is responsible for: Maintaining updated formulary and benefits information. Publishing the information regularly to keep recipients up-to-date. Providing a means for linking a patient to a formulary, either through a Cross-Reference List or through an Eligibility transaction. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SENDER

At a high-level, the Intermediary is responsible for: Facilitating the distribution of formulary and benefits information between the Formulary Publishers and Retrievers. Documenting and communicating the data load specifications, processing, and usage guidelines particular to their service. Validating transmitted files against the standard specification (optional). RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE INTERMEDIARY

At a high-level, the Receiver is responsible for: Accepting or retrieving the formulary information from the Sender (directly or via an Intermediary) and integrate it into their point-of-care application. Associating formulary and benefits information to the patient or group, as appropriate, using the Cross- Reference List or an Eligibility transaction. In the context of a prescribing system, present the formulary and benefits information to the physician during the prescribing process, enabling him/her to make the most appropriate drug choice for the patient RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RECEIVER (TECHNOLOGY VENDOR)

Large files needed to provide the F&B Data – might be minimized using RxNorm instead of NDC’s. This will also help when medication are not match due to differences in representative NDC via compendia’s or other sources Submitted in batch form, not in real-time Group level variations in coverage are not represented leading to the provider not seeing an accurate representation of the patients drug-specific benefit since member-specific exceptions and other variances are not accurately reflected Assumes that the patient’s current drug insurance plan is identified through a successful eligibility check based on 5 point identifier and not the patients actual pharmacy benefit data (PCN/BIN) Differences in coverage among different employer level groups within individual health plans is a major source of inaccuracies in the F&B data presented to clinicians Use of symbols used in formulary interpretation that do not reflect actual drug-specific benefits at the point of care Cannot detect differences in primary & secondary prescription benefit coverage Possible Industry Issues

Automatic (push) – formulary data information is automatically pushed into the provider’s system in real time without any provider intervention Pull (manual) – the provider must take the initiative and manually download the updated data (or called ‘practice triggered’). Possible Industry Issues (con’t)

Short term: – NCPDP Formulary & Benefit Standard Version v3.0 (Current standard – batch files) should be supported in CEHRT for F&B transmission to EHRs – F&B transmission with NCPDP 3.0 should be required to use RxNorm to facilitate accurate exchange of data and to reduce file size – Certified EHR technology should have functionality to match the patient not only to their medical benefits but also to their pharmacy benefits utilizing PCN/BIN/Issuer – Certified EHR technology should be required to support acceptance of automatic updates or push functionality to update F&B data at the provider level to minimize latency in information at the Point of Care – F&B Data presented at the point of care should, at minimum, represent the patient’s group pharmacy benefit Long term: – Certified EHRs should develop the functionality to run patient level formulary checks against the patient’s actual drug benefit for a specific drug & dose in a timely manner (new standard/transaction is required) Proposed Recommendations

Image Sharing Standards Clinical Operations Workgroup Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013

Approach: 1. Discuss use cases and candidate standards and methods 2. Refine use case scenarios 3. Determine and align recommendations to scenarios Initial Use Cases – Provider to Consumer Image Sharing – Clinician to Clinician Image Sharing – Care Team / Network / Community Image Sharing Possible Additional Use Case – Consumer-mediated Provider to Provider Image Sharing Initial standards/methods considered: RSNA Image Share Pilot Report On Initial WG Discussions