PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Idea-Based -isms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

Structure and Agency in Foreign Policy Analysis
MDAW 2013: DCH & MBK.  Realism  Idealism  Liberalism  Marxism  Critical Theory(s)
International Relations Theory
Marxist Theory and International Conflict and Security
Marxist theories of International relations
Global Problems, Global Solutions.  The fast, interdependent spread of open society, open economy, and open technology infrastructure.  Globalization.
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
Today  Updates: Kenya and Chad  Simulation: your country assignments  The Cold War, /91 Causes of the Cold War  Cuban Missile Crisis  The.
Realism.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Several Realisms.
Chapter 2: Theories of World Politics
Constructivism in I.R..
POLS 425 U.S. Foreign Policy Topic: Nested Games And Alternative Theories February 28, 2007.
2.4. The Postmodern and Constructivist Challenge Learning Objectives: Understand the principles of constructivist and postmodern thought Identify postmodern.
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College.
POLS 425 U.S. Foreign Policy Week 2: Major Worldviews. Part II January 17, 2007 Week 2: Major Worldviews. Part II January 17, 2007.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
International Relations
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IN THIS CLASS? What three big questions (units) will we study? – Why do countries do what they do? When/how do states work together,
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
International Political Economy The Rational Choice Approach in IPE Ch. 5 Lecture 8.
One Republic—Two Americas?
Social Constructivism
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Constructivism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Κονστρουκτιβισμός
Sociology Definition - The systematic study of human society and social interaction.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Foreign Policy Chittick’s 3-D Framework.
POSC 2200 – The State, Decision Making and Foreign Policy Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
IR 203 Global Economy & International Relations Lecture Notes
Social Constructivism. Introduction Social Constructivist – Last of the four major theories in IR Born when the Cold War died Gaining momentum and popularity.
The IR theoretical approaches- a framework for analysis Typology of the IR theories Structural comparison of the key IR approaches Realism Liberalism Marxism.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
POL 3080 Approaches to International Relations Introduction
WILL GLOBALIZATION CHANGE EVERYTHING? Four big questions for social scientists: Will global politics in the 20 th c. follow the rules of a new system?
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Foreign Policy Early History of American Foreign Policy.
Realism Statism…survival…self-help. Why theory “A theory must be more than a hypothesis; it can’t be obvious; it involves complex relations of a systematic.
Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Globalization and Trade
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
US-China Relations: Should Australia be Worried? Professor Martin Griffiths Dean, School of International Studies Tuesday 26 th May 2015.
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
Topics for today Events of the day/week Review: Constructivist theory Wednesday, 2/27/2008Hans Peter Schmitz.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
Realism Liberalism Capitalism Critical theories Relativism Universalism Theoretical Foundations.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
Theories explaining globalization
International Relations
Introduction to International Relations Week 2 Lecturer: Andris Banka
LIBERALISM.
Systemic & Dyadic Explanations of Interstate Conflict
WILL GLOBALIZATION CHANGE EVERYTHING?
Security Theory And Peak Oil Theory.
STATES & NON-STATE ACTORS
IR School of Thought: Constructivism
Marxist Criticism.
Presentation transcript:

PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Idea-Based -isms

2 / 12 Thus Far… On Friday, we discussed four realisms: –Classical Realism –Liberal Realism –Neorealism –Neoclassical Realism On Monday, we discussed many of the idealism theories

3 / 12 Today… Today, we will discuss some of the theories of International Relations that hold state action depends on common ideals and ideas –Constructivism –Marxism –Functionalism

4 / 12 Constructivism Realism deals mainly with security and material power Liberalism looks primarily at economic interdependence and domestic-level factors Constructivism most concerns itself with the role of ideas in shaping the international system

5 / 12 Constructivism Those ideas? –Goals, threats, fears, identities, and other elements of perceived reality that influence states and non-state actors within the system. Example: Who would be more threatened by a US military buildup? Canada or Cuba? Why? How would that reflect in their actions?

6 / 12 Constructivism Finally, constructivists do not see anarchy as the invariable foundation of the international system Anarchy is not inevitable We created it, and we can create its successor

7 / 12 Marxism One of the Critical Theories –Critical Theories focus on critiquing and changing society, as opposed to merely understanding it The focus is on economic concerns, on class The international system is a capitalist system whose purpose is accumulation (of wealth, power, etc.)

8 / 12 Marxism The system is based on two classes of people –The bourgeoisie own the means of production –The proletariat do not Economic power is also political power –If you hold the capital, you also hold the political power –The proletariat do not hold the power

9 / 12 Marxism (Central Ideas) Alienation –Separation of things that naturally belong together Class consciousness –Class becoming aware of its place in society Commodity Fetishism –Personal relationships become centered on capital Hegemonic Culture –The ideas of the age are the ideas of the rulers

10 / 12 Functionalism Focus on states sharing common interests and needs –Response to loss of state sovereignty (as caused by globalization) –States are no longer absolutely sovereign (interdependence) Functionalism proposed to replace realism with linked authorities and needs from the international system

11 / 12 Functionalism Emphasis on ‘low politics’ –Low politics are economics and social movements Dominant Goals of Actors –Peace and prosperity of the state, which requires peace and prosperity in other states Instruments of State Policy –Economic instruments used to further state policies International Organizations –Have a substantial role –They join the states together

12 / 12 Assignment Read Chapter 1 from the Chittick text This chapter explains how Chittick sees foreign policy decisions and lays out a structure of study It also tells us what Chittick thinks is most important in studying foreign policy