CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th 2007. A. Rivetti Pixel detector development for PANDA A.Rivetti INFN – Sezione di Torino.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ATLAS Pixel Detector
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
E. Atkin, E. Malankin, V. Shumikhin NRNU MEPhI, Moscow 1.
G. RizzoSuperB WorkShop – 17 November R&D on silicon pixels and strips Giuliana Rizzo for the Pisa BaBar Group SuperB WorkShop Frascati-17 November.
1 Research & Development on SOI Pixel Detector H. Niemiec, T. Klatka, M. Koziel, W. Kucewicz, S. Kuta, W. Machowski, M. Sapor, M. Szelezniak AGH – University.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Workshop on Silicon Detector Systems, April at GSI Darmstadt 1 STAR silicon tracking detectors SVT and SSD.
Victoria04 R. Frey1 Silicon/Tungsten ECal Status and Progress Ray Frey University of Oregon Victoria ALCPG Workshop July 29, 2004 Overview Current R&D.
Snowmass 2005 SOI detector R&D Massimo Caccia, Antonio Bulgheroni Univ. dell’Insubria / INFN Milano (Italy) M. Jastrzab, M. Koziel, W. Kucewicz, H. Niemiec.
5ns Peaking Time Transimpedance Front End Amplifier for the Silicon Pixel Detector in the NA62 Gigatracker E. Martin a,b J. Kaplon b, A. Ceccucci b, P.
Patrick Spradlin, SCIPP trip to LLU, May 2, 2001 Detector Characteristics.
FEE Perugia. A. Rivetti A FAST LARGE DYNAMIC RANGE SHAPING AMPLIFIER FOR PARTICLE DETECTOR FRONT-END A.Rivetti – P Delaurenti INFN – Sezione di Torino.
Mass production testing of the front-end ASICs for the ALICE SDD system L. Toscano a, R. Arteche Diaz b,d, S. Di Liberto b, M.I. Martínez a,c, S.Martoiu.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Development of Readout ASIC for FPCCD Vertex Detector 01 October 2009 Kennosuke.Itagaki Tohoku University.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
NINO RO chip qualification with the laser test system Sakari and Fadmar.
Pierpaolo Valerio.  CLICpix is a hybrid pixel detector to be used as the CLIC vertex detector  Main features: ◦ small pixel pitch (25 μm), ◦ Simultaneous.
1 Monolithic Pixel Sensor in SOI Technology - First Test Results H. Niemiec, M. Koziel, T. Klatka, W. Kucewicz, S. Kuta, W. Machowski, M. Sapor University.
The ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector Gianfranco Segato Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Padova and INFN for the ALICE Collaboration A barrel of two layers.
A. Rivetti Gigatracker meeting, dec 2009 Charge measurement with the TDC per pixel architecture A. Rivetti, G. Dellacasa S. Garbolino, F. Marchetto, G.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Progress on STS CSA chip development E. Atkin Department of Electronics, MEPhI A.Voronin SINP, MSU.
Specifications & motivation 2  Lowering integration time would significantly reduce background  Lowering power would significantly reduce material budget.
Pixel 2000 Workshop Christian Grah University of Wuppertal June 2000, Genova O. Bäsken K.H.Becks.
Self triggered readout of GEM in CBM J. Saini VECC, Kolkata.
The ALICE Forward Multiplicity Detector Kristján Gulbrandsen Niels Bohr Institute for the ALICE Collaboration.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLICPIX2 AND STATUS REPORT ON THE TSV PROJECT Pierpaolo Valerio 1.
PHASE-1B ACTIVITIES L. Demaria – INFN Torino. Introduction  The inner layer of the Phase 1 Pixel detector is exposed to very high level of irradiation.
Update on Simulation and Sensor procurement for CLICPix prototypes Mathieu Benoit.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
65 nm CMOS analog front-end for pixel detectors at the HL-LHC
A. Rivetti Villa Olmo, 7/10/2009 Lepix: monolithic detectors for particle tracking in standard very deep submicron CMOS technologies. A. RIVETTI I.N.F.N.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008. CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy.
SIAM M. Despeisse / 29 th January Toward a Gigatracker Front-end - Performance of the NINO LCO and HCO Matthieu Despeisse F. Osmic, S. Tiuraniemi,
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
CMOS MAPS with pixel level sparsification and time stamping capabilities for applications at the ILC Gianluca Traversi 1,2
Fermilab Silicon Strip Readout Chip for BTEV
Pixel detector development: sensor
Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international.
CMOS Sensors WP1-3 PPRP meeting 29 Oct 2008, Armagh.
WG3 – STRIP R&D ITS - COMSATS P. Riedler, G. Contin, A. Rivetti – WG3 conveners.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Eleuterio SpiritiILC Vertex Workshop, April On pixel sparsification architecture in 130nm STM technology ILC Vertex Workshop April 2008 Villa.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
A. Rivetti VIPS workshop-Pavia, April 23rd, 2010 The PANDA Microvertex Detector: Present Design and Opportunities for 3D Integration Technologies Angelo.
UPDATE ON CLICPIX2 DESIGN Pierpaolo Valerio Edinei Santin
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
S.Zucca a,c, L. Gaioni b,c, A. Manazza a,c, M. Manghisoni b,c, L. Ratti a,c V. Re b,c, E. Quartieri a,c, G. Traversi b,c a Università degli Studi di Pavia.
A Forward Calorimeter (FoCal) as upgrade for the ALICE experiment at CERN S. Muhuri a, M. Reicher b and T. Tsuji c a Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre,
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Clear Performance and Demonstration of a novel Clear Concept for DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors Stefan Rummel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik – Halbleiterlabor.
The design of fast analog channels for the readout of strip detectors in the inner layers of the SuperB SVT 1 INFN Sezione di Pavia I Pavia, Italy.
De Remigis The test has been accomplished with an SLVS signal, since that was chosen for the serial communication between the readout and the optical converter.
Hybrid pixel detector in the PANDA experiment
Ivan Peric, Christian Kreidl, Peter Fischer University of Heidelberg
Pixel front-end development
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Charge sensitive amplifier
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Digital readout architecture for Velopix
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
BESIII EMC electronics
Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17 R&D status of FPCCD VTX Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17
Presentation transcript:

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Pixel detector development for PANDA A.Rivetti INFN – Sezione di Torino

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Major requirements  In PANDA the MVD is expected to contribute also to particle ID via dE/dx.  Dynamic range: up to 2.5 MeV of deposited energy ( electrons).  Low momentum particles => low material budget.  About 120 modules and 1300 front-end chip will be needed.  Asymmetric hit rate distribution.  Global estimated rate: GHz (50 Gbit/s)  Maximum hit rate per module: 34 MHz (1.7 Gbit/s)  Maximum hit rate per front-end chip: 5.8 MHz (290 Mbit/s)  Triggerless read-out  Front-end power < 200mW/chip.  Pixel size: 100  m x 100  m

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Motivations for R&D  Custom front-end design motivated by the combination of:  Large dynamic range.  Pixel form factor.  Triggerless read-out.  Material budget  Eg. Tests done in Juelich show that the ATLAS chip used in “ PANDA mode ” is at the limit of rate required and would dissipate 330 mW/chip.  In this presentation:  Architecture of the front-end.  Results from a first prototype.  R&D work on epitaxial silicon sensors.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Pixel read-out chain

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Front – end chip Pixel matrix Read – out logic Basic features:  Chip size O(1 cm 2 ).  Technology 0.13  m CMOS.  Adequate radiation tolerance.  Buttable on three sides.  Capable of handling sensors of both polarities.  In each pixel: hit time and charge

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti 3 tasks run simultaneously: Hit detection in pixel and storage of time stamp Readout of pixel data into the column FiFos Readout of FiFos out of the FE  Column read-out ATLAS-like.  Chip read-out optimized for triggerless environment A first architecture

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Event ordering  Three circuits in the chip ensures the proper time ordering of the hits in case of counter overflow.  The column controller, which generates a counter-overflow signal when the counter overflows after all “old” data in a column was read out.  The read-out controller. If a FIFO shows a CO event, its read-out is stopped till all the FIFO show a CO event.  The EoC event generator. The EoC is generated when all the FIFO show a CO event. The EoC mark is sent outside the chip and the CO flags are cleared.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Architecture simulations  Combined Monte-Carlo – VHDL simulations.  Simulation based on a sample of events on pbar on copper with a beam momentum of 4 GeV/c.  Full read-out cycle simulated on events.  800 hit lost (1.18 %)  Reasons for losses:  hit below threshold (set at 1200 electrons)  Pile-up on the ToT (0.5 %)

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Front-end readout time (1)

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Front-end readout time (2)

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti First prototype for PANDA  A first prototype was designed and tested.  Aim of the exercise: gain experience with the technology (very complex!) and explore the analogue performance.  32 pixel cells with preamplifier with ToT and comparator.  Goal: keep the analogue power consumption below 12  W pixel at 1.2V supply

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Inside the pixel cell

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Preamp schematic  Single stage preamplifier design to minimize power consumption  Feedback capacitor of 10fF nominal value  Calibration capacitor of 30 fF

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Comparator schematic

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Test board  The chip has been wired bonded to a small sensor provided by ITC – IRST (Trento).

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Chip and sensor detail Fe chip IRST sensor

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Performance example

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Preamp response to 0.5fC 0pF: 98 e- rms

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti ToT linearity  Only the region up to 32fC can be explored through the injection capacitor  Preamplifier saturates at 12 fC.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti A first spectrum ENC: 440 rms electrons Input capacitance about 1.5 pF

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Epitaxial silicon sensor Highly doped Cz substrate:  = 0.01 – 0.02  cm Lightly doped epitaxial layer  = 50  cm  Several studies indicate that sensor build on epi wafer have good radiation tolerance.  Interest for PANDA: radiation tolerance adequate with standard p-type design. Wafers supplied by ITME and processed by ITC-IRST in Trento  Substrate properties:  Diameter: 100 ± 0.5 mm.  Doping type: n/Sb.  Thickness 525 ± 25  m.  Resistivity: 0.01 – 0.02  cm.  Epi layer properties:  Doping type n/P.  Thickness 50/75/100  m.  Variation: <4%/8%/8%  Resistivity: 2500 – 5000  cm.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Epi assemblies  Low cost R&D reusing existing electronics and sensor design:  Electronics: ALICE front-end chip provided by CERN  Sensor: masks developed by INFN-Ferrara for the P326 project.  Three types of epi assemblies:  3 with 150  m total thickness (100  m epi)  7 with 120  m total thickness (75  m epi)  1 with 100  m total thickness (50  m epi)  Several wafers cracked during thinning (problem more severe on thicker wafer)  Problem probably due to stresses on the epi layer: work in progress to fix it  Good assemblies were however delivered and will be tested in May.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Summary  The R&D for a custom pixel detector for PANDA has been started.  The architecture of front-end chip is under development.  Design is not yet frozen, many changes still possible!  A first analogue prototype has been designed and tested in 0.13  m.  Good performance obtained for noise, dynamic range, linearity.  The analogue part has been operated with 12  W/pixel.  The results are in reasonable agreement with simulations.  The technology is significantly more complex than the 0.25  m, but it offers several interesting options (triple-well NMOS, analogue components, thicker oxide devices for I/Os, etc..)

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Credits  Thanks to the many people working on the project in several ways… D. Calvo, P. Deremigis, G. Mazza, S. Martoiu, M. Mignone, R. Wheadon, K. Brinkmann, F. Huegging, T. Stocksmann, R. Jäkel, M. Mertens, J. Ritman…  Thanks to the organizers for the invitation!

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Discussion slides

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Some design considerations in 0.13  m  Mobility very different between PMOS and NMOS devices (k N /k P ~6).  The use of NMOS transistor to control small currents becomes problematic (problem much more severe than in 0.25  m).  NMOS input with triple-well and splitted PMOS current sources is probably the best compromise.

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Issues related to ToT technique  The preamplifier saturates at 12 fC, but the ToT preserves good “linearity” at least up to 40 fC.  Caveat: in the saturated region the open-loop gain of the input stage drops down, making the system more prone to cross-talk. Cin=Cf(1+A0)>>Cd Cf=10fF, Cd=200fF Cin=Cd for A0=20

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Mastering cross talk  The cross-talk with a saturated preamplifier can go up to 20%.  Possible remedies:  1. Guard-ring connected to ground  2. Two stage preamplifier, with first stage working always in linearity hit event no hit event Pixel Matrix Adjacent Coupled DetectorsC J in2 = 0 J in1  0 Particle hit J in2 CDCD -+-+ CfCf V o2 CSA 02 detector 02 J in1 CDCD -+-+ CfCf V o1 CSA 01 detector 01 Equivalent Circuit hit event no hit event Injected charge C

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Energy deposited in pixel

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Hits per module

CBM workshop – GSI, April 18th – 20th A. Rivetti Time to store hit in a FIFO