Characterisation of Active Pixel Sensors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
Advertisements

Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
Pixel-level delta-sigma ADC with optimized area and power for vertically-integrated image sensors 1 Alireza Mahmoodi and Dileepan Joseph University of.
First results from the HEPAPS4 Active Pixel Sensor
Cameras for scientific experiments A brave attempt to give an overview of the different types and their pros & cons Grouptalk Optical Sciences, may
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
Temperature Dependence of FPN in Logarithmic CMOS Image Sensors Dileepan Joseph¹ and Steve Collins² ¹University of Alberta, Canada ²University of Oxford,
Modelling, calibration and correction of nonlinear illumination-dependent fixed pattern noise in logarithmic CMOS image sensors Dileepan Joseph and Steve.
Logarithmic CMOS image sensors Dr. Dileepan Joseph Dept. of Engineering Science University of Oxford, UK.
Photodiodes Photons incident on the depletion layer induce a current.
Charge Coupled Device (CCD)
06/02/2008CCDs1 Charge Coupled Device M.Umar Javed M.Umar Javed.
Photomultiplier Tube m = k 8–19 dynodes (9-10 is most common).
Photodiodes Ingle and Crouch, Spectrochemical Analysis Photons incident on the depletion layer induce a current. In most cases, best response in the NIR.
From CCD to EMCCD Scientific imaging for today’s microscopy.
CCD and CMOS Sensors Craig Robinson.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
Fiber Optic Receiver A fiber optic receiver is an electro-optic device that accepts optical signals from an optical fiber and converts them into electrical.
CMOS image sensors Presenter: Alireza eyvazzadeh.
1 Instrumentation DepartmentMicroelectronics Design GroupR. Turchetta 3 April 2003 International ECFA/DESY Workshop Amsterdam, 1-4 April 2003 CMOS Monolithic.
UVP BioImaging Systems Solutions for the Science of Life Digital CCD Cameras 101.
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Copyright : Marconi Applied Technologies Limited. All Rights Reserved. CCDs for Adaptive Optics CfAO Workshop: Nov 1999 By P.
Different sources of noise in EM-CCD cameras
CDS Fall, 2010 Computing for Scientists Measurements (Sep. 14, 2010 – Sep. 29, 2010) Jie Zhang Copyright ©
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
AST3 detector properties
ECE 1352 Presentation Active Pixel Imaging Circuits
A 200x100 Array Of Electronically Calibratable Logarithmic CMOS Pixels
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
Photon Transfer Method 1. Using two identical flat field exposures it is possible to measure the read noise of a CCD with the Photon Transfer method. Two.
By Grégory Brillant Background calibration techniques for multistage pipelined ADCs with digital redundancy.
First Results from Cherwell, a CMOS sensor for Particle Physics By James Mylroie-Smith
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Andrew Blue 24 th February 2007 Characterisation of Vanilla - a Novel Active Pixel Sensor for Radiation Detection Andrew Blue* 1, D Maneuski 1, A. Laing.
CMOS Image Sensor Design. M. Wäny Nov EMVA Standard 1288 Standard for Measurement and Presentation of Specifications for Machine Vision Sensors and.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays Andrew Blue* a, R. Bates a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a, J. Marchal b, P. Steadman b,
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
The Multidimensional Integrated Intelligent Imaging Project (M-I 3 ) Phil Evans on Behalf of M-I 3 consortium.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
DynAMITe: a Wafer Scale Sensor for Biomedical Applications M. Esposito 1, T. Anaxagoras 2, A. Fant 2, K. Wells 1, A. Kostantinidis 3, J. Osmond 4, P. Evans.
First tests of CHERWELL, a Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor. A CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) using 180 nm technology James Mylroie-Smith Queen Mary, University.
Active Pixel Sensors in Nuclear Medicine Imaging RJ Ott, N Evans, P Evans, J Osmond, A Clark, R Turchetta Physics Department Institute of Cancer Research.
Development of CCDs for the SXI We have developed 2 different types of CCDs for the SXI in parallel.. *Advantage =>They are successfully employed for current.
Observational Astrophysics I
March 2004 Charles A. DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 15: Introduction to Array Detectors Profs.
Tests of AWAKE spectrometer screen and camera at PHIN Introduction Layout Procedure Setup, results (runs 1 – 5) Conclusions L. Deacon, S. Mazzoni, B. Biskup.
Human vision The image is formed on retina (sítnice) –The light is focused on retina by lens (čočka) –Retina contains two types of receptors: rods (tyčinky)
Tests of spectrometer screens Introduction Layout Procedure Results Conclusions L. Deacon, B. Biskup, S. Mazzoni, M.Wing et. al. AWAKE collaboration meeting,
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
A Fast Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor with in Pixel level Reset Noise Suppression and Binary Outputs for Charged Particle Detection Y.Degerli 1 (Member,
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
W. Kucewicz a, A. A.Bulgheroni b, M. Caccia b, P. Grabiec c, J. Marczewski c, H.Niemiec a a AGH-Univ. of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30,
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Active Pixel Sensors in Medical and Biologi The application of Large Area Active Pixel Sensor (LAS) to high resolution Nuclear Medicine imaging Bob Ott.
Cameras For Microscopy Ryan McGorty 26 March 2013.
Comparison of a CCD and the Vanilla CMOS APS for Soft X-ray Diffraction Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, A. Blue a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a,
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Pixel layouts for (a) a standard 3-T APS containing reset (R), row select (RS)
Topic Report Photodetector and CCD
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Simulations and comparison of SOFI reconstructions with different optical pixel.
Presented by Renato Turchetta CCLRC - RAL 7 th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors – PSD7 Liverpool (UK), September 2005 R&D.
1 Topic Report Photodetector and CCD Tuan-Shu Ho.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors
for the SPiDeR collaboration (slides from M. Stanitski, Pixel2010)
Design and Characterization of a Novel, Radiation-Resistant Active Pixel Sensor in a Standard 0.25 m CMOS Technology P.P. Allport, G. Casse, A. Evans,
LHCb Upgrade: Flavour Physics at High Luminosity
LHCb Upgrade: Flavour Physics at High Luminosity
Presentation transcript:

Characterisation of Active Pixel Sensors Dima Maneuski 1st year PhD Student University of Glasgow

Outline What is APS? What is CCD? Vanilla APS HEPAPS4 What do we actually need to characterise? Photon transfer technique Experimental setup Status on Prague activity

We live here in Kevin Building

Basic CCD camera Advantages: Low noise; High full-well capacity; 100% fill factor; High uniformity; Mature technology; Disadvantages: Slow readout; Pixel blooming; Specialised fabrication; Low functionality;

Basic CMOS camera Advantages: High Speed readout; Random access; On-chip intelligence; Low power consumption; Disadvantages: High read-out noise; Reduced dynamic range; Reduced uniformity; Reduced fill-factor; High cost;

Vanilla APS 512 x 512 pixels – 25 mm square Fill Factor ~ 85 % Optional soft/hard/flushed Analogue and digital output up to 100 fps at 12 bit digital output Flexible ROIs (up to 6 x 6 @ 20kHz in analogue output) 100k –e full well capacity

Flushed Reset Soft reset results in a lowered reset noise (kTC/2)1/2 instead of (kTC)1/2 However, frames taken utilising soft reset are affected by image lag, where the current image is affected by the previous frame. Using hard reset, image lag is overcome, but results in full (kTC)1/2 noise and reduced full well capacity. By using a hard reset followed by a soft reset, it is possible to get the best of both reset methods. This is known as flushed reset.

Region of Interest 12 bit digital output for full frame mode. Region of Interest (ROI) readout for up to 6 ROI (6 x 6 pixels/ROI). 20kHz analogue readout at 10 bits resolution for ROI. 520x520 – 4fps 200x200 – 28fps 50x50 – 432fps

HEPAPS4 1024 x 384 pixels – 15 mm square 100 % efficiency for MIPs 20um epi Radiation hard ( > Mrad) (?)

Spectral Response Refers to the detected signal response as a function of the wavelength of light. Often expressed in terms of the Quantum Efficiency, a measure of the detector's ability to produce an electronic charge as a percentage of the total number of incident photons that are detected.

Dynamic Range A measure of the maximum and minimum intensities that can be simultaneously detected in the same field of view. It is often calculated as the maximum signal that can be accumulated, divided by the minimum signal which in turn equates to the noise associated with reading the minimum signal. It is commonly expressed in decibel scale. Camera Gain The camera gain is the conversion factor that relates the ADU value to the number of electrons collected by a pixel. Signal to Noise Ratio The comparison measurement of the incoming light signal versus the various inherent or generated noise levels, and is a measure of the variation of a signal that indicates the confidence with which the magnitude of the signal can be estimated.

Linearity non-linearity is based on the error between the best-fit straight-line to the original data of the camera input vs. the camera mean response at each illumination level, in ADU’s

Noise, noise, noise… • Read Noise: inherent output amplifier noise • Dark Noise: thermally induced noise arising from the camera in the absence of light • Shot Noise (Light Signal): noise arising out of the stochastic nature of the photon flux itself Sensor Photon noise, dark current, fixed pattern noise, and shot noise Electronics reset noise, quantization noise

Photon Transfer Curve Measuring noise with noise The camera is a system block with light as an input, and digital data as an output The only noise introduced at the input is shot noise. Any difference between the noise at the input and the noise at the output is sensor and/or electronics noise. Mean = S (signal) Standard deviation = S1/2 (Noise)

Photon Transfer Curve Direct data Read noise Gain Full well Indirect data Dynamic range SNR Linearity (if power of LED is known)

HEPAPS4 PTC

Vanilla Performance Parameter Value Units Camera Gain 10.9 electrons/DN Read Noise 51 electrons Full Well (ADC saturation) ~ 4 x 104 SNR 47 dB Dynamic Range 70

Prague activity Calibration of MXRs for ATLAS 55Fe 6 KeV 241Am 50 KeV, 14 KeV 252Cf 2 MeV AmBe 4 MeV Results in numbers 16 MXRs calibrated with Am and Fe 1 in progress, 4 left 10 MXRs calibrated with Sr 4 MXRs calibrated with neutrons

Thank you for attention!

University of Glasgow, Scotland 1st - 5th September 2008 The conference explores the scientific and technical developments of detector systems used in: Astronomy and space science; Astrophysics; Condensed matter studies; Industrial applications; Life sciences; Medical physics; Nuclear Physics, Particle physics and Synchrotron based science. National Organising Committee (subject to change) P.P. Allport, Liverpool R.L. Bates, Glasgow A.J. Bird, Southampton C.R. Cunningham, UK ATC, Edinburgh G.E. Derbyshire, STFC, RAL P. Evans, ICR, London R. Farrow, STFC, Daresbury W. Faruqi, MRC, Cambridge M. Grande, Aberystwyth P.R. Hobson, Brunel D.P. Langstaff, Aberystwyth P.J. Nolan, Liverpool D.J. Parker, Birmingham P.J. Sellin, Surrey A. Smith, MSSL, London R. Speller, UCL, London T.J. Sumner, IC, London S. Watts, Manchester psd8@physics.gla.ac.uk http://www.psd8.physics.gla.ac.uk

+ - Radiation Metal layers Dielectric for insulation and passivation Polysilicon N+ N+ P+ - + N+ P-Well N-Well P-Well Potential barriers Concept first proposed in 1999, and published in NIM in 2001 (R. Turchetta et al.) P-epitaxial layer P-substrate