ASPRS Panel on Digital Sensor Calibration/Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Advertisements

Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland Camera Calibration, Characterization and Contracting Guidelines: An Quality Assurance Perspective U.S.
SWOT and User Needs Workshop, DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, 5-6 July 2006 HYRESSA - HYperspectral REmote Sensing in Europe specific Support Actions Hyperspectral.
Bridging the Gap Between Statistics and Engineering Statistical calibration of CFD simulations in Urban street canyons with Experimental data Liora Malki-Epshtein.
CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Transition to Digital Acquisition Presented to USDA Imagery Planning Meeting 12/04/08 By: Alistair Stuart.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Aparajithan Sampath, Don Moe, Jon Christopherson, Greg Strensaas. ASPRS, April Geometric Evaluation.
Nevada Test Site Calibration Range and Geometric Calibration of Digital Cameras ISPRS I/2 Bob Kletzli Spectrum Mapping, LLC December 2-4, 2003.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Digital Aerial Mapping Camera Status CRSS/ASPRS Specialty Conference October 2007 USGS Remote.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Design Requirements, Interfaces, and Schedule P.T. Spampinato V.B. Graves T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Intergraph User Group ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference Reno, Nevada Overview of the USGS Plan for Quality.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group Mapping the Path to Digital Sensor.
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data November 8, 2006 Dave Alleman Pat Clancy Sarah Gustafson.
Brenda K. Brunello Quality Manager November 14, 2007 WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER How to Make the Most of an Assessment by NASA.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference Reno, Nevada Overview of the USGS Plan for Quality Assurance of Digital.
Imagery for the Nation and the changing landscape Remote sensing systems overview Geo-spatial requirements for GIS Technology advancements in sensing systems.
Real-Time High Resolution Photogrammetry John Morris, Georgy Gimel’farb and Patrice Delmas CITR, Tamaki Campus, University of Auckland.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group The Proposed USGS Plan for Digital.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS GIS 2006 Workshop Denver, Colorado Overview of the USGS Plan for Quality Assurance of Digital.
ARSF Data Processing Consequences of the Airborne Processing Library Mark Warren Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK RSPSoc 2012 – Greenwich, London.
Photogrammetric Monitoring of Rock Mass Behavior in Deep Vein Mining Donovan Benton, Mining Engineer Stephen Iverson, Mining Engineer Jeffrey Johnson,
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group Digital Aerial Imaging Systems: Current.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geometric Assessment of Remote Sensed Data Oct Presented By: Michael Choate, SAIC U.S.
Radar stage sensors and other instrumentation issues from the ICOM (Instrumentation Committee) November 14, 2006 James Fallon Annual COE-NWS-USGS Mississippi.
Radiometric and Geometric Calibration Workshop Camera calibration program in the United States: past, present, and future U.S. Department of the Interior.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of OSL RFI Inputs Received 20 April 2011.
VI-5475(SamCalValNotes) 1 SAM (Sun and Aureole Measurement) Calibration Prepared for MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting Dennis Villanucci, Andrew LePage.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Intergraph DOT Meeting ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference Reno, Nevada In-Situ Calibration Challenge to.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group Mapping the Path to Digital Sensor.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland Overview of USGS Calibration Activities U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group NOAA March 2005 Greg Stensaas USGS.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey June 22, 2009 Landsat Data Gap Readiness Plan Briefing to Landsat Science Team Rochester, New.
MULTI – SOURCE I2I VERIFICATION (ORTHO + LIDAR INTENSITY) Absolute Accuracy Verification:.125 Foot (GSD) RGB Image Data Tuck Mapping, Co-Acquired Ortho.
Patent U.S. 8,121,433 B2 California Institute of Technology Providing Environmental Intelligence From Space Your best solution for monitoring.
FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Records Appraisal Tool Presented at the Ensuring the Long-Term.
Design Features of a Boresighted GPM Core Radiometer Christopher S. Ruf Dept. of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
INTRODUCTION TO REMOTE SENSING. Remote sensing is the science and art of obtaining information about an object, area, or phenomenon through the analysis.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Steve Helterbrand, USGS Bryan Christensen, SAIC at USGS EROS Digital Aerial Data Provider Certification.
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Airborne Digital Camera Calibration and Certification
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LSI Constellation Portal Project WGISS #26, Boulder, Colorado, USA September, 2008 Lyndon R. Oleson.
Wanda R. Ferrell, Ph.D. Acting Director Climate and Environmental Sciences Division February 24, 2010 BERAC Meeting Atmospheric System Research Science.
1 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) 7 th Annual Workshop held March 25-27, 2008  USGS, NGA, USDA, and NASA Collaboration Next Workshop.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
Government / Private Sector Partnership between the U.S. Geological Survey and SPOT Image Corporation U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference, Baltimore, Maryland Overview of USGS Calibration Activities U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
A WIRELESS PASSIVE SENSOR FOR TEMPERATURE COMPENSATED REMOTE PH MONITORING IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL VOLUME 13, NO.6, JUNE 2013 WEN-TSAI SUNG, YAO-CHI HSU Ching-Hong.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Archiving Geospatial Data John Faundeen, Archivist Presentation to Map & Geographic Information.
Supporting the “Solving Business Problems with Environmental Data” Competition 24 th October 2013 Vlad Stoiljkovic.
An Accuracy Assessment of a Digital Elevation Model Derived From an Airborne Profiling Laser Joseph M. Piwowar Philip J. Howarth Waterloo Laboratory for.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Commercial Remote Sensing Data for Federal Users and Partners The Commercial Remote Sensing Space.
Report from USGS 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016 Thomas Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona USA GSICS-EP-17, Biot, 2-3 June.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD Work performed under.
Sioux Falls Geometric Test Range: Evaluation and Application
W. Geoffrey Gabbott USDA FSA Contracting Officer
ERT247 GEOMATICS ENGINEERING
Analysis Ready Data ..
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Washington Geological Survey
Mapping the Path to Digital Sensor Calibration
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Meeting
MSU Agriculture Innovation Day
Mapping the Path to Digital Sensor Calibration
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
Presentation transcript:

ASPRS Panel on Digital Sensor Calibration/Evaluation USGS Early Testing Efforts of Digital Camera Systems May 26, 2004 Jon Christopherson, SAIC USGS EROS Data Center jonchris@usgs.gov

Background USGS has been calibrating film cameras since 1973 Optical Science Lab at USGS HQ in Reston, VA Uses multi-collimator assembly developed in 1953 Metric aerial film cameras very flat, very stable

Laboratory Calibration Research June ’03 - Control point cage installed at EDC Contract w/ Pictometry Australis software used to determine camera coefficients In early stages of research now Multiple cameras & lenses have been tested (~10+)

USGS Digital Camera Testing USGS facilities suitable for small- and medium-format cameras Ill-suited for most large-format systems EDC has tested USGS camera plus selected few outside systems Range from Medium-format, medium-expense systems (~$20K) to “pocket” cameras (< $1K)

Caveats! The results presented here are from exploratory research only Not meant to imply the quality of any camera/back/lens These results are: Far from complete! Far from conclusive! However, they are a start and indicate areas of interest for ongoing research

Exploratory Research

Exploratory Research (cont.)

Exploratory Research (cont.)

Interim Observations No system tested approaches the flatness of film metric cameras Repeatability of results varies with system Variability can likely be controlled – on some systems only Concern – can calibrations be trusted over time?

Interim Observations (cont.) In General: the more “consumer” the less “metric” The less “consumer” the more expensive There is potential for small- and medium-format metric sensors Potential for great benefits in size, cost, speed, ease-of-use Possibilities with new aerial platforms Continued investigation warranted

Near-Term Plans Basic environmental testing (temperature, vibration) of EDC cameras Explore other camera/sensor types Explore methods to ensure stability MTF Testing Both Lab & in-situ Begin radiometric testing Validate all of above with In-Situ testing Enhance EDC photogrammetry capability

MTF Characterization EDC working with SDSU to develop MTF characterization tools & software In lab using ISO 12233 In-situ with ground targets Ease-of-use

Radiometric Testing Start basic: measure s/n, linearity, stability Would like to move farther Spectral profiling, monitoring Long-term stability Can systems can deliver “calibrated” multispectral data? How to maintain performance?

EDC In-Situ Range 65 ea. targets in 4mi × 4mi area around EDC surveyed to ± 2cm absolute accuracy Additional 65 targets in higher density pattern for testing in-situ camera calibration Site contains operating CORS station Option to set to 1 sec. intervals Site has been flown once at 6” resolution and at 2’ resolution We need more overflights!

EDC Range

EDC Range Targets patterned after OSU range

Conclusions USGS research is underway Small- and medium-format systems are problematic, but there is promise USGS needs help exploring techniques being used Partnerships, assistance with overflights, cameras/sensors, etc.

Contact Information Gregory L Stensaas stensaas@usgs.gov (605) 594-2569 USGS EROS Data Center http://edc.usgs.gov/ Commercial Remote Sensing Characterization, Calibration, Verification, and Validation (C2V2) Project