Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.
Advertisements

Paleolimnology as a Tool for Interpreting Ecosystem Changes within Freshwater Lakes Heather Burgess1, Andrea Lini1, Milt Ostrofsky2, Suzanne Levine3, Neil.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer
Effects of Land Use and Associated Factors On Biological Communities of Small Streams in the Illinois River Basin of Arkansas by James C. Petersen, Billy.
ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS Utah Division of Water Quality Snake Creek, Heber Valley, 2014.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 18 Trophic State and Eutrophication Dodds & Whiles.
Forests and surface water eutrophication and sedimentation Dr Mary Kelly-Quinn, Dr Michael Bruen, Dr Ted Farrell, Dr Jan- Robert Baars, Dr Robert Cruikshanks,
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Case study: Tommelen bomb craters (Hasselt) WWII High density ponds (ca 110 ponds;12 ha), similar age, same soil (light sandy loam) (Part of WP1:
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
Nutrient Standards – Where will they lead? OWEA / WEF Webinar February 24, 2011 Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Evaluation of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Marcellus Shale Region of the Susquehanna River Basin, Luanne Steffy Susquehanna River Basin.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
The Utility of Spatially Explicit Parameters in Phosphorus Water Quality Monitoring Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor: Dr. Paul McGinley.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Effects of Multi-scale Environmental Characteristics on Agricultural Stream Biota in the Midwestern USA 5th National Monitoring Conference May 9, 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Crawford and Robert J. Gilliom National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide National.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
OLC-OST Environmental Protection Program Research and Educational Collaboration Charles Jason Tinant, OLC Robert Pille, OLC Delinda Simmons, OST EPP Hannan.
Identifying Changes to Stream Condition caused by Urbanization How understanding the responses can improve ecological risk characterization
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
NAWQA Nutrient Synthesis Past, Present, and Future USGS Workshop on Nutrient Processes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin UMESC, LaCrosse, WI March 25.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Using periphyton communities to indicate nutrient levels in Pacific Northwest streams Dan Sobota 1, Shannon Hubler.
Watershed Health Indicators
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Impervious Surface Category
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
A (prototype) Shiny app for QCing continuous stream sensor data
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Chad Larson - WDOE Daniel Marshalonis - EPA Region 10
Evaluation of Proposed Controls Over Baseflow Phosphorus Concentrations in Wadeable Streams in Wisconsin Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor:
Presentation transcript:

Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W. Moran 1, and J.D. Frankforter 2 National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA) 1 Washington Water Science Center, US Geological Survey, Tacoma, WA, USA, 2 Nebraska Water Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lincoln, NE, USA

Objective: Determine the relations between algal communities and nutrient, habitat and macroinvertebrate conditions in streams from agricultural settings in Washington and Nebraska. Large N spatial study (57 sites) Stable flow period Habitat assessment Chemical: Nutrients, DOC, POC, SS (2 sampling events) Biological: algae and invertebrates, algal (seston and benthic) biomass, macrophyte cover/biomass

Washington and Nebraska Study Design and Characteristics -28 to 29 wadeable stream sites/study unit -Independent basins sq. km -Significant agricultural areas -Semi-arid to arid regions -Significant hydrologic modifications of most streams due to irrigation

EPA Nutrient Indicators Algal biomass Chlorophyll a AFDW Community composition Community metrics pH DO Hydrologic studies TN, DIN TP, SRP Nutrient ratios Sediment composition Temperature Transparency/TSS

Are algal communities related to nutrients, macroinvertebrates and/or habitat conditions in Washington and Nebraska agricultural streams? Algal communities in each study area were related to a different suite of environmental variables and in some cases not nutrients. Models relating traditional measure of eutrophication to nutrients were insignificant. Non traditional measures of algae composition show promise

Analyses Multivariate statistics (MDS) –Monitoring sites are grouped together based on similarity of algae/invertebrate communities AND collected environmental variables Nonparametric Multiplicative Regression –Ecologically relevant benefits over traditional regression Metrics and indices –Opportunity to standardize response measures over temporal and spatial scales

Total Nitrogen Concentrations by Study Unit Washington Nebraska

Total Phosphorus Concentrations by Study Unit Washington Nebraska

Small Scale Environmental Variables That Significantly Explain Depositional Algae (MDS) Community Organization by Study Unit

Significant Predictive Models for Depositional Algae and Small Scale Variables in Washington Using Nonparametric Multiplicative Regressions

Significant Predictive Models for Depositional Algae and Small Scale Variables in the Nebraska Using Nonparametric Multiplicative Regressions

Average Taxonomic Distinctness of Depositional Algae by Study Unit Number of Species Average Taxonomic Distinctness Washington/Nebraska Mean Reference Mean

Variation in Taxonomic Distinctness for Depositional Algae by Study Unit Number of Species Var. in Taxonomic Distinctness Washington/Nebraska Mean Reference Mean

Significant Predictive Models of Algal Taxonomic Distinctness (Diversity) in Washington and Nebraska

Summary Nutrient levels in the agricultural streams of the Washington and Nebraska study units are well above the proposed EPA Criteria. Response variables (algal communities and metrics) generally related to variables other than nutrients. –Nutrient saturation, Physical and Biological (Top Down) control –Periodic Nutrient sampling vs. Annual Nutrient Loading Responses tended to be stronger in Nebraska – less plumbing? “Non-traditional” response measures are more significantly related to environmental variables.

Nutrient Criteria Implications Establishing nutrient criteria will need to utilize multiple response and predictor variables. Traditional response (if they work) and predictor variables may need to be regional/habitat specific Predictive models using scale independent response variables (Taxonomic Distinctness measures) to evaluate the response of streams to changes in nutrients and other watershed variables show promise

Contact Information Robert Black and Patrick Moran Washington Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey Tacoma, WA (253) Jill Frankforter Nebraska Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey Lincoln, NE