Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROMOTING A COORDINATED GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR LAGOS STATE: WAY FORWARD By PROFESSOR E.O. LONGE, PhD FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL.
Advertisements

History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
Cross Cutting Group B: Ammonia policy context and future challenges Chair: Till Spranger Rapporteur: Zbigniew Klimont Attendees: 13.
The UNEP Global Mercury Programme and Fate and Transport Research
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Health Impact Assessment for Healthy Places: A Guide for Planning and Public Health.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.
Guidelines for State School Environmental Health Programs EISA Sec. 504.
ITU Activities on Bridging the Standardization Gap (BSG) ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa (Kampala, Uganda, June 2014) Vijay Mauree,
Modeling the Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants STI-6102 Stephen Reid, Ken Craig, Garnet Erdakos Sonoma Technology, Inc. Jonathan.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
Realistic Biological and Exposure/Dose Relationships: How They Modify Perceived Human Health & Ecological Risk May 22, 2008 Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L.
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Air Quality Health Risk Assessment – Methodological Issues and Needs Presented to SAMSI September 19, 2007 Research Triangle Park, NC Anne E. Smith, Ph.D.
Canadian Experience in Implementing the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) Mexico City, Mexico May 19, 2015.
Oct. 13, Afternoon: Discussion: 1.What kinds of needs from other direction? 1.1characterization of uncertainties: exposure better quality vs higher resolution.
ICTs Tackling Climate Changes Dr. Amr Badawi Executive President NTRA.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
Sustainability Issues
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
Who are we? -Group of active climate researchers with diversified expertise in a wide range of disciplines relevant to climate science, including atmosphere,
EPA’s Related Programs and Coordination with NASA Presentation to the NASA Environmental Compatibility IV Workshop, August 12-13, Colorado Springs, CO.
Introducing Ozone into Critical Loads Analysis - State of the Science in Europe and Progress in North America Robert C. Musselman USDA Forest Service Rocky.
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
And the Role of Stakeholders Integrated Coastal Management and the Role of Stakeholders by: Lyn Buchanan.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
Engaging China on Reducing Air Pollution 11 January 2008 Dennis Leaf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC USA.
Network for the support of European Policies on Air Pollution The assessment of European control measures and the effects of non-linearities.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
National Academy of Sciences: Air Quality Management in the United States MWAQC Briefing March 24, 2004.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
International and National Abatement Strategies for Transboundary air Pollution New concepts and methods for effect-based strategies on transboundary air.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
JEG DM: common work items Targets & ex post analysis Robustness Links with biodiversity Trends in selected modeled/measured parameters.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change Neil Leary, AIACC Science Director AIACC Regional Workshop for Latin America.
1 A VIEW FROM INDUSTRY Special event, 25 th Anniversary of the 1979 Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution Geneva, 1 December 2004.
John Vandenberg, PhD Human Health Risk Assessment National Program Director Division Director National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) Office.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
AQ Emissions Data Considerations and Needs Greg Frost NOAA, University of Colorado Two key kinds of AQ data on chemical species: Emissions and Ambient.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Group F: Economic Consequences of Invasive Species Q1: Critical Scientific Issues Quantifying and verifying non-market impacts and their value Costs of.
Livestock and Air Quality Update An Air Quality Perspective From The State’s Perspective Presented by Phyllis Woodford, Program Manager Environmental Agriculture.
Chapter 5 Population Health Quality and Safety Learning Objectives 1. Explain why it is difficult to monitor healthcare quality and safety at the population.
EPA Global Change Research Program A TEN YEAR PLAN Presentation to 13 th Symposium on Global Change Studies Janet L. Gamble, Ph.D. National Center for.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Health and Environmental Effects of Ozone Layer Depletion
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Lessons learned from ozone thematic session 2016
Ozone.
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005

A Very Important Issue The growing human needs in urban, suburban, and rural settings drive the increasing need for clean air, as well as clean and plentiful water. A very important question to address is the limits of acceptable change in air and water quality.

Critical Limits for Change It is necessary to explore the identification of these critical limits to air quality problems by determining the response of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to atmospheric deposition, which includes ozone. The research work by Drs. Musselman and Massman is extremely important in developing measures that identify the critical limits to air quality problems.

Identifying Critical Limits Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing the state of knowledge of the effects of ozone on human health and welfare (e.g., vegetation) and has published the first draft of its findings in an Ozone Criteria Document (CD) that was released to the public in January A key section of the CD focuses on effects- based air quality exposure- and dose-response indices that relate ozone to vegetation effects.

RMRS Scientists Contribute to the Ozone Criteria Document The section is important because it forms the scientific rationale for the selection of an index that the U.S. EPA may propose as a form for the secondary standard. Dr. Bob Musselman, Dr. Bill Massman, and I co-authored this section. The published research results of Drs. Musselman and Massman played an important role in the conclusions concerning the limitations associated with exposure and flux- based indices for protecting vegetation.

Dr. Bob Musselman’s Research Dr. Musselman’s current and past research is extremely valuable in identifying candidate exposure and flux-based indices. Much of Dr. Musselman’s research in the 1980s and 1990s provided valuable information on exposure dynamics as related to vegetation growth. Dr. Musselman’s work emphasized the importance of (1) providing greater weight to the higher hourly average ozone concentrations, while including mid- level values, and (2) nighttime ozone exposures.

Dr. Bill Massman’s Research Dr. Massman’s research has provided both the conceptual modeling and the results to show the relative timing of ozone uptake, concentration exposure, and defense mechanisms and how all three interact together to affect vegetation. His research results have been used in highlighting the importance of defense processes when attempting to use flux-based indices to predict vegetation effects.

Integrating the Results of Drs. Musselman and Massman Over the past several years, Drs. Musselman, Massman, and I have co-authored peer-review papers that integrated ozone flux modeling with vegetation effects. The integrated work is important for establishing a rational research approach for using dose (i.e., ozone uptake) in assessing possible vegetation effects from ozone. A careful evaluation of plant defense mechanisms is important so that overestimates are avoided when predicting vegetation effects associated with ozone dose/exposure.

Who Comprises the Scientific Community in this Area of Research? The contributions of Drs. Musselman and Massman in the exposure- and dose-response scientific area allow for the more efficient application of models to predict the relationship between ozone and vegetation effects.. The results published by Drs. Musselman and Massman provide local, regional, national, and international scientists with the information that is needed to develop scientifically defensible models that relate the relative timing of ozone uptake, concentration exposure, and defense mechanisms with vegetation effects.

How Does One Specifically Benefit from the Findings of the RMRS Air Research Program? Drs. Musselman and Massman have demonstrated the capability to provide a bridge between models that are used to relate ambient air quality exposure and pollutant uptake to vegetation. These models are used to estimate safe levels that will protect vegetation from ozone. Academic, government, private sector scientists, and policy makers are utilizing the findings that are associated with the results reported by Drs. Musselman and Massman.

Conclusion As indicated in my introductory comments, the identification of critical limits of acceptable change in air and water quality is important in establishing protective standards. The research work by Drs. Musselman and Massman has proven to be extremely important in developing measures that identify some of the critical limits to air quality problems. As development continues to occur across the United States, including the Rocky Mountain area, more and more attention will be focused on the potential for anthropogenic emissions and their chemical reaction products to affect our nation’s resources.